Axed duo back in Biennale after 'avoidable' arts crisis
In a statement on Wednesday, artist Khaled Sabsabi and curator Michael Dagostino said they had accepted an invitation to once again represent the nation at the 2026 Venice Biennale after being uninvited in February.
"This decision has renewed our confidence in Creative Australia and in the integrity of its selection process," they said.
"It offers a sense of resolution and allows us to move forward with optimism and hope after a period of significant personal and collective hardship."
The pair's invitation was rescinded when some of Sabsabi's early work, which referenced terrorism, was raised in federal parliament.
National arts funding and advisory body Creative Australia cancelled their invitation on the grounds their selection would cause prolonged and divisive debate, and that it posed an unacceptable risk to public support for Australia's artistic community.
More than 4000 people, including some of Australia's most respected artists, called for the pair to be reinstated.
They again accepted the invitation to represent the nation following an external review of Creative Australia's decision-making.
Missteps, assumptions and missed opportunities - although no single predominant failure - were identified in the review.
"It was a complex series of events that created a unique set of circumstances which the board had to address," Creative Australia acting chair Wesley Enoch said in a statement.
The review noted a "broader, fraught environment" surrounding the decision-making meant the agency was not as well-prepared as it needed to be.
A series of recommendations for better risk-identification procedures and crisis management were included, but the review noted the agency faced a considerable task to rebuild trust.
"If there is a dominant theme in the findings of this report, it is that much pain, anger, damage and anxiety could have been avoided if Creative Australia had been appropriately prepared for what, inevitably, was going to be a controversial decision," the report said.
Arts Minister Tony Burke said he still had confidence in the Creative Australia board and politicians should not be in charge of its decisions.
"These are arms-length decisions," he told ABC TV.
"When they made the decision to appoint, I said I supported it, when they made the decision to terminate, I said I'd support that."
But Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said the agency's leadership needed a "clean out".
"This is the right end to a very sorry saga but it's a terrible day for the board and CEO of Creative Australia who have disgraced themselves throughout this ordeal," she said.
Coalition arts spokesman Julian Leeser criticised the duo's reinstatement.
"This has been a deeply flawed process from the beginning and has now led to a ridiculous outcome," he said.
"It diminishes the power of Australian art as a tool of soft diplomacy."
An axed duo have been reinstated as Australia's picks for a major international exhibition after a review found the nation's arts body should have been better prepared for an inevitably controversial decision.
In a statement on Wednesday, artist Khaled Sabsabi and curator Michael Dagostino said they had accepted an invitation to once again represent the nation at the 2026 Venice Biennale after being uninvited in February.
"This decision has renewed our confidence in Creative Australia and in the integrity of its selection process," they said.
"It offers a sense of resolution and allows us to move forward with optimism and hope after a period of significant personal and collective hardship."
The pair's invitation was rescinded when some of Sabsabi's early work, which referenced terrorism, was raised in federal parliament.
National arts funding and advisory body Creative Australia cancelled their invitation on the grounds their selection would cause prolonged and divisive debate, and that it posed an unacceptable risk to public support for Australia's artistic community.
More than 4000 people, including some of Australia's most respected artists, called for the pair to be reinstated.
They again accepted the invitation to represent the nation following an external review of Creative Australia's decision-making.
Missteps, assumptions and missed opportunities - although no single predominant failure - were identified in the review.
"It was a complex series of events that created a unique set of circumstances which the board had to address," Creative Australia acting chair Wesley Enoch said in a statement.
The review noted a "broader, fraught environment" surrounding the decision-making meant the agency was not as well-prepared as it needed to be.
A series of recommendations for better risk-identification procedures and crisis management were included, but the review noted the agency faced a considerable task to rebuild trust.
"If there is a dominant theme in the findings of this report, it is that much pain, anger, damage and anxiety could have been avoided if Creative Australia had been appropriately prepared for what, inevitably, was going to be a controversial decision," the report said.
Arts Minister Tony Burke said he still had confidence in the Creative Australia board and politicians should not be in charge of its decisions.
"These are arms-length decisions," he told ABC TV.
"When they made the decision to appoint, I said I supported it, when they made the decision to terminate, I said I'd support that."
But Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said the agency's leadership needed a "clean out".
"This is the right end to a very sorry saga but it's a terrible day for the board and CEO of Creative Australia who have disgraced themselves throughout this ordeal," she said.
Coalition arts spokesman Julian Leeser criticised the duo's reinstatement.
"This has been a deeply flawed process from the beginning and has now led to a ridiculous outcome," he said.
"It diminishes the power of Australian art as a tool of soft diplomacy."
An axed duo have been reinstated as Australia's picks for a major international exhibition after a review found the nation's arts body should have been better prepared for an inevitably controversial decision.
In a statement on Wednesday, artist Khaled Sabsabi and curator Michael Dagostino said they had accepted an invitation to once again represent the nation at the 2026 Venice Biennale after being uninvited in February.
"This decision has renewed our confidence in Creative Australia and in the integrity of its selection process," they said.
"It offers a sense of resolution and allows us to move forward with optimism and hope after a period of significant personal and collective hardship."
The pair's invitation was rescinded when some of Sabsabi's early work, which referenced terrorism, was raised in federal parliament.
National arts funding and advisory body Creative Australia cancelled their invitation on the grounds their selection would cause prolonged and divisive debate, and that it posed an unacceptable risk to public support for Australia's artistic community.
More than 4000 people, including some of Australia's most respected artists, called for the pair to be reinstated.
They again accepted the invitation to represent the nation following an external review of Creative Australia's decision-making.
Missteps, assumptions and missed opportunities - although no single predominant failure - were identified in the review.
"It was a complex series of events that created a unique set of circumstances which the board had to address," Creative Australia acting chair Wesley Enoch said in a statement.
The review noted a "broader, fraught environment" surrounding the decision-making meant the agency was not as well-prepared as it needed to be.
A series of recommendations for better risk-identification procedures and crisis management were included, but the review noted the agency faced a considerable task to rebuild trust.
"If there is a dominant theme in the findings of this report, it is that much pain, anger, damage and anxiety could have been avoided if Creative Australia had been appropriately prepared for what, inevitably, was going to be a controversial decision," the report said.
Arts Minister Tony Burke said he still had confidence in the Creative Australia board and politicians should not be in charge of its decisions.
"These are arms-length decisions," he told ABC TV.
"When they made the decision to appoint, I said I supported it, when they made the decision to terminate, I said I'd support that."
But Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said the agency's leadership needed a "clean out".
"This is the right end to a very sorry saga but it's a terrible day for the board and CEO of Creative Australia who have disgraced themselves throughout this ordeal," she said.
Coalition arts spokesman Julian Leeser criticised the duo's reinstatement.
"This has been a deeply flawed process from the beginning and has now led to a ridiculous outcome," he said.
"It diminishes the power of Australian art as a tool of soft diplomacy."
An axed duo have been reinstated as Australia's picks for a major international exhibition after a review found the nation's arts body should have been better prepared for an inevitably controversial decision.
In a statement on Wednesday, artist Khaled Sabsabi and curator Michael Dagostino said they had accepted an invitation to once again represent the nation at the 2026 Venice Biennale after being uninvited in February.
"This decision has renewed our confidence in Creative Australia and in the integrity of its selection process," they said.
"It offers a sense of resolution and allows us to move forward with optimism and hope after a period of significant personal and collective hardship."
The pair's invitation was rescinded when some of Sabsabi's early work, which referenced terrorism, was raised in federal parliament.
National arts funding and advisory body Creative Australia cancelled their invitation on the grounds their selection would cause prolonged and divisive debate, and that it posed an unacceptable risk to public support for Australia's artistic community.
More than 4000 people, including some of Australia's most respected artists, called for the pair to be reinstated.
They again accepted the invitation to represent the nation following an external review of Creative Australia's decision-making.
Missteps, assumptions and missed opportunities - although no single predominant failure - were identified in the review.
"It was a complex series of events that created a unique set of circumstances which the board had to address," Creative Australia acting chair Wesley Enoch said in a statement.
The review noted a "broader, fraught environment" surrounding the decision-making meant the agency was not as well-prepared as it needed to be.
A series of recommendations for better risk-identification procedures and crisis management were included, but the review noted the agency faced a considerable task to rebuild trust.
"If there is a dominant theme in the findings of this report, it is that much pain, anger, damage and anxiety could have been avoided if Creative Australia had been appropriately prepared for what, inevitably, was going to be a controversial decision," the report said.
Arts Minister Tony Burke said he still had confidence in the Creative Australia board and politicians should not be in charge of its decisions.
"These are arms-length decisions," he told ABC TV.
"When they made the decision to appoint, I said I supported it, when they made the decision to terminate, I said I'd support that."
But Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said the agency's leadership needed a "clean out".
"This is the right end to a very sorry saga but it's a terrible day for the board and CEO of Creative Australia who have disgraced themselves throughout this ordeal," she said.
Coalition arts spokesman Julian Leeser criticised the duo's reinstatement.
"This has been a deeply flawed process from the beginning and has now led to a ridiculous outcome," he said.
"It diminishes the power of Australian art as a tool of soft diplomacy."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
9 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Do it immediately': Ray Hadley lashes out at shark net madness
Premier Chris Minns must act now to stop the removal of shark nets from Sydney beaches ahead of the summer season, starting September 1. Three councils, Waverley, Northern Beaches and Central Coast, have been given the option to trial one beach each without a shark net. The Greens are being blamed, but Central Coast Mayor Lawrie McKinna says he was not involved in the decision: 'That decision was taken by the administrator. We don't want to remove shark nets from our beaches'. He said people travelled to the area specifically because of the safety of its beaches. So who is playing Russian roulette with swimmers and surfers? According to McKinna, it's the Minns Labor government - and particularly the left faction led by Upper House MP Penny Sharpe. Chris Minns, with a stroke of the pen, you can stop this. You can say: 'No, the nets are staying'. If there is a shark attack on one of these beaches next summer after the nets are removed, the blame will fall squarely on your shoulders. Pick up the pen. Do it. You must act immediately.
The Age
16 hours ago
- The Age
A target of Latham's disparaging messages, Abigail Boyd is directing her anger elsewhere
'This was a private message that he [Latham] didn't actually intend for me to see, so I have accepted his apology.' Instead, her anger is reserved for the premier. After passing the lower house with support from progressive crossbench MPs including Alex Greenwich after he moved amendments, Labor's bill has been blocked in the upper house thanks to a voting bloc comprising Coalition, progressive crossbenchers including the Greens and Animal Justice Party, and Latham. While this masthead previously reported the government had worked hard to lobby Latham to support its workers' compensation bill, Labor has sought to capitalise on the accusations against him by focusing on the Coalition for working with the former One Nation MP on amendments to the legislation. The amendments include changes to the definition of sexual harassment to include whether a perpetrator knew 'or should reasonably know' their actions were sexual harassment. Minns has urged the Coalition to 'cut that string', while Treasurer Daniel Mookhey has said the change to the definition of sexual harassment would mean a victim would have to 'prove their perpetrator deliberately wanted to hurt them'. Loading That, said Boyd, is an example of 'stunning hypocrisy' because it is Labor's bill that creates definitions of sexual harassment, bullying and racial discrimination that injured workers would have to meet. The bill has also been criticised by unions, in part because of what they say will be the disproportionate impact on female-dominated industries such as nursing from changes that would make it harder for people with psychological injury to receive workers' compensation. In a statement, a spokesman for Minns said the government 'totally rejects' the assertion its criticisms of the Coalition and Greens were hypocritical, and it was a 'belated political response from the Greens and Abigail Boyd after months of the government calling out Greens-Latham co-operation'. Minns' repeated attacks on the Coalition have raised eyebrows among MPs because of Labor's willingness to lobby Latham on bills and, in some cases, work with him on specific amendments to legislation. His description of Latham last month as a 'shameful bigot' following remarks made against anti-domestic violence campaigner Rosie Batty, independent MP Alex Greenwich and the Jewish community also came after the MP opposed the workers' compensation reform. 'I sat there and watched them trying to win over Mark Latham to supporting their bill,' she said. 'This idea that they won't work with him is laughable. If they had his vote, or if they needed it, we would not be hearing any of the criticism we are at the moment.' Boyd, who has long had an antagonistic relationship with Latham over her push for changes to the culture inside NSW parliament, met Minns in February last year to raise the issue of Labor's 'track record on dealing with sexism in the parliament' after becoming fed up with the 'permissiveness' of some MPs, including Latham. That included, she said, voting against a motion she moved to have parliamentary standing orders updated 'to require respectful behaviour in both Houses'. Labor subsequently supported the referral.
Perth Now
a day ago
- Perth Now
Protester's message to ‘cowardly' cops
A former Greens candidate who fears she may lose vision in her eye following an altercation with police says protesters will not be stopped by 'cowardly police' or governments. Hannah Thomas, formerly a Greens candidate in Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's seat of Grayndler, participated at a protest outside SEC Plating in Belmore on June 27. Protesters alleged the company participated in the production of weapons components used by the Israel Defence Forces. The company has strongly denied the claims. Ms Thomas was arrested by NSW Police at the protest last month, and suffered an eye injury so severe she fears she may lose her vision. The former Greens candidate has issued a strong message to police at a protest in Sydney's Hyde Park on Sunday afternoon. Hannah Thomas says protesters will not be stopped by 'cowardly police' or governments after she was NewsWire / Damian Shaw Credit: News Corp Australia 'You can send your cowardly police … and we still will not be afraid of you,' Ms Thomas said. 'I'd rather look in the mirror every day and see someone with one eye and a disfigured face than someone with no soul.' She addressed the crowd for about 10 minutes, wearing dark sunglasses and standing in front of both a Palestinian and a Lebanese flag. 'So to Albanse and to (Chris) Minns, we don't owe you respect, we do not owe you decorum, we owe the people of Gaza our resistance. '...We won't stop. 'You should be afraid of our movement, because we are not afraid of you.' Hannah Thomas has had surgery to recover from the injury to her eye. Supplied. Credit: Supplied Ms Thomas spoke at a protest on Sunday afternoon, wearing a pair of sunglasses. NewsWire / Damian Shaw Credit: News Corp Australia Ms Thomas has already had surgery to recover from the injury to her eye, however she last week told 10 News+ she will have at least one more surgery. 'Even if I don't lose the eye, I don't know how much vision I'm getting back,' Ms Thomas told the program. 'I won't know for some months because I'll have at least one more surgery.' Hannah Thomas (right) marched at the Gaza protest in the Sydney CBD. NewsWire / Damian Shaw Credit: News Corp Australia She was subsequently charged with hindering or resisting arrest and two counts of refusing to comply with all directions to disperse. NSW Police have since withdrawn a charge related to the rarely used emergency anti-protest powers introduced after the 2005 Cronulla riots. Ms Thomas entered pleas of not guilty to all three charges. NSW Police Assistant Commissioner Brett McFadden earlier said he had viewed the video of Ms Thomas' arrest, and saw no evidence of misconduct by the officers. However, a critical incident was declared and the matter will be investigated by an independent police watchdog. At the federal election Ms Thomas received 25.1 per cent of the first preference votes, but was roundly defeated by the Prime Minister who took 53.5 per cent of first preferences. Since the defeat Ms Thomas has been employed as a media officer for the Greens. She recently told 10 News that the injury had affected her vision, and she could no long look at a screen for 'too long'. 'I don't know what happens with my career because of this injury.'
