EXCLUSIVE Teacher Michelle Martin sues Cairns Rudolf Steiner School over right to disconnect laws
Michelle Martin, who was a Class 1 teacher at Cairns Rudolf Steiner School in Kuranda State Forest, Queensland, filed a statement of claim in federal court in May.
In it, she accused the independent school, which is also run under the name Cairns Hinterland Steiner, of unfair dismissal and has sought a payout of $780,000.
Ms Martin alleged she was targeted after complaining about child safety and a person reviewing the school.
She also said they insisted on contacting her during the holiday period, when she was exercising her 'right to disconnect'.
Under laws launched by the Albanese government in August 2024, employees have the right to refuse employer or third-party contact outside working hours.
By citing the law in her statement, Ms Martin's case is understood to be a first for Australia in referencing the new workplace rules.
'Teaching is the only profession that creates all others,' Ms Martin's legal representative Tom O'Donnell, from O'Donnell Legal, told Daily Mail Australia.
'We understand this case may help clarify how the Right to Disconnect provisions operate in practice - not just for teachers, but for all Australian workers.'
In March, the Fair Work Commission heard that Ms Martin made two complaints to the school between January and March last year.
She then took leave due to stress and a medical report informed the school on August 27 that discussing the prospect of not returning to work could make exacerbate it.
The commission also heard that discussing potential legal consequences, negative feedback or warnings could also negatively impact her.
On September 12, despite recommendations and during school holiday, the school emailed Ms Martin a letter setting out six allegations of 'management matters'.
The letter told her to respond in writing by close of business in eight days, still during the holiday period.
Ms Martin responded through her solicitor, pointing out that it was the school holidays and that she was receiving treatment for a medical condition.
'The response referred to the right to disconnect... and proposed a revised date,' the commission heard, but the school maintained Ms Martin was not on holiday.
On October 8, Ms Martin was dismissed, 'purportedly based on (her) failure to respond to the allegations,' the commission heard.
The school refuted allegations it had breached workplace rights or contraventions during the commission's hearing. Daily Mail Australia has contacted it for comment.
In Ms Martin's statement of claim, filed on May 2, she argued she lost out on thousands of dollars.
She claimed she would have stayed on in the role for six years, which meant she lost $730,000 in income. She also requested $50,000 for hurt and humiliation.
Her claim said the refusal to extend the deadline to respond, and the decision to sack her, 'directly or indirectly prevented the applicant from exercising her right to disconnect'.
'For Ms Martin and her family, these proceedings represent her legal right to seek redress following the termination of her employment as a teacher,' Mr O'Donnell said.
With legal proceedings underway, Mr O'Donnell said it would be inappropriate to comment on specific details of the case.
According to the new workplace laws, a worker can legally ignore calls and texts from their boss out of hours.
But it doesn't apply to emergencies, and working out what's reasonable includes the reason for making contact, how disruptive it is, the nature of someone's job and their personal circumstances including caring responsibilities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Gina Rinehart's apocalyptic visions for bush summits just the latest in a history of climate science denialism
You won't be able to have a cremation because the ovens won't be allowed to run on fossil fuels, and hospitals will be forced to shut for more than half the year because they've emitted too much CO2. Are you terrified yet? This is the vaguely comical and imagined world of Gina Rinehart, who wants people to think a George Orwell-style climate police state is just around the corner thanks to Australia's decision to join more than 130 other countries in backing the need to get greenhouse gas emissions to net zero. The mining billionaire laid this all out in a column for the Herald Sun this week, as part of a News Corp series of bush summits her companies are sponsoring. Rinehart's article was stuffed with more straw men than a Wizard of Oz convention where the only cosplay allowed is the Scarecrow. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Her argument – if you can call it that – is that Australia should have negotiated 'carve-outs' for a whole range of industries under the Paris climate agreement and, because it didn't, those industries will now be 'forced' to either down tools or go electric to be able to operate. Rinehart opened with a complaint that Australia had not negotiated a Paris 'carve-out' for its defence industry emissions. But in fact, much of the reporting in the Paris agreement is voluntary, including emissions from warfare – and in any case, Australia does in fact exclude reporting of defence and security agency emissions in its 2030 target. 'Our hospitals, again no carve-out – nurses, doctors, technicians forced to acquire EVs to be able to see patients. Who really wants this?' she went on. Perhaps the question should not be 'who really wants this' but rather, who has ever suggested that anyone would be 'forced' by climate policies to buy an electric vehicle? The answer is absolutely nobody – except, perhaps, Australia's richest person. What else is going to happen in Rinehart's alternative universe, where the imagined climate police are out to confiscate your tractor as soon as look at you? Here's just a short list from her column. Defence manufacturers would 'be forced to close for much of the year at least' The Royal Flying Doctor Service would not be able to collect any patients for eight months of the year 'as we've exceeded our emissions permitted' Cancer and maternity patients would be left to fend for themselves because 'we have to close the hospitals for nine or 10 months of the year' Funerals would be delayed because of something to do with refrigeration and 'ovens' – honestly, you'll have to work that one out for yourself 'It's time for truth,' wrote Rinehart, signing off with not even a whiff of irony. Other high-profile corporates sponsoring the summits, include Woolworths, Optus, Commonwealth Bank and Qantas. The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, is due to give a keynote at one in Ballarat next Friday. Rinehart also delivered a speech for the opening of the first summit in Broome this week, promoted by The Australian newspaper. 'Many of our farmers and their families and farms are already suffering from net zero ideology,' she said. 'They have more than enough to worry about with devastating droughts, floods, fires.' After removing their heads from their desks, climate scientists will point out that the risks of worsening droughts, floods and fires can be laid at the door of rising greenhouse gas emissions. Here's one now. 'Fire risk has increased due to climate change with increased fire season length, number of fire danger days, intensity and area burnt and this will also worsen with further climate change,' says emeritus professor Mark Howden, of the Australian National University. 'Climate change caused by human emissions of greenhouse gases is unequivocally increasing temperatures across Australia's farming lands and across the southern half of the nation and is driving down growing seasonal rainfall and water availability. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'This has dragged back the productivity and profitability of broadacre farming by around 20% compared with what it would otherwise be. A huge climate-change hit already. And worse is on the way.' Natalie Collard is the chief executive of Farmers for Climate Action – a group of more than 8,400 farmers and farming community members (the clue on what they want is in the name). 'I'm not aware of any country that is forcing anyone – let alone farmers – to change their combustion engines to EVs,' Collard pointed out. The organisation surveyed more than 700 farmers and people working in related industries in 2023, and 92% said they had seen climate-related 'on-farm impacts' in the last three years. Collard said 55% of farmers had identified climate change as the biggest threat to the future of farming, with the next-highest threat being bureaucracy, and red tape coming in at 15%. 'We know farmers are on the frontlines of climate change and they are hurting the most,' she said. There are real concerns from farmers and environmentalists about the roll-out of renewable energy, and those concerns should be listened to. But it is hard to see how imagined scare stories will help them negotiate the best outcomes for their future. Some of the organised voices railing against renewable energy and net zero have a history of also rejecting the risks of climate change. Their wild fear-mongering on net zero can be seen as the other side of the climate denial coin. Rinehart's climate science-denialism is well known and long-standing. In a 2021 video to students of her former girls' school she described concerns over climate change as 'propaganda'. In 2011, she wrote she was unconvinced that adding CO2 to the atmosphere could cause significant warming of the atmosphere. Rinehart has poured millions of dollars into the Institute of Public Affairs – another outspoken critic of net zero that continues to promote fringe and contrarian views on climate change. Her sponsorship of News Corp's bush summits has given her a vehicle to continue her anti-science crusade. Graham Readfearn is Guardian Australia's environment and climate correspondent
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
How the Bendigo writers' festival's code of conduct caused a walkout and claims of censorship
Last Wednesday, just two days before opening, Bendigo writers' festival sent its lineup of more than 90 participants an email that would end up derailing the three-day event. The email contained a code of conduct, including directions to 'avoid language or topics that could be considered inflammatory, divisive, or disrespectful'. Speakers on panels presented by festival sponsor La Trobe University were also required to comply with La Trobe's anti-racism plan, including the contentious definition of antisemitism adopted by Universities Australia in February. The response was swift. By Thursday evening, high-profile participants including the Palestinian Australian author and academic Dr Randa Abdel-Fattah and the Stella prize-winning First Nations poet Dr Evelyn Araluen had withdrawn from the festival, citing censorship concerns. And by Friday afternoon, about 30 participants had pulled out, including high-profile authors such as the La Trobe University academic Prof Clare Wright, Paul Daley, Jock Serong, Thomas Mayo and Jess Hill, forcing the cancellation of the opening night address. On Monday, BWF confirmed to Guardian Australia that 53 participants had withdrawn, resulting in 22 sessions – a third of the program – being cancelled, including the closing ceremony on Sunday night. The boycott and controversy are the latest in a string of high-profile tussles over freedom of expression involving pro-Palestine artists, including the sacking (and reinstatement) of Lebanese Australian artist Khaled Sabsabi as Australia's representative to the Venice Biennale, and the stripping of a government-funded writing fellowship from the First Nations author K A Ren Wyld. Writers' festivals have become fraught events, but never before has a backlash been so swift or produced such debilitating results as in Bendigo. On Monday, the festival said it was still tallying the cost of refunding tickets – but the reputational damage had already been deeply felt. Its founding director, Rosemary Sorensen, accused the festival of exercising an 'authoritarian abuse of power'; Noongar author Claire G Coleman called the code of conduct 'condescending and insulting'; and Abdel-Fattah, sharing her withdrawal letter on Instagram, wrote: 'At a time when journalists are being permanently silenced by Israel's genocidal forces, it is incomprehensible that a writers' festival should also seek to silence Palestinian voices.' Samuel Cairnduff, a lecturer in culture and communication at the University of Melbourne, described the mass withdrawal as 'a vote of no confidence in institutional leadership that has forgotten why it exists'. Abdel-Fattah had been scheduled to appear on a La Trobe-sponsored panel titled On Reckonings, speaking about her new novel Discipline, which reflects on the silencing of Palestinians in academia and the media. 'How ironic that they would invite me, knowing what my book is about, on a panel called 'reckonings', where I'm going to be discussing a book on silencing Palestinians – and then attempt to silence me,' she told Guardian Australia. Abdel-Fattah said her withdrawal was more than a matter of principle. After receiving the code of conduct, she believed participating in the BWF 'would have resulted … in some kind of media coverage demonising me'. She believes this is part of a larger move to silence Palestinian voices. '[For] most institutions and organisations, it becomes a cost-benefit risk analysis: I become a Palestinian who is dealt with in terms of risk. I'm a risk management crisis.' A festival spokesperson said: 'The City [of Greater Bendigo which runs the festival] and La Trobe University, as the Festival's Presenting Partner, agreed to issue a one-page Code of Conduct to emphasise the importance of safety and wellbeing for all participants.' The code of conduct 'was never intended to silence anyone, but rather to allow discussions to happen while ensuring the safe participation and inclusion of everyone,' the spokesperson said. BWF did not respond directly to Guardian Australia's questions about whether the code of conduct was issued at the request of La Trobe, instead directing questions to the university. Nor did BWF respond to a question about why the code was sent just two days before the festival opened. A spokesperson for the university said: 'La Trobe will always take seriously any concerns raised about community safety and inclusion – including cultural safety – and we welcome feedback on our public events and engagement.' On Monday, it was revealed that the Australian Academic Alliance Against Antisemitism, or 5A, group wrote to La Trobe and BWF in July, urging them to 'implement immediate measures' concerning the inclusion of Abdel-Fattah; and characterising her as a person who 'perpetually dehumanises people who hold Zionist views'. It's not clear whether the letter played any part in the decision to issue the code of conduct, and La Trobe and BWF refused to comment on the matter. The timing of the email announcing the code has been criticised as well as its content. 'When you consider how long ago I was invited to the festival, [this] was an unacceptably short time to consider such a change,' Coleman said in her letter to the festival, shared on Instagram. Cairnduff wrote that the festival's last-minute approach is part of a broader trend of late-stage risk mitigation – 'a governance approach that frequently generates greater controversy than it prevents because it fundamentally alters the terms of engagement after commitments have been made'. Louise Adler, the director of Adelaide Writers' Week, which has faced criticism and withdrawal of sponsorship over its programming of Palestinian and pro-Palestine authors, says the BWF 'debacle' is 'symptomatic of the current environment' in the arts. Other high profile controversies included actors wearing keffiyehs at a Sydney Theatre Company curtain call; pianist Jayson Gillham suing the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra for cancelling one of his concerts, after he made a statement criticising Israel's targeting of journalists in Gaza; and the National Gallery of Australia covering up two Palestinian flags in a textile work by the Aotearoa New Zealand collective SaVĀge K'lub. 'We have witnessed a succession of pre-emptive buckles by arts managers second-guessing risk-averse boards who collectively (with management) are concerned about the reputational damage, the withdrawal of desperately needed sponsorship, and the relentless media campaigns that lobby groups can and do orchestrate with the help of News Ltd,' Adler says. 'The arts community needs boards that have courage and [who] understand their role, the importance of curatorial independence and that the artists who choose to work with these organisations are entitled to full-throated and unwavering support.' Adler says the Adelaide writers' festival's code of conduct is limited to 'compliance with Australian laws regarding racial discrimination, vilification, hate speech and incitement to violence'. 'During my tenure there has not been a single incident requiring intervention,' she says. Denis Muller, a senior research fellow with the University of Melbourne's Centre for Advancing Journalism, describes the festival's code of conduct as 'extremely vague and oppressive', one that 'no self-respecting journalist or writer is going to adhere to'. 'The body politic in Australia is in the process of recalibrating the whole idea of where moral authority rests in the Middle East. This is a period of transition, and it's extremely tense,' he says. In a previous piece for the Conversation, Muller wrote about the 'fraught position' writers' festivals are now in: 'They navigate the frontier between social media's echo chambers of outrage and the traditional public square's conventions, where restraint, reason and tolerance in the face of opposing views are the basis for civilised debate.' Cairnduff says there are lessons for institutions in how they communicate with and consult artists – but argues a more fundamental reckoning needs to occur. 'Arts organisations should be questioning what kinds of restrictions that they – as platforms for creative people – should be imposing,' he says. 'The idea of arts and cultural expression is about freedom of expression and engaging in some of those more challenging and difficult areas of a broader social discourse … restricting speech and freedom of expression – that's exactly the antithesis of what a cultural organisation in contemporary Australian society should be doing.' On the opening night of Adelaide writers' week in 2023, as the festival faced criticism over the inclusion of a Palestinian speaker and a Palestinian-American speaker, the South Australian premier, Peter Malinauskas, admitted he had been under immense pressure to axe its funding – had even considered it – but decided it would set a dangerous precedent if a government determined who was allowed to speak. 'If I was to unilaterally defund writers' week … what path does that take us down?' he said. 'It's a path to a future where politicians decide what is culturally appropriate … a path, in fact, that leads us into the territory of Putin's Russia.' Adler told the Guardian at the time: 'These matters are complex. None of this is simple. 'People are free to deeply object. They don't have to come. Or come, and you don't need to agree with what people think. But people listened. These steadfast Adelaide audiences came out in their thousands and listened with courtesy and respect for the conversation. It should be something that lifts the spirits of all of us.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Giving Australians $2,700 tax back while widening GST could help generate $152bn windfall, economist says
Giving the average worker a $2,700 income tax cut in return for widening the GST would be part of a major tax overhaul that could add a combined $158bn to the Australian economy. Chris Murphy, an economist who provided the modelling for introduction of the GST and Ken Henry's 2010 tax review, has outlined a $91bn shift in the tax mix, which includes replacing stamp duties with a land tax and taxing corporate super profits. 'Comprehensive tax reform stands out as a way of delivering large benefits compared to other areas of economic reform,' Murphy says in a newly released paper. The proposed tax package would be budget neutral, according to Murphy's estimates, but would lift real GDP by about 6%, boost business investment by 11% and increase the number of homes by 8%. When announcing the roundtable on 18 June, Jim Chalmers raised hopes that the Albanese government was ready to tackle the thorny issue of tax. The treasurer told the National Press Club that 'no sensible progress can be made on productivity, resilience or budget sustainability without proper consideration of more tax reform'. 'I don't just accept that, I welcome it,' Chalmers said at the time. Sign up: AU Breaking News email But the prime minister has proved less welcoming, telling journalists two weeks ago that 'the only tax policy that we're implementing is the one that we took to the election'. The final sessions of the roundtable process, on Thursday, focused on a 'better tax system'. Murphy said shifting the tax base towards simpler and less-distortionary types of taxes was a useful starting point to think about potential reform. He said in his modelling, 'inefficient state conveyancing duty and land tax are abolished, with the revenue replaced by a broad-based land tax like municipal rates'. 'The company tax system is modified so that normal returns to capital are taxed less and economic rents and dividends are taxed more. 'To broaden tax bases, GST-free categories become taxable and the payroll tax threshold is cut by 75%, funding a large cut in personal income tax.' Murphy estimates that 54% of Australian company taxes are based on so-called 'economic rents', such as super profits linked to oligopolistic sectors such as financial services, as well as rents from the country's natural resources. Murphy says the answer would be a different type of company tax that cuts company tax rate, but introduces another tax to better target those rents – such as the 5% net cashflow tax recently proposed by the Productivity Commission. While the estimated benefits of these packages are large, the shifts in the tax base would be jarring. For example, Murphy's analysis shows getting rid of stamp duties on residential property purchases and state-based land taxes on investment properties would remove two very inefficient taxes. But filling that budgetary hole would require a new land tax that would be equivalent to trebling municipal rates, Murphy said. 'The states have to get back the money from abolishing conveyancing and state land taxes,' he said. Murphy said his next round of modelling would focus on the impact of the tax changes on the equity of the system, but that conceptually the household tax package – which included widening the net of the GST – would tend to raise the inequity of the tax system. In contrast, the corporate and property changes would likely be progressive. For example, Murphy said the evidence was that state land taxes drive up the cost of investing in property and artificially inflate rents. 'There would be winners and losers, but there's a strong argument that if you are doing tax reform, then go the whole hog, because what you lose on one thing, you might pick it up on something else,' he said.
