US senator pushes mega-tariffs on Russias partners
US Senator Lindsey Graham has claimed that his plan to hit Russia's trade partners with 500% tariffs would help President Donald Trump push Moscow towards a peace deal with Ukraine. At the same time, this would rebuild America's reputation after the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan under Joe Biden, Graham said.
Graham, a longtime foreign policy hawk and Trump ally, is backing legislation that would impose a 500% tariff on countries that buy Russian energy, uranium, and other raw materials - measures aimed chiefly at India and China.
The senator linked the situation to Afghanistan in an op-ed published by the Wall Street Journal on Monday, described as "a message" to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
"America's shameful withdrawal from Afghanistan didn't merely damage our reputation; it set in motion aggression across the world," the South Carolina Republican wrote. "If the US continues to lead decisively on bringing the Russia-Ukraine war to an end, that could change. Mr. Trump can restore our reputation - and end the bloodbath."
Biden's handling of the 2021 exit from Afghanistan, which included the swift collapse of American-trained local forces and the Taliban's return to power in Kabul, has remained a frequent line of attack from Republicans. Critics have warned that Trump could make a similar blunder as he seeks to mediate an agreement between Moscow and Kiev. The president has claimed that the Ukraine conflict would not have broken out had he been in office instead of Biden.
Graham's commentary responded to a recent editorial from the Wall Street Journal's board, which urged Trump not to distance himself from the conflict.
"It's pure fantasy to imagine that Mr. Trump can 'walk away' and let Mr. Putin win without damaging consequences," the newspaper wrote, accusing Trump of "acting like the war is someone else's problem."
READ MORE: Everything out of Zelenskys mouth causes problems Trump
Kiev and its European backers have called for additional sanctions after Moscow rejected a Ukrainian demand for an unconditional 30-day ceasefire - an idea viewed in Russia as an attempt by Kiev to gain unilateral military advantage. Russian officials are currently working on a peace framework that could set the stage for an eventual halt in fighting.
(RT.com)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
4 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Cracker Barrel new logo row: Why Lebanon-based chain is facing backlash; CEO responds
Cracker Barrel, famous Lebanon-based restaurant chain, is facing severe backlash on social media over its new logo and menu updates. On Wednesday, the chain announced the changes, saying the new logo is 'now rooted even more closely to the iconic barrel shape and word mark that started it all'. This is the first time in 48 years that the Cracker Barrel logo will be text-only with no images. Cracker Barrel has changed its logo(Cracker Barrel) The chain, which opened in 1969, had a logo with just text before, but in 1977, it updated the image to show a man resting by the barrel. In a press release, Cracker Barrel noted that 'farm fresh scrambled eggs and buttermilk biscuits' were the inspiration behind the color palette in the new campaign. The company is running an 'All the More' campaign that 'positions the iconic American brand for the future'. 'We believe in the goodness of country hospitality, a spirit that has always defined us. Our story hasn't changed. Our values haven't changed. With 'All the More,' we're honoring our legacy while bringing fresh energy, thoughtful craftsmanship and heartfelt hospitality to our guests this fall,' Sarah Moore, chief marketing officer of Cracker Barrel, said in a statement. However, social media backlash followed the makeover. 'The CEO of Cracker Barrel is as woke as they come. She is destroying a once great American brand,' pro-Trump adviser Alex Bruesewitz wrote on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. 'This logo is depressing,' another person added. 'Now why would they remove the cracker & the barrel?' a third one tweeted. Cracker Barrel CEO responds The CEO of the company, Julie Felss Masino, explained the changes in an interview with Good Morning America. 'People like what we're doing. Cracker Barrel needs to feel like the Cracker Barrel for today and for tomorrow -- the things that you love are still there. We need people to choose us, and we want people to choose us,' she said. Masino added that at a recent on-site meeting in Florida, the 'No 1 question I got asked was, 'How can I get a remodel, when can I get a remodel and how do I get on the list?'"
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 minutes ago
- First Post
US Judge blocks bid to unseal grand jury records as pressure mounts on Trump for Epstein list
District Judge Richard Berman in Manhattan ruled on Wednesday that the grand jury records – around 70 pages of testimony – were 'merely a hearsay snippet' compared with the government's 100,000 pages of investigative files Commuters walk past a bus stop near Nine Elms Station as activists put up a poster showing President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein near the US Embassy in London. AP A US judge has denied a Justice Department attempt to release grand jury records from the sex-trafficking case against Jeffrey Epstein, saying the sealed materials are far less significant than the wider trove of government files on the disgraced financier that remain withheld from the public. District Judge Richard Berman in Manhattan ruled on Wednesday that the grand jury records – around 70 pages of testimony – were 'merely a hearsay snippet' compared with the government's 100,000 pages of investigative files. He argued that if the administration was serious about transparency, it should release the broader cache of documents rather than seeking an exception to rules protecting the secrecy of grand jury proceedings. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's promise collides with legal barriers The decision adds to the political pressure on Donald Trump, who has faced mounting criticism from his conservative base over his administration's handling of the Epstein files. During his 2024 campaign, Trump pledged to make public all material connected to Epstein and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department announced it would not release any further material, dismissed claims of a hidden client list, and insisted much of the evidence could not be disclosed. The stance infuriated supporters who had expected sweeping disclosures. Following Trump's instruction, Attorney General Pam Bondi had asked the court to approve the release of Epstein's grand jury testimony. The filing revealed that the panel had heard from just one witness – an FBI agent – before handing down Epstein's indictment. Wider legal push stalls across jurisdictions The latest ruling follows similar setbacks for the administration in other courts. Earlier this month, Judge Paul Engelmayer in Manhattan rejected a bid to unseal grand jury materials from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's longtime associate, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for recruiting underage girls. Engelmayer wrote that the evidence presented to her grand jury was already aired at her trial and contained no indication of others having sexual contact with minors. In July, a Florida judge also refused a request to release grand jury records from Epstein's earlier federal investigations in 2005 and 2007. Those probes culminated in a controversial 2008 plea deal that saw Epstein serve just 13 months in jail on a state prostitution charge. Epstein's legacy and lingering conspiracy theories Epstein, who pleaded not guilty to sex-trafficking charges, died in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019. His death, officially ruled a suicide by hanging, fuelled conspiracy theories that he was murdered to protect powerful associates. His connections with influential figures across politics, business and royalty have continued to stoke public interest in the case and demands for transparency. With inputs from agencies
India.com
4 minutes ago
- India.com
A Meeting That Isn't Likely To Happen: Why Putin Won't Sit Down With Zelensky – And Might Always Say No
Washington: Hopes for a direct meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky dimmed this week despite signals from Washington that such a summit could be next. After a call between Putin and former U.S. President Donald Trump, Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov told reporters the two sides might consider 'raising the level of representatives' in future talks. He did not mention the leaders themselves, offering no sign Moscow is preparing for a face-to-face meeting. Speaking on state television, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Moscow does not rule out talks in any format, but insisted top-level contacts require 'the utmost care' in preparation. The hesitation reflects Moscow's broader stance on the war. Russia recognised Donetsk and Luhansk as independent in 2022 and Putin has repeatedly argued Ukraine is historically and culturally inseparable from Russia. A meeting with Zelensky would force him to acknowledge Ukraine's independence, a step analysts say he is unwilling to take. Putin will have to accept the failure of sitting down with a president he considers a joke from a country that doesn't exist. And such a move could be hard to justify domestically. He has brainwashed Russians on state television that Zelensky is a Nazi, that Ukraine is a puppet state of the West, etc. He won't be able to justify his sudden talks with his Ukrainian counterpart. The Kremlin has also questioned Zelensky's mandate, pointing to postponed elections under martial law. A recent Russian 'peace' proposal required Ukraine to hold elections before any treaty. Russian officials rarely use Zelensky's name, referring instead to 'the Kyiv regime'. When Zelensky travelled to Turkey in May for direct talks, Putin stayed away and sent only a delegation led by a historian. Analysts say Putin sees little benefit in a leader-level meeting unless Ukraine is ready to make concessions. The Russian president's key demands include ceding territory still under Kyiv's control. For now, Zelensky has ruled out those terms. Putin views Trump as central to any breakthrough. The U.S. president is seen as an enabler of the Russian vision of the settlement and for that the United States is supposed to work with Kyiv to push them to be more flexible and open to Russian demands. Putin will not risk the optics of a failed summit with Zelensky. Trump, meanwhile, told supporters he had 'begun the arrangements' for a Putin-Zelensky meeting. By the next morning, his tone shifted on Fox News. 'I sort of set it up with Putin and Zelensky, and you know, they are the ones that have to call the shots. We are, we are 7,000 miles away,' he said. Putin shows no sign of compromise. He secured a summit with Trump in Alaska, avoided making concessions on a ceasefire and seen sanctions pressure falter. Russian forces escalated drone and missile strikes this week, launching 270 drones and 10 missiles on Monday night. With military pressure as his fallback, Putin still calculates leverage. The unanswered question in Washington and Moscow is if talks collapse again, who will Trump blame?
