Was the first National convention a success?
Those in the tent are hailing it a success.
But, many stood outside calling it a waste of time and money.
The DA, Freedom Front Plus and ActionSA pulled out of what they called a costly talk shop.
While, Legacy Foundations stayed away saying the dialogue had lost its focus.
A broad-based steering committee to oversee and guide the dialogue will be finalised in the next two weeks.
e spoke to governance expert, Sam Koma, to discuss the talks over the past two days.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
37 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: New reform tracker helps answer the question, ‘Will SA be okay?'
Finally, we are getting a live report card to help us answer this question. Last week, I was asked to be MC at the two launches of the Business Leadership SA Reform Tracker. It has a rather grand title. But, unlike so many other names in the economic and political space, it does what it says on the tin. It is tracking our reforms. Not quite minute by minute, but not far off. As someone who identifies as a 'journalist' and watches everything that happens as much as I can, I'm often asked certain questions by people I bump into, or audiences I speak in front of. The questions are wide-ranging, from 'who should I vote for' to 'should I emigrate', to 'will our economy start to grow now that…' I could go on. But in reality, they're the same question. Everyone who asks me one of those questions is asking something much more fundamental. They're asking, really: 'Will South Africa be okay?' It was a question summed up incredibly well by my old journalistic colleague and friend, Jan-Jan Joubert. He wrote a very well-researched answer and published it as a book. There is something almost peculiar to the South African middle class about this question. I don't think people in New Zealand or, dare I say it this particular Monday, Australia ask themselves this. Or people in the UK or Spain — despite the fact that in both those countries there are serious economic and political problems. But, considering the era of State Capture we have come from, I think it's fully understandable. I mean, look around. In Johannesburg, the mayor blames the DA for the state of the city while he himself has not appointed a finance head, or someone to actually manage the roads. That pothole that you see twice a day? There is actually no one in charge of fixing that right now. Our economy is still growing incredibly slowly, and it seems that people are putting more energy into arguing about the definition of employment than actually making changes that will result in more jobs. Just this weekend we saw a liar, someone who was central to the Guptas, who has been able to use the Hawks to have his ex-wife literally locked up in jail, still mouthing off about the state of the ANC? Malusi Gigaba should be in court. Not being given interview after interview as the chairperson of a portfolio committee in Parliament. But as we all know, there are virtually no Zondo prosecutions. And institutions such as Transnet are still battling to recover from State Capture. Progress However, it's important to note that there is progress. Finally, we are getting a live report card to help us answer the question: 'Will South Africa be okay?' Last week, I was asked to be MC at the two launches of the Business Leadership South Africa Reform Tracker. It has a rather grand title. But, unlike so many other names in the economic and political space, it does what it says on the tin. It is tracking our reforms. Not quite minute by minute, but not far off. Now, when I was at school, my reports were written in quite dry, dull text. They were very different from my tests, in which red was a prominent feature. Here, you get red, yellow and green. So at a glance, you can see how we are doing. But you can also click on each little tile and read what has been written about that sector. It might be that there is progress but still work to do; the story might be a lot more complicated than a single colour can indicate. And, wonderfully, there is also a way for you, perhaps as someone working in one of these sectors, to send some feedback. You might know that something has changed, or that in fact there has been more progress than the tracker is showing. Now, as a journalist, it's tempting to look for the red and start to get a little stroppy with a few politicians. Journalistic instincts But Dr Stuart Theobald, the founder and chairperson at Krutham who put the whole thing together, tells me that we should just wait a little before people like me go back to our journalistic instincts. He acknowledges that, yes, some reforms have stopped because of political problems, or opposition. And some have just failed. But some have been stopped deliberately, because the reform no longer makes sense. In other words, yes it's stopped — but for a good reason. So, if you are interested, it does make sense to actually go a little deeper into each sector, just to see how things really are. I know that one of the reasons you really read this is because you are searching for an answer to that question: 'Will South Africa be okay?' I mean, there is a lot to be worried about. Just as there is in the US, or China, or many, many other places right now. It might be worth just checking in with this tracker from time to time. Perhaps put it on your browser dashboard or something.
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
National Dialogue Exposed as a Talk Shop: No Roadmap, No Accountability, No Future
From the start, President Cyril Ramaphosa's weak and uninspired remarks set the tone for what became a complaints session masquerading as a national renewal project. Citizens once again listed the failures of the State, but this time, with no pathway to solutions, says the writer. Following ActionSA's decision not to participate in the National Dialogue Convention but to deploy observers, ActionSA has noted the outcomes of the Convention, which, instead of charting a clear way forward with a defined end state, quickly descended into a stage-managed talk shop that was heavy on rhetoric and empty on solutions. The lack of proper organisation was glaring from the outset. It soon became clear that Ramaphosa's Convention was nothing more than a venting session without answers, met with youth rejection and no plan to confront corruption. From the start, President Cyril Ramaphosa's weak and uninspired remarks set the tone for what became a complaints session masquerading as a national renewal project. Citizens once again listed the failures of the State, but this time, with no pathway to solutions.
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
National Dialogue Exposed as a Talk Shop: No Roadmap, No Accountability, No Future
Lerato Ngobeni | Published 54 minutes ago Following ActionSA's decision not to participate in the National Dialogue Convention but to deploy observers, ActionSA has noted the outcomes of the Convention, which, instead of charting a clear way forward with a defined end state, quickly descended into a stage-managed talk shop that was heavy on rhetoric and empty on solutions. The lack of proper organisation was glaring from the outset. It soon became clear that Ramaphosa's Convention was nothing more than a venting session without answers, met with youth rejection and no plan to confront corruption. From the start, President Cyril Ramaphosa's weak and uninspired remarks set the tone for what became a complaints session masquerading as a national renewal project. Citizens once again listed the failures of the State, but this time, with no pathway to solutions. Five Observations from the National Convention Failure of Leadership: The President failed to inspire or outline a roadmap. He recycled excuses instead of presenting a vision for the country. A Complaints Session, not a Problem-Solving Forum: Citizens expressed frustrations about collapsing services, poverty, and joblessness. Yet there was no mechanism to convert complaints into binding commitments or action. Youth Disillusionment: Young South Africans rejected the process outright, questioning why they should waste time on leaders who have failed to deliver jobs, safety, or a better future. Ward-Based Sessions as Political Theatre: The proposed ward sessions are already exposed as a ploy to revive dormant ANC branches under the guise of consultation, not as a genuine exercise in participatory democracy. Critical Omissions – Corruption and Accountability: Most shockingly, there was no dedicated stream on corruption, the very cancer hollowing out South Africa's democracy and destroying public trust. A dialogue that refuses to confront corruption is dishonest and incomplete. The withdrawal of respected legacy foundations underscores the lack of credibility in this process. The inclusion of political parties also raises serious concerns, as only one party elevated to the steering committee will entrench partisan advantage instead of genuine multiparty collaboration, despite the ANC displaying a willingness not to be part of the political party steering committee representative. And so, much like the Freedom Charter of 1955, the National Dialogue risks becoming nothing more than a wish list without a coherent plan. Without a binding framework, South Africans will again be left with empty promises written on borrowed paper. South Africans don't need another talk shop and venting session. They need leadership with the courage to define the destination, chart the roadmap and deliver on it. Until then, this National Dialogue will remain pure political theatre, heavy on words, but bankrupt on action. Lerato Ngobeni MP ActionSA Parliamentary Chief Whip
