Wales: Online abuse of politicians ‘getting worse'
Plaid Cymru's Adam Price, the first out-gay man in his party to be elected to national office, warned prejudices based on sex, race and sexual orientation have been reinvigorated.
He told the Senedd: 'It is getting worse by the day, and it really represents an existential crisis for our democracy and our society.'
Mr Price said: 'For our democracy to be effective, it has to be diverse. Diversity trumps ability. It's a piece of evidence in social science.'
The former Plaid Cymru leader called for a focus on representation of trans women and men, a community 'under siege', to ensure their voices are heard in the Senedd.
Mr Price highlighted harmful comments below news stories involving him in recent weeks. 'That certainly won't deter me and I hope it won't deter anyone else,' he said. 'But we've got to do something about it collectively, haven't we?'
Labour's Hannah Blythyn expressed concerns that Wales could go backwards in terms of equality of representation at the next Senedd election in less than 12 months.
She warned that online abuse, misogyny and homophobia are rife across society.
Ms Blythyn told Senedd members: 'I very much made an active decision when I had the opportunity to stand in this legislature because of the make-up – that there were more women here, that it was more representative.'
She emphasised that diversity not only changes the face of politics but its focus too, saying: 'It makes what we do and the policies that we produce so much better because we are experts by our own life experiences.'
Jane Hutt, Wales' social justice secretary, acknowledged the rise of abuse, harassment and intimidation towards politicians, candidates and campaigners.
During a statement on June 10, she told the Senedd: 'This is a significant barrier to participation in politics, particularly for people from under-represented groups.'
She outlined voluntary diversity and inclusion guidance for political parties which aims to ensure democratic bodies are truly representative of all the people of Wales.
Ms Hutt said safety costs will be exempt from spending limits for Welsh elections, in line with calls from the Jo Cox Foundation which was set up after the Labour MP's murder in 2016.
TOP STORIES TODAY
She added that Welsh ministers are working with regulator Ofcom, which has new enforcement powers, around the misuse and abuse of online media.
Altaf Hussain, the Kashmir-born Conservative who represents South Wales West, warned guidance on equal representation risks crossing a dangerous line.
The former surgeon said: 'Equality of access cannot come just by bureaucratic diktats or targets that treat individuals not as nuanced, valued voices but boxes to tick.
'This removes merit, choice and, frankly, voters' rights deciding who is best representing them. Let's not replace one form of exclusion with another altogether; the truest diversity only flourishes where and when freedom leads.'
Plaid Cymru's Sioned Williams said progress on underrepresentation of women in politics has slowed and, in some parts of democracy, has gone into reverse. She pointed out that the number of female leaders in councils has halved to only 9%.
Ms Williams warned the voluntary guidance was published 'far too late' and represented a 'poor reflection' of shelved plans to introduce gender quotas to ensure equal representation. 'Wales belongs to everyone,' she said. 'Everyone must have a voice in our nation's future.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Kendall tells MPs she'll press ahead with welfare cuts, despite fierce opposition from backbenchers
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has told concerned MPs she'll press ahead with planned welfare cuts, despite fierce opposition from many backbenchers. Responding to a letter from the Work and Pensions Committee urging her to delay the changes, Kendall wrote "we will not avoid or delay the decisive action needed to transform the system". MPs on the committee had said there needs to be a pause in implementing the reforms while the government carry out a full impact assessment. But Kendall insisted there will be no delay, because the bill needs final sign off from Parliament by November this year for the changes to be in effect from 2026. The government plans to make it harder for disabled people to claim Personal Independence Payments (Pip), and to freeze universal credit incapacity benefits for existing claimants, while cutting them by 50% for new claimants. The reforms are expected to save £5bn from the ballooning welfare budget, but critics warn the move will push vulnerable people into poverty. ITV News revealed the details of the letter from the Work and Pensions Committee last month. The cross-party group of MPs, led by Labour MP Debbie Abrahams, said that alongside a comprehensive impact assessment, disabled people must also be consulted before MPs are asked to vote on the reforms. After hearing from a series of experts, the group warned of possible unintended consequences. The letter warned: "The legislative changes might not incentivise work as the government hopes, but rather push people deeper into poverty, worsen health, especially in more deprived areas, and move people further away from the labour market." Abrahams told ITV News that she understood the financial strain facing the government, and the need to reform welfare to support disabled people into work. But she also cited expert evidence that cutting benefits could increase the risk of suicides. Chancellor Rachel Reeves also confirmed on Thursday that the government is "not going to be changing" the planned cuts, despite speculation they could be softened. The U-turn on winter fuel and reports the government could be poised to lift the two-child benefit sparked hope from backbenchers the government could be more likely to change course on welfare. But in an interview on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme, Reeves insisted: "No, we're not going to be changing that. It is important that we reform the way the welfare state works, so that there is a welfare state there for people.' But the rebellion among backbench Labour MPs doesn't seem to be abating. "I don't think they're listening to us on welfare reform at all", one MP said. "The government just aren't taking the size of this rebellion seriously", said another. "The free school meals and winter fuel allowance announcement and signals on the two child benefit cap are great, but not cutting it when it comes to the welfare changes." Cat Eccles, Labour MP for Stourbridge said she was "disappointed" by Kendall's response to the letter from Debbie Abrahams, accusing her of a "tunnel-vision approach of rushing forward" to get the plans signed off by parliament by November. "Many are rightfully concerned that ignoring this will push some of our most vulnerable in society into unnecessary poverty and hardship. "The response from the Secretary of State appears to ignore this evidence-based advice entirely, focusing rather on a tunnel-vision approach of rushing forward to gain Royal Assent by November this year, so these reforms can be implemented for 2026/27." She called on Kendall to "reconsider" her response, insisting: "Our welfare system must be a safety net to catch and support those who need it. "Do not pursue reckless changes that result in the holes of that net widening, with more of our most vulnerable falling through." There are reports up to 170 Labour MPs have raised concerns about the cuts with the government. ITV News understands that includes some senior backbenchers who work as Parliamentary Private Secretaries (PPS) to ministers, and even one junior minister. The legislation needed to bring in the changes is due to be introduced to Parliament on Monday 16th June, with a vote expected in the week of the 30th June. It's unclear exactly how many MPs will vote against the plans, but it's likely to be the biggest rebellion of Starmer's premiership. The government's own impact assessment on the reforms estimates that that in 2029-30,
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Swinney begs rebels not to oust him
The SNP leader has pleaded with party rebels not to press ahead with a threatened leadership challenge after a shock by-election defeat. John Swinney, the First Minister, warned it would not be a 'good idea' for disaffected Nationalists to try and oust him at the SNP conference in October. Mr Swinney said he had helped the SNP 'recover from a very, very difficult situation' following the troubled final months of Nicola Sturgeon 's premiership and Humza Yousaf 's chaotic tenure. His plea came the day after it was reported that 25 senior SNP figures met on Monday evening to discuss removing Mr Swinney, barely a year after he succeeded Mr Yousaf. They warned that he risked facing a leadership challenge at the SNP conference in Aberdeen unless he comes up with a new strategy to achieve Scottish independence. Discontent with his leadership has surfaced after Labour pulled off a surprise victory in last week's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, which the SNP had been hot favourites to win. The defeat followed Labour's rout of the SNP in last year's general election, also under Mr Swinney's leadership. Alex Neil, a former Cabinet minister in Alex Salmond's and Ms Sturgeon's governments, said that Mr Swinney should be replaced. Mr Swinney is expected to face robust questions at a meeting of the party's ruling national executive committee on Sunday about his by-election campaign strategy, which focused on the claim that it was a straight fight between the SNP and Reform UK. The Guardian reported that he faced criticism about the strategy at a 'fractious' MSP group meeting on Tuesday, with one backbencher claiming he had 'panicked' at the rise of Reform, which finished a close third in the contest. Insiders also expect him to face pressure to come up with much clearer strategy for achieving independence, after he warned that support for separation would have to rise to more than 60 per cent to get another referendum. Under SNP rules, any member who can secure 100 nominations from 20 different branches ahead of party conference can trigger a leadership vote. Mr Swinney admitted that he had 'absolutely no idea' about whether he would face a challenge but said: 'I don't think that would be a good idea.' Speaking after First Minister's Questions at Holyrood, he said: 'I came into office to help the SNP recover from a very, very difficult situation in the spring of 2024, and I'm very focused on making sure that we make that recovery to be ready for the 2026 elections, and that's what's the focus of my thinking and my planning. 'I've obviously taken forward a number of steps over the course of the last 12 months to get the SNP into a better position.' He insisted that the SNP would not have even been in contention in the by-election before he took over, despite the party winning the seat in the 2021 Holyrood contest by 4,582 votes. Labour won the contest last week by 602 votes, after the SNP vote in the seat dropped by 17 points compared to 2021. Swinney worried 'not in the slightest' However, Mr Swinney said he was 'not in the slightest' worried about the internal briefing against him, and rejected criticism that he was not moving fast enough on independence. He said he had spent the first year of his leadership 'addressing the issues that people are immediately preoccupied by', such as the cost of living crisis. Mr Swinney said this was necessary to ensure 'we could get a hearing' from the public, but his 'phase two' plan was to 'open up a conversation about independence' ahead of next year's election. But Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, said: 'Even John Swinney's MSPs are now openly rebelling against him with senior figures saying he has two weeks to come up with a new idea to save his job. John Swinney and the SNP are out of ideas, out of steam and out of time.' He told First Minister's Questions: 'One SNP MSP said about John Swinney, 'there is no energy, no fire, no boldness, no long-term vision' – they are right.' It is not thought that an MP or MSP will directly challenge Mr Swinney for the leadership ahead of the May 2026 election, but the rebels said a rank-and-file activist could come forward as a stalking horse. They warned that any contest would be 'hugely damning and damaging, and make the party look utterly ridiculous'.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
MPs demand Government not to weaken ‘Hillsborough Law' when bill is passed
MPs have urged the Government not to weaken a law designed to prevent cover-ups in the wake of major disasters, as they call for the "Hillsborough Law" to be passed as soon as possible. Labour MP Clive Efford warned Commons Leader and Manchester Central MP Lucy Powell that the Public Authorities Accountability Bill, which will include the 'Hillsborough Law', should not be changed under pressure from Whitehall. Mr Efford asked for it to be passed before the end of July. Meanwhile his party colleague Liverpool and West Derby MP Ian Byrne asked for the Bill to be 'worthy of the name'. The proposed law would require public bodies to have a duty of candour, meaning they would need to co-operate with official inquiries and tell the truth in the aftermath of major disasters – or face criminal sanctions. A previous deadline set by Labour, that the Bill would be passed before the anniversary of the Hillsborough disaster in April, has been missed. The Government had said it needed more time to finalise the Bill. A draft Bill has been criticised by campaigners, including the Hillsborough Law Now group, for not containing pledges previously made – including the duty of candour. In March it was reported that a meeting between Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and campaigners had been cancelled, with claims officials were attempting to have the contents of the Bill watered down. Mr Byrne told the Commons: 'The Prime Minister promised my city and all those affected by state cover-ups that the Hillsborough Law would be introduced before April 15 of this year – the 36th anniversary of the Hillsborough disaster. 'Almost two months have passed since the Prime Minister missed that deadline. 'This is particularly disappointing, since there is a draft Hillsborough Law ready to go, written by legal experts, endorsed by survivors, families, campaigners and proposed in Parliament by Andy Burnham.' The Liverpool West Derby MP added that 'a failure to introduce a Hillsborough Law worthy of the name will be seen as a continuation of the betrayal of families and survivors of Hillsborough and all those affected by state cover-ups'. Lucy Powell said the Government was 'working at pace' and was co-operating with families and their representatives. She said: 'At these times, we always remember those affected by the Hillsborough disaster but particularly the plight that they have faced ever since to fight for justice and fight for accountability.'
