
Manager explains how Dustin Poirier 'bet on himself' in Conor McGregor rivalry
Ahead of UFC 318 on Saturday at Smoothie King Center in New Orleans (ESPN+ pay-per-view, ESPN, ESPN+), where Poirier will compete for the final time in his career against Max Holloway in a lightweight trilogy bout for the BMF title, it has been a time of reflection around the career of "The Diamond."
There have been many trials and tribulations since his MMA debut in May 2009. When felt his ceiling was hit when he faltered against McGregor in their first meeting at UFC 178 in September 2014 when, after a heated build up, he lost by first-round TKO as "The Notorious" made his assent to superstar status.
Years later and in a different division, Poirier got another opportunity. The pair had a rematch at UFC 257 in January 2021, and according to Poirier's longtime manager Rob Roveta, that was an incredibly important and defining moment.
"I would say that's the most special fight of his career, and my favorite in terms of the mental mountain he had to climb," Roveta told MMA Junkie. "The hurdle you have to overcome to get one back like that against a guy that has been talking sh*t to you for years and talked sh*t to you back then and still doing it now. It kind of felt the same way with Khabib (Nurmagomedov at UFC 242), not quite as much, but he pulled up on a yacht. I don't think they applied the same COVID rules to him as they did us. It felt a little one-sided to us. But in that fight, I don't think he gave a sh*t. He was going to win."
Poirier, 36, had an edge around him going into the UFC 257 rematch with McGregor that only comes out in rare instances. In addition to just wanting to get redemption on a significant loss, Poirier and his team were forced to make a roll of the dice after negotiations.
Despite headlining a massive numbered card against the biggest star the sport has ever seen, Poirier was not compensated with pay-per-view points or many extra financial perks. All those were factored in to a trilogy clause, where if Poirier won, he would get a rubber match with McGregor right away and all the upside that came with it.
It wasn't the ideal scenario, Roveta said, but one that added even more drive and motivation.
"It certainly felt like the bet was against us and they looked at him as a stepping stone to far greater plans (for McGregor) – at least that's the way I looked at it," Roveta said. "The negotiations were tricky and he definitely bet on himself and obviously the back side of that worked out greater than we could've imagined, so it all worked out. But it was far different than you would imagine.
"Everyone looking from the outside in, it's always, 'Oh, there's his shot. He's going to fight the biggest superstar and there will be a windfall of money and life is going to change forever.' Well, I can tell you the economics don't look like that. It's not like that for that particular fight. It's like, 'Hey, prove yourself and once you do, you can have the backside and everything you wanted.' But you have to do that, and it's not an easy mountain to climb."
Poirier climbed that mountain in remarkable fashion. He knocked out McGregor in the second round at UFC 257, then won the trilogy six months later by first-round TKO at UFC 264 in July 2021 after McGregor broke his leg.
It was just one of many high-profile fights and rivalries Poirier had throughout his career. The American achieved great things in his career, and although he went 0-3 in his chances for undisputed UFC titles, he can exit his career on an ultimate high at UFC 318.
Poirier (30-9 MMA, 22-8 UFC) is already 2-0 against Holloway (26-8 MMA, 22-8 UFC), but will look to extend that further while simultaneously taking the BMF belt from his Hawaiian foe.
No matter what happens, though, Roveta said Poirier exceeded all expectations that were mapped up when their working relationship began just a few fights into his MMA career.
"When the goal and the vision was set out was one thing, but the reality was bigger," Roveta said. "I think the only thing we did is we shot too low, in hindsight. It's easy to say now, but ultimately the goals we set out, we were thinking too small for a while. He's a much bigger superstar than I think we could've envisioned at the time."
To hear Roveta discuss the highs and lows of Poirier's career in more detail, check out his complete appearance on "The Bohnfire" podcast with MMA Junkie senior reporter Mike Bohn in the video above.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
26 minutes ago
- USA Today
Will Conor McGregor fight at the White House? If he 'stays the course,' says Dana White
Dana White says Conor McGregor sounds serious about competing at the White House. News of the UFC holding an event on the White House grounds next July 4 in Washington D.C. has re-sparked McGregor's interest in competing again. It's been over four years since McGregor last fought when he broke his leg in a TKO loss to Dustin Poirier at UFC 264. McGregor (22-6 MMA, 10-4 UFC) was scheduled to return last June against Michael Chandler at UFC 303, but withdrew after breaking his pinky toe. No developments were made ever since on a potential comeback, but according to the official UFC Anti-Doping database, McGregor is back in the testing pool. "I mean if you see, he's been posting videos of himself training, he's back in the pool now, he wants the White House fight," White said on "Pardon My Take." "If he starts getting in shape and training, and stays the course, that's the fight he wants. He keeps telling me he wants that fight so, we'll see how it plays out over the next several months." McGregor has since posted multiple videos of him training. McGregor is not the only UFC star to express his desire of fighting at the White House. Shortly after he announced his retirement and relinquished his UFC heavyweight title, Jon Jones is already back in the testing pool.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Data Wars Hold a Lesson for ESPN's New NFL Partnership
The recent tie-up between the NFL and ESPN, in which the league took a 10% stake in the sports media giant, contains a big unanswerable question: Will it ensure the network keeps its Monday Night Football rights for the foreseeable future? Many believe the answer is yes. But the NFL was in a similar position in 2021, in talks to renew a prominent commercial deal with a partner in which it also held an ownership stake, and the league ultimately selected a higher bid from the company's biggest competitor. More from Aaron Rodgers-Backed Group Building 'IMDb' for Athlete Deals Sporticast 474: Paramount Opens David Ellison Era With MMA Bang Jon Gruden Wins Appeal in Case Against NFL, Roger Goodell Back in 2015, the NFL signed a four-year data deal with Sportradar, at the time a private company relatively unknown in the U.S. This was before the nationwide ban on sports betting was lifted, but the NFL's media data was still a robust business, and it wasn't impossible to foresee a future where its betting feed was be the industry's most valuable commodity. As part of that original deal, the NFL took an undisclosed stake in Sportradar's growing U.S. business. The deal was extended again in 2019, and when Sportradar went public in 2021, it disclosed that the NFL owned a 7% non-voting share of its U.S. operations. Some NFL owners also invested in Sportradar separately. Yet when the NFL was in the market for a new data deal around that same time, it ended up with a different partner. In April 2021, following months of negotiations, the NFL announced an exclusive global deal with Genius Sports, Sportradar's main rival. Genius made a notably higher offer. That deal also had a significant equity component. It included penny warrants for 22.5 million shares in Genius Sports (NYSE: GENI) stock. At the time that was worth $446.6 million; it is currently worth about $283.5 million. The NFL has added additional warrants in later extensions of the Genius relationship. Equity upside has been a growing priority for the NFL over the past decade. The world's richest sports league is a key man of sorts for many of its partners, and commissioner Roger Goodell has begun prioritizing the opportunity to more directly share in the growth of companies that profit from football. This was the driving force behind 32 Equity, the league's venture arm, and the warrants that appear in a number of the NFL's commercial deals. The Sportradar equity—and the Genius equity as well—is accounted for differently from the investments made by 32 Equity. As Sportico explained in a story last week, 32 Equity deals are held entirely by owners, as is their financial upside. The equity and warrants that the league receives as part of its commercial deals, like these data tie-ups, are shared with players under the cap. The most recent CBA includes a detailed section about how that equity is amortized out over a 10-year span and shared with players at fair market value. It's unclear exactly how the league's 10% stake in ESPN works in that regard. (An NFL spokesman declined to comment). But it is notable that the partnership is technically two different non-binding agreements. In one, ESPN acquired NFL Network, RedZone and NFL Fantasy in exchange for that 10% stake. In the other, the NFL will license rights—like live games, logos and other IP—to ESPN. That appears to be structured so players get their share of those rights, but not in the ESPN equity portion. The 10% stake is likely worth at least $2 billion, and as Disney chairman Bob Iger shared last week, the NFL will receive dividends from ESPN profits. Many have interpreted this deal, in particular the 10% stake, as a back-end way for ESPN to guarantee proximity to its most valuable content partner. A LightShed Partners analyst note said the deal 'dramatically improves ESPN's chances of renewing Monday Night Football beyond the current 2033 expiration.' On a recent Semafor podcast, Pablo Torre said his former employer essentially secured 'most-favored-nation status unto eternity' with the league. But history shows that's not always the case. The NFL also received equity warrants in its 2006 supplier deal with Under Armour, and that didn't appear to grant the apparel company any prime positioning in future talks. In fact, Under Armour let its NFL deal lapse in 2020 as part of a multiyear restructuring, then returned to the league for this upcoming season. Neither Sportradar nor Under Armour provide a perfect comparison for ESPN. Broadcast agreements are way more valuable, and media is changing at a much faster clip. All of that sets the stage for a critical 2029. That's when the NFL can—and will—opt out of its current $110 billion media deals and renegotiate a whole new package. The league still cares about TV, and reach has been critical to the league's enduring success. But the NFL has also gradually dipped its toes into the streaming waters with Amazon and Netflix. Those companies have virtually unlimited funds and a growing appetite for sports. It seems very possible—likely in fact—that at least one of the NFL's four primary broadcasters ends up without games starting with the 2030 season. Will that be ESPN? It seems less likely now than two weeks ago. But as Sportradar learned in 2021, existing ties only go so far. If the price is right, your NFL deal may soon be held by your biggest competitor. Best of Most Expensive Sports Memorabilia and Collectibles in History The 100 Most Valuable Sports Teams in the World NFL Private Equity Ownership Rules: PE Can Now Own Stakes in Teams


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Dricus Du Plessis ahead of UFC 319: Khamzat Chimaev 'definitely not bigger than me'
Dricus Du Plessis shuts down claims that Khamzat Chimaev looked a lot bigger than him in their encounter. Middleweight champion Du Plessis (23-2 MMA, 9-0 UFC) defends his title against Chimaev (14-0 MMA, 8-0 UFC) in Saturday's UFC 319 (pay-per-view, ESPN, ESPN+) main event at United Center in Chicago. Du Plessis crossed paths with Chimaev during fight week, where the pair shared a cordial handshake. Many commented on the size difference between the two, but Du Plessis assures that's not the case. "I mean, maybe it was the angle," Du Plessis told Helen Yee. "I haven't seen the video, but I can promise you – you'll see, you'll see. I stood in front of him. He is definitely not taller than me. Maybe a little, maybe like, half an inch. Yeah, you'll see. And the other thing, I don't give a sh*t how big he is. It's not what wins fights. But yeah, I saw him, he's definitely not bigger than me." Episode 3 of UFC Embedded shows a different angle of their run-in. "He was very respectful. He came over and said hello," Du Plessis said. "I mean, the fight is happening on Saturday night. People aren't paying to see this. Yeah, it could have gone either way. But now we know."