London Trans Pride sees record turnout after Supreme Court ruling
The attendance this year marked a significant increase of about 40,000 participants compared to the previous year's event.
Organisers and attendees highlighted the particular importance of this year's march following a Supreme Court ruling in April regarding the definitions of 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010.
Community representatives expressed concerns that the ruling and subsequent guidance could lead to increased discrimination and 'vigilante' actions against trans individuals in public spaces.
Speakers at the event underscored the community's resolve to assert their rights and dignity, emphasising solidarity against attempts to undermine their place in society.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Sport England to meet RFL over concerns with rugby league funding at stake
Sport England will meet the Rugby Football League in the coming weeks to air their concerns over developments at the governing body in a move which could have an impact on the sport's financial outlook. Rugby league is one of several sports in receipt of millions of pounds worth of funding from Sport England every year. That funding is critical to the ongoing existence of the sport, and is particularly important for the RFL, with continued adherence to the code for sports governance essential to maintain it. The RFL has been under scrutiny in recent months with its former chief executive, Nigel Wood, returning to the organisation initially as its interim chair following the resignation of his predecessor, Simon Johnson, in March. Wood was appointed by clubs to lead a strategic review of the professional game which recommended Super League expanding to 14 teams as early as 2026. That was approved by clubs at a meeting in Leeds on Monday, two weeks on from Wood's interim position as chair being made permanent. That code details that all key leadership appointments – such as chair of the governing body – have to follow recruitment processes that are deemed 'open and transparent' by Sport England. The Guardian has now had confirmation that meetings are planned in the coming weeks in light of Wood's installation as permanent chair. A Sport England spokesperson told the Guardian: 'All organisations in receipt of significant funding from Sport England must reach the standards of the Code for Sports Governance. This includes major leadership appointments following open and transparent recruitment processes. 'Following recent developments, we will meet with the leadership of the RFL in the coming weeks to address our concerns.' Tony Sutton, the RFL's CEO, said: 'The RFL is working with Sport England on a Governance Action Plan, following the resignations from the Board earlier in the year. The new board at the RFL remain totally committed to working towards full compliance with Sport England's Code for Sports Governance.' Wood's return was seen by many of his critics as controversial. Clubs elected to remove him as chief executive in 2018 and he was paid a severance package of over £300,000. He has since held the role of chair at Bradford Bulls, a role he relinquished in order to return to the RFL, though he remains a shareholder of the Championship club. However, those same clubs now feel he is the best individual to deliver an overhaul of the professional game, led by an expansion of Super League to 14 teams. The Guardian revealed earlier this week how Sky Sports were seeking answers from Super League on the decision to extend the competition. The RFL have been approached for comment.
BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
What went wrong with NATS' air traffic control system?
A radar problem used within the UK's air traffic control system caused chaos at airports in the UK and beyond on fault lasted a mere 20 minutes, but was enough to ground planes across the country, causing 150 flight cancellations and delays that have continued into what went wrong with this vital piece of air traffic technology? NATS, which is partly owned by the government, manages all of the UK's airspace for flights arriving and departing the country's has not provided lots of detail on Wednesday's outage other than saying there was "radar-related issue which was resolved by quickly switching to the back-up system".It said it reduced traffic during the outage for safety reasons and added that "there is no evidence" that it was caused by any cyber Secretary Heidi Alexander has said NATS told her it was "an isolated event and there is no evidence of malign activity".To understand how such a brief radar failure could cause such much havoc, Graham Lake, a former director general of the Civil Air Navigation Services Organisation (CANSO), said people should imagine the NATS air traffic network as "national infrastructure"."Think of the network as motorways in the sky," he told the BBC."When you lose something like surveillance radar coverage for whatever reason, the capability of your network degrades to a country lane."That's why the systems slow down when there's a technical failure." Is NATS to blame for the outage? Airlines have been vocal in their criticism of NATS, noting that this is the second time its system has failed since August 2023, more than 700,000 passengers were affected when some 500 flights were cancelled at the UK's busiest airports due to a major airline, Ryanair, has called for NATS chief executive Martin Rolfe to resign, arguing "no lessons" have been learned from the previous has called the outage "extremely disappointing".However, Mr Lake told the BBC's Today programme he did not believe it was fair to call for Mr Rolfe to lose his job, arguing that technical failures are "inevitable" and that "the recovery was quick".Even with the issues in 2023, NATS has been performing well "if you look at the minutes of outage over a period of years", he said. Are the UK's skies just too busy? Mr Lake said that the NATS performs well when compared with other countries - which also suffer from air traffic glitches - and that Wednesday's issue was a case of bad luck."The UK airspace is very busy, certainly among the busiest in the world. We are at the busiest time of year and the failure yesterday was at the busiest time of day, so it's not an ideal situation."Because of the congestion in the UK's skies, Heathrow Airlines Operators Committee, which represents airlines that fly from the airport, has called for more runways in the south east of England to increase group's chief executive Nigel Wicking said "the NATS operational teams do a phenomenal job" but that the system is "running hot" and "when things go wrong and we lose the system for even an hour the impact is major".The UK government has said it backs the expansion of Heathrow, Gatwick, and Luton airports, but critics argue the plans would increase emissions and air pollution.
Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour deserves to be punished by voters for its disgraceful smear against Farage
This morning Labour MP Neil Coyle Tweeted a picture of Nigel Farage standing at the podium of his party's last annual conference. The legend on the lectern read: 'Reform will fix it'. 'This was Reform conference branding,' wrote Coyle, smugly confirming what his colleagues and fellow Labour MPs have been saying in the last 48 hours: that Farage, because of his opposition to the Online Safety Act, is 'on the side' of predators like the late Jimmy Savile. Allow me to take you back to the dark day in October 2021 when Conservative MP David Amess was murdered by a knife-wielding Islamist in his constituency surgery. David's former colleagues from across the House of Commons gathered to seek ways of avoiding the very real threat of Islamism, and so came up with the notion that if only everyone was kinder to each other on social media then everything would be alright in future. It was an illogical and cowardly turn for the debate to take, but let's go with it for now, for it suits our purposes in the current circumstances. In what way does the Jimmy Savile smear – and it is a smear, whatever its defenders may claim – against Farage and his party align with this Government's belief that there is a need for more courtesy and tolerance – dare I say, kindness – in modern political discourse? Let's face it: Peter Kyle, the Secretary of State for Technology, was suggesting Farage was on the side of paedos. There was no subtlety in the attack, there was no need to read between the lines. Labour might as well have emblazoned 'If you vote Reform, you need your hard drive checked' across its election literature. And before the usual suspects take to Twitter to accuse me of being a closet Reform supporter, nothing could be further from the truth: I would vote SNP before I voted Reform (and if you are aware of my views about the SNP, that should tell you something). I want to see Reform defeated, because I think Farage would be a disaster for this country were he ever to achieve office. If only Labour took the Reform threat as seriously as I do. Because this sort of smear isn't a serious political response by a mature political party. There are primary level kids in this country right now who are in their playground murmuring 'Come on mate, get a grip' to the Labour leadership. But worse than being childish and downright stupid – not to mention politically incompetent, and we'll come to that – this whole drama is downright dangerous. When kind and good MPs like David Amess – and Jo Cox before him – can so easily fall victim to extremists, painting Farage or any MP of any party as being sympathetic to child rapists is a grotesquely dangerous and hugely irresponsible thing to do. For a party that fought tooth and nail against holding a national public inquiry into Pakistani rape gangs, it is also a self-defeating tactic. The sad thing is that Kyle, Coyle and even Number 10 – where the attack was approved, if not where it was originated – know this. Yet still they persevere and double down on an attack that would, in any sensible world, have made them feel ashamed of themselves as soon as it was uttered. For those of you who aren't keeping up: in 2025, cabinet ministers label those who criticise Government policy as apologists for child rapists. God forbid that any MP suffers the same fate as either David Amess or Jo Cox, but if ever such an attack is ever repeated, calls for kindness and courtesy towards political opponents from senior Labour figures serving in cabinet today will be immediately dismissed as meaningless and insincere, for they will fail to include the caveat to such an injunction: 'Provided they don't threaten us electorally.' The real stupidity of this attack is in its gross insult to those millions of Britons who are considering giving their vote in future elections to Reform. The phrase 'Project Fear' was deployed against the campaigns in support of the status quo in both the Scottish independence and the EU referendum two years later. It perfectly captured the negative mindset of those campaigns and provided a boost to the anti-UK and anti-EU efforts. In the case of the former, it almost led to their victory. In the case of the latter, it helped them across the finishing line first. Yet the arguments used by both the Yes and the Leave campaigns never once plumbed the depths of sheer offensiveness, childishness and superficiality as what we have seen from Labour ministers and back benchers. Do they imagine that the voters are impressed? Can we expect to see more of this strategy deployed in the months ahead? Perhaps Number 10, fresh from its impressive victories on welfare reform, the winter fuel allowance and Palestine, will authorise leaflets pronouncing that 'Nigel Farage is a poopy-head'? If this is the best Labour has got, if these are the depths to which a once professional party has fallen, perhaps it should just concede now and retire from the game. Voters aren't stupid, and a strategy based on exactly that assumption will deserve to fail; they will deliver a damning judgement when the polls re-open.
