Trump Mobile's T1 phone: How much will the gold smartphone cost and how to pre-order now?
The Trump family on Monday said it is starting a new mobile phone service. The president's son, Eric, said that the new venture is called Trump Mobile and it will sell phones that will be built in the US. He further announced a new mobile phone and service, called T1 Phone, which will be gold and is 'proudly designed and built in the United States'.
The T1 Phone is currently available for pre-order, per the Trump Mobile website. The phone will be available in September. Customers can also subscribe to 'Trump Mobile' with their current mobile device.
Read More: Trump Mobile released, T1 phone to be launched Sept 2025 | What do they offer?
'Hard-working Americans deserve a wireless service that's affordable, reflects their values, and delivers reliable quality they can count on,' Eric Trump said in a statement on Monday.
The Trump Organization said the new, gold-coloured phone available for USD 499 in August, called the T1 Phone, won't be designed or made by Trump Mobile, but by another company.
Retail Price: The T1 Phone is priced at $499. A $100 deposit is required for pre-orders.
Service Plan: The accompanying '47 Plan' costs $47.45/month, offering unlimited talk, text, and data, plus extras like telehealth and roadside assistance.
Announced Release: Trump Mobile's press release states the T1 Phone will launch in August 2025, but the official website lists September 2025.
Pre-Order Status: Pre-orders are open as of June 16, 2025, with a $100 deposit.
Read More: Trump Mobile copying Obama's phone strategy? Here's how the two plans are different
The T1 runs Android 15 with a 6.8-inch AMOLED display (120Hz), 50MP main camera, 12GB RAM, 256GB expandable storage, 5,000mAh battery, and features like a headphone jack and AI Face Unlock. However, the chipset is unspecified, and the camera quality is questioned. A 250-seat customer service center will be set up in the US to assist subscribers. Customers will be able to switch to the Trump Mobile network with their current phones,or connect with the new Android-based T1.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump's three excruciating choices on Iran
DONALD TRUMP promised to end the wars in the Middle East. Instead America's president finds himself supervising a new one. No matter: he thinks the conflict between Israel and Iran, now in its fourth day, will be simple to stop. 'We can easily get a deal done,' he wrote in a social-media post on June 15th. A few hours later he implied that peace between the two countries, bitter foes since 1979, was merely a matter of convincing them to trade more. His breezy optimism is easy to dismiss, out of place with a war that has rained air strikes on Tehran and missile barrages on Tel Aviv. But Mr Trump will nonetheless have a big say in when and how that war ends. In the coming days he will have to make several decisions that will either restrain or embolden Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister. Mr Netanyahu started the war, but he is relying on Mr Trump to end it; how the president plans to do so, though, is anyone's guess. The first decision is whether to demand a diplomatic solution. Before the war America was trying to negotiate a new nuclear pact with Iran, to replace the one Mr Trump abandoned in 2018. A sixth round of talks had been scheduled for this weekend. Unsurprisingly, it was cancelled. Still, Mr Trump continues to urge negotiations. Iran's nuclear project is the ostensible focus of Israel's war effort; an agreement to restrict it would be a key part of a ceasefire. But Mr Trump will face a string of obstacles. More on the war between Israel and Iran: For a start, neither warring party is ready to make such a deal. Israel has spent years planning this war. It will not want to stop fighting after a few days, with many of its goals unmet. And while Iran says it is willing to accept a mutual ceasefire, it is not yet prepared to make major concessions on its nuclear programme. America will want it to forswear uranium enrichment and dismantle many of its nuclear facilities, things it has resisted doing for decades. Perhaps Iran will be more willing to capitulate as the damage mounts. The regime wants to survive. But it does not trust America in general, and Mr Trump in particular: he ditched the nuclear pact in 2018, assassinated Iran's top commander in 2020 and allowed Israel to start a war. The German foreign minister has offered, alongside Britain and France, to negotiate with the Iranians. But America would still have to play a central role in the talks. No one else could assure both Israel and Iran that an agreement would stick. If it is serious about a deal, it will need to be a more competent negotiator this time around. Steve Witkoff, the president's Middle East envoy, managed just five meetings with Iran in two months, while juggling a portfolio that also included the wars in Gaza and Ukraine. He also scorned help from American allies (a European diplomat says he received more detailed readouts on the talks from Iran than from America). If Mr Trump is not serious about diplomacy, his second choice is whether America should join the war. Satellite imagery suggests that Israel has destroyed the so-called 'pilot-fuel enrichment plant' at Natanz, an above-ground facility where Iran enriched uranium to 60%, a small step below weapons-grade. But it has yet to damage the enrichment facility at Fordow, which is dug into the side of a mountain, too deep for Israeli ordnance to reach. Israel could damage the entrances and ventilation shafts, in effect entombing the facility for a time. It would rather enlist help from America, which has specialised bombs capable of burrowing deep underground. It has asked Mr Trump to join strikes on Fordow (he has not yet agreed). In the most optimistic scenario those sorties would both cripple the facility and spook Iran into submitting to a deal. Reality is rarely so tidy, however. Iran may fear that strikes on Fordow are merely the opening act in a broader campaign to topple the regime. That could lead it to retaliate against America or its allies in the region. Iran has so far refrained from such actions, fearing they would draw America into the war; if America was already involved, though, Iran may feel it had nothing to lose. Some of Mr Trump's supporters in Washington, and some analysts in Israel, suspect Mr Netanyahu has such a scenario in mind. When the war began, after all, Israel said it only needed America's permission. Now it wants America to join a limited military campaign—one that could easily morph into something bigger. The prime minister seems increasingly fixated on toppling Iran's regime. In a statement addressed to the people of Iran on June 13th he urged them to 'stand up' against their rulers. Two days later, in an interview with Fox News, he was asked if regime change was Israel's goal. 'It could certainly be the result, because the Iran regime is very weak,' Mr Netanyahu replied. Several of Mr Trump's advisers have urged him not to approve American strikes, fearing it would become an open-ended campaign. That points to Mr Trump's third choice. Israeli leaders like to say that their country defends itself by itself. But it relies on America to protect it against Iranian ballistic missiles, to share intelligence and to resupply its army. If Mr Trump stays out of the war, and if he declines to pursue serious diplomacy—or if his efforts are aimless and futile, a hallmark of his administration—he will have to decide how much continued support to give Israel. He could urge Israel to end the war anyway. Or he could allow it to continue, much as he has done in Gaza since March, when Israel abandoned a ceasefire there. Israel could probably continue its strikes in Iran for weeks, especially if Iran runs short of the ballistic missiles it uses to counter-attack. Would it eventually declare victory? Or would it keep bombing and hope it could destabilise the regime? And if Iran could no longer effectively strike back at Israel, would it widen the war to neighbouring countries? The longer the war goes on, the more unpredictable it becomes. 'There's no end game for Israel unless it draws in the US or unless the regime falls,' says a Western diplomat. 'Both are big gambles.' Eventually the only plausible way out may be a deal. But getting one will require diplomatic savvy from Mr Trump and flexibility from both Israel and Iran—things that none of them are known for. Sign up to the Middle East Dispatch, a weekly newsletter that keeps you in the loop on a fascinating, complex and consequential part of the world. Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon are clashing with Trump over Iran-Israel conflict
President Donald Trump on Monday took a dig at MAGA allies Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon over their criticism of the United States' involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict. This comes as the 78-year-old warned people in Tehran to 'evacuate immediately' as tensions between the countries increased overnight. Since the conflict began, Carlson and Bannon have been critical of Washington's involvement. On the War Room podcast earlier on Monday, Carlson said that he actually does 'really love Trump'. Read More: Netanyahu says Iran 'wants to kill' Trump, was behind assassination attempts 'He is a deeply humane, kind person, and I am saying this because I am really afraid that my country is going to be further weakened by this. I think we are going to see the end of American empire. Other nations would like to see that, and this is a perfect way to scuttle the U.S.S. America on the shoals of Iran. But it is also going to end Trump's presidency,' he said. Trump retaliated during the G7 summit. 'I don't know what Tucker Carlson is saying. Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen," he said. Only hours later, Trump slammed the former Fox News host on Truth Social. "Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that,' IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!' the president wrote. Read More: UK citizen stranded in Jerusalem describes city after Iran attack: 'Ghost town' President Trump has cut short his G7 trip and is returning to Washington on Monday, the White House confirmed. 'President Trump will return to Washington tonight so he can attend to many important matters,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. She added that he made the decision due to the situation in the Middle East. 'President Trump had a great day at the G7, even signing a major trade deal with the United Kingdom and Prime Minister Keir Starmer,' Leavitt wrote. 'Much was accomplished, but because of what's going on in the Middle East, President Trump will be leaving tonight after dinner with Heads of State.'
The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Trump muses about turning G7 back into G8, or even G9 with China
U.S. President Donald Trump kicked off his time at the Group of Seven summit on Monday (June 16, 2025) by suggesting that Russia and maybe even China should be part of the organisation. The U.S. leader indicated that he would rather have the G7 become the G8 or possibly even the G9, although Russia and China would notably be authoritarian governments in an organization whose members are democracies. Mr. Trump asserted that it was a 'very big mistake' to remove Russia in 2014 after it annexed Crimea, a move that precipitated Russia's wider invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The comments added more complexity regarding Mr. Trump's interests as he is set to meet on Tuesday (June 17, 2025) with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy about ending the brutal war started by the invasion. 'The G7 used to be the G8. Barack Obama and a person named Trudeau didn't want to have Russia in,' Mr. Trump said, referring to Justin Trudeau, who was elected Canadian prime minister the year after Russia was removed from the G8. Stephen Harper was the Canadian prime minister at the time. 'I think you wouldn't have a war right now if you had Russia in, and you wouldn't have a war right now if Mr. Trump were president four years ago,' Mr. Trump said. 'They threw Russia out, which I claimed was a very big mistake, even though I wasn't in politics then.' Mr. Trump added that Russia's leader, Vladimir Putin, is 'no longer at the table, so it makes life more complicated.' Asked by a reporter if China should also be added, Mr. Trump said: 'It's not a bad idea. I don't mind that if somebody wants to see just China coming in.' The U.S. president said it's important for world leaders to be able to speak with one another at summits. 'Putin speaks to me. He doesn't speak to anybody else,' Mr. Trump said. 'He doesn't want to talk because he was very insulted when he got thrown out of the G8, as I would be, as you would be, as anybody would be.' Mr. Trump was speaking to reporters after meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who is hosting the summit in Kananaskis, along the Canadian Rocky Mountains. The U.S. President has levied steep tariffs against dozens of countries, and the G7 leaders are also trying to address the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran over Tehran's nuclear ambitions. But Mr. Carney tried to flatter Mr. Trump by noting that the G7 would be rudderless without the U.S. 'The G7 is nothing without U.S. leadership,' Mr. Carney said.
