logo
31 million tons of toxic seaweed is creeping toward beaches in Florida and around the Caribbean

31 million tons of toxic seaweed is creeping toward beaches in Florida and around the Caribbean

CNN15-05-2025

The Caribbean
Mexico
The AmazonFacebookTweetLink
Follow
The Atlantic Ocean has a toxic seaweed problem.
Floating in brown islands of algae, this year's sargassum bloom has already broken its own size record by millions of tons — and the growing season isn't done yet.
Now stretching across some 5,500 miles of ocean, the annual bloom is more than just an eyesore: Sargassum hurts ecosystems and economies wherever its overgrown arms reach. And they are spreading into Florida's waterways, coating marinas and beaches in the Miami area.
'Sargassum goes from being a very beneficial resource of the North Atlantic to becoming what we refer to as … a harmful algal bloom, when it comes ashore in excessive biomass,' said Brian LaPointe, a research professor at Florida Atlantic University's Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute.
'What we have seen since 2011 are excessive inundation events all around the Caribbean region, the Gulf, as well as the South Florida region,' explained LaPointe, who has studied the seaweed for decades.
As it rots on shore, it emits harmful gases— an infamous stench.
It's a blight on beaches that repels tourists during the high-travel season, ultimately hurting towns that rely on tourism to fuel their economy.
Rising ocean temperatures due to human-caused climate change have spurred this sargassum surplus, supercharging the seaweed. In April, the University of South Florida estimated this year's bloom is already at 31 million tons — '40% more' than the previous record from June 2022, according to LaPointe.
The sargassum bloom itself is not a new phenomenon. It's long provided a home to species from sea turtles to fish as winds and tides push it from the coast of West Africa toward Brazil, up into the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico.
'Sargassum has been around for eons. Colombus ran into it right in the Sargasso Sea,' La Pointe told CNN. 'But what we are seeing now is above and beyond what we had historically.'
Sargassum's growth is also being driven by an excess of nitrogen in the water, LaPointe said — and that's a key factor behind this year's monster bloom.
Some nitrogen may be coming from the atmosphere, carried in the air from the burning of fossil fuels or dust from the Sahara Desert.
But there's one major source: agricultural fertilizers. Used in the American heartland as well as in the Amazon basin where there's been rapid deforestation for farming, the nitrogen-rich fertilizers are likely making their way into the Mississippi and Amazon Rivers as runoff, which then carries it into the Atlantic.
And the Amazon basin has notched its lowest water levels on record amid two straight years of extreme drought — the worst since records began being kept in 1950.
'What happens when you have a severe drought in the world's largest watershed? You get all this organic matter that dries up. Plants dry up and die. And then, when the rain hits, what happens? All those nutrients wash out,' LaPointe hypothesized, adding that 'first flush' events like this are full of concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus at peak levels, which go on to feed the bloom's growth explosion.
Unsurprisingly, the constant inundation of stinky, brown seaweed along the coast is not good for economies driven by tourism.
This year's bloom has already been making an appearance along Florida's east coast, from the Keys to Saint Augustine, according to reports on a sargassum monitoring site, and southeastern Florida could see more in the coming weeks. The unwanted algae has also been spotted in popular destinations from Mexico to Barbados and farther south.
'It's not good for the environment, because what you're smelling is hydrogen sulfide gas which is toxic,' LaPointe said.
In some places, the beaches are cleared of seaweed from sunrise to sunset — an expensive endeavor combing up sargassum that inundates the coastline with every wave. Some of the machinery used to clean the beaches adds its own pollution to the scenic environment, too.
'Resorts have gone out to their beaches with heavy equipment like front-end loaders, bulldozers, dump trucks to try to remove the sargassum to make those beaches available,' LaPointe said, as tourists don't want mounds of sargassum to mar their tropical views. 'The tourists check out, and they don't come back.'
This is a major tangle for places like Mexico's Yucatán Peninsula, which exists in the heart of the sargassum belt between the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea.
The problem has become so pronounced along the Riviera Maya, Mara Lezama, the governor of Quintana Roo, a state in the peninsula, has taken to social media to say her state is working with the Mexican Navy to collect the seaweed in the water while also installing a nearly 6-mile barrier in the water to protect Quintana Roo's Mahahual, Playa del Carmen and Puerto Morelos beaches.
The barriers, which are similar to booms that contain oil spills, are just over a yard deep and are designed to keep the seaweed from reaching the coast.
As it approaches, the decaying sargassum can also create health problems for animals and humans.
'When it arrives to the coastal area, it creates a shadow from the sun, so everything that is below — all the life is not getting sunlight. So, it starts to affect the ecosystem, coastal ecosystem, and many things die,' said Christian Appendini, professor at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
'Then when it gets over the beach, it starts to decompose. And when it decomposes, it releases all the contaminants it has.'
Ammonia is another problem emitted by the decaying seaweed, LaPointe noted. The chemical compound 'strips the oxygen out of the waters along our coastal ecosystems like mangroves, coral reefs, seagrass beds,' he said.
'When you see the mass inundation events along the beaches, say in the Mexican Riviera, for example, you don't see many fish or crabs,' LaPointe continued. 'If you do, they're probably dead because there's no oxygen in that water.'
With sargassum cementing itself as an ongoing problem, some are looking into putting the seaweed to good use, instead.
Appendini says research is ongoing to find ways to use the sargassum for biofuel, building bricks, or as membranes for cleaning water, since it is particularly absorbent.
'They absorb all the heavy metals and contaminants in the water,' he told CNN. 'That's also why sargassum can be very toxic, because when it's drifting in the ocean it's just assimilating all the toxic elements in the ocean like cadmium, arsenic and other minerals and elements.'
There's also the possibility of carbon sequestration by sinking the excessive biomass to the bottom of the ocean. And there's interest in possibly using sargassum to replace one of the globe's other problems: plastic.
'If we could harvest this sargassum and produce this biodegradable product that could replace single use plastics, that would begin to restore the oceans regarding the serious plastic pollution that we're seeing,' LaPointe said.
As the sargassum situation remains pervasive for more than a decade now, Appendini said the record-breaking bloom should make the world pay attention.
'I think the sargassum blooms are like a warning that we need to be more mindful of how we are developing in this world,' Appendini said. 'We need to change … how we do things.'
CNN's Norma Galeana contributed to this story.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk trades threats with Trump: What it could mean for SpaceX launches in Florida
Elon Musk trades threats with Trump: What it could mean for SpaceX launches in Florida

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk trades threats with Trump: What it could mean for SpaceX launches in Florida

When President Donald Trump took office in January, he began offering plenty of signs that his goals for U.S. spaceflight aligned closely with those of billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk. Now those goals, which included making reaching Mars during Trump's second term a top priority, appear to be up in the air amid an increasingly volatile fallout between two of the world's most powerful men. As insults have turned to threats, Trump has suggested he'd hit Musk where it could hurt most: His wallet. Musk's SpaceX has spent years positioning itself at the center of American civil and military spaceflight – a profitable relationship that has made the company's CEO incredibly wealthy. In response, Musk has floated – and then retracted – the idea of decommissioning a SpaceX vehicle critical to NASA's spaceflight program. The vast majority of SpaceX's missions with NASA and the government launch from Cape Canaveral, either from the space agency's Kennedy Space Center or the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. Serious threats, or empty words? That remains to be seen as Musk and Trump reportedly consider a détente. In the meantime, here's what to know about what's at stake if the U.S. government's relationship with SpaceX were to crumble: U.S. spaceflight: Trump looks to axe many NASA space missions that launched from Florida The feud between Trump and his former top advisory escalated in a dramatic fashion when the president threatened to cut off the taxpayer dollars that have fueled the growth of SpaceX, of which Musk is the CEO. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump said in a post on his social media platform. "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" In all, Musk and his businesses have received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits, a Washington Post analysis found. How the potential fallout between two of the world's most powerful men could affect U.S. spaceflight ambitions remains to be seen. NASA Press Secretary Bethany Stevens said in a post on social media site X that 'NASA will continue to execute upon the President's vision for the future of space.' 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President's objectives in space are met,' Stevens wrote. Elon Musk, the world's richest man, founded Space Exploration Technologies Corp., more widely known as SpaceX, in 2002. The commercial spaceflight company is headquartered at Starbase in South Texas. The site, which is where SpaceX has been conducting routine flight tests of its 400-foot megarocket known as Starship, was recently voted by residents to become its own city. SpaceX benefits from billions of dollars in contracts from NASA and the Department of Defense, which use many of the company's spacecraft to help launch government missions. SpaceX also conducts many of its own rocket launches, most using the Falcon 9 rocket. That includes a regular cadence of deliveries of Starlink internet satellites into orbit from both California and Florida, and occasional privately-funded commercial crewed missions on the Dragon. SpaceX is also planning to bring its Starship operations to Florida by the end of 2025. The most recent of SpaceX's private human spaceflights, a mission known as Fram2, took place in April. SpaceX was also famously involved in funding and operating the headline-grabbing Polaris Dawn crewed commercial mission in September 2024. SpaceX provides launch services to the Pentagon, including the launch of classified satellites and other payloads. CEO Gwynne Shotwell has said the company has about $22 billion in government contracts, according to Reuters. The vast majority of that, about $15 billion, is derived from NASA. SpaceX's famous two-stage Falcon 9 rocket ‒ one of the world's most active ‒ is routinely the rocket of choice to get many NASA missions off the ground. For instance, the rocket is due in the days ahead to help propel a four-person crew of private astronauts to the International Space Station for a venture with NASA known as Axiom Mission 4. NASA also has plans to use SpaceX's Starship in its Artemis lunar missions to ferry astronauts aboard the Orion capsule from orbit to the moon's surface. The rocket, which is in development, has yet to reach orbit in any of its nine flight tests beginning in April 2023. SpaceX's Dragon capsule is also a famous vehicle that is widely used for a variety of spaceflights. The capsule, which sits atop the Falcon 9 for launches to orbit, is capable of transporting both NASA astronauts and cargo to the space station. Under NASA's commercial crew program, the U.S. space agency has been paying SpaceX for years to conduct routine spaceflights to the International Space Station using the company's own launch vehicles. The first of SpaceX's Crew missions ferrying astronauts to the orbital outpost on the Dragon began in 2020, with the tenth and most recent contingent reaching the station in March for about a six-month stay. Standing nearly 27 feet tall and about 13 feet wide, Dragon capsules can carry up to seven astronauts into orbit, though most of SpaceX's Crew missions feature a crew of four. The Dragon spacecraft also was the vehicle NASA selected to bring home the two NASA astronauts who rode the doomed Boeing Starliner capsule to the space station in June 2024. Certifying the Starliner capsule for operation would give NASA a second vehicle in addition to Dragon for regular spaceflights to orbit. Because Boeing is still developing its Starliner capsule, Dragon is the only U.S. vehicle capable of carrying astronauts to and from the space station. It's also one of four vehicles contracted to transport cargo and other supplies to the orbital laboratory. For that reason, Musk's threat Thursday, June 5 to decommission the Dragon "immediately" would be a severe blow to NASA if he were to follow through on it. Musk, though, appears to already be backing off on the suggestion, which he made in response to Trump's own threats. In response to a user who advised Musk to "Cool off and take a step back for a couple days," Musk replied: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Seven astronauts are aboard the International Space Station, including three Americans. Four of the astronauts rode a SpaceX Dragon to the station for a mission known as Crew-10, while the remaining three launched on a Russian Soyuz spacecraft. Contributing: Joey Garrison, Josh Meyer, USA TODAY; Reuters Eric Lagatta is the Space Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at elagatta@ This article originally appeared on Florida Today: SpaceX at center of Trump, Musk feud: What it could mean for Florida

Don't let the Trump-Musk breakup harm ‘kids' NASA and SpaceX
Don't let the Trump-Musk breakup harm ‘kids' NASA and SpaceX

New York Post

time11 hours ago

  • New York Post

Don't let the Trump-Musk breakup harm ‘kids' NASA and SpaceX

Dead as the Trump-Musk bromance plainly is, neither man — nor the American people, heck even the world as a whole — would benefit from a disruption in federal contracts for at least two Musk companies: Starlink and, especially, SpaceX. It looked to be headed that way at one point in Thursday's post-war, with President Trump's Truth Social blast saying one way to save billions is 'to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' prompting a later Musk tweet about SpaceX 'decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' Credit banker Bill Ackman for weighing in on X with a call for the two to 'make peace for the benefit of our great country. Advertisement 3 Tesla and SpaceX Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk speaks at the SATELLITE Conference and Exhibition in Washington, March 9, 2020. AP We are much stronger together than apart' — which brought a terse 'You're not wrong' reply from Musk, followed by general radio silence. Trump has also cooled down, pointedly shrugging off the feud as he chatted with Post reporters Friday. Advertisement Which suggests he won't be taking Steve Bannon's insane advice to try to deport Musk and have Uncle Sam seize SpaceX. The Crew Dragon is now the primary vehicle for US astronauts heading to orbit; the Cargo Dragon is now key to supplying the International Space Station. 3 President Donald Trump walks from the Oval Office before departing on Marine One from the South Lawn of the White House, Friday, June 6, 2025, in Washington. AP 3 SpaceX headquarters is shown in Hawthorne, California, U.S., June 5, 2025. REUTERS Advertisement And SpaceX's reusable, super-heavy-lift Starship holds huge promise for both public- and private-sector ambitions in space. And no better alternatives are on the near horizon, though we certainly root for vigorous private-sector competition to keep cutting costs and extending humanity's off-planet footprint. As for Starlink, it's plainly the cheapest and best option for federal programs to provide broadband in remote, lower-income areas. Advertisement Musk, meanwhile, would only be stomping on his own dreams (and profits) if he quit his NASA work now. The breakup sure looks permanent, but some relationship is still mutually beneficial, and a boon to everyone except their still-shared enemies; anyone pushing either man to fight any more is just urging him to shoot himself in the foot.

Elon Musk threatened to decommission Dragon spacecraft. Here's what that would mean for NASA

time13 hours ago

Elon Musk threatened to decommission Dragon spacecraft. Here's what that would mean for NASA

Amid an escalating feud between billionaire Elon Musk and President Donald Trump, Musk threatened to decommission the Dragon spacecraft. Dragon is a family of spacecraft that is produced by Musk's technology company SpaceX. Various Dragon spacecraft have been making trips to the International Space Station (ISS) since 2012, carrying both cargo and crew to the floating station. SpaceX is a key partner in NASA's Artemis program, which seeks to establish a permanent base on the moon and eventually send humans on missions to Mars. Although Musk backed off from his initial threat hours later in a post on X, it is possible the world's richest man could change his mind again. Space science experts told ABC News that SpaceX has been essential to NASA's missions and the breakdown of a relationship would leave a hole that would be hard to fill. "Basically, the United States has uniquely put all of its eggs into the Elon Musk basket in terms of a sovereign, uniquely American vehicle to get people into and out of space," Moriba Jah, a professor of aerospace engineering and engineering mechanics at the University of Texas at Austin, told ABC News."Now that relationship's severed; it leaves the United States completely vulnerable." NASA and SpaceX's relationship began in 2008 when the federal space agency launched the Commercial Resupply Services program to deliver of cargo and supplies to the ISS on commercially operated spacecraft. The agency signed a contract with SpaceX, and awarded the company 12 flights valued at about $1.6 billion. Mark Jernigan, executive director of the Rice Space Institute in Houston and former associate director for Space Life Sciences Spacecraft Systems Development Support at the NASA Johnson Space Center in Houston, said he was involved in the launching of NASA's commercial cargo program. "The idea was to offload NASA responsibility by actually changing the paradigm of how NASA did business, and commercial cargo was kind of one of the groundbreaking versions," he told ABC News. "The nature of that was to specify what kind of cargo you wanted to launch, and how much you wanted … and the requirements that the rocket has to meet in order to safely dock with the station." At the time, Jernigan said space programs in Japan, Europe, the U.S. and Russia delivered cargo, but now just the latter two do so. Dragon 1 provided cargo service to the ISS for 10 years, between 2012 and 2020, before it was retired. SpaceX launched Dragon 2 with two versions: one as a replacement for the Dragon 1 spacecraft and the second as a capsule that could take crew into space. In September 2014, NASA announced the selection of SpaceX and its Crew Dragon spacecraft as one of the companies to transport U.S. astronauts to the ISS. Michael Liemohn, a professor of climate and space sciences and engineering at the University of Michigan, said SpaceX has been essential to NASA's commercial cargo program. "[SpaceX has been] very important," he told ABC News. "When we retired the space shuttles, our only way [for] sending humans into low Earth orbit was to contract with Russia on a Soyuz capsule, and that's why NASA commissioned both Boeing and SpaceX to build new crew capsules so that there would be capability there." Jernigan -- the Rice Space Institute executive director -- noted that SpaceX has been more successful than other candidates including Boeing and its spacecraft Starliner. In June 2024, two NASA astronauts performed the first astronaut-crewed flight of Starliner capsule to the ISS. What was supposed to be a mission lasting about one week turned into a nine-month stay aboard the ISS due to several issues with Starliner and NASA's decision to add the two astronauts to the ISS crew. Eventually, in March 2025, SpaceX's Crew-10 successfully docked at the ISS, bringing four new astronauts to work on the floating lab and setting up the return to Earth of the two astronauts, as well as a third NASA astronaut and a Russian cosmonaut. "Right now, the only U.S. provider [for crew] is SpaceX, and so not having SpaceX would be a big deal," Jernigan said. "My speculation would be that if the SpaceX Dragon went away, it would be difficult to ramp up Boeing to replace SpaceX." He noted that such a change would be costly. "So if we had to do without SpaceX, we would really have to shift gears and infuse a lot of capital to try to get back our alternatives up to speed," he said. SpaceX also plays a role in the Artemis program, which aims to send astronauts back to the moon for the first time in more than 50 years and eventually set up a permanent base there before heading to Mars. SpaceX is the lunar lander provider for the first flight and Blue Origin, founded by Jeff Bezos, is the second lunar lander provider. If Musk were to decommission the Dragon spacecraft and no longer have contracts with NASA, it would be hard for Blue Origin to get up to speed, according to Jah from the University of Texas at Austin "If Dragon goes away and then it's just Blue Origin, we would have to put more funding resources not just into trying to get Blue Origin to launch sooner, but also in being able to test all those technologies in ways that they haven't been tested yet," he said. "Like, so far, the SpaceX technologies have been very successful in getting people into and out of space. That has not happened yet with the Blue Origin technologies and, at most, they've only had sub-orbital flights."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store