logo
Ex-Umno man Isham Jalil acquitted of contempt

Ex-Umno man Isham Jalil acquitted of contempt

Daily Express08-07-2025
Published on: Tuesday, July 08, 2025
Published on: Tue, Jul 08, 2025
By: V Anbalagan, FMT Text Size: Former Umno leader Isham Jalil (left) with his counsel Azhar Harun after the Kuala Lumpur High Court delivered its verdict today. Kuala Lumpur: The High Court here has acquitted former Umno Supreme Council member Isham Jalil of contempt over remarks on Najib Razak's 1MDB-related cases. Justice K Muniandy said the prosecution failed to prove that Isham's statements, made in late 2023, posed a real risk of interference in the administration of justice. 'The claim that the administration of justice was derailed or sullied by the statements does not hold water,' he said. Muniandy also said the allegation that Isham's statements had scandalised the judiciary appeared untrue. Filed on Dec 28, 2023, the application to cite Isham for contempt concerned statements he allegedly made during an interview titled 'Townhall for Justice: Keadilan Sebenarnya Untuk Siapa' published on Sept 30 through a Facebook account known as Malaya Post. In an affidavit filed in support of the leave application, deputy public prosecutor Mustapha Kunyalam claimed that Isham had commented on Najib's 1MDB and SRC International trials, and on the Federal Court's conduct of the final appeal in the latter case. Isham allegedly accused Justices Collin Lawrence Sequerah and Nazlan Ghazali of bias and said they should have withdrawn from hearing the cases. Sequerah is presiding over Najib's 1MDB trial in the High Court while Nazlan was the judge who convicted the former prime minister in the SRC case. Both Sequerah and Nazlan now sit in the Court of Appeal. Mustapha also said Isham had claimed that the panel of five judges, led by former chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, who heard Najib's final appeal from his conviction and sentence in the SRC case, had judged the case unfairly. According to the affidavit, the statements made by Isham could undermine the public's confidence in the judiciary and could be considered as interference with the administration of justice. Muniandy ruled that the attorney-general had not discharged the burden of proof in the case before him, adding that criticism levelled by Isham against the courts' various decisions were within reasonable limits. He said the law of contempt was not designed to protect judges or their dignity but to ensure that the administration of justice was not obstructed. 'As judges, we must stand resilient in the face of adversity and criticism, for the scales of justice must never be swayed by external pressures,' he said. He said that when delivering judgments, judges not only decide cases but also reinforce public trust in the judiciary, proving that even in the most emotionally charged circumstances, the pursuit of truth and application of law can, and must, prevail. 'The most effective way for the judiciary to dispel unwarranted criticism and defend its integrity against scurrilous attacks is through the delivery of judgments that are undeniably fair, just and deeply rooted in the principles of law,' he said. Muniandy said while Article 10 of the Federal Constitution allowed for free speech, the right was not absolute and came with inherent limitations, including contempt of court. 'While freedom of speech is the cornerstone of democracy, its exercise must respect the vital function of the judiciary. However, (the contempt process) should be reserved for where there is real risk of undermining the administration of justice,' he added. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Turun Anwar is trending but is it the answer? — E Jia Xi
‘Turun Anwar is trending but is it the answer? — E Jia Xi

Malay Mail

time10 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

‘Turun Anwar is trending but is it the answer? — E Jia Xi

JULY 23 — In recent weeks, 'Turun Anwar' has emerged as the battle cry of certain protest groups and online campaigns, demanding the resignation of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. The slogan is loud, simple, and emotionally charged. To many Malaysians, this is more than a slogan. It is a cry of frustration. Frustration that prices are still high. Frustration that reforms seem slow. Frustration that hope, once renewed in 2022 - now feels distant again. These feelings are valid. They deserve to be acknowledged, not dismissed. But they also demand reflection. Because while it's easy to direct our anger at one man or administration, the real answer lies deeper. Structural pain, not personal failure Malaysia did not become unequal, indebted, or inefficient overnight. For over 20 years, our economy became overly reliant on subsidies instead of productivity. Our education system stagnated. Corruption hollowed out public trust. Talent fled, and key sectors were left behind. When Anwar Ibrahim took office in late 2022, he didn't just inherit a seat, he inherited a ticking fiscal time bomb. An annual subsidy bill ballooning to over RM80 billion. Billions borrowed today just to repay the RM48 billion 1MDB debt. National debt and liabilities approaching RM1.5 trillion. 27 consecutive years of budget deficit. A rakyat fatigued by instability, and suspicious of every policy. None of this can be solved in two and a half years. To claim otherwise is either naive, or dishonest. The world is hurting - not just us Malaysia doesn't exist in a vacuum. Global inflation didn't spare us. Since the pandemic, supply chains have fractured. Wars in Ukraine and Gaza have pushed commodity prices upward. The US, China, and Europe are battling their own inflation crises, while central banks worldwide are raising interest rates. We are not alone in our struggles. But we are one of the few countries still maintaining targeted subsidies for essentials like rice, fuel, and electricity. Instead of kicking the can down the road, like so many governments before - Anwar's administration chose to restructure: slowly, and at a political cost. That is what real reform looks like. Not optics. Not giveaways. Not performative outrage. But doing the difficult work that no one dares to do when elections are near. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim speaks during an event at the Tun Azizan Zainul Abidin Auditorium in Putrajaya on June 18, 2025. — Bernama pic Democracy was never meant to be easy The 2022 general election left us with no clear majority, and it was only through consensus and royal intervention that a unity government was formed. For the first time in decades, Malaysia had a fragile chance at ruling party alternation. If we derail this compromise before it bears fruit, what precedent are we setting for our democracy? That a government is only legitimate if it delivers miracles in two years? That we want change, but only if it feels good, fast, and free? That's not democracy. That's impatience dressed as principle. We forget that democratic maturity isn't measured by how often we change leaders but by how well we hold them accountable without collapsing the system. And we must ask: if not Anwar, then who? If not now, then when? If we replace a government midstream with no credible alternative coalition, we invite chaos. When opposition politicians chant hashtags instead of offering real solutions, they are not building a better future. They are gambling with our present. They want power, not progress. And when the dust settles, it will be us who juggle three jobs, or struggle to pay rent, not them. Criticism is healthy, cynicism is not This is not a call for blind loyalty. Anwar and his team must communicate better, listen harder, and act faster. Malaysians have every right to demand more: more transparency, more empathy, more urgency. But tearing down a reformist government without offering a better plan is not activism. It is despair. If we really want to fight injustice, then our frustration must fuel policy advocacy, not performative hashtags. We can choose to be angry and constructive. We can hold our leaders accountable and protect our democratic process. These are not contradictions. They are the duties of citizens in a fragile democracy. We are all being tested, not just the PM This is not just Anwar Ibrahim's test. It is ours. Can we resist the temptation of instant gratification? Can we support reform even when it hurts in the short term? Can we distinguish between disappointment and disaster? Anwar is not perfect. No leader is. But for the first time in a long time, we have a leader trying to clean up the mess instead of covering it up. That deserves scrutiny, not sabotage. We've spent decades watching this country fall apart. Don't let a moment of frustration undo the hope we've finally begun to rebuild. Reform is not a sprint. It is a long, uneven road. If we abandon it at the first storm, we'll never know how far we could've gone. * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.

Behind Prison Walls: A Daughter's Love Marks Najib's 72nd Birthday
Behind Prison Walls: A Daughter's Love Marks Najib's 72nd Birthday

Rakyat Post

time10 hours ago

  • Rakyat Post

Behind Prison Walls: A Daughter's Love Marks Najib's 72nd Birthday

Subscribe to our FREE Today marks a milestone that would typically call for family gatherings, birthday cake, and celebration. Instead, Datuk Seri Najib Razak is spending his 72nd birthday behind the walls of Kajang Prison – but his daughter's touching tribute on social media proves that love knows no barriers. As the clock struck another year for the former Prime Minister, his daughter Yana Najib took to Facebook with a message that cut straight to the heart. She opened with a quote from former President of South Africa, Nelson Mandela, that seemed to capture everything: 'A brave man is not one who is not afraid but one who conquers his fears.' The timing wasn't coincidental. Today, 23 July, 2025, Najib turns 72 – a birthday that marks his third consecutive year celebrating behind bars, and his daughter wasn't about to let it pass unnoticed. Three Years of Separated Birthdays 'Happy birthday Daddy,' Yana wrote in Malay, her words carrying the weight of years of separation. May Allah SWT grant you strength and good health for Daddy. The reality she acknowledges is stark: 'We haven't been able to celebrate with Daddy for 3 years, separated from us.' Yet her message carries no trace of bitterness, only hope wrapped in faith: 'May all matters be made easy and God willing, we can be together again in the near future.' Yana's heartfelt tribute sparked a wave of solidarity across social media, as Najib's supporters joined in marking his 72nd birthday. Facebook and other platforms are filled with nostalgic posts from loyalists sharing fond memories of better times – photos from political rallies, screenshots of his achievements as Prime Minister, and throwback images of him with family during happier occasions. Among the throwback moments was a particularly endearing video clip showing Najib singing Cliff Richard's 1961 classic 'The Young Ones' – a moment that captured a lighter, more personal side of the former Prime Minister that many supporters fondly remember. Finding Light in Dark Times Yana's post reads like poetry born from pain: 'A calm heart behind the silence. A ray of hope illuminating the path in adversity. Surely there is wisdom behind every trial. More wise, patient and kind than before.' These aren't just words – they're a daughter's way of making sense of a situation that has redefined her family's reality since 23 August, 2022, when Najib began serving his sentence for the Najib has repeatedly denied wrongdoing. Today's birthday carries particular significance because it brings the family closer to potential reunion. The Pardons Board's February 2024 decision to That's just over three years away, making today's 72nd birthday a marker on a countdown that his family clearly holds dear. At the same time, the Attorney General confirmed the existence of a royal order that is crucial for Najib's Beyond Politics, Pure Love In a political landscape often defined by division and rhetoric, Yana's birthday message stands apart. Her hashtags #bossku and #dsn (Datuk Seri Najib) show unwavering support, but her words transcend politics entirely. This is simply a daughter honouring her father on his birthday, separated by circumstances but united by unbreakable bonds. The Mandela quote she chose resonates deeply – a reminder that even leaders who've faced imprisonment can emerge with wisdom and strength. As Najib marks his 72nd year today, his daughter's message suggests she sees this chapter not as an ending, but as a test of character that will ultimately reveal more profound truths. READ MORE : Share your thoughts with us via TRP's . Get more stories like this to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter.

Najib's bankruptcy case adjourned to Sept 8 over disorganised submissions
Najib's bankruptcy case adjourned to Sept 8 over disorganised submissions

New Straits Times

time12 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Najib's bankruptcy case adjourned to Sept 8 over disorganised submissions

KUALA LUMPUR: Datuk Seri Najib Razak's bid to stay bankruptcy proceedings was postponed after the High Court raised concerns over disorganised and incomplete submissions by his legal team. Judicial commissioner Suhendran Sockanathan @ Saheran Abdullah also instructed Najib's lawyer Muhammad Farhan Shafee to refile a consolidated set of submissions after finding that key issues were either missing or scattered across documents. Farhan had earlier argued that the Inland Revenue Board's (IRB) RM1.69 billion tax claim against Najib was tied to funds allegedly received from 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB), which were still the subject of ongoing criminal and civil proceedings. He submitted that there were unresolved legal issues surrounding whether the alleged proceeds of criminal activity could be taxed under Section 4 of the Income Tax Act 1967. "The IRB has treated the sums received through the appellant's personal accounts, alleged to have originated from 1MDB, as income. "These amounts do not fall within the scope of Section 4 of the Income Tax Act. Furthermore, provisions under the Anti-Money Laundering Act are also involved," he said during the proceeding today. Farhan also told the court that these matters were pending before the Special Commissioners of Income Tax, and a final ruling had yet to be made. He also raised the issue of potential double recovery by the government, saying there were attempts to penalise his client under both criminal and tax laws using the same facts. However, the court pressed Farhan repeatedly for clarity, pointing out that these central arguments were either not included in the written submissions or only briefly referenced in affidavits. "None of this is (arguments) in your submissions, you know? "At the moment, you are all over the place. "I do not want to have bits here and bits there... it is too cumbersome," Saheran said. Farhan then suggested that the court grant a short date to allow his team to update and streamline their submissions. He acknowledged that their arguments had not been presented in a structured manner and expressed his willingness to return to court with a more comprehensive and organised set of submissions. Saheran: I think yes... Farhan, I think you need to focus a bit more. Farhan: Sure. Saheran: Update the submissions and get it to us... I do not want this to be sitting on my docket. For a long period of time. How long will it take? Farhan: We can file it within the week. Saheran: Take two weeks... but do it properly. Senior federal counsel Norhisham Ahmad, who appeared for IRB, also supported the call for clearer submissions, adding that many of the appellant's arguments had not been raised in their original filings. The court then fixed Sept 8 to hear the case. Najib is appealing against two bankruptcy notices stemming from additional tax assessments amounting to RM1.46 billion, which have now ballooned with penalties and interest to RM1.69 billion. The former prime minister maintains that the tax assessments are flawed and should not proceed while related matters are being litigated in other courts. On June 25, 2019, the government, through IRB, filed the suit against Najib asking him to settle the unpaid tax with interest at five per cent, a year from the date of judgment, as well as costs and other relief deemed fit by the court. The government claimed that Najib had failed to pay his income tax from 2011 to 2017 within the stipulated 30-day period after assessment notices were issued by the IRB.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store