Senate resumes ethics investigation into Sen. Ellsworth, former Senate president
The main stairway to the third floor of the Montana Capitol building is seen on Wednesday, February 12, 2025. (Nathaniel Bailey for the Daily Montanan)
Sen. Forrest Mandeville, R-Columbus, announced Thursday the Senate Ethics Committee will resume its investigation into ethical allegations against Sen. Jason Ellsworth, R-Hamilton, former Senate president.
The Senate had earlier referred criminal and ethical allegations made by its Ethics Committee to the Department of Justice and temporarily paused its own internal probe.
The DOJ said Wednesday it had launched an investigation into criminal allegations.
However, the Attorney General said the department lacks the jurisdiction to investigate or enforce ethics complaints against a legislator, said Mandeville, chairperson of the Ethics Committee, citing a letter from the DOJ.
In his letter, Knudsen also said the Montana Constitution 'confers exclusive authority' on the legislature to enforce the code of ethics against legislators.
During announcements Thursday on the Senate floor of upcoming committee, Mandeville said the nonpartisan Legislative Services Division legal staff verified that the action he announced was proper.
'The suspension is over,' Mandeville said of the internal investigation. 'So the Senate Ethics Committee will now resume its work.'
Mandeville also said the DOJ's open investigation is the result of a separate referral to the agency, one from the Legislative Auditor.
The Legislative Auditor had found Ellsworth abused his power and wasted state resources when he signed a $170,000 state contract, since nulled, with a colleague as former senate president in December, before the 2025 session.
Ellsworth's lawyer has called on the Legislative Auditor to retract the findings.
Thursday, Ellsworth said Senate rules state the Ethics Committee's investigations must be related to actions 'during a legislative session,' and he argued the review would be improper.
'Obviously, this is political,' Ellsworth said.
After the meeting, Minority Leader Pat Flowers, D-Belgrade, who made the earlier motion to refer both the criminal and ethical allegations outside the body, arguing Ellsworth would not receive due process within the Senate, said Thursday he supported the internal ethics investigation given the decision from the DOJ.
The Ethics Committee will meet 10:30 a.m. Monday, Feb. 24, and 8 a.m. Friday, Feb. 28, Mandeville said.
Mandeville said he anticipated the committee's work would take more than one week and less than one month.
The Montana Legislature should complete its work by the first week of May.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
A crypto CEO is accused of laundering $500 million to aid sanctioned Russian banks
The US Department of Justice charged the CEO of a cryptocurrency company with a money laundering scheme that helped clients with ties to Russian banks evade sanctions. An announcement from the department on Monday said that Iurii Gugnin, the CEO of Evita Pay, funneled $530 million of foreign payments through banks and crypto exchanges while concealing the purpose and the source of the transactions. "The defendant is charged with turning a cryptocurrency company into a covert pipeline for dirty money, moving over half a billion dollars through the U.S. financial system to aid sanctioned Russian banks and help Russian end-users acquire sensitive U.S. technology," John A. Eisenberg, assistant attorney general for national security, said. The scheme ran from June 2023 to January 2025, and involved processing payments of Tether — one of the biggest dollar-denominated stablecoins — for Russian clients linked to blacklisted banks including VTB and Sberbank. "To effectuate the scheme, Gugnin defrauded various banks and cryptocurrency exchanges through which he converted funds and made wire transfers," the DOJ statement said. "Gugnin repeatedly lied to these banks and exchanges, telling them that Evita did not conduct business with entities in Russia and did not deal with sanctioned entities." Gugnin was arrested in Manhattan on Monday and faces 22 counts related to wire and bank fraud, operating an unlicensed money transmitting business, and failing to implement an effective anti-money laundering compliance program. The DOJ statement also says Gugnin's internet search queries included things like "how to know if there is an investigation against you," and "money laundering penalties US." If convicted, Gugnin could face life in prison, with a maximum of 30 years for each count of banks fraud, 20 years for each count of wire fraud, and 10 years for failing to implement anti-money laundering practices.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
2024 Election Results Under Scrutiny as Lawsuit Advances
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A legal case questioning the accuracy of the 2024 election is moving forward. The lawsuit, brought by SMART Legislation, the action arm of SMART Elections, a nonpartisan watchdog group, filed the lawsuit over voting discrepancies in Rockland County, New York. Judge Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court ruled in open court in May that the allegations were serious enough for discovery to proceed. Newsweek has contacted SMART Elections for comment via email. People cast their ballots on the last day of early voting for the general election in Michigan at the Livingston Educational Service Agency in Howell on November 3, 2024. People cast their ballots on the last day of early voting for the general election in Michigan at the Livingston Educational Service Agency in Howell on November 3, 2024. Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images Why It Matters The lawsuit could renew debate about the 2024 election, though it won't change the outcome since Congress has certified the results declaring President Donald Trump the winner. It comes amid unconfirmed reports that voting machines were secretly altered before ballots were cast in November's election. The federally accredited testing lab, Pro V&V, that signed off on "significant" changes to ES&S voting machines—which are used in over 40 percent of U.S. counties—"vanished from public view" after the election, according to the Dissent in Bloom Substack. What To Know According to the complaint, more voters have sworn in legal affidavits that they voted for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare than the Rockland County Board of Elections counted and certified, contradicting those results. The complaint also cited numerous statistical anomalies in the presidential election results. They include multiple districts where hundreds of voters chose the Democratic candidate Kirsten Gillibrand for Senate, but none voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate for president. Max Bonamente, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the author of the Statistics and Analysis of Scientific Data, said in a paper that the 2024 presidential election results were statistically highly unlikely in four of the five towns in Rockland County when compared with 2020 results. What People Are Saying Lulu Friesdat, the founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, said in a statement: "There is clear evidence that the Senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely. "If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted in the 2024 Rockland County general election. The best way to determine if the results are correct is to examine the paper ballots in a full public, transparent hand recount of all presidential and Senate ballots in Rockland County. We believe it's vitally important, especially in the current environment, to be absolutely confident about the results of the election." Max Bonamente said in a paper on the voting data from Rockland County: "These data would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation, and would benefit from further assurances as to their fidelity." Costas Panagopoulos, a professor of political science at Northeastern University, told Newsweek: "Statistical irregularities in elections should always be investigated, but the sources of such inconsistencies, which can include error or miscalculation, are not always nefarious. Still, scrutinizing election results can strengthen confidence in elections. Mistakes can happen. "In this case, the drop-off inconsistencies could reflect the idiosyncratic nature of the 2024 presidential election cycle. Alone, statistical comparisons to previous cycles cannot provide definitive proof of wrongdoing. "In any case, it does not appear that any of these inconsistencies would be sufficient to change the outcomes of any of the elections in question in New York state. That does not mean they should not be scrutinized, and any errors, if verified, should be corrected for the historical record. But there is not necessarily any need to invalidate any of these elections in these jurisdictions." What's Next The lawsuit is seeking a full, hand recount of ballots cast in the presidential and U.S. Senate races in Rockland County. A hearing has been scheduled for September 22.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Trump's 'big beautiful' spending bill could make it harder to claim this low-income tax credit
As Senate Republicans debate President Donald Trump's "big beautiful bill", a lesser-known provision from the House-approved package could make it harder to claim a low-income tax credit. If enacted as written, the House measure in the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" would require precertification of each qualifying child for filers claiming the so-called earned income tax credit, or EITC, starting in 2028. Under current law, taxpayers claim the EITC on their tax return — including Schedule EIC for qualifying children. The provision aims to "avoid duplicative and other erroneous claims," according to the bill's text. But policy experts say the new rules would burden eligible filers, who may forgo the EITC as a result. The measure could also delay tax refunds for those filers, particularly amid IRS cutbacks, experts say. More from Personal Finance:Job market is 'trash' right now, career coach says — here's whyWhat a 'revenge tax' in Trump's spending bill could mean for investorsWhat Trump's plan to slash Pell Grant to lowest level in a decade means for you "You're going to flood the IRS with all these [EITC] documents," said Janet Holtzblatt, a senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. "It's just not clear how they're going to process all this information." Holtzblatt, who has pushed to simplify the EITC for decades, wrote a critique of the proposed precertification last week. "This is not a new idea, but was previously considered, studied and rejected for very good reasons," Greg Leiserson, a senior fellow at the Tax Law Center at New York University Law, wrote about the proposal in late May. Studies during the George W. Bush administration found an EITC precertification process reduced EITC claims for eligible filers, Leiserson wrote. During the study, precertification also yielded a lower return on investment compared to existing EITC enforcement, such as audits, he wrote. One of the key benefits of the EITC is the tax break is "refundable," meaning you can still claim the credit and get a refund with zero taxes owed. That's valuable for lower earners who don't have a tax bill, experts say. To qualify, you need "earned income," or wages from work. The income phase-outs depend on your "qualifying children," based on four IRS tests. "Eligibility is complicated," and residency requirements for qualifying children often cause errors, said Holtzblatt with the Tax Policy Center. For 2025, the tax break is worth up to $8,046 for eligible families. You can claim the maximum EITC with adjusted gross income up to $61,555 for single filers and $68,675 for married couples filing jointly. These phase-outs apply to families with three or more children. As of December 2024, about 23 million workers received the EITC for tax year 2022, according to the IRS. But 1 in 5 eligible taxpayers don't claim the tax break, the agency estimates. Nine Democratic Senators last week voiced concerns about the House-approved EITC changes in a letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. If enacted, the updates would "further complicate the EITC's existing challenges and make it more difficult to claim," the lawmakers wrote. Higher earners are more likely to face an audit, but EITC claimants have a 5.5 times higher audit rate than the rest of U.S. filers, partly due to improper payments, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center. The proposed EITC change, among other House provisions, still need Senate approval, and it's unclear how the measure could change. However, under the reconciliation process, Senate Republicans only need a simple majority to advance the bill.
