Boston housing crisis 2025: How Wu and Kraft plan to tackle affordability
During a candidate forum hosted by the Massachusetts Affordable Homeownership Alliance in Roxbury on Tuesday evening, Wu and Kraft shared their respective visions and plans to reduce housing costs. Both candidates agreed that housing is too expensive in the city, but they disagreed on the most effective ways to tackle the problem.
Wu emphasized her track record on housing during her first term as mayor, noting that more than 1,000 first-time homebuyers had purchased homes with city assistance during that time. And more than 20% of affordable homes currently in development are expected to be homeownership units, not rentals.
She said her administration has cut the time it takes for affordable housing developments to get through the permit process in half.
However, Kraft asserted, as he has throughout the campaign, that construction of new housing was currently too slow to address affordability issues in the region. He said repeatedly Tuesday evening that he wanted to lower the cost of construction to help spur development.
By creating more housing, the city will be able to collect more tax dollars to funnel into housing programs such as down payment assistance for first-time homebuyers, Kraft said.
'It's too expensive to get housing built, and we need to get housing production moving,' he said. 'We are going to work with private developers and other people in the housing world to make sure we can get the production of housing and supply of housing moving forward.'
Read more: Josh Kraft calls out 'heartbreaking' conditions at Boston Housing Authority
Although both candidates stated they would continue to fund or expand existing housing programs, they disagreed on two sometimes-controversial issues: inclusionary zoning and a transfer fee on luxury real estate sales.
Last year, the city revised its inclusionary zoning policy, which requires new housing projects with seven or more units to set aside 17 to 20% of those units as affordable, depending on the building's size. Previously, the requirement was 13% affordable units.
Read more: Downtown Boston zoning changes could allow buildings up to 700 feet tall
The transfer fee, proposed by Wu in 2022, would impose a tax of 1 to 2% on real estate sales exceeding $2 million, with the revenue from the tax allocated toward affordable housing. While the City Council approved the proposal, the city needs approval from the state Legislature to implement the tax, which it has not received.
Kraft said the proposed transfer fee and retaining the current inclusionary zoning requirements would make housing construction more expensive, slowing down development.
'We need housing. That's the number one issue,' he said. 'The number one way to solve a housing emergency is to get more housing built.'
He said if in the future, the city saw an easier economic environment, he would consider the transfer fee.
Wu, however, took issue with her opponent's characterization of the situation. She compared his view of the inclusionary zoning requirements to changing the channel on an old television, saying it made no sense to keep playing with the antenna 'when the TV is unplugged from the wall.'
She said the slowing of housing development had also been seen around the country, not just in Boston, and the inclusionary zoning changes did not cause it. Instead, she attributed it to high interest rates and tariffs imposed by the federal government, which drive up construction costs.
She also pushed back on Kraft's stance on the transfer fee, saying it made 'no sense' to wait until 'when it's good for developers.'
'We hear the same things over and over again, that the same communities just have to wait, and eventually it'll trickle down. eventually [developers will] make their money and then everyone else will have the benefit,' she said. 'It is not the job of the city government or the public sector or the people to subsidize for-profit developers in making their money. It is our job to focus on affordability.'
MAHA will hold a second, virtual candidate forum next month. The preliminary municipal election will be held on Sept. 9, 2025. Polls will be open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m.
More on Boston's 2025 race for mayor
This issue won big in NYC's mayoral race. Why Wu, Kraft should pay attention | Bay State Briefing
These are the Big 3 issues to watch in Boston's mayoral race — and one sleeper
Super PACs continue to flood Boston mayor's race with cash: Who's spending what
Read the original article on MassLive.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Search for answers after Texas' deadly floods brings lawmakers to devastated Hill Country
KERRVILLE, Texas (AP) — Texas lawmakers will take their search for answers following the deadly July 4 floods to the heart of the devastation in Kerr County, where local officials were expected to face questions over their response to the disaster that swept away homes and campers along the Guadalupe River. The hearing Thursday is the first time a panel of lawmakers is visiting the hard-hit Texas Hill Country since the floods, which killed at least 136 people. Most were in Kerr County, including 27 young campers and counselors at Camp Mystic, an all-girls summer camp. Among those invited to testify were local leaders who have defended their preparations and response to the fast-rising waters. Residents will also be given the chance to address lawmakers. The hearing comes as authorities have begun publicly releasing records and audio — including 911 calls — that have provided new glimpses into the escalating danger and chaos in the early hours of the July Fourth holiday. They include panicked and confused messages from residents caught in trees as well as families fleeing with children from homes with water creeping up to the knees. 'People are dying,' one woman tells a 911 operator in call logs released by nearby Kendall County. She says she had a young relative at a church camp in Kerr County who was stranded along with his classmates because of the high waters. 'I don't want them to get stuck in a low-water crossing. And what are they going to do? They have like 30 kids," the woman says. Kerr County officials have denied several Texas Public of Information requests filed by The Associated Press for 911 calls and body-camera footage related to the floods. Lawmakers have had to address flood relief amid a busy 30-day legislative special session that has included a highly-partisan sprint by Republicans to redraw the state's maps to pick up five more seats in the U.S. House. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott added flood relief and disaster preparedness to the agenda items shortly after calling a special session in June. He also included redrawing the state's maps after receiving pressure from President Donald Trump, who has said he wants Texas Republicans to squeeze five additional seats. House Democrats have launched a series of protests that have involved fleeing the state to meet with Democratic governors to try and stop Republican redistricting. As the minority party in both chambers, the caucus has few options and lawmakers face up to $500 a day for walking out after they broke a quorum in 2021. Party leaders have said they will not engage in other legislative business until the legislature addresses flood relief. Lawmakers have filed bills to provide funding for early warning systems, improve emergency communications and strengthen flood infrastructure in flood-prone areas. Residents along the Guadalupe River have said they were caught off guard and had no warning when rainfall struck. Kerr County does not have a warning system along the river after several missed opportunities by state and local agencies to finance one. Abbott and Texas Republicans have signaled no appetite for assigning blame for the disaster or second-guessing decisions by local officials, who have described the scale of the disaster as one that no one could have saw coming. At the first hearing by Texas lawmakers this month, Texas' chief emergency management official called for better accreditation for county response officials. Democrats, meanwhile, have questioned if officials had done enough to provide sufficient infrastructure for flood-prone areas in rural counties. ___ Lathan is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Triumphant in trade talks, Trump and his tariffs still face a challenge in federal court
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has been getting his way on trade, strong-arming the European Union, Japan and other partners to accept once unthinkably high taxes on their exports to the United States. But his radical overhaul of American trade policy, in which he's bypassed Congress to slam big tariffs on most of the world's economies, has not gone unchallenged. He's facing at least seven lawsuits charging that he's overstepped his authority. The plaintiffs want his biggest, boldest tariffs thrown out. And they won Round One. In May, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade, a specialized federal court in New York, ruled that Trump exceeded his powers when he declared a national emergency to plaster taxes — tariffs — on imports from almost every country in the world. In reaching its decision, the court combined two challenges — one by five businesses and one by 12 U.S. states — into a single case. Now it goes on to Round Two. On Thursday, the 11 judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, which typically specializes in patent law, are scheduled to hear oral arguments from the Trump administration and from the states and businesses that want his sweeping import taxes struck down. That court earlier allowed the federal government to continue collecting Trump's tariffs as the case works its way through the judicial system. The issues are so weighty — involving the president's power to bypass Congress and impose taxes with huge economic consequences in the United States and abroad — that the case is widely expected to reach the U.S. Supreme Court, regardless of what the appeals court decides. Trump is an unabashed fan of tariffs. He sees the import taxes as an all-purpose economic tool that can bring manufacturing back to the United States, protect American industries, raise revenue to pay for the massive tax cuts in his 'One Big Beautiful Bill,'' pressure countries into bending to his will, even end wars. The U.S. Constitution gives the power to impose taxes — including tariffs — to Congress. But lawmakers have gradually relinquished power over trade policy to the White House. And Trump has made the most of the power vacuum, raising the average U.S. tariff to more than 18%, highest since 1934, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. At issue in the pending court case is Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs without seeking congressional approval or conducting investigations first. Instead, he asserted the authority to declare a national emergency that justified his import taxes. In February, he cited the illegal flow of drugs and immigrants across the U.S. border to slap tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico. Then on April 2 — 'Liberation Day,'' Trump called it — he invoked IEEPA to announce 'reciprocal'' tariffs of up to 50% on countries with which the United States ran trade deficits and a 10% 'baseline'' tariff on almost everybody else. The emergency he cited was America's long-running trade deficit. Trump later suspended the reciprocal tariffs, but they remain a threat: They could be imposed again Friday on countries that do not pre-empt them by reaching trade agreements with the United States or that receive letters from Trump setting their tariff rates himself. The plaintiffs argue that the emergency power laws does not authorize the use of tariffs. They also note that the trade deficit hardly meets the definition of an 'unusual and extraordinary'' threat that would justify declaring an emergency under the law. The United States, after all, has run trade deficits — in which it buys more from foreign countries than it sells them — for 49 straight years and in good times and bad. The Trump administration argues that courts approved President Richard Nixon's emergency use of tariffs in a 1971 economic crisis. The Nixon administration successfully cited its authority under the 1917 Trading With Enemy Act, which preceded and supplied some of the legal language used in IEEPA. In May, the trade court rejected the argument, ruling that Trump's Liberation Day tariffs 'exceed any authority granted to the President'' under the emergency powers law. 'The president doesn't get to use open-ended grants of authority to do what he wants,'' said Reilly Stephens, senior counsel at the Liberty Justice Center, a libertarian legal group that is representing businesses suing the Trump administration over the tariffs. In the case of the drug trafficking and immigration tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico, the trade court ruled that the levies did not meet IEEPA's requirement that they 'deal with'' the problem they were supposed to address. The court challenge does not cover other Trump tariffs, including levies on foreign steel, aluminum and autos that the president imposed after Commerce Department investigations concluded that those imports were threats to U.S. national security. Nor does it include tariffs that Trump imposed on China in his first term — and President Joe Biden kept — after a government investigation concluded that the Chinese used unfair practices to give their own technology firms an edge over rivals from the United States and other Western countries. Paul Wiseman, The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UBS Lifts PT on QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) to $165 From $145, Keeps a Neutral Rating
QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ:QCOM) is one of the most undervalued blue chip stocks to buy according to hedge funds. On July 21, UBS raised the firm's price target on QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ:QCOM) to $165 from $145, keeping a Neutral rating on the shares. A technician testing the latest 5G device, demonstrating the company's commitment to innovation. The firm told investors in a research note that it expects a modest upside bias to the company's Q3 results in a backdrop showing solid signs of tariff-related pull-ins for Android and Apple units in the quarter. However, it also added that it does not expect this momentum to be sustained into the second half of the year as pull-ins usually wane, primarily because the end consumption for smartphones and PC has failed to get any better. QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ:QCOM) develops and commercializes foundational technologies for the wireless industry, including 3G, 4G, and 5G wireless connectivity and high-performance and low-power computing, including on-device AI. While we acknowledge the potential of QCOM as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
