
Electric car rules are pushing Britain towards disaster
BMW is stalling plans to restart production of electric Minis at its factory in Oxford.
The Cowley plant, an auto-building site since 1913 and the original home of Morris Motors, was bought by the German carmaker 20 years ago.
The future of this iconic manufacturing hub is now in doubt. And a big part of the reason is the over-zealous imposition by Labour of net zero rules originally introduced by the Tories.
BMW has halted a £600m overhaul of Cowley, it emerged last weekend, amid slow demand for electric vehicles (EVs) and the UK's zero emission vehicle (ZEV) regulations – which are even more punitive than those operating across the European Union.
I'm astonished this move by BMW hasn't attracted more attention.
It calls into question not only production at Cowley, a site employing well over 3,000 people, but is a moment of truth for mass carmaking in Britain per se – a sector providing upwards of a million jobs, and many more in related industries and activities.
The UK's switch away from petrol and diesel cars and towards EVs has now descended into chaos.
Carmakers previously happy to take subsidies to facilitate the huge upheaval of shifting from internal combustion engines to battery-powered cars, now bemoan weak consumer demand for EVs and the extremely punitive fines manufacturers face as a result.
Either ministers get beyond virtue-signalling and ease net zero rules, quickly and significantly, or what remains of UK carmaking will be decimated, as production becomes economically unviable and the market is overwhelmed by a flood of heavily subsidised Chinese-made EVs.
UK carmaking is, of course, dominated by foreign companies. Jaguar Land Rover is owned by Tata, Bentley by Volkswagen, Vauxhall by Stellantis and Rolls-Royce by BMW. The top 10 UK carmakers are all foreign-owned.
Yet automotives are still a vital part of British manufacturing and the broader economy, turning over tens of billions of pounds each year, while providing relatively well-paid jobs in parts of the country, such as the the Midlands and North East, where such jobs are scarce.
A sector-wide collapse would be an economic, political and societal catastrophe.
But that's where we're heading unless these ZEV rules rapidly change.
British carmaking last year hit its lowest level (outside of lockdown) since 1954 – and the slowdown is continuing.
Just 71,104 vehicles rolled off our production lines in January 2025, down from 82,997 during the same month the previous year, a shocking 14.3pc below what was already a low base.
A major reason is that carmakers endure massive ZEV mandate fines which actively discourage them from producing cars, makes it financially ruinous if they do.
From January 2023, UK carmakers faced fines if 22pc of cars they sold in Britain weren't fully electric – paying an astonishing £15,000 for every vehicle by which they fell short.
But the reality that EVs are expensive, unreliable and drivers have 'range anxiety' – given our patchy and often expensive charging network. EVs also depreciate sharply and the second-hand market is slow.
That's why, despite large tax breaks on fleet vehicles, just 18.7pc of new vehicles sold last year were EVs, well below the ZEV mandate – with take-up stuck stubbornly below 20pc for several years now.
And since the start of 2025, that ZEV cut-off has ratcheted up 28pc, increasing steadily to 80pc by 2030 and 100pc, outlawing new petrol and diesel cars completely, by 2035.
That's why UK carmakers are slowing down production of new petrol and diesel cars – because EV sales aren't yet strong enough to match even a 22pc market share, let alone escalating looming targets in years to come.
That's why conventional cars are being 'rationed', leading to soaring prices, as low EV sales mean manufacturers can only avoid ruinous fines by curtailing petrol and diesel car production.
Both the UK and EU have a 2035 headline ban, but the UK's rules are tougher, with a steeper ramp-up of fines, making Britain an increasingly less attractive place to make cars.
Oh – and Labour has a manifesto pledge, popular among trendy urban-voters, viewed with disdain by trade unionists and across our manufacturing heartlands, to bring forward the complete ban by five years to 2030 – where, by the way, it was originally, under equally naive rules implemented under the Tories.
Stellantis recently announced its long-standing Luton plant is closing, in part due to ZEV rules.
Ministers, meanwhile, insist that BMW remains committed to upgrading its electric Mini production facility at Cowley, as does the carmaker itself. Will that happen? I suspect it won't.
Policymakers in the UK and EU have bet the ranch on EVs. But the market, rather than public sector bureaucrats, should decide which is the best technology. When bureaucrats 'pick winners', it nearly always goes wrong.
The renewable lobby is powerful, as are the companies both building and financing the rollout of the UK's charging network.
Huge vested interests are at work to maintain an iron grip over the 'EVs or bust' narrative, as this insane ZEV mandate comes into force.
This stranglehold needs to be broken – there are other technologies that may well work better, rendering such a cumbersome and costly charging network rollout unnecessary.
Many senior car industry executives believe, for instance, a much better solution lies in the use of hydrogen-hybrids – hydrogen-powered internal combustion engines which charge smaller, lighter batteries that need no plugging in and far less lithium and rare earths.
Heavily subsidised Chinese-made EVs account for 76pc of all EVs sold worldwide. Plus China controls 90pc of global production capacity of the rare earths used in EV batteries.
Why are we unilaterally destroying our car industry on the altar of net zero?
Ministers need to face reality, slacken the rules and give UK-based carmaking at least a fighting chance to adapt.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Revised York parking charges approved by council after backlash
Plans to lower some parking charges in York have been approved following a backlash against price hikes. In late April, car parking spots including Bishopthorpe Road saw prices rise by 500% from 80p per hour to £ of York Council hoped the increases would cut congestion, but local traders reported a drop in takings due to the "unaffordable" a meeting on Tuesday, the council's executive decided to cut on-street parking fees outside the inner ring road to £3 per hour from early July. Kate Ravilious, Labour's transport spokesperson on the council, said the local authority had listened to raised concerns about the price hike. "While we remain committed to tackling congestion and making it easier for everyone to get around, it is clear that some of the changes introduced were too much, too soon," she to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, parking at Bishopthorpe Road's car park would cost £3 per hour, with a maximum stay of three hours. It will also mean no Friday, Saturday or event uplift and no evening charge in the outer inner ring road car parking in Micklegate and Priory Street will also be £3 per hour, the council confirmed, however fees would be "reviewed in the future". The Labour administration previously said April's hikes were needed to deal with traffic issues and to help balance council said: "Congestion is throttling York - buses, deliveries and essential workers are delayed and lives are put at risk because emergency services are stuck in traffic."One third of city centre traffic is drivers searching for a parking space, and whenever I or anyone drives into York we're contributing to that congestion."Acknowledging concern about the recent price lift, she added: "I take on board the challenges that have been raised and I welcome the commitment to work together going forward."Liberal Democrat Nigel Ayre said the recent changes had failed to discourage car use, shore up the council's finances or support local businesses."This has led to an entirely unsatisfactory situation which could and should have been avoided," the opposition leader said. "We have a parking policy which has been made up on the hoof, it's half-hearted and doesn't please anyone." Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.


Daily Record
41 minutes ago
- Daily Record
New Motherwell boss can get a good look at us in packed pre-season, says star
Stephen O'Donnell reckons their programme is a good one Stephen O'Donnell hopes a packed pre-season schedule can give Motherwell's next manager a good idea of what he has to work with next season. The Fir Park club are yet to appoint a successor to Michael Wimmer, who unexpectedly returned to Germany for personal reasons. But Motherwell return for training on Wednesday, June 18, and they're booked in to return to Delden in the Netherlands for their pre-season camp seven days later. The Premier Sports Cup group stages kick off on July 12, with games at Clyde on the opening day, and at Stenhousemuir on July 19, with midweek home matches against Peterhead (July 15) and Morton (July 22). Motherwell last week announced they will round off their summer preparations with a friendly at home to German giants Hertha Berlin on Friday, July 25. O'Donnell reckons that's plenty to get stuck into, and can't wait. He said: 'I just saw the schedule the other day and I think [the Hertha Berlin friendly] is on the Friday after the last Tuesday game [in the Premier Sports Cup], so lots of games for a new manager to get to see his players and see what suits best. 'Hertha Berlin, I don't think you'll get much bigger challenges than that, so that will be a good one. 'More importantly there are cup games, and certainly if we get off to a flier and do well in that, it's a nice end to the pre-season, and hopefully it's off the back of a successful campaign. 'It's always a tough one for managers, when you're the Premiership team, and the others are right up for it, while you're trying to tweak things and adjust, so it becomes a strange position. 'It's good to get the games, you need the games anyway, and we approach them pretty seriously, so we should be in a good position, again. 'I would have been really keen to see how we did under the old manager, because he had started implementing his things, and hopefully bringing in one or two of his own players, but now that's not the case. 'The new manager has these games to get to know his players, in a system that suits him and the players, so it will be exciting. 'Hopefully we can be successful. We have a draw that has been kind to us, there are no big, long journeys. 'We can't complain, hopefully they're good games, good performances, and something to build on for the new season.' Fans won't have to wait long to learn the club's Premiership fixtures, with the schedule for that released on Friday, June 20.


New Statesman
44 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Inside No 10's new dysfunction
Keir Starmer's Downing Street was dysfunctional from its earliest days. Labour, senior figures often say, had a plan to win but not a plan to govern. Blame for this was attributed to Sue Gray, who resigned as Starmer's chief of staff after just four months in office and whose tenure still 'casts a long shadow' in the words of one government source. No 10 has strived ever since to recover from this false start. As well as the appointment of Morgan McSweeney as Gray's replacement, two Blair-era figures joined last November: Jonathan Powell as national security adviser and Liz Lloyd as director of policy delivery and innovation. In his memoir A Journey, Tony Blair writes of the latter that she brought 'order and discipline' and 'had an excellent temperament too: lovely to work with, honest and, underneath all the English feminine charm, quite steely. Above all, capable.' Powell, who was No 10 chief of staff from 1997-2007 (making him the longest-serving Blair aide), is regarded as one of the government's most successful hires. He is credited with helping to broker the US-Ukraine détente and overseeing a wider foreign policy reset (with Britain striking trade deals with the US, Europe and India). But Lloyd, who served as Blair's deputy chief of staff from 2005-07, is proving a more divisive figure. Insiders speak of tensions between herself and Stuart Ingham, the head of the No 10 Policy Unit and Starmer's longest-serving aide, who joined as a senior parliamentary researcher in December 2016. Ingham, who has consciously eschewed a media profile, is described by those who know him well as a cerebral social democrat (his PhD dissected the debate between the liberal philosopher John Rawls and the Marxist intellectual GA Cohen). 'If there's one person in the country who can define what Starmerism is, it's him,' an ally told me. Cabinet ministers liken his relationship with Starmer to that between a father and a son (Ingham survived an attempt by Gray to remove him). Yet during Labour's fraught early months in government, grandees such as historian Anthony Seldon and former cabinet secretary Gus O'Donnell complained that loyalty had come at the expense of experience. 'I do think there is a need for No 10 to have a lot more heavyweights in there – a lot more policy heavyweights,' said O'Donnell after Gray's resignation, recalling past Policy Unit heads such as David Miliband, Andrew Adonis and Geoff Mulgan. Such critiques helped prompt the appointment of Lloyd who is close to Pat McFadden, Starmer's chief Whitehall fixer ('what does Pat think?' the Prime Minister will often ask). But government sources speak of a difficult marriage between Lloyd – who is unashamedly Blairite in her outlook – and a broadly soft left Policy Unit (No 10 denied claims that Ingham, who now reports to Lloyd, threatened to resign over her arrival). Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Before her return to government, Lloyd held roles including group company secretary of Standard Chartered Bank and chief investment officer of British International Investment. Though some praise her aptitude and experience, others speak of a clash of worldviews. In one meeting on growth at the start of this year, Lloyd is said to have raised concerns over the government's abolition of non-dom tax status. 'People who operate with assumptions from 20 years ago are different to the people who were in the guts of this election campaign and who understand how we built our coalition,' a senior Labour source told me. Lloyd is also said to have expressed concerns over Bridget Phillipson's school reforms, which impose new requirements on Blair-era academies such as employing qualified teachers and following the national curriculum (a Phillipson source insisted that talk of divisions was 'nonsense'). The recent appointment of Oli de Botton, who co-founded a free school former Blair aide Peter Hyman, as Starmer's education adviser was viewed as a shift in emphasis. But intermittent speculation that the Education Secretary will be moved at the next cabinet reshuffle is downplayed. 'Keir really, really likes Bridget,' remarked one insider. A recurrent critique of Starmer's government, intensified by the recent U-turn over winter fuel payment cuts, is that it has lacked a clear philosophical direction. Both Blairites and the soft left, for different reasons, have been disappointed by Labour's first year in office. Some believe this is exacerbated by the marginalisation of the Policy Unit, which one observer described as 'demoralised, lacking purpose and cut out of the loop left, right and centre'. Two advisers, Tom Webb (health) and Nick Williams (planning and infrastructure), left last month and a third, Ravinder Athwal, who oversaw Labour's manifesto and led on the economy, will depart in July. Some on the party's soft left – which has openly challenged Reeves' fiscal approach in recent weeks – hope that a new economic adviser could serve as a counterweight to the Treasury but others contend that 'there isn't an economist in the world who could come in and persuade Keir to go against Rachel'. As Starmer's government strives for direction, insiders believe that relations between Lloyd and Ingham will be a key litmus test. 'He's a great survivor,' said one Labour source, predicting that the original Starmerite would ultimately outlast his new Blairite boss. [See also: Andy Burnham has made his leadership bid] Related