Pinnacle Ponies: 10 of the Coolest Mustangs Ever Built
Highlighting 10 of the coolest Ford Mustangs ever built, from the original 1964.5 model to the 2024 Dark Horse. It includes iconic versions like the 1965 Shelby GT350, 1967 GT500 Super Snake, 1984 SVO, and the 2016 Shelby GT350, showcasing their unique features and historical significance.
This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article Read Next
More than six decades later, Ford has produced countless Mustang models and variants, each unique and distinct. What's fascinating is they haven't always adhered to a consistent formula, but the execution has always been the same: to give much higher-dollar and more exotic sports cars a run for their money. That's what we call a democratization of performance and power.
Below, we've made the difficult choice of narrowing down our favorite Mustangs to the 10 listed in chronological order. Did your favorites make it? Keep reading to find out. 1964.5 Ford Mustang
Here's how confident Ford was in the brand-new, first-ever Mustang when it made its debut in 1964: It had journalists take the test cars on a 750-mile trip from Westchester County, New York, back to its headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan, for what was clearly intended to be a reliability test. Ultimately, Mustang sales quadrupled what Ford estimated them to be.
Part of that, surely, was because of the sheer number of options offered. Not only were there 15 exterior paint colors to choose from, but there were also five different selections for vinyl seat upholstery. Convertibles and hardtops were available side by side, and convertible customers could have either white or black fabric roofs, while hardtops could be had with either white or black vinyl tops.
Then there were the engine options. You could get the first Mustang with either a 2.8-liter inline-six with 101 hp, a 4.3-liter V-8 with 164 hp, a 4.7-liter V-8 with 210 hp, or a special, high-compression version of the 4.7-liter that kicked power up to 271. The six-cylinder and 4.3-liter V-8 came standard with a three-speed manual, and the 4.7-liter V-8 had a four-speed manual. Everything except the high-compression 4.7-liter could be fitted with Ford's three-speed automatic.
1964.5 Ford Mustang Specs Price when new: $2,368
Horsepower: 101-271 hp
Torque: 156-312 lb-ft
0-60 mph: 8.2 sec (est) 1965 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350
It didn't take long for the iconic Mustang to reach a new stratosphere of iconic with the 1965 Shelby GT350. Built for the track, the first GT350s ignored comfort in favor of lap times. Turning the Mustang into a bona fide Corvette-killer proved no easy task, as the Ford Falcon platform underpinning the car wasn't exactly motorsport material. Engineers had to keep costs down, too.
'The decision to go with the live axle was OK with Ford,' we wrote in a retrospective from 2017, 'as Klaus Arning estimated the development of the [independent rear suspension] would cost upwards of $85,000. The Shelby G.T. 350 utilized the Galaxie station wagon rear end equipped with a towing package with Ford's largest rear brakes at 10 inches in diameter with 2.5-inch-wide sintered metallic brake linings. Best of all, this axle bolted right into the Mustang chassis with very little modification.'
The result? Something very good: 'At Interstate speeds, the GT350 is rough and ready,' Donald Farr wrote in 2010. 'It's not a luxury car by any stretch of the imagination. The suspension is stiff, wind whooshes by the open side windows, and header heat rises off the floor pans. The car even smells fast. And did I mention that it's loud? At 65 mph and 3,000 rpm, the blown-out glasspacks drown out any attempt at passenger conversation.'
1965 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350 Specs Price when new: $4,547
Horsepower: 306 hp
Torque: 329 lb-ft
0-60 mph: 6.8 sec
Once upon a time, there was a Mustang with the heart of a GT40.
As the story goes, Carroll Shelby was hired to showcase some new Goodyear tires. The Super Snake that resulted was a one-off GT500 prototype that used a monstrous 427 V-8 like one found in the Ford GT40 race car. A Shelby test diver took the car 500 miles around Goodyear's oval test track and averaged 142 mph, thus showing the Goodyears were more than up to snuff. Plans to build more of the GT500 Super Snakes were scrapped, so this is the only one in existence. It might very well be the most valuable Mustang ever.
Half a century later, Shelby finally created a 'continuation run' of cars built on real 1967 Mustangs and given all the GT500 Super Snake hardware. The cars are not technically from the time, but they're also not new cars, either. Regardless, when a '67 Super Snake rides again, everyone wins.
1967 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Super Snake Specs Price when new: $8,000 (est.)
Horsepower: 520 hp
Torque: 550 lb-ft
0-60 mph: N/A 1968 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500KR
With plenty of spoilers and scoops, the GT500KR was the nastiest Mustang of its age. Knowingly, KR stood for 'King of the Road.' With just 933 fastbacks built, the GT500KR wears the beautiful, elongated lines that define '60s car design.
'The KR does its talking underhood, though,' we wrote in a 2001 comparison against a 1999 Mustang SVT Cobra. 'In mid-1968, Ford spanked the competition with a surprise of its own: the Bob Tasca Ford–inspired 428 Cobra Jet FE-series big-block in the GT500. Period road tests prove the 428 Cobra Jet could rocket the Shelby Mustang through the quarter mile in 14 seconds flat with 3.91:1 gears; with 3.50:1 cruising gears, 14.5 seconds. This makes the GT500KR a formidable competitor for the SVT Cobra. In perfect tune with a seasoned drag racer at the wheel, the KR will stay flush with the more high-tech Cobra.'
We won't spoil the rest.
1968 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500KR Specs Price when new: $4,473
Horsepower: 335 hp
Torque: 440 lb-ft
0-60 mph: 5.4 sec (est.) 1984 Ford Mustang SVO
As a response to fuel shortages and high gas prices of the '70s, the Mustang underwent some market-demanded changes but emerged to usher in the '80s with the Fox body. And one of the coolest of the Fox-bodied Mustangs was the 1984 Mustang SVO.
The SVO implemented a ton of Mustang firsts, including disc brakes at all four wheels and intercooled turbocharging for its small-displacement four-cylinder. Because it saved 150 or so pounds over the 5.0-liter Mustang GT, the SVO wound up being quite the handling athlete, with us calling it 'the best-driving street Mustang the factory has ever produced' at the time. It proved you didn't need a giant engine and massive power to make a Mustang fun. Sometimes you just need lightness. Maybe that Colin Chapman guy did know a thing or two about cars.
Plus, the SVO was better on gas—which, with ever-shifting fuel prices, is something that's always a plus.
1984 Ford Mustang SVO Specs Price when new: $15,585
Horsepower: 176 hp
Torque: 210 lb-ft
0-60 mph: 7.5 sec (est.) 2000 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra R
It pretty much goes without saying if you see an 'R' anywhere in a car's name, chances are it'll be awesome. The 2000 Mustang SVT Cobra R was no exception. With a quoted top speed of 170 mph, the R version of the Cobra had a 5.4-liter, 385-hp V-8, a lowered suspension setup, bigger brakes and wheels, stickier tires, exterior aero bits, and Recaro bucket seats. Oh, and it came with a manual transmission, too. Only 300 were built.
'Our acceleration tests revealed steam catapult-like launches with 60 mph arriving in just 4.4 seconds and the quarter taking 12.9 seconds at 110.8 mph,' we reported in a 2004 road test. 'That compares favorably with the Corvette's 4.8-second run to 60 and 13.3 at 108.6 through the quarter mile. To more reliably and efficiently handle the 5.4's extra muscle, Ford specified beefier axle shafts, a 3.55:1 axle ratio, and a Gerodisc hydromechanical differential with speed and torque sensitivity. But, of course, these goodies would be useless if the suspension couldn't keep the rubber on the ground most of the time.'
2000 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra R Specs Price when new: $54,995
Horsepower: 385 hp
Torque: 385 lb-ft
0-60 mph: 4.4 sec 2001 Ford Mustang Bullitt
Whether you believe Steve McQueen's 1968 movie Bullitt delivers either the greatest car chase scene in cinematic history or is the most boring hyped-up movie to date, the first Mustang Bullitt deserves to be on this list simply because of how great it looks. Dark metallic green is a lovely shade on any car, but it's extra special here. We were even able to look past the fake hood scoop.
'Except for balls-to-the-wall acceleration, the Bullitt is by far the best GT ever,' we wrote in 2002. 'The handling is flatter, the styling better and the braking shorter than any non-Cobra that's come before it. The interior is totally cool, and Team Mustang obviously sweat the details with the aluminum trim, red rotors, etc.'
We just really, really didn't like the fact that the modified engine made just 5 hp more than stock. Ultimately, we deemed the first Bullitt Mustang had a ton to love but also needed work.
2001 Ford Mustang Bullitt Specs Price when new: $27,380
Horsepower: 265 hp
Torque: 305 lb-ft
0-60 mph: 5.2 sec 2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302
The fifth-generation Mustang caught a lot of heat for its continued use of a solid rear axle. But before retiring the technology on the Mustang for good in favor of an independent rear suspension, Ford made it the best version of itself in the 2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302. In our first drive from 2011, we called it 'the best of all the current Mustangs.'
Jason Cammisa wrote, 'It's the best expression of a modern muscle car and, frankly, it's the best all-around sports car to wear a Mustang badge. Unburdened with the extra weight and disproportionate thrust of the supercharged GT500, unafflicted with the GT's cushy suspension, and unfettered by the V-6's incorrect soundtrack, the Boss 302 is, to us, exactly what a Mustang should be.'
The Laguna Seca version lost the rear seats and replaced them with a cross brace and added a 1.0mm larger anti-roll bar, Torsen limited-slip differential, stiffer rear springs, and 1.0-inch-wider rear wheels with R-compound Pirelli Corsa tires. Cool in concept, but unless you're tracking it often, we didn't know if the reduction in practicality was ultimately worth the $6,995 premium.
2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302 Specs Price when new: $40,995
Horsepower: 444 hp
Torque: 380 lb-ft
0-60 mph: 4.0 sec 2016 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350
Perhaps this author's favorite Mustang of all time is the 2016 Shelby GT350. As a tribute to the original GT350, it's a very fitting one. From the 5.2-liter naturally aspirated flat-plane Voodoo V-8 with an 8,250-rpm redline came the music of the gods. Perfectly paired with a Tremec six-speed manual transmission, the 2016 GT350 was a delight both on and off track.
'The engineering effort translates into a Mustang that is ridiculously fun and easy to drive at speed,' we wrote in a first drive. 'The readiness of the chassis and suspension gives drivers confidence and a variety of driving situations. Stability, feel, and control have been taken to a new level. The body remains flat during all phases of cornering, and when braking, you'll sense virtually no nose dive or nervousness in the rear. Turn-in occurs immediately, almost as if your thoughts, rather than your hands, are connected to the wheel. The steering is the most precise we've seen from a production Mustang. Save for a touch of understeer, the balance was spot on.'
2016 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350 Specs Price when new: $47,795
Horsepower: 526 hp
Torque: 429 lb-ft
0-60 mph: 4.1 sec 2024 Ford Mustang Dark Horse
The Shelby GT350 is no more, but fans of the current-generation Mustang can get their fix with the Dark Horse, which was a finalist in our recent Performance Vehicle of the Year event. Though there's the 5.0-liter Coyote V-8 under this hood instead of the berserk Voodoo engine, you still get a Tremec six-speed manual if you so choose. Plus, the automatic-equipped Dark Horse currently holds MotorTrend 's shortest braking-distance record (from 60 mph to a standstill) to date at just 86 feet. This means it beat out all the Ferraris, Porsches, and other high-performance stuff we've tested.
'When you put the spurs to the Dark Horse, a tuned version of Ford's naturally aspirated Coyote V-8 pushing an even 500 horsepower howls through a standard active exhaust,' we wrote in our PVOTY review. 'In our testing, we hustled a manual-transmission-equipped model like the one we had at Chuckwalla to a 0–60-mph time of 4.1 seconds. (We got it down to 3.7 in an automatic-equipped car.)'
2024 Ford Mustang Dark Horse Specs Price when new: $65,075
Horsepower: 500 hp
Torque: 418 lb-ft
0-60 mph: 4.1 sec (manual), 3.7 sec (automatic)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
View Photos of the Ford Bronco Roadster Concept
READ THE FULL STORY Ford rolled out this unexpected Bronco concept during Monterey Car Week at Pebble Beach on Saturday, August 16, another way the automaker is celebrating the Bronco's 60th anniversary. Scroll through for a complete look at the white convertible version of the popular SUV. Ford said the Bronco Roadster Concept is "directly inspired by the 1966 U13 Bronco Roadster, the sportiest of the three original Bronco configurations." The intent was to combine the '60s-era Bronco's appearance with that of the current sixth-gen Bronco. A "philosophy of intentional reduction" led to a fully open roadster with minimalistic details. Fold-down tailgate is another element of the simplified design. Fifteen52 Analog wheels add to the retro style. You Might Also Like Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades How to Buy or Lease a New Car Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Motor 1
an hour ago
- Motor 1
'This Motor Might Say Land Rover…:' Mechanic Lifts the Hood of a Luxury SUV. Then He Reveals Who Actually Makes the Engine
Land Rover owners expect rugged British style and refinement. But lift the hood on certain models and you might find a surprise stamped right into the metal: Ford Motor Company. Mechanic and automotive-minded creator Larry Law ( @ ) is all smiles in a viral clip where he reveals the provenance of Land Rover's critical components to potential owners. 'This motor might say Land Rover, but on the side of it, it says Ford Motor Company. So you thinking you getting some kind of Porsche,' he says while looking under the hood of a Land Rover sitting in his repair bay. 'This is a 5.0. This is a 302 Ford.' When Ford and Land Rover Shared Parts In the world of automotive manufacturing, luxury brands sometimes borrow engineering from broader platforms, especially when cost-sharing or corporate ownership comes into play. Following Ford's 2000 acquisition of Land Rover , several V‑8 engines in Land Rover models were produced at Ford facilities. The AJ‑V8 family, designed by Jaguar, is a perfect example. Despite its British design, production occurred within a dedicated 'plant‑within‑a‑plant' at Ford's Bridgend Engine Plant in Wales. Trending Now 'That's Your Sign Not to Sell It': Man Is on His Way to Sell His 1966 Mustang. Then It Breaks Down in the Middle of the Highway Woman Signs for a Ford at the Dealership. Then They Call Her Back and Say They Miscalculated the Price and She Owes $3,800 More The Bridgend plant , active from 1980 to 2020, produced over 22 million engines during its lifetime and served Ford, Jaguar, Volvo, and Land Rover operations. In August 2020, Land Rover confirmed it would shift engine production in‑house after Bridgend's closure. The 5.0-liter engine that Larry refers to is most likely the AJ-V8 (AJ133) , which powered certain Range Rover models between 2009 and 2012. While its displacement matches Ford's classic 302 cubic-inch V-8, the AJ-V8 is a distinct design , making it more of a cousin than a direct descendant. Automotive enthusiasts point out that, although these engines were built in Ford facilities, their internals were explicitly developed for Jaguar and Land Rover applications. The AJ-V8 also features direct fuel injection and a hemispherical-like combustion chamber, which the mechanic likened to Chrysler's 'Hemi' design. While the comparison captures the general shape and injector placement, it's more a colorful analogy than a technical match. Many of the Land Rover models using this engine were also paired with Ford-sourced automatic transmissions, underscoring the level of component sharing between the two brands during and after Ford's ownership. Sharing powertrain components is a strategy that demonstrates smart economics. By using a common engine platform, manufacturers reduce development costs and leverage proven systems. Ford's use of the Bridgend facility exemplified this: Jaguar (and later Land Rover) could tap into existing production lines without setting up a completely separate factory. After the Bridgend closure, JLR invested in its engine production capabilities, bringing operations to its Wolverhampton Engine Manufacturing Centre. Why It Matters to Owners For Land Rover owners, the connection to Ford has real-world implications for maintenance, repair, and brand perception. On the positive side, using Ford-sourced internals can make it easier to source replacement parts , particularly in markets with an extensive Ford service network. Many independent mechanics are already familiar with Ford V-8 systems, which can translate into shorter repair times and potentially lower labor costs. The components themselves also carry a track record from years of use in other vehicles, lending them a degree of proven durability . However, the discovery that a luxury SUV's engine bears Ford branding can be unsettling for some buyers who expect entirely bespoke engineering under the Land Rover badge. Paying premium prices for a vehicle that shares significant mechanical DNA with less expensive models also raises questions about perceived value . However, in practice, the integration and refinement often remain firmly in the luxury category. Stay informed with our newsletter every weekday back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . The Ford–Land Rover collaboration is far from unique in the automotive world. Across the industry, luxury automakers have long relied on sister companies or corporate group resources to source components and share technology. Aston Martin, for example, has incorporated Ford-derived switchgear and electronics into several of its models, a legacy of Ford's former partial ownership stake in the brand. Bentley, meanwhile, has built vehicles on Volkswagen Group modular platforms and used VW-sourced powertrains, blending high-end craftsmanship with shared engineering foundations. Such practices are rooted in economics. Component and platform sharing allows manufacturers to maintain brand identity while achieving the cost efficiencies of large-scale production. For owners curious about their own vehicle's mechanical heritage, there are several ways to trace an engine's origin. VIN decoding tools , available online or through dealerships, can identify the specific engine type and where it was built. A visual inspection of the engine block may also reveal stamped markings such as 'Ford Motor Company' that point directly to its provenance. Additionally, reviewing factory service manuals, official parts catalogs, or detailed service histories can uncover information about part suppliers and manufacturing sources, offering a clearer picture of the vehicle's lineage. Motor1 reached out to Larry via direct message. We'll update this if he responds. More From Motor1 BMW Once Considered Selling Range Rovers Directly—Yes, Really The 2026 Land Rover Defender Keeps the Supercharged V-8 Alive Jaguar Be Damned: JLR Just Had its Best Profit in a Decade Every Three-Row SUV You Can Buy in 2025 Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
Digital Trends
2 hours ago
- Digital Trends
The week in EV tech: Glitz on the coast, grit from Detroit
Welcome to Digital Trends' weekly recap of the revolutionary technology powering, connecting, and now driving next-gen electric vehicles. Monterey Car Week and its jewel event The Quail: A Motorsports Gathering have become the automotive world's most exclusive runway. Here, the richest of the rich—and the most daring of the designers—unveil concept cars that seem plucked from sci-fi dreams. Yet in the same week, a very different kind of revolution was also announced by Ford: a $30,000 midsize EV pickup, born from a new software‑designed, small‑battery platform meant to power a whole new 'family' of affordable electric vehicles. It's a reminder that while ultra‑luxury is dazzling, democratized EV tech isn't just possible—it's on the horizon. Recommended Videos Sculpted Innovations on the Lawn At The Quail, brands unleashed show‑stoppers resting somewhere between movie props and next‑gen vehicles. · Cadillac's Elevated Velocity concept redefined luxury and utility with flair: gullwing doors; bold 24‑inch wheels; and modes like Terra for off‑road, Elements Defy vibrating debris off the body, and Sand Vision for enhanced visibility in dust storms—all wrapped in cabin amenities like red‑light therapy and a 'waterfall' screen embedded in the steering wheel. · Karma Automotive impressed with its Kaveya super‑coupe and 'GT‑UV' study—complete with a production‑ready interior, carbon‑fiber structure, and a blistering 1,000 hp electric drivetrain. · A wave of ultra‑luxury and performance electrics also made their presence felt: from Rimac's 2,107‑hp Nevera Rhypercar (price: ~$2.5 million), to Acura's RSX prototype, powered by an in‑house EV architecture and showcasing Honda's e:Architecture, soon to reach production. Not to mention Mercedes‑AMG's futuristic Concept GT XX with 1,341 hp from triple axial‑flux motors, a radical performance blueprint. Set against this spectacle of excess, these vehicles illustrate the creative peak of EV tech: performance, luxury, radical design—yet firmly perched out of reach for most of us. Ford's 'Model‑T Moment' Hits Home Now look at the other end of the spectrum: Ford's bold announcement of a $30,000 midsize EV pickup, built on a software‑defined vehicle platform, sparked a collective intake of breath—not for its headline price, but for its implications. This 'universal EV Platform' is designed with a small, affordable LFP (lithium‑iron‑phosphate) battery, fewer parts, and an architecture structured to spawn a family of cost‑efficient models. More than just building a pickup, Ford is signaling the arrival of integrated EV tech where intelligent software, battery management, and production‑scale efficiency converge. Unsurprisingly, Ford CEO explicitly framed the move as a technological and price war with BYD—China's EV champion known for cost‑effective batteries and platform economies. Ford's plan is a direct challenge to the global dominance of affordable EVs emerging from Asia, blending scale, simplicity, and local battery production to undercut and compete. Ford's new generation of EVs will be built as software-defined vehicles, meaning their core systems—everything from performance tuning to infotainment and battery management—will be controlled by centralized software platforms. Much like a smartphone, they'll receive over-the-air (OTA) updates, enabling Ford to introduce new features, improve efficiency, enhance safety, and fix bugs without a trip to the dealership. This concept first became reality in 2012, when Tesla introduced OTA updates in its Model S, setting a new standard for connected vehicle technology. In the years that followed, Chinese EV startups NIO and XPeng adopted similar software-first architectures, launching their own OTA-capable vehicles around 2018. By 2021, American EV makers Lucid and Rivian als o embraced the software-defined model, reinforcing the shift away from the traditional, hardware-centric approach to vehicle design. Today, SDVs are becoming increasingly commonplace across the industry. For drivers, this means owning a more adaptable and future-ready vehicle—one that can evolve over time. Automakers can remotely update vehicle behavior, improve range estimates, refine infotainment interfaces, and even introduce entirely new capabilities after the car has been sold. This also paves the way for personalized experiences and subscription-based features, where owners can unlock upgrades or tailor their vehicle's digital environment on demand. Two Worlds. One Future. What's most compelling is the contrast—and the convergence—of these stories. On one side, Monterey's lawn dazzles with what's next-level bold: solar visions, luxury interiors, hyper‑performance, AI‑driven cabins, and exaggerated power figures. On the other, Ford offers a quieter, yet perhaps revolutionary pivot: EV tech embedded in affordability, not as an afterthought, but as its core. Software-defined platforms mean updates, performance, safety, and user features can be upgraded without hardware overhaul—a glimpse at how mass‑market EVs can evolve fast. This isn't just a tech fantasy. It signals that EV solutions for the mainstream are maturing. Deep integration of cost‑effective battery chemistry, lean parts architecture, and software-centric control are what make an attainable EV reality—not just for well‑heeled collectors, but for everyday families.
