Doctors and public health organizations sue Kennedy over vaccine policy changes
The American Academy of Pediatrics, American Public Health Association and four other groups — along with an unnamed pregnant doctor who works in a hospital — filed the lawsuit in federal court in Boston.
U.S. health officials, following infectious disease experts' guidance, previously urged annual COVID-19 shots for all Americans ages 6 months and older. But in late May, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced he was removing COVID-19 shots from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women.
A number of health experts decried the move as confusing and accused Kennedy of disregarding the scientific review process that has been in place for decades — in which experts publicly review current medical evidence and hash out the pros and cons of policy changes.
The new lawsuit repeats those concerns, alleging that Kennedy and other political appointees at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services have flouted federal procedures and systematically attempted to mislead the public.
'This administration is an existential threat to vaccination in America, and those in charge are only just getting started,' said Richard H. Hughes IV, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs. 'If left unchecked, Secretary Kennedy will accomplish his goal of ridding the United States of vaccines, which would unleash a wave of preventable harm on our nation's children.'
HHS officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Also joining the suit are the American College of Physicians, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Massachusetts Public Health Association and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Real Housewives' Star Reveals Young Son's 'Very Overwhelming' Health Diagnosis
'Real Housewives' Star Reveals Young Son's 'Very Overwhelming' Health Diagnosis originally appeared on Parade. Real Housewives of Orange County star is opening up about the "very overwhelming" diagnosis her young son, Luke, recently received. In a new interview with People, the reality star revealed that the 10-year-old suffers from ARFID, or Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder, which is an eating disorder that causes food restriction, but is not 'caused by a negative self-image or a desire to change your body weight," according to the Cleveland Clinic, like Anorexia or Bulemia. Simpson believed that Luke, like many kids, was simply an incredibly picky eater, until he stopped eating altogether. After seeing a therapist, he was diagnosed with the mental health disorder, which sparks "fear and anxiety about food or the consequences of eating." People with ARFID may avoid eating due to the fear of choking or vomiting, or decline food because of "unwanted color, taste, texture or smell." In Luke's case, "he's very overwhelmed by texture, color, smells." Simpson explained, "He will only eat white rice. And he has to inspect each piece of rice before he eats it. So it's beyond picky eating. A lot of control issues. It's very overwhelming.' The diagnosis will be chronicled in season 19 of RHOC, which Simpson admitted she often "didn't even know if [she] could continue to film" due to the stress and uncertainty. 'There were so many times when he would say he was starving… because he was starving. But he would refuse to eat. And as a mom, that was so frustrating," she explained. "I didn't know what to do because on one hand he's crying and telling me he's starving, and on the other hand, he refuses to eat anything that I offer." 'Every day is challenging,' she added. Today, Luke's therapist and nutritionist help him to improve, and he's added french fries, sliced bananas, potato chips, ice cream and plain turkey that 'doesn't have any lines or blemishes in it' to his diet, and they continue to work on ways to decrease his fears and anxieties surrounding food. While Simpson has some concerns that being so open about Luke's diagnosis may lead kids or parents at school to say something, she's more hopeful that her transparency will help others going through the same thing—something and youngest daughter also aims to do, as she has struggled with the same disorder.'Real Housewives' Star Reveals Young Son's 'Very Overwhelming' Health Diagnosis first appeared on Parade on Jul 12, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jul 12, 2025, where it first appeared.
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
Attorney General Pam Bondi announces dismissal of charges against plastic surgeon accused of faking COVID-19 vaccine cards
Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Saturday that she is dismissing the criminal charges against a Utah plastic surgeon who was currently on trial for allegedly issuing fake Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 vaccination records cards to people who sought fake vaccine cards. Dr. Michael Kirk Moore, whose criminal trial was currently underway in Utah, was indicted by the Justice Department in 2023. Moore, his medical corporation and three co-defendants were accused of allegedly destroying more than $28,000 worth of government-provided COVID-19 vaccines and distributing at least 1,937 falsely marked COVID-19 doses on vaccine cards in exchange for direct cash payments or donations to a charitable organization. Moore pleaded not guilty to the charges, while one of his co-defendants entered into a plea agreement for a misdemeanor charge and another co-defendant entered into a diversion agreement. One co-defendant is currently on trial with Moore. A Justice Department spokesperson did not respond to questions on whether or not the charges against them would be dropped as well. In court filings, attorneys for Moore argued that the CDC vaccine regulations in place were unconstitutional. The Biden Justice Department alleged that Moore was not administering COVID-19 vaccines in exchange for the payment, and was administering saline shots to minors, at the request of their parents, so children would think they were receiving a vaccine dose. Moore and his co-defendants were also charged with conspiracy to convert, sell, convey, and dispose of government property; and the conversion, sale, conveyance, and disposal of government property and aiding and abetting for their efforts to forge the vaccine cards. The fake cards were sold for $50 each, charging documents said, during the scheme they allegedly operated between May 2021 and September 2022. "Dr. Moore gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so. He did not deserve the years in prison he was facing. It ends today," Bondi wrote on X, thanking Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has a history of casting doubts on the efficacy of COVID vaccines, for raising awareness of his case. "She has been a warrior for Dr. Moore and for ending the weaponization of government," Bondi wrote. In a post on X on Saturday, Greene called Moore a "hero who refused to inject his patients with a government mandated unsafe vaccine!" It was not immediately clear if the charges were being dismissed for Moore's co-defendants. The announcement comes as the department is facing uncertainty after a clash between Bondi and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino over a Justice Department review of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, which led to Bongino not showing up for work on Friday, as sources say he is considering leaving his post over the dispute.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
The Doctor was in (and out): Biden's physician invokes Fifth Amendment during deposition
Dr. Kevin O'Connor made a house call this week. Specifically to the House of Representatives. O'Connor served as President Biden's physician. The House Oversight Committee wanted to talk to O'Connor about whether Biden was fit to serve as president. So House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., issued a subpoena for O'Connor. The doctor was in. But not for very long. After 20 minutes behind closed doors with Comer and company, the deposition concluded. Committee attorneys peppered O'Connor with questions about whether he thought former President Biden was up to the job and if he was asked to lie about the commander in chief's health. But Comer got the same response each time. Even when committee lawyers posed a simple question, asking O'Connor if he understood the proceedings. O'Connor deployed his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination each time. The committee even took the rare step of releasing a video from most of the deposition the same evening. "Most people invoke the Fifth when they have criminal liability. And you know, that's what it would appear (to be) on the surface here," said Comer after the deposition concluded. "The American people have a right to know the health condition of the president. Both physical and mental." Comer observed that O'Connor's silence "adds more fuel to the fire that there was a cover-up." Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Tex., was the only Democrat who showed up for the deposition. Crockett just bowed out a few weeks ago from a bid to become the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee after the death of late Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va. "It was important to make sure that a Democrat was in the room. Because unfortunately, sometimes people like to cherry pick and make sure that they can give whatever fits their narrative," said Crockett. But the video revealed O'Connor repeatedly citing the Fifth Amendment "on the advice of counsel." That's why Comer hoped to shape one narrative about the health of former President Biden. Comer also suggested the potential lengths that O'Connor was willing to go to in order to protect the former president. And perhaps himself. Crockett was incredulous at Comer's assertions. "It's kind of astounding to hear someone say, if you invoke the Fifth Amendment, that is only because you are guilty," said Crockett. "(Republicans) have been very good at rallying people up and getting them emotional because they don't fully understand some of our processes." Crockett added that patients "have the right to confidentiality when it comes to your health care." The Department of Justice has launched an investigation into the use of the autopen by Biden. O'Connor's lawyers say that led their client to exercise his Fifth Amendment rights. "We want to emphasize that asserting the Fifth Amendment privilege does not imply that Dr. O'Connor has committed any crime," said his legal team. And the statement also indicated there was concern about O'Connor keeping medical information of the First Patient in confidence. "The Committee has indicated that it will demand that Dr. O'Connor reveal, without any limitations, confidential confirmation regarding his medical examinations, treatment and care of President Biden," read the statement. "Revealing confidential patient information would violate the most fundamental ethical duty of a physician." His attorneys went on to say that O'Connor could face "civil liability" and "revocation" of his medical license. Regardless, O'Connor wasn't answering any questions anywhere. Inside the meeting room. Heading to the meeting room. Or heading home. "Will you invoke the Fifth? What about patient doctor confidentiality?" yours truly asked O'Connor as he navigated a third-floor hallway in the Rayburn House Office Building with a small coterie of attorneys. "Do you think (President Biden) was up to the job? Do you think he was up to serve?" No response. O'Connor reprised his reticence on the way out. "Did you take the Fifth because you're trying to cover up what the President's state was?" I asked as he departed down a Rayburn stairwell. Nothing. The statement from the physician's counsel declared that the pact between doctors and patients "require that Dr. O'Connor refuse to testify." This is a question which vexes even doctors who double as lawmakers. Such is the case with Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan. He's an OB-GYN. "I can see both sides of it. I can certainly see, as a physician, you take an oath of confidentiality with every patient. If there's a national security issue, does that outweigh that relationship?" pondered Marshall. "I would really have to think about that. I want to get a couple of consults myself and talk to some constitutional lawyers." But aside from the Constitutional, ethical and medical questions, Democrats reverted to defending the former president. I asked Crockett if she ever perceived health problems with the president. "No. None. No. None. I had none. Now, granted, I didn't see Joe Biden every single day. But I did have an opportunity to interact with the president. I never had a concern," said Crockett. "He may get fumbled up by words. But that's not anything new. And it's not anything that (didn't come) with age." There had been discussion about getting O'Connor to cooperate without a subpoena. Comer contends his investigation isn't about plowing some of the same Biden political fields explored a couple of years ago when it was thought the former president might seek a second term. This isn't about business dealings or Burisma or "influence peddling." But Comer is posing a legitimate question here about the fitness of a president. Any president. Regardless of what Crockett says, there are plenty of questions about Mr. Biden's acuity and whether staff made decisions – in lieu of the president. And these questions aren't new when it comes to presidential health. President Woodrow Wilson suffered a stroke during his time in office. Historians believe First Lady Edith Wilson made decisions on behalf of the president. Questions lingered about President Ronald Reagan. And the Washington press corps was complicit hiding the infirmaries of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt from the public in an era before television and social media. The committee wheels in other former Biden figures in the coming days. That includes former Biden Chief of Staff Ron Klain and Anthony Bernal, a top aide to former First Lady Jill Biden. Because of patient-doctor confidentiality, we may never know O'Connor's true analysis of former President Biden. It's a problem because the public deserves to know if the commander in chief is up to the job. But there's a special relationship between a patient and their doctor. The question is whether issues of national security and the administration of government outweigh those private rights.
