The Northern Lights Are Coming to 14 States This Week—Are You in One of Them?
A coronal mass ejection (CME) that erupted from the sun on June 28 is traveling toward Earth and will likely cause G1 geomagnetic storm conditions.
Residents in northern U.S. states, including Washington, Montana, Michigan, and New York, may have a chance to view the aurora.This summer has been an incredible time to view the northern lights across the U.S. The celestial phenomenon is expected to make another appearance overnight on Tuesday and Wednesday, according to a recent forecast by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Space Weather Prediction Center.
A coronal mass ejection (CME) that left the sun on June 28 and is traveling toward Earth is expected to cause minor geomagnetic storm conditions. Per NASA, a CME is an eruption of plasma threaded by magnetic field lines ejected from the sun over the course of several hours.
Geomagnetic storms range from G1 (minor) to G5 (extreme). NOAA's three-day forecast predicts the CME, which is slated to reach Earth early on Wednesday, July 2, will cause a G1 storm. The administration also expects the Kp index to reach 5, measured at a value of 0 to 9. Higher Kp values increase the chances of seeing auroras at lower latitudes.
Those living in Washington, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Iowa, New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine may have an opportunity to spot the auroras. Residents in the northernmost parts of these states will have the highest chance, according to NOAA's aurora viewline forecast.
If you want to catch a glimpse of the northern lights over the next two days, NOAA says the aurora borealis can often be observed just after sunset or just before sunrise. The northern lights aren't visible during daylight hours.
Read the original article on Martha Stewart
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Eating Cheese Before Bed May Cause Nightmares, Study Finds
Consuming cheese before bed could lead to 'bizarre or disturbing dreams' A study involving 1,082 participants was conducted by Frontiers in Psychology Sweets are the leading cause of sleep-related disturbances, according to the studyYou may want to steer clear of cheese before bed if you're hoping to have sweet dreams! On Monday, June 30, Frontiers in Psychology published results of a study with 1,082 participants, sharing how 'food affects their dreams, including whether specific foods influence dreams directly (food-specific effects), through physiological symptoms (food distress), via altered sleep quality (sleep effects).' Researchers measured the results on the Nightmare Disorder Index, defined by the National Institute of Health (NIH) as 'an efficient and valid self-report assessment of nightmare disorder.' Cheese may not be the sole culprit, but dairy scored 22% on the Nightmare Disorder Index, while desserts and sweets came in at 31%. 'The effect was also associated with food allergies and Gluten Intolerance, while worse sleep perceptions were tied to Lactose Intolerance. Nightmare Disorder Index scores were strongly associated with Food Allergy and Lactose Intolerance, the latter being mediated by the severity of gastrointestinal symptoms,' Frontiers in Psychology reported. Their results found that 'food sensitivities, particularly Lactose Intolerance, as contributors to nightmare prevalence.' Additionally, 'dairy-induced gastrointestinal symptoms' can contribute to 'bizarre or disturbing dreams.' Frontiers in Psychology also stated that the theory has existed for years, citing an early 20th century cartoonist named Winsor McCay who 'published bizarre dreams that the cartoon's protagonists frequently attributed to having eaten Welsh rarebit — a spicy melted cheese toast — or other cheese dishes prior to sleep.' Marie-Pierre St-Onge, the director at the Center of Excellence for Sleep & Circadian Research at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, told NBC News, 'If you have GI issues, that could account for a lot of what's happening in terms of your sleep disturbances that could be associated with different dreams.' Patrick McNamara, an associate professor of neurology at Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine who studies the brain and sleep, also told the outlet that people who are lactose intolerant but still eat foods that contain dairy can trigger 'micro-arousals' that disturb sleep quality, resulting in stronger nightmares. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Tore Nielsen, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Montreal who has studied the topic, does not think that the condition, in most cases, is serious enough to consult a doctor. Read the original article on People
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump slams Elon Musk as feud reignites before Senate vote
President Trump slammed Elon Musk's subsidies, and Republican senators struck down a plan to shield artificial intelligence from state regulations. These two middle-of-the-night developments on Tuesday reinforced a growing schism between Trump and Silicon Valley supporters ahead of the vote on his "big, beautiful bill." The first development came at 12:44 a.m. ET, when Trump responded to Tesla (TSLA) CEO Musk's ongoing critiques of the package, focusing on the government grants that Musk's companies receive. "Without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa," wrote the president in a Truth Social post, adding, "perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this?" The president was referring to the government efficiency group that Musk ran until recently. The president's missive came after Trump's signature legislation underwent key changes in recent days that set off many in the tech industry, Musk most of all, with new measures to tax green energy companies and further support for fossil fuels, as well as a growing price tag. The divide between many in Silicon Valley and the "big, beautiful bill" has been evident for over a month. It appeared set to deepen further when, a few hours later, a closely watched artificial intelligence provision was stripped from the bill itself. This plan, which had many Silicon Valley supporters, was meant to shield the quickly growing AI industry from state and local regulations. But the idea now appears to be dead after Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee turned against a compromise plan Monday evening and stripped it from the bill. It wasn't close in the end, with the Senate voting 99-1 to adopt Blackburn's subsequent amendment in a count that wrapped up a little after 4:00 a.m. ET. Trump's overall package also appears to be teetering Tuesday morning after a series of overnight developments saw two key Republican senators — Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine — uncommitted to vote yes. Those two senators could join two Republicans already committed to voting no, which would be enough to sink the package. The drama between the president and the world's richest man has been up and down for weeks, but it escalated Monday afternoon when Musk offered new electoral threats against Republicans. Musk had already amplified Democrats' critiques and talked about the need for a new political party. He offered a striking promise Monday afternoon that lawmakers who vote for the bill "will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth." Musk, of course, was the biggest donor during the 2024 campaign, spending at least $288 million, most of which was offered in support of Trump. Trump reiterated his critiques of Musk Tuesday morning, speaking to reporters and saying of Musk's objection to losing EV subsidies, "Elon can lose a lot more than that." The president also called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) a "monster that might have to go back and eat Elon." And when asked by a reporter if he would consider deporting Musk, he demurred: "We'll have to take a look." What is unclear for the days ahead is how much the Trump-Musk fight will impact the actual chances of the bill's passage, with Senate amendment votes ongoing. Musk is clearly focused on a debate likely coming later this week, when the House is set to take up the amended measure if it passes. The House is where a vocal bloc of fiscal conservatives — who often vote as part of the "Freedom Caucus" — warily supported a previous version of the bill, saying a previous smaller price tag was too big. Musk even tagged some of these House Republican lawmakers in some of his latest posts, which continued throughout the night with dozens of messages. Musk also responded to Trump's comments about his subsidies by saying his companies like Tesla and SpaceX ( would be fine and that oil and gas subsidies should be removed as well. The back-and-forth over AI also came to a head overnight after the House passed a plan in May that included a complete ban on state regulations of AI for a decade. The little-noticed measure gained wider attention in the weeks that followed, with many of Trump's most loyal supporters opposing it. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene even admitted that she hadn't been aware of the provision when she voted yes. The Georgia lawmaker then announced her opposition and plans to vote no if this "violation of state rights" stayed in the bill. Trump himself doesn't appear to have taken a position on the measure, but it had the backing of his Silicon Valley-aligned aides, most notably the vocal support of AI and crypto czar (and longtime venture capitalist) David Sacks. But Republican opposition grew, and Sen. Blackburn of Tennessee became a leading voice of opposition in the Senate. She entered into negotiations over the issue and appeared to have found a compromise in recent days around the idea that instead of a decade-long ban, the provision would be amended to be a "temporary pause" of five years. States would be strongly discouraged from regulating AI, as lawmakers linked it to access to millions of dollars in AI infrastructure and deployment funding. But even that wasn't enough. Blackburn renounced the compromise, said a moratorium "could allow Big Tech to continue to exploit kids, creators, and conservatives," and teamed with a top Democrat to strike the provision entirely. Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (a former Trump press secretary) congratulated Blackburn on the move in a post the senator quickly reposted. "This is how you take on big tech!" Sanders wrote. This story has been updated with additional developments. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
E&E News
an hour ago
- E&E News
Greens sue to compel ESA action on desert wildflower
Environmentalists filed suit against the Fish and Wildlife Service on Tuesday for alleged inaction in the face of threats to a rare desert plant called the Tecopa bird's beak. Citing the presence or possibility of nearby mines, solar energy farms and geothermal projects, the Center for Biological Diversity called on the federal agency to make a final determination as to whether the plant warrants listing as threatened or endangered. According to the lawsuit, the FWS missed a decision deadline established under the Endangered Species Act. Advertisement 'The Fish and Wildlife Service has delayed long enough,' said Patrick Donnelly, Great Basin director at the CBD. 'We're suing to make sure that these special little plants get the protections they need before it's too late.'
