
Electric car rules are pushing Britain towards disaster
The Cowley plant, an auto-building site since 1913 and the original home of Morris Motors, was bought by the German carmaker 20 years ago.
The future of this iconic manufacturing hub is now in doubt. And a big part of the reason is the over-zealous imposition by Labour of net zero rules originally introduced by the Tories.
BMW has halted a £600m overhaul of Cowley, it emerged last weekend, amid slow demand for electric vehicles (EVs) and the UK's zero emission vehicle (ZEV) regulations – which are even more punitive than those operating across the European Union.
I'm astonished this move by BMW hasn't attracted more attention.
It calls into question not only production at Cowley, a site employing well over 3,000 people, but is a moment of truth for mass carmaking in Britain per se – a sector providing upwards of a million jobs, and many more in related industries and activities.
The UK's switch away from petrol and diesel cars and towards EVs has now descended into chaos.
Carmakers previously happy to take subsidies to facilitate the huge upheaval of shifting from internal combustion engines to battery-powered cars, now bemoan weak consumer demand for EVs and the extremely punitive fines manufacturers face as a result.
Either ministers get beyond virtue-signalling and ease net zero rules, quickly and significantly, or what remains of UK carmaking will be decimated, as production becomes economically unviable and the market is overwhelmed by a flood of heavily subsidised Chinese-made EVs.
UK carmaking is, of course, dominated by foreign companies. Jaguar Land Rover is owned by Tata, Bentley by Volkswagen, Vauxhall by Stellantis and Rolls-Royce by BMW. The top 10 UK carmakers are all foreign-owned.
Yet automotives are still a vital part of British manufacturing and the broader economy, turning over tens of billions of pounds each year, while providing relatively well-paid jobs in parts of the country, such as the the Midlands and North East, where such jobs are scarce.
A sector-wide collapse would be an economic, political and societal catastrophe.
But that's where we're heading unless these ZEV rules rapidly change.
British carmaking last year hit its lowest level (outside of lockdown) since 1954 – and the slowdown is continuing.
Just 71,104 vehicles rolled off our production lines in January 2025, down from 82,997 during the same month the previous year, a shocking 14.3pc below what was already a low base.
A major reason is that carmakers endure massive ZEV mandate fines which actively discourage them from producing cars, makes it financially ruinous if they do.
From January 2023, UK carmakers faced fines if 22pc of cars they sold in Britain weren't fully electric – paying an astonishing £15,000 for every vehicle by which they fell short.
But the reality that EVs are expensive, unreliable and drivers have 'range anxiety' – given our patchy and often expensive charging network. EVs also depreciate sharply and the second-hand market is slow.
That's why, despite large tax breaks on fleet vehicles, just 18.7pc of new vehicles sold last year were EVs, well below the ZEV mandate – with take-up stuck stubbornly below 20pc for several years now.
And since the start of 2025, that ZEV cut-off has ratcheted up 28pc, increasing steadily to 80pc by 2030 and 100pc, outlawing new petrol and diesel cars completely, by 2035.
That's why UK carmakers are slowing down production of new petrol and diesel cars – because EV sales aren't yet strong enough to match even a 22pc market share, let alone escalating looming targets in years to come.
That's why conventional cars are being 'rationed', leading to soaring prices, as low EV sales mean manufacturers can only avoid ruinous fines by curtailing petrol and diesel car production.
Both the UK and EU have a 2035 headline ban, but the UK's rules are tougher, with a steeper ramp-up of fines, making Britain an increasingly less attractive place to make cars.
Oh – and Labour has a manifesto pledge, popular among trendy urban-voters, viewed with disdain by trade unionists and across our manufacturing heartlands, to bring forward the complete ban by five years to 2030 – where, by the way, it was originally, under equally naive rules implemented under the Tories.
Stellantis recently announced its long-standing Luton plant is closing, in part due to ZEV rules.
Ministers, meanwhile, insist that BMW remains committed to upgrading its electric Mini production facility at Cowley, as does the carmaker itself. Will that happen? I suspect it won't.
Policymakers in the UK and EU have bet the ranch on EVs. But the market, rather than public sector bureaucrats, should decide which is the best technology. When bureaucrats 'pick winners', it nearly always goes wrong.
The renewable lobby is powerful, as are the companies both building and financing the rollout of the UK's charging network.
Huge vested interests are at work to maintain an iron grip over the 'EVs or bust' narrative, as this insane ZEV mandate comes into force.
This stranglehold needs to be broken – there are other technologies that may well work better, rendering such a cumbersome and costly charging network rollout unnecessary.
Many senior car industry executives believe, for instance, a much better solution lies in the use of hydrogen-hybrids – hydrogen-powered internal combustion engines which charge smaller, lighter batteries that need no plugging in and far less lithium and rare earths.
Heavily subsidised Chinese-made EVs account for 76pc of all EVs sold worldwide. Plus China controls 90pc of global production capacity of the rare earths used in EV batteries.
Why are we unilaterally destroying our car industry on the altar of net zero?
Ministers need to face reality, slacken the rules and give UK-based carmaking at least a fighting chance to adapt.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Shares scale fresh tops in Asia, oil slips on truce talks
SYDNEY, Aug 18 (Reuters) - Share markets edged higher in Asia on Monday ahead of what is likely to be an eventful week for U.S. interest rate policy, while oil prices slipped as risks to Russian supplies seemed to fade a little. A general risk-on mood saw indices in Japan and Taiwan make record peaks, while Chinese blue chips reached their highest in 10 months. U.S. President Donald Trump now seemed more aligned with Moscow on seeking a peace deal with Ukraine instead of a ceasefire first, after meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. Trump will meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders later on Monday to discuss the next steps, though actual proposals are vague as yet. The major economic event of the week will be the Kansas City Federal Reserve's August 21-23 Jackson Hole symposium, where Chair Jerome Powell is due to speak on the economic outlook and the central bank's policy framework. "Chair Powell will likely signal that risks to the employment and inflation mandates are coming into balance, setting up the Fed to resume returning policy rate to neutral," said Andrew Hollenhorst, chief economist at Citi Research. "But Powell will stop short of explicitly signalling a September rate cut, awaiting the August jobs and inflation reports," he added. "This would be fairly neutral for markets already fully pricing a September cut." Markets imply around an 85% chance of a quarter-point rate cut at the Fed's meeting on September 17, and are priced for a further easing by December. The prospect of lower borrowing costs globally has underpinned stock markets and Japan's Nikkei (.N225), opens new tab firmed 0.9% to a fresh record high. MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan (.MIAPJ0000PUS), opens new tab was a fraction lower, having hit a four-year top last week. Chinese blue chips (.CSI300), opens new tab added 1.0%, bringing gains so far this quarter to almost 8%. EUROSTOXX 50 futures and FTSE futures rose 0.2%, while DAX futures firmed 0.1%. S&P 500 futures nudged up 0.2%, while Nasdaq futures added 0.3% with both near all-time highs. Valuations have been underpinned by a solid earnings season as S&P 500 EPS grew 11% on the year and 58% of companies raised their full-year guidance. "Earnings results have continued to be exceptional for the mega-cap tech companies," noted analysts at Goldman Sachs. "While Nvidia has yet to report, the Magnificent 7 apparently grew EPS by 26% year/year in 2Q, a 12% beat relative to consensus expectation coming into earnings season." This week's results will provide some colour on the health of consumer spending with Home Depot, Target, Lowe's and Walmart all reporting. In bond markets, the chance of Fed easing is keeping down short-term Treasury yields while the longer end is pressured by the risk of stagflation and giant budget deficits, leading to the steepest yield curve since 2021. European bonds also have been pressured by the prospect of increased borrowing to fund defence spending, pushing German long-term yields to 14-year highs. Wagers on more Fed easing have weighed on the dollar, which dropped 0.4% against a basket of currencies last week to last stand at 97.851 . The dollar was a fraction firmer on the yen at 147.46 , while the euro held at $1.1701 after adding 0.5% last week. The dollar has fared better against its New Zealand counterpart as the country's central bank is widely expected to cut rates to 3.0% on Wednesday. In commodity markets, gold was stuck at $3,343 an ounce after losing 1.9% last week. Oil prices struggled as Trump backed away from threats to place more restrictions on Russian oil exports. Brent dropped 0.2% to $65.74 a barrel, while U.S. crude eased 0.1% to $62.76 per barrel.


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Watchmaker Swatch apologises for 'slanted eye' ad after online backlash in China
SHANGHAI, Aug 18 (Reuters) - Swiss watchmaker Swatch (UHR.S), opens new tab has issued an apology and pulled ads featuring images of an Asian male model pulling the corners of his eyes up and backwards in a "slanted eye" pose. The images for the Swatch Essentials collection were widely condemned online in China, where many comments said they appeared to mimic racist taunts about Asian eyes. In an apology posted in both Chinese and English on its official account on the Weibo social media platform Saturday, Swatch said that it has "taken note of the recent concerns" and removed all related materials worldwide. "We sincerely apologise for any distress or misunderstanding this may have caused," the statement said. It also posted the same apology on Instagram. Swatch Group did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for further comment. Swatch, which also makes Omega, Longines and Tissot watches, is heavily exposed to China for revenue, with around 27% of the group's sales last year coming from the China, Hong Kong and Macau region. Revenue for the watchmaker last year slumped 14.6% to 6.74 billion Swiss francs ($8.4 billion) in 2024, hit by a downturn in demand in China, where Swatch said it was seeing "persistently difficult market conditions and weak demand for consumer goods overall". ($1 = 0.8065 Swiss francs)


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Australia's Ampol profit slumps but resilient despite weather hits
Aug 18 (Reuters) - Australia's top fuel retailer Ampol ( opens new tab reported a 23% drop in its first-half profit on Monday, hurt by weak refinery margins and operational and weather-related disruptions, though the result was better than what the market had feared. Shares of the fuel retailer drifted within tight ranges in early trade, and were down 0.2% at A$29.08 as of 0115 GMT, after rising 0.7% earlier in the session. That compared with a largely flat broader ASX 200 benchmark index (.AXJO), opens new tab. The company said Lytton's refinery margins started the second half strongly, with July being $9.95 per barrel, up from $7.44 per barrel in the first half. Planned maintenance shutdowns and production losses from a cyclone disrupted operations, while weak Singapore refining margins pressured profitability at its Queensland refinery. The refinery's underlying operating earnings shrank substantially to A$1.1 million ($716,650.00), from A$89.5 million a year ago, while earnings from its fuel and infrastructure division also nearly halved to A$118.3 million. As a result, the company's net profit after tax from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30 fell to A$180.2 million on a replacement-cost basis, 23% lower than A$233.7 million a year ago, but beating the Visible Alpha consensus estimate of A$165.6 million. Ampol declared an interim dividend of 40 Australian cents per share, lower than 60 Australian cents per share paid out a year ago. The fuel retailer flagged that trends for its fuel and infrastructure division, excluding Lytton, convenience retail and New Zealand segments are expected to largely continue from the first half. "We don't expect material consensus estimate changes, which will allow the market to focus on upside from the impending EG Group acquisition," Jefferies analysts wrote. The company announced last week it would buy British fuel station operator EG Group's local unit, EG Australia, for a total of A$1.1 billion. ($1 = 1.5349 Australian dollars)