How global forces are reshaping base metal prices
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
U.S. Trade Tariffs: A Double-Edged Sword
Weakening U.S. Dollar: A Bullish Signal for Commodities
Geopolitical Tensions: Disrupting Supply Chains
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
China's Supply-Demand Dynamics: The Decisive Factor
Conclusion
(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of www.economictimes.com .)
The base metals market is navigating a complex web of economic and geopolitical forces.Aluminium and copper—two of the most critical industrial metals—are experiencing heightened price volatility, driven by U.S. trade policies, currency fluctuations, geopolitical tensions, and shifting supply-demand dynamics in China.The United States, under President Donald Trump's renewed tariff strategy, has imposed blanket tariffs on imports from several countries, including key metal producers. These tariffs aim to protect U.S. industries but often lead to unintended consequences. Retaliatory tariffs from affected nations are disrupting global supply chains, adding to market uncertainty.The U.S. dollar has shown signs of weakening in 2025 due to rising fiscal deficits and dovish monetary policy. Since base metals are priced in dollars, a weaker greenback typically makes them cheaper for foreign buyers—boosting demand and driving prices higher.This effect has been particularly visible in copper, which is widely used in electrical infrastructure and green technologies. As global buyers take advantage of favorable exchange rates, copper prices have surged, even amid supply constraints. Aluminium, with its applications in transportation and packaging, has also come under upward price pressure.Ongoing geopolitical tensions—especially in Eastern Europe, the South China Sea, and the Middle East—are adding layers of complexity to the metals market. Conflicts and sanctions disrupt mining operations, transportation routes, and trade agreements, triggering supply shortages.Recently, tensions involving Russia, a major aluminium producer, have led to sanctions restricting exports to Western markets. Similarly, instability in African copper-producing nations like the Democratic Republic of Congo has affected global supply reliability. These disruptions are fueling speculative pressure, with traders pricing in risk premiums that elevate market prices.China remains the world's largest consumer and producer of base metals. Its domestic policies, industrial output, and environmental regulations have a profound impact on global pricing. In 2025, China is grappling with slower economic growth and a transition toward cleaner energy, both of which affect demand and supply.On the demand side, reduced construction activity and cautious infrastructure spending have softened copper consumption. However, the country's aggressive push toward electric vehicles and renewable energy continues to support long-term copper demand. Aluminium demand, meanwhile, is being reshaped by China's efforts to curb carbon emissions, leading to production caps and higher domestic prices.On the supply side, China's tightening environmental regulations have led to the closure of several high-emission smelters, particularly in aluminium production. This has reduced global supply and contributed to price increases, especially as other producers struggle to fill the gap.The interplay of U.S. trade tariffs, currency movements, geopolitical instability, and China's evolving industrial landscape is creating a volatile environment for base metals.Aluminium and copper, essential to both traditional manufacturing and emerging technologies, are at the center of this transformation.Looking ahead, base metal prices are likely to remain volatile in the short term. Investors, manufacturers, and policymakers must navigate this uncertainty with agility. Hedging strategies, diversified sourcing, and adaptive trade policies will be crucial for managing risks and capitalizing on opportunities in a market increasingly shaped by global forces beyond just supply and demand.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
Friday fury ahead? India's tariff clock is ticking
As the August 1st deadline looms, India faces potential US tariffs due to unresolved trade negotiations. The US team's visit on August 25th signals a missed deadline, increasing the risk of punitive measures. Trump's administration may use tariffs to pressure India, impacting key export sectors and straining bilateral relations despite mixed signals. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads As the clock ticks toward Friday, August 1, the weight of an unresolved trade deal with the United States is beginning to feel increasingly burdensome for US team will visit India on August 25 -- well after the looming deadline -- for the sixth round of negotiations for the proposed bilateral trade agreement between the two countries, an official told PTI on Tuesday. India faces the strong possibility of punitive tariffs from the US, a development that could send ripples through its export economy and broader diplomatic ties with trajectory of US-India trade negotiations has become emblematic of a broader pattern in Washington's trade posture under President Donald Trump . What began as a bilateral discussion aimed at resolving market access issues and addressing tariff asymmetries has evolved into a high-pressure bargaining exercise marked by missed deadlines and implicit slated for July 9, the deadline for concluding the interim trade deal was extended to August 1 by Trump, ostensibly to give negotiations more room. However, the scheduling of a sixth round of talks for August 25 strongly signals that no agreement will be reached in time to meet the new deadline. This delay, while perhaps reflecting the complexity of the deal, is unlikely to be viewed sympathetically by a White House that has increasingly framed trade as a high-stakes, zero-sum has already shown a willingness to use tariffs as a tool of leverage in trade negotiations, not just with strategic competitors like China, but with allies and partners alike. India, though spared from a tariff notification letter after the July 9 deadline passed, remains very much in the crosshairs. The administration's hesitation to act then may have been strategic: a calculated move to keep India at the table without escalating tensions the upcoming August 1 deadline carries more urgency. Trump could reassert his trademark coercive tactics, using tariffs to pressure India into faster concessions. The risk is amplified by the current political tone in Washington, where trade deals are increasingly judged by their speed and assertiveness rather than the nuances of this context, recent remarks made by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stand out as a rare, moderating voice. His assertion that 'quality matters more than timing' suggests a recognition of the complexity involved in crafting a sustainable and equitable trade deal. "We're not going to rush for the sake of doing deals," Bessent told CNBC in an interview nearly a week ago. However, he said that tariffs might re-enter the negotiation toolkit if progress stalls, effectively undermining the very caution he advocates. "We'll see what the President wants to do," he said. "But again, if we somehow boomerang back to the August 1 tariff, I would think that a higher tariff level will put more pressure on those countries to come up with better agreements."This duality -- between a push for quality and a readiness to use tariffs -- mirrors the broader contradictions in the Trump administration's trade approach. While the US claims to be seeking mutual benefit, the reliance on deadlines, threats and unilateral pressure points to a strategy of deal-making by domination rather than now finds itself in a delicate position. With little time left before the August 1 deadline, and no further negotiations scheduled until August 25, it must brace for the economic and diplomatic fallout of potential US tariffs. Key export sectors such as pharmaceuticals and textiles could be hit hard by sudden trade barriers. Moreover, the imposition of tariffs would inject fresh tension into an already complex bilateral relationship, one that spans not just trade but also defense, regional security and technology cooperation. If Washington proceeds with punitive measures, it risks alienating one of its key strategic partners in Asia at a time when counterbalancing China is high on both nations' August 1 approaches, India faces an unenviable situation: a deadline without a deal, and a partner unwilling to wait. The scheduling of the next round of talks for August 25 makes it all but certain that the two sides will miss the current window for an interim agreement. What remains to be seen is whether Trump will act on his threats or hold off once more in the hope of securing a better, more stable outcome of the immediate outcome, the broader takeaway is clear: India must prepare for a more transactional and turbulent trade relationship with the US, where pressure and pace increasingly trump patience and process.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
US job openings fell to 7.4 million last month as job market continues to cool
The American job market is showing signs of cooling as job openings decreased to 7.4 million in June, according to the Labor Department. While layoffs remained steady, fewer people are quitting their jobs. Economists anticipate a slight rise in the unemployment rate to 4.2% in July, with an expected addition of 115,000 jobs. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Washington: Employers posted 7.4 million job vacancies last month, a sign that the American job market continues to Labour Department reported Tuesday that job openings in June were down from 7.7 million in were little changed. But the number of people quitting their jobs - a sign of confidence in their prospects elsewhere - dropped last US job market has lost momentum this year, partly because of the lingering effects of 11 interest rate hikes by the inflation fighters at the Federal Reserve in 2022 and 2023 and partly because President Donald Trump 's trade wars have created uncertainty that is paralysing managers making hiring Friday, the Labour Department will put out unemployment and hiring numbers for July. They are expected to show that the unemployment rate ticked up to a still-low 4.2% in July from 4.1% in June. Businesses, government agencies and nonprofits are expected to have added 115,000 jobs in July, down from 147,000 in June, according to a survey of economists by the data firm seemingly decent June hiring numbers were weaker than they appeared. Private payrolls rose just 74,000 in June, fewest since last October when hurricanes disrupted job sites. And state and local governments added nearly 64,000 education jobs in June - a total that economists suspect was inflated by seasonal quirks around the end of the school far this year, the economy has been generating 130,000 jobs a month, down from 168,000 last year and an average 400,000 a month from 2021 through 2023 during the recovery from COVID-19 lockdowns.
Economic Times
35 minutes ago
- Economic Times
US Fed opens policy meeting, set to hold rates steady
The US Federal Reserve opened its two-day policy meeting Tuesday, with the central bank widely expected to hold off on further interest rate cuts despite fierce political pressure from President Donald Trump to slash levels. ADVERTISEMENT Fed policymakers have kept the benchmark lending rate unchanged since their last rate reduction in December, as officials wait for clarity on how Trump's tariffs are impacting the world's biggest economy. Their patient approach has riled the president, who has chastised Fed Chair Jerome Powell on multiple occasions, calling him a "numbskull" and a "moron." On Tuesday, the Fed said in a statement that its policy meeting started at 9:00 am US Eastern time (1300 GMT) as scheduled. The case for holding interest rates steady at a range between 4.25 percent and 4.50 percent this week has been made by several Fed speakers, said JP Morgan chief US economist Michael Feroli in a recent note. Inflation remains above the Fed's longer-term target of two percent, risks still persist and the labor market is near full employment, he added. ADVERTISEMENT The Fed has signalled it is waiting on the effects of Trump's sweeping tariffs on allies and competitors alike to begin to show up in economic data. As the central bank mulls changes to monetary policy, officials are seeking a balance between price stability and maximum employment. ADVERTISEMENT Analysts are expecting to see some dissent from Fed policymakers at the end of their meeting Wednesday, given that a couple of officials have signaled openness to rate cuts as soon as in July."It will be interesting to watch whether Powell alludes to some potential policy easing before year-end" or if he avoids explicit forward guidance given differences among the Fed's rate-setting committee, said EY chief economist Gregory Daco. ADVERTISEMENT "With no imminent need to act, and a fractured FOMC facing asymmetric risks, the Fed will likely wait until September to deliver the next 25 basis points rate cut," Daco added, referring to the Federal Open Market Committee. The Fed said Governor Adriana Kugler would not be attending the meeting "due to a personal matter." (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
