
Fake discounts and pressure tactics: How Shein has become the target of Ireland's consumer watchdog
Chinese fast fashion brand Shein is usually in the news because of its poor human rights and environmental record. This week, its anti-consumer practices came under the spotlight.
The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC), along with the European Commission and national consumer authorities in Belgium, France and The Netherlands have called on Shein to rectify several practices on its platform that potentially breach EU consumer law.
Shein routinely uses fake discounts, which seem to offer better deals by showing price reductions, but these reductions are not actually based on prior prices, as required by EU law.
They also use pressure tactics: using false deadlines to make consumers feel they have to act now or lose out on a bargain. The consumer body says the site also displays incomplete and incorrect information about a consumer's rights to return goods and receive refunds.
There's also deceptive labelling, where it's suggested the product offers something special when in fact the relevant feature is required by law.
Misleading claims is another issue. This is where the site gives false or deceptive information about the sustainability benefits of certain products.
And if you want to contact Shein with questions or complaints, you're going to have trouble finding its contact details — another potential breach of consumer law.
The CCPC says information has been requested to assess the company's compliance with further obligations, including those around product rankings, ratings and reviews, and third-party sellers.
Shein now has one month to propose commitments on how it will address the identified consumer law issues. Picture: Reuters/Dado Ruvic/Illustration
Last April, Shein was designated as a Very Large Online Platform under the Digital Services Act. Shein then had four months to comply with the most stringent obligations applicable to these platforms. These include the obligation to assess and mitigate any systemic risks stemming from its services.
The European Commission is currently carrying out a preliminary Digital Services Act investigation of Shein that concerns, among other things, the presence of illegal content and goods on Shein's marketplace, the transparency of its recommender systems and measures to mitigate risks relating to consumer protection, public health and users' wellbeing.
The ongoing investigation, which is being carried out through the European Commission's Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) network is co-led by the CCPC, together with consumer authorities in Belgium, France and The Netherlands under the coordination of the European Commission.
Shein now has one month to propose commitments on how it will address the identified consumer law issues. Depending on its reply, the CPC may enter a dialogue with the company, and if it does not address the concerns identified, national authorities may take enforcement measures to ensure compliance. Any resultant fines will be based on the company's annual turnover in the relevant member states.
Patrick Kenny is a member of the CCPC. He says consumers should be allowed to shop without being put under pressure by fake deadlines or misled by fake discounts.
They also need clear information about how consumers can contact the company, how to return an item and receive a refund. In this case, the CCPC and the CPC network have identified several practices that could mislead consumers or undermine their consumer rights.
"E-retailers and online marketplaces have a legal obligation to provide transparent and honest information about the products they sell, and consumers' rights around returns. The CCPC takes any breaches of the law very seriously and looks forward to constructive engagement with Shein during the course of this investigation.'
Boots Ireland pleaded guilty to breaking sales-pricing legislation. File picture
The big problem with Shein is, of course, its contribution to ecological degradation and abusive labour practices. A recent BBC investigation into the online retailer found workers were routinely spending 75 hours a week bent over sewing machines — in contravention of China's own labour laws. In 2023, the company admitted to finding two cases of child labour in its supply chain.
The company's runaway success has been built on selling dresses and tops that cost next to nothing, which is a seductive business model in an era of runaway inflation on almost everything else.
But i n a world in climate crisis, how we choose to spend our money today has a direct impact on the lives of others. Buying cheap clothes that don't last is getting more and more difficult to justify.
Meanwhile, the CCPC has also been busy bringing Irish-based retailers into line with sales pricing legislation. In the Dublin District Court on Monday, Boots Retail (Ireland) Limited pleaded guilty to breaking this legislation.
The pharmacy and beauty chain was ordered by Judge Anthony Halpin to pay €1,000 to the Little Flower Penny Dinners charity and to pay the costs of the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission. Section 1 of the Probation of Offenders Act "is to be applied upon compliance with the court order".
The prosecution was brought by the CCPC against Boots Ireland following online sweeps conducted over the 2023-2024 winter sales season, including Black Friday.
CCPC chair Brian McHugh: 'Businesses need to be able to compete for consumers openly and honestly on price.'
This case forms part of the first wave of prosecutions under sales pricing legislation introduced in 2022, after Lifestyle Sports, DID Electrical, and Rath-Wood also pleaded guilty to breaking the same legislation in March of this year.
The law requires traders to base any discount on the lowest price in at least the previous 30 days, and to display this price clearly on any price tag or advertisement.
Suppose, for example, a product is priced at €1,649 from December 23, 2024, to January 24, 2025. On January 25, 2025, until February 8, 2025, the price of the product is increased to €1,949. On February 9, 2025, the price is reduced to €1,579 with an indicated prior price of €1,949 in the price reduction announcement, despite the lowest price in the previous 30 days before this reduction being €1,649.
If a trader increases the price of a product for a short period before immediately reducing the price back to its previous price, the trader can't use this briefly-increased price as the prior price in its price reduction announcement, as this is not the lowest price in at least the previous 30 days.
Chairperson of the CCPC, Brian McHugh, pointed out that misleading sale discounts harm consumers and harm competition.
'Businesses need to be able to compete for consumers openly and honestly on price. Transparency around sales discounts allows consumers to make informed decisions about their purchases and to shop with confidence.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
The Irish Independent's View: Donald Trump's tariff woes may turn into Europe's golden opportunity
Were he to do so, a quote from Julius Caesar about 'a tide in the affairs of man' and how 'we must take the current when it serves, Or lose our ventures' seems pertinent. Portentous events within the US courts, and in his own political circle, should give pause for thought. The ruling putting a brake on his 'Liberation Day' tariff wall is a setback, no matter what Republicans say. The sudden departure of the world's richest man, Elon Musk, from his court of invincibles has suddenly introduced a sense of vulnerability to the administration. Insiders played down the implications of the tariffs block being turned around on appeal. 'If anybody thinks this caught the administration by surprise, think again,' trade adviser Peter Navarro said. But the timing is fortuitous, to say the least, for the EU, as it goes eyeball to eyeball in a crucial stage of crunch trade talks with Trump. Brussels is in a desperate race to avoid a 50pc general tariff that the president threatened. However, a 'very nice' call with European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen has secured a stay on this until July 9. The finding by the US Court of International Trade that the president had exceeded his authority in invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act as a basis for imposing draconian levies is a blow. ADVERTISEMENT Analysts feel the impact may be limited for the trade talks, given the other tariff options available. However, the court's insistence that the US constitution confers on Congress exclusive powers to regulate commerce with other nations, and therefore could not be over-ridden by the president, may embolden countries to hold out, at the very least, until there is greater clarity. As noted by Letitia James, the attorney general of New York, one of 12 states involved in the lawsuit: 'The law is clear: no president has the power to single-handedly raise taxes whenever they like.' The tariffs saga is likely to have many more twists and turns, as illustrated by the US federal appeals court decision last night to temporarily reinstate the tariffs. Trump has bristled at the latest 'Taco' label he has been tagged with (Trump always chickens out) when the markets put the heat on, but there is enough truth in it to encourage some to be defiant. Brussels has been given another card to play, and it would be naive not to. Kowtowing can only result in more volatility as Trump will surely up the ante. If the bloc is to be taken seriously as a player on the world stage, it must flex some financial muscle. The departure of Elon Musk also suggests there may be some blood in the water. Quitting only a day after slamming Trump's landmark 'big beautiful bill' for undermining spending cuts suggests division in the ranks. Trump's difficulty could be the EU's opportunity.


Irish Independent
5 hours ago
- Irish Independent
‘It's been a great adventure' – Peter Bellew leaves Riyadh Air role after almost three years
Mr Bellew has been with the airline, which is due to begin scheduled flights later this year, for almost three years and his current role was announced just over two years ago. Earlier this year, Riyadh Air postponed its launch date to later in 2025 due to supply chain issues at Boeing. The carrier is aiming to make Riyadh a hub for traffic between Asia, Africa and Europe. By 2030 its target is to serve 100 destinations. Riyadh Air, backed by Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund, will be the second flag-carrier in the country, with the government already owning airline Saudia. Riyadh Air has billions of dollars' worth of orders from Boeing and Airbus and is planning to have a fleet of up to 200 jets. Getting a new widebody airline licence, launching an airline, and building a super team was fascinating Last autumn, it placed an order for 60 Airbus A321 jets and it also has orders for Boeing Dreamliners. Riyadh Air's CEO is Tony Douglas, a former executive at Abu Dhabi's Etihad. Mr Bellew confirmed his departure from Riyadh Air. 'It has been a great adventure with Riyadh Air for the last three years,' he said. 'Getting a new widebody airline licence, launching an airline, and building a super team was fascinating. Being welcomed by the wonderful Saudi people was the highlight.' He said he is 'optimistic for the future' and that the 'journey is the reward'. Mr Bellew, from Co Meath, was CEO of Malaysia Airlines before rejoining Ryanair in 2017 as chief operations officer. He was hired by Michael O'Leary as Ryanair dealt with pilot unrest that ultimately resulted in company-wide union recognition. In 2019, Mr Bellew announced that he was leaving Ryanair and later said he would be joining EasyJet as its chief operating officer. Ryanair tried to enforce a non-compete clause, taking a case against Mr Bellew in the High Court. But Mr Bellew won, with the High Court ruling a non-compete clause in his contract was not enforceable. Mr Bellew resigned from EasyJet in 2022. Mr Douglas told Reuters last month that Riyadh Air would be interested in acquiring Boeing aircraft that Chinese carriers have opted not to take due to the trade war that erupted between the US and the rest of the world, should the opportunity arise..

The Journal
10 hours ago
- The Journal
Trump claims China has 'totally violated' tariff de-escalation deal with the US
US PRESIDENT DONALD Trump has accused China of violating a tariff de-escalation deal, while saying he expects to eventually speak with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. His comments came hours after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that trade talks with Beijing were 'a bit stalled' in an interview with broadcaster Fox News. Earlier this month, the world's two biggest economies agreed to temporarily lower staggeringly high tariffs they had imposed on each other, in a pause to last 90 days. But today, Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform: 'China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' without providing further details. He told reporters this afternoon: 'I'm sure that I'll speak to President Xi, and hopefully we'll work that out.' Trump's deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told reporters that with China failing to fulfill its obligations, 'that opens up all manner of action for the United States to ensure future compliance.' US stock markets closed mixed, after fluctuating in the day on jitters that Trump could return to a more confrontational stance on China. Market jitters On Wall Street, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed higher, while the S&P 500 index was flat, and the tech-focused Nasdaq Composite fell 0.3%. 'If it weren't for the trade war, the market would be feeling pretty good,' said Tom Cahill of Ventura Wealth Management. Advertisement 'Inflation is definitely moving in the right direction,' he added, referencing the Federal Reserve's favored inflation gauge, which cooled more than expected last month, according to fresh data published today. In Europe, London and Germany's major indices ended higher, while France's CAC40 closed lower, following declines in Asian markets earlier in the day. 'If President Trump does slap tariffs back on Chinese imports to the US… we may see demand for US assets, and the dollar, severely impaired by a chaotic and undiplomatic approach to trade policy,' said Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB. Earlier, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CNBC: 'The Chinese are slow-rolling their compliance, which is completely unacceptable.' While Greer did not go into specifics, he noted reports that Beijing continues to 'slow down and choke off things like critical minerals and rare earth magnets,' adding that the US trade deficit with China is still 'enormous.' Greer said that Washington was not seeing major shifts in Beijing's behavior. Forthcoming deals? Washington is also in 'intensive talks' with other trading partners, Greer told CNBC, saying he has meetings next week with counterparts from Malaysia, Vietnam and the European Union. The meetings come as he heads to Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) talks in Europe. 'The negotiations are on track, and we do hope to have some deals in the next couple of weeks,' Greer said. Washington and Tokyo are making progress towards a deal, Kyodo News reported, citing Japan's tariffs envoy Ryosei Akazawa. Akazawa, who met with Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick in Washington, expects another round of talks before mid-June. But Trump's tariff plans are facing legal challenges. Related Reads White House complains of 'judicial coup' after US court blocks Trump's sweeping import tariffs 'Wait and see': Taoiseach says Trump's extension on tariff threat could stifle economic growth Trump says 50% tariffs on EU delayed until 9 July after 'very nice call' with von der Leyen On Wednesday, the New York-based Court of International Trade ruled that the tariffs were unconstitutional, and that Trump did not have the authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose them. The White House bit back at the decision, calling it 'blatantly wrong' while accusing the court of attempting to 'usurp' Trump's authority. However, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Thursday temporarily reinstated Trump's sweeping measures, requesting instead that both sides issue written arguments on the matter before a final ruling is made by next month. Greer said it was important to get through the legal process so partners have a 'better understanding of the landing zone.' Since Trump returned to the presidency, he has slapped sweeping tariffs on most US trading partners, with especially high rates on Chinese imports. New tit-for-tat levies on both sides reached three digits before the de-escalation this month, where Washington agreed to temporarily reduce additional tariffs on Chinese imports from 145% to 30%. China, meanwhile, lowered its added duties from 125% to 10%. The US level is higher as it includes a 20% that Trump imposed on Chinese goods over the country's alleged role in the illicit drug trade – an accusation that Beijing has pushed back against. The high US-China tariffs, while still in place, forced many businesses to pause shipments as they waited for both governments to strike a deal. With reporting from © AFP 2025 Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal