U.S. revokes visa of Brazilian judge overseeing Bolsonaro case
July 19 (UPI) -- The U.S. visa of the Brazilian judge overseeing the criminal case against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro was revoked Friday, four days after President Donald Trump called the South American nation's treatment of the former leader a "witch hunt."
Secretary of State Marco Rubio made the announcement on Friday.
"President Trump made clear that his administration will hold accountable foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States," Rubio said in a statement. "Brazilian Supreme Federal Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes's political witch hunt against Jair Bolsonaro created a persecution and censorship complex so sweeping that it not only violates basic rights of Brazilians, but also extends beyond Brazil's shores to target Americans.
"I have therefore ordered visa revocations for Moraes and his allies on the court, as well as their immediate family members effective immediately."
The visa restriction policy is pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act, which authorizes the secretary of state to not allow anyone whose entry into the United States "would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences."
Rubio, in a cable to diplomatic and consular posts on Thursday, said public comments on foreign elections "should be brief, focused on congratulating the winning candidate and, when appropriate, noted shared policy interests," according to The New York Times, which obtained the memo.
De Moraes doesn't travel often to the United States, The Washington Post reported.
Friday, de Moraes accused Bolsonaro and his son, Eduardo, of conspiring to incite U.S. hostilities against Brazil, ordering the former president to wear an ankle bracelet. Bolsonaro was also barred from contacting foreign governments, and blocked from using social media.
The judge also is investigating online misinformation, and has ordered the takedown of social media accounts that violate Brazil's freedom of speech. In 2024, Elon Musk's X restored service in the country after paying a $5 million fine and appointed a new legal representative there.
Trump's social media company, The Trump Media & Technology Group, sued de Moraes in February, accusing him of censoring conservative voices on social media.
The judge is on the judicial panel to preside over Bolsonaro's trial before Brazil's Supreme Court, who was indicted in February after the alleged coup.
Bolsonaro has been accused of attempting to violently to retain power after his 2022 election loss to Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
Lula, in a speech Thursday night, condemned Bolsonaro's supporters, whom he accused of siding with Trump about the "witch hunt."
"They're the true traitors of the homeland," he said. "They don't care about the economy of the country or the damage caused to our people."
On Monday, Trump wrote a letter to Lula threatening a 50% tariff on imported goods, because of how Bolsonaro "has been treated" and an "unfair trade relationship." Unless there is an agreement, the new rate takes effect on Aug. 1, he wrote.
Trump said that "the way Brazil has treated former President Bolsonaro, a Highly Respected Leader throughout the World during his term, including by the United States, is an international disgrace. The trial should not be taking place. It is a Witch Hunt that should end IMMEDIATELY."
Trump also noted "Brazil's insidious attacks on Free Elections, and the Fundamental Free Speech Rights of Americans."
Then on Thursday, he posted on Truth Social a letter sent to Bolsonaro about his "terrible treatment you are receiving at the hands of an unjust system turned against you," demanding an immediate trial.
"It is my sincere hope that the Government of Brazil changes course, stops attacking political opponents, and ends their ridiculous censorship regime. I will be watching closely."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
24 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Peace rally attendees in Geneva Saturday prevail through rain
Ann Wilson of Geneva wanted to help raise awareness within her community about things she finds unacceptable in our country today and felt that coming out to a peace rally in the rain this past Saturday morning was a way to do it. 'I've been to like my fifth or sixth rally that I've come to now, and I feel these are making a difference,' Wilson said as rain fell heavily just before 11:30 a.m. 'I feel like this draws attention to things and people are willing to speak out and maybe we can change some minds.' Saturday in Geneva brought together hundreds as the grass roots Fox Valley-based We Can Lead Change group gathered along south Randall Road and Gleneagle Drive in Geneva for a rally/protest called 'Together for Justice.' The 90-minute event represented the 10th held by the group, and they have continued to draw thousands, organizers said. Ellen Ljung of Geneva, one of the 10-member steering committee that leads the organization, spoke an hour before the start of the rally, which was already threatening to be cancelled due to severe weather. 'This is our 10th rally and people keep asking for them and so – we just do it. We have raincoats, we've done it [rallies] in bitter cold but people are asking for the opportunity to come together and we're getting people that have never been involved before,' Ljung said. 'When we started, we had 300 people on April 5th and our No Kings event had close to 10,000 people. I think today will be small because of the weather and it's not a national thing but we're talking thousands that have gotten involved. We're not small anymore.' Ljung spoke about the impact of the rallies on national government officials and said despite being locally based, 'They are having an effect.' 'We are giving people a way to connect and to show them our initiatives and to help people get involved,' she said. 'I think the sense of pressure is being felt by Washington because it's not just us – it's nationwide. A lot of the rallies have been on nationally-designated days and I feel the pressure is being felt. I also think it's absolutely critical for people to have an outlet to work for change.' Ljung noted that the group also offers educational programs and initiatives and 'has written representatives about the latest budget bill.' 'We've written senators and the Supreme Court asking them to protect due process,' she said. 'We worked on immigrations and met with libraries and school superintendents. Our goal is to bring people together to work for change. I'm 78 now and I never thought we'd be doing this in the last chapter of our life, but the only way to make change happen is grassroots organizing. What we do here in Kane County is a drop-in-the-bucket, but we're filling buckets around the nation and that pressure will come to bear.' Despite an 11:30 a.m. official start time, supporters were already present an hour before and drew plenty of honking horns and cheers as motorists drove by. Rain and lightning forced an early cancellation just before noon but not before Wilson and others in attendance had their say. 'We had 10,000 people at the Kings Rally we had and then we did the bridge rally with 5,000 on the Geneva Bridge,' Wilson said. 'This is a good way to build community and maybe fight.' Pamela O' Brien of Batavia sat under an umbrella and said she has been 'at every rally since [President] Trump was elected.' 'I was at a lot of the other ones – maybe eight or 10 altogether and when I know something is coming up – I cancel everything else I'm doing because I feel it's the most important thing to do right now,' she said. 'I'm surprised when other people don't.' O'Brien said looking back on the rallies she has attended, 'I see an engaged yet peaceful group of people, very passionate about keeping democracy.' 'It's a very diverse group of people as well as all kinds of issues – everything from young people afraid of what the future will bring to someone from Mexico,' she said. 'Community wise – compared to when the presidential election was over – there's been much more engagement. This whole Randall Road is touching more people and they are starting to wake up.' JoAnn Vanthournout of St. Charles, 92, attended her first rally and admitted 'I never thought I'd be a protestor at my age.' 'I never thought someone we have as president would be elected. I remember the Vietnam protests and it does feel at least like I'm trying,' she said. 'I was afraid at first but they said I could bring a chair. I'd like to come again but I'd prefer it not be raining.' Denise Ward of Geneva said this was her sixth rally and was encouraged by the turnout despite the rain. 'These rallies are making a difference,' she insisted. 'At least it shows we're not going to sit here and let things happen.'
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick says Aug. 1 date for EU tariffs is 'hard deadline'
Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said that the United States' Aug. 1 date for EU tariffs to take effect is a "hard deadline." File Photo by Chris Kleponis/UPI | License Photo July 21 (UPI) -- The United States appears firm on its slated tariff increase on the European Union following comments made by U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick over the weekend. Lutnick told CBS News' Face the Nation the Aug. 1 deadline President Donald Trump has placed on the EU is a "hard deadline." "So on Aug. 1, the new tariff rates will come in," he said. "Nothing stops countries from talking to us after August 1, but they're going to start paying the tariffs on Aug. 1." If the United States does follow through, it would place a 30% baseline tariff on the EU at the deadline. Trump has sent letters to several countries that warn increased tariffs between 20% and 50% will begin Aug. 1 unless new trade deals are achieved. The EU was the United States largest trading partner last year, when the 27-country bloc traded over $975 billion worth of goods, more than with any single nation. Lutnick also expressed doubt that tariffs could lead to inflation, that he thinks prices will be "low, shockingly low," and that "You're going to see inflation is not going to change." The EU was set to enforce tariffs on U.S. goods earlier this month in retaliation for a 25% tariff imposed by Trump on all steel and aluminum imports, but European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced last week those levies have been paused until Aug. 1 to allow for more time to negotiate.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Climate denial is tearing our nation apart — we can't wait much longer to act
We know from decades of scientific research, and now from brutal experience, that global climate change is real. Few, if any, places in the U.S. are safe from its many consequences. They are as quick as flash floods and as slow as rising seas, but they are undeniably real and growing worse. They are the physical consequences of political decisions and a physical act — namely the burning of fossil fuels. Nevertheless, we still rely on fossil fuels to meet 86 percent of the world's energy needs. Our lack of political will to change this puts us at odds with nature, ourselves, one another and our children. One result is personal and society-wide cognitive dissonance — the mental and emotional discomfort we feel when our actions clash with reality or beliefs. a recent Gallup poll shows that 63 percent of Americans believe global warming is underway, and that 48 percent — a record — believe it will seriously threaten their way of life. Yet more Americans are moving into places with high risks of climate-related disasters rather than out of them. Fifty-two percent of us, according to another survey, want global warming to be a high priority for the president and Congress. Nearly 70 percent support America's transition to 100 percent clean energy by mid-century. And almost 80 percent want the U.S. to participate in the Paris climate agreement. Yet we tolerate a national government whose climate and energy policies are diametrically opposed to what most Americans say they want. National energy policy has become a pitched battle, not only between two political parties, but also between two classes of resources. One, which has dominated economic development since the 18th century, consists of the detritus of plants and animals that died hundreds of millions of years ago. We drill, blast and bulldoze the ground to get it. We foul the air and damage human health when we burn it. By transferring carbon from the Earth to the atmosphere, we are altering the conditions that have supported life for the past 12,000 years. The other group of energy resources includes sunlight, wind, water, geothermal temperatures, and other assets that are less expensive, ubiquitous, easily accessible, inexhaustible, indigenous and capable of liberating us from our dependence on foreign oil and utility monopolies. Shifting from old energy to new would be disruptive, but it could not be clearer why it's necessary. Scientists say that to stabilize the climate, two-thirds of the world's remaining fossil fuel reserves must stay in the ground. For obvious reasons (the reserves are said to be worth at least $20 trillion), the industry isn't willing to accept this prescription. The battle between two energy futures became political in the 1990s, when Republicans shifted from supporting climate action to helping the fossil-energy sector discredit and deny climate science. The industry richly rewards Republicans for their support. One analysis found the oil sector spent $450 million on election campaigns, advertising and lobbying to influence the 118th Congress and Donald Trump's positions during the 2024 election cycle. The dissonance between politics, policy and physical reality is causing dissonance between generations. Eight years ago, a study in the respected health journal The Lancet concluded, 'Youth depression is a burgeoning illness that may be uniquely sensitive to changes in the global climate.' For example, the Oregon Health Authority found in 2020 that its young people felt stress, anxiety, isolation, frustration and depression because adults weren't taking sufficient action to prevent climate change. Climate denial persists. After scanning the literature, artificial intelligence explains that climate denial is 'a complex issue with psychological roots including motivated reasoning, ideological worldviews, fear and anxiety, social and cultural influences, and cognitive biases.' Denial can be explicit or implicit. Explicit denial rejects science and the need to shift our energy paradigm. It is irrational. Science is replete with issues that result in reasonable differences of opinion, but climate change is not one of them. As Psychology Today points out, 'We can affirm without doubt that anthropogenic climate change is a real phenomenon that is already apparent and will, if not mitigated, cause terrible suffering and destruction before this century is over.' But for some, climate change is a reality 'too big to believe.' Implicit denial accepts the science but fails to act. It is becoming more common as the weather worsens, but the majority don't mobilize against fossil fuels. We have mobilized several times in the past to save industries that are 'too big to fail.' None is more important than climate stability. There are hopeful signs. For example, Florida developers built a community the size of Manhattan where buildings are designed to withstand hurricanes. A 150-megawatt solar farm and underground transmission lines prevent extreme weather from interrupting power. The community preserves 90 percent of its land as wetlands to absorb stormwater and reduce flooding. During Hurricane Milton last fall, 2,000 Floridians found sanctuary and uninterrupted electricity in the community's buildings. The insurance industry reportedly is innovating to keep its premiums affordable and losses lower. One idea is community-based catastrophe insurance, where the local government, a homeowners association, or another entity provides coverage for its members while reducing premiums with bulk purchasing and hazard mitigation measures. Moving people and property out of high-risk places is another idea that may be gaining traction. It remains relatively rare because no single federal program or agency provides adequate help. But 'managed retreats' within municipal borders allow governments to retain their tax base. A study of 11 relocated communities in the Midwest found that it reduced flood exposure by over 95 percent. Another study concluded that moving properties out of flood zones was by far the most cost-effective way to reduce disaster risks, saving $6.50 for every dollar spent. There's no mystery about what we should do to minimize dissonance. Congress wrote the prescription into America's foundational environmental law in 1970. It said national policy should 'create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony, and fulfill the social, economic, and other requirements of present and future generations of Americans.' Time will tell whether we are smart enough to accomplish that mission. But we already know this: No nation is healthy when floods are sweeping children away, fires are burning families alive in their homes, and tornadoes are leveling entire towns as its people do nothing of consequence to keep those tragedies from becoming normal. William S. Becker is a former official at the U.S. Energy Department and founder of its Center of Excellence for Sustainable Development during the Clinton administration. He is the author of '
