
Hamas ‘ready for a ceasefire' but only if a deal ends the war in Gaza
He has been increasing pressure on the Israeli government and Hamas to broker a ceasefire and hostage agreement and bring about an end to the war.
Mr Trump said the 60-day period would be used to work towards ending the war — something Israel says it will not accept until Hamas is defeated. He said a deal might come together as soon as next week.
Hamas's response raised questions about whether the latest offer could lead to an actual pause in fighting.
Hamas official Taher al-Nunu said the militant group was 'ready and serious regarding reaching an agreement', adding that the group is 'ready to accept any initiative that clearly leads to the complete end to the war'.
A Hamas delegation is expected to meet Egyptian and Qatari mediators in Cairo on Wednesday to discuss the proposal, according to an Egyptian official.
Throughout the nearly 21-month war, ceasefire talks have repeatedly faltered over whether the war should end as part of a deal.
Hamas has said it is willing to free the remaining 50 hostages, less then half of whom are said to be alive, in exchange for a complete Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and an end to the war.
Israel says it will only agree to end the war if Hamas surrenders, disarms and exiles itself, something the group refuses to do.
An Israeli official said the latest proposal calls for a 60-day deal that would include a partial Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a surge in humanitarian aid to the territory.
The mediators and the US would provide assurances about talks on an end to the war, but Israel is not committing to that as part of the latest proposal, the official said.
It was not clear how many hostages would be freed as part of the agreement, but previous proposals have called for the release of about 10.
Israel has yet to publicly comment on Mr Trump's announcement. On Monday, he is set to host Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for talks at the White House, days after Ron Dermer, a senior Netanyahu adviser, held discussions with senior US officials about Gaza, Iran and other matters.
On Tuesday, Trump wrote on social media that Israel had 'agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War'.
'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump calls for Jerome 'Mr. Too Late' Powell to resign as Fed chair 'immediately'
President Donald Trump has escalated his feud with Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell by demanding the head of the central bank 'resign immediately.' The president has for months blasted Powell - whom he appointed to the position in 2017 - over his refusal to lower interest rates, which Trump claims cost the country a 'fortune' in debt servicing costs. Trump last month seemed to threaten to remove Powell from his role before his term expires in May 2026, though the Supreme Court signaled he is unauthorized to do so. The president then sent Powell a handwritten note on Monday that he is 'too late' in bringing down rates after other country's central banks already announced rate cuts. But Powell has consistently said Fed decisions would not be influenced by political pressure - and has hinted that the central bank would have lowered interest rates if it weren't for the inflation risks brought by Trump's tariffs. The president's latest attack on Powell, in which he wrote that '"Too Late" should resign immediately,' now comes on the heels of Bill Pulte - the head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency - asking Congress to investigate the Fed chair. Pulte accused Powell of making 'deceptive' statements at a congressional hearing about the mounting costs of planned renovations to the Federal Reserve headquarters. In his testimony to the Senate Banking Committee, Powell pushed back at reports that the $2.5 billion plans include luxurious items like a VIP dining room and a new marble table. On Wednesday, Trump called on Powell to 'resign immediately' 'All of the sort of inflammatory thing that the media carried are either not in the current plan or just inaccurate,' the Fed chairman said, according to Bloomberg. Other costs, like repairing elevators that go directly to board members' offices and marble fixtures, were basic upkeep, he argued. But Pulte now argues that Powell knowingly lied about the opulent renovations. 'I am asking Congress to investigate Chairman Jerome Powell, his political bias and his deceptive Senate testimony,' the head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency said in a statement. 'Jerome Powell's $2.5B Building Renovation Scandal stinks to high heaven and he lied when asked about the specifics before Congress,' Pulte continued. 'This is nothing short of malfeasance and is worthy "for cause."' He then cited remarks from Wyoming Sen. Cynthia Lummis, who claimed Powell 'made a number of factually incorrect statements... regarding the Fed's plush private dining room and elevator, skylights, water features and roof terrace.' 'This is typical of the mismanagement and "don't bother me" attitude that Chairman Powell has always shown,' she said. Bill Pulte, the head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, accused Powell of lying about the renovations and called for a Congressional investigation Rep. Jim Jordan, a Republican from Ohio who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, told Bloomberg that the committee has not yet discussed whether to investigate Powell but said 'everything's on the table.' 'We'll take a look at that,' he vowed.


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Why is Paramount paying Trump $16m?
👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 David Blevins and Mark Stone discuss how Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' is progressing in the House - and also dig into a few other stories: the potential of a Gaza ceasefire, Paramount's payout to the president, and a setback on his immigration policy. If you've got a question you'd like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@ You can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Judge blocks Trump's asylum ban at southern border saying he exceeded authority
A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump's order suspending asylum access at the U.S.-Mexico border. In a day-one executive order, Trump declared the situation at the southern border constitutes what he called an invasion of America. The president said he was 'suspending the physical entry' of migrants and their ability to seek asylum until he decides it is over. Federal District Judge Randolph Moss has now blocked that order, writing, 'the President cannot adopt an alternative immigration system, which supplants the statutes that Congress has enacted.' Moss added that neither the Constitution nor immigration law gives the president 'an extra-statutory, extra-regulatory regime for repatriating or removing individuals from the United States, without an opportunity to apply for asylum' or other humanitarian protections. The order will take effect July 16, giving the Trump administration two weeks to appeal. American Civil Liberties Union attorney Lee Gelernt, who argued the merits of the case, called Moss's ruling a 'hugely important decision.' 'Not only will it save the lives of families fleeing grave danger, it reaffirms that the president cannot ignore the laws Congress has passed and the most basic premise of our country's separation of powers,' Gelernt said in a statement. The Homeland Security Department did not immediately respond to a request but an appeal is likely. The president and his aides have repeatedly attacked court rulings that undermine his policies as judicial overreach. The ruling comes after illegal border crossings have plummeted. The White House said Wednesday that Border Patrol made 6,070 arrests in June, down 30 percent from May. On June 28, the Border Patrol made only 137 arrests, a sharp contrast to late 2023, when arrests topped 10,000 on the busiest days. Arrests dropped sharply when Mexican officials increased enforcement within its own borders in December 2023 and again when then-President Joe Biden introduced severe asylum restrictions in June 2024. They plunged more after Trump became president in January, deploying thousands of troops to the border under declaration of a national emergency. Trump and his allies say the asylum system has been abused. They argue that it draws people who know it will take years to adjudicate their claims in the country's backlogged immigration courts during which they can work and live in America. But supporters argue the right to seek asylum is guaranteed in federal law and international commitments — even for those who cross the border illegally. They say asylum is a vital protection for people fleeing persecution — a protection guaranteed by Congress that even the president doesn't have the authority to ignore. People seeking asylum must demonstrate a fear of persecution on a fairly narrow grounds of race, religion, nationality, or by belonging to a particular social or political group. In the executive order, Trump argued the Immigration and Nationality Act gives presidents the authority to suspend entry of any group that they find 'detrimental to the interests of the United States.' Groups which work with immigrants — the Arizona-based Florence Project, the El Paso, Texas-based Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center and the Texas-based RAICES — filed the lawsuit against the government, arguing the president was wrong to equate migrants coming to the southern border with an invasion. They also argued Trump's proclamation amounted to the president unilaterally overriding '... the immigration laws Congress enacted for the protection of people who face persecution or torture if removed from the United States.' But the government argued that because both foreign policy and immigration enforcement fall under the executive branch of government, it was entirely under the president's authority to declare an invasion. 'The determination that the United States is facing an invasion is an unreviewable political question,' the government wrote in one argument.