English farmland could be cut by 9% to hit green targets
To meet environmental targets 9% of England's farmland will need to be converted into forests and animal habitats, according to new proposals released by the government. The benchmark was set out in a consultation launched on Friday by Environment Secretary Steve Reed on managing England's land to prioritise food production, net zero targets and nature.In total, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) predict nearly a fifth of the UK's farming land will need to cut agricultural use but argue greater efficiencies on the remaining land could maintain UK food production at current levels.Tory leader Kemi Badenoch accused Labour for "adding even more burdens on farmers".
The Land Use Framework was due to be published in 2023 but has faced considerable delays, with the scope and focus of the promised policy changing over time.The framework was first suggested by 2021 Dimbleby Review on a National Food Strategy, to guide farming incentives and regulations.
On Friday, the government opened a consultation calling for ideas on how England should manage land use changes to balance food security, nature recovery, infrastructure needs and climate goals.Government analysis shows 1.6 million hectares of farming land to be repurposed for environmental and climate goals by 2050, including:1% making small changes such as planting herbs or other plants along field margins4% incorporating more trees alongside food production 5% repurposed mostly for environmental benefits, while still producing food9% removed from food production to make way for the creation of woodland and other natural habitatsDefra say the impact of these land use changes on domestic food production will be offset by productivity improvements.If domestic production does decline, England may need to import more food, increasing the UK's exposure to global food price shocks and supply chain disruptions."England is now one of the most nature-depleted countries in the world," the report said - with poor farming practices and climate change damaging soil and increasing water pollution.Better planning under the Land Use Framework would prevent "high-quality farmland" being lost to developers pushing for prime land near urban areas, Defra said.Under the plans woodland would cover 16.5% of England's land by 2050, with an extra 500,000 hectares of new or restored "wildlife-rich habitat".Restoration of degraded peatlands would also help cut 8 megatons of CO2 emissions annually, Defra predict.
Badenoch told broadcasters on a visit to a farm in Cheshire she was "worried that we are adding even more burdens on farmers".She argued the government were "killing farmers in our country" through the introduction of "the family farm tax, the family business tax, the rise in national insurance,"."To add even more burdens saying that we are going to spend more time on net zero shows they are not serious," Badenoch said.
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
9 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Wales: Online abuse of politicians ‘getting worse'
Plaid Cymru's Adam Price, the first out-gay man in his party to be elected to national office, warned prejudices based on sex, race and sexual orientation have been reinvigorated. He told the Senedd: 'It is getting worse by the day, and it really represents an existential crisis for our democracy and our society.' Mr Price said: 'For our democracy to be effective, it has to be diverse. Diversity trumps ability. It's a piece of evidence in social science.' The former Plaid Cymru leader called for a focus on representation of trans women and men, a community 'under siege', to ensure their voices are heard in the Senedd. Mr Price highlighted harmful comments below news stories involving him in recent weeks. 'That certainly won't deter me and I hope it won't deter anyone else,' he said. 'But we've got to do something about it collectively, haven't we?' Labour's Hannah Blythyn expressed concerns that Wales could go backwards in terms of equality of representation at the next Senedd election in less than 12 months. She warned that online abuse, misogyny and homophobia are rife across society. Ms Blythyn told Senedd members: 'I very much made an active decision when I had the opportunity to stand in this legislature because of the make-up – that there were more women here, that it was more representative.' She emphasised that diversity not only changes the face of politics but its focus too, saying: 'It makes what we do and the policies that we produce so much better because we are experts by our own life experiences.' Jane Hutt, Wales' social justice secretary, acknowledged the rise of abuse, harassment and intimidation towards politicians, candidates and campaigners. During a statement on June 10, she told the Senedd: 'This is a significant barrier to participation in politics, particularly for people from under-represented groups.' She outlined voluntary diversity and inclusion guidance for political parties which aims to ensure democratic bodies are truly representative of all the people of Wales. Ms Hutt said safety costs will be exempt from spending limits for Welsh elections, in line with calls from the Jo Cox Foundation which was set up after the Labour MP's murder in 2016. TOP STORIES TODAY She added that Welsh ministers are working with regulator Ofcom, which has new enforcement powers, around the misuse and abuse of online media. Altaf Hussain, the Kashmir-born Conservative who represents South Wales West, warned guidance on equal representation risks crossing a dangerous line. The former surgeon said: 'Equality of access cannot come just by bureaucratic diktats or targets that treat individuals not as nuanced, valued voices but boxes to tick. 'This removes merit, choice and, frankly, voters' rights deciding who is best representing them. Let's not replace one form of exclusion with another altogether; the truest diversity only flourishes where and when freedom leads.' Plaid Cymru's Sioned Williams said progress on underrepresentation of women in politics has slowed and, in some parts of democracy, has gone into reverse. She pointed out that the number of female leaders in councils has halved to only 9%. Ms Williams warned the voluntary guidance was published 'far too late' and represented a 'poor reflection' of shelved plans to introduce gender quotas to ensure equal representation. 'Wales belongs to everyone,' she said. 'Everyone must have a voice in our nation's future.'
Spectator
37 minutes ago
- Spectator
US urges UK to U-turn on Israeli sanctions
As if the Labour government didn't have enough on its plate with Rachel Reeves's spending review to be announced at midday, it is also facing pressure from the US over sanctions imposed on two Israeli cabinet ministers. Late last night, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that the travel ban and asset freezes imposed on security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and finance minister Bezalel Smotrich 'Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, said that the asset freezes and travel bans on Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich 'do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war'. Rubio hasn't just taken aim at the UK – President Donald Trump's man has also urged Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway to row back on their sanctions, while Israel has slammed yesterday's sanctions as 'outrageous'. The move by the UK and allied countries came after remarks made by Ben-Gvir and Smotrich were deemed to have 'incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights' by Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Reform and SNP are two sides of the same coin
PA Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Like most political animals, I have always enjoyed the drama of by-elections. Whilst seldom making a difference to who actually governs us in the short-term, they can be clear indicators of the mood music amongst the public towards parties vying for power, particularly when the next national election is not so far away. That said, I didn't stay up for the result in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election last week, not expecting much in the way of drama. My expectation was that there would be a fairly comfortable SNP victory, with the only real interest being whether Reform would finish third or manage to beat Labour into second place. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I woke up in the morning to a WhatsApp message from a colleague expressing surprise at the outcome, and when I checked the numbers I had to share that sentiment. Few saw the Labour candidate Davy Russell's victory coming, and it is all the more to his credit, and that of his campaign team, that they were able to pull off a quite dramatic victory against the odds. So congratulations are due first of all to Labour in delivering a result which undoubtedly is a boost to Anas Sarwar. Having been written off by the pundits, and with a candidate widely ridiculed for his refusal to participate in TV debates, it demonstrated the importance of a strong, local narrative in winning votes. The Scottish Conservatives had an equally strong local candidate in Cllr Richard Nelson from Larkhall who fought an energetic campaign albeit one we knew never had any realistic prospect of victory. Fourth place was always the best place we could hope for in this seat, as our voters were squeezed to vote tactically either for Labour or for Reform to beat the SNP. On the doorstep we met loyal Conservative voters who told us that they would be using this by-election to 'send a message' to the SNP by voting tactically for whoever they thought was best placed to defeat them, but at next year's Holyrood election would be back voting for us again. That said, we know there is work to be done in presenting a compelling message to maximise our vote for Holyrood in 2026. The real losers on the night were, of course, the SNP. All the polls suggested that this is a seat that they would hold, and the party poured in resources, with numerous visits by leadership figures from the First Minister John Swinney downwards. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The SNP strategy appeared politically clever, if essentially dishonest, in attempting to portray the contest as a two-horse race between them and Reform. This was designed to squeeze Labour voters, in particular, into voting SNP as the lesser of two evils. It backfired spectacularly. The Reform vote was indeed substantial, but if we analyse the figures, it seems that Reform's gains were not so much at the expense of Labour, or even the Conservatives. The 26 per cent of the vote achieved by Reform, at a time when Labour's vote share hardly moved, can only be explained by looking at the 17 per cent drop in the SNP vote. There was a direct transfer from one party to another. Perhaps this should not surprise us. Both SNP and Reform are essentially parties of protest, who have spent years pointing the blame elsewhere for the country's troubles – in the case of Reform, to the EU and immigrants, and in the case of the SNP, to Westminster governments. I can well remember at a previous election meeting on a doorstep in Perthshire one voter who we had previously identified as a regular Conservative supporter, who came out red-faced and angry to lambast me for the failings of the Tory government. 'You've let me down', he shouted, 'letting far too many immigrants in. That's it, I've had it with you lot. From now on I'm voting SNP'. It was an encounter indicative of a particular type of individual who rages at the world around them. These will be some of the people who were motivated to vote for independence in 2014 on the basis that anything must be better than what we currently have. And it will be some of the same people who were amongst the 2 in 5 Scots who voted for Brexit in 2016. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad For years the SNP have played the part of a populist party, simultaneously in government and in opposition, blaming all Scotland's ills not on their own failings but on big, bad Westminster. Now we have the new entrants on the scene in Reform, singing a different song to the same tune. To change the metaphor, the two Parties are essentially opposite sides of the same coin. They are parties who seek not to find solutions to the complex issues that face our country, but rather resort to simplistic slogans appealing to the basest level. Little wonder, then, that voters have little difficulty in switching between the two. Swinney's claim that Reform's values are antithetical to Scotland now look ridiculous, when his Party was not only defeated in Hamilton, but finished a mere 869 votes ahead of Farage's. Scottish exceptionalism has never had such a rude awakening. Over the last 18 years, the SNP have demonstrated how far populist politics can take you. Now, the rise of Reform shows they have a significant competitor for that segment of the population who are content to blame others for the country's woes. Fortunately, there is an alternative: the serious parties prepared to do the heavy lifting in proposing credible solutions to fix the problems in our society.
