logo
Council rapped after school bullying 'whitewash' claim

Council rapped after school bullying 'whitewash' claim

BBC News2 days ago
A Scottish council has been censured by the UK's information watchdog after records about a bullying incident were modified weeks after it took place. East Dunbartonshire Council previously paid damages to a parent who claimed the narrative of his daughter's bullying was being "whitewashed" in favour of her school.The council told him the incident was properly logged at the time and it was not possible to modify records retrospectively, but later admitted this was not the case.The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has ruled the backdating of these records did not comply with data protection laws. East Dunbartonshire Council said it has taken action to address the issues raised.
The row centres on a nationwide education IT system called Seemis which is used for recording pupil data and tracking bullying complaints.Concerns have previously been raised about how Seemis is accessed and used by staff amid fears bullying in schools is under-recorded.A petition calling for measures to stop teachers altering Seemis records has also been lodged with the Scottish Parliament by public sector governance campaign group Accountability Scotland.A spokesman for the group said: "It is clearly in the public interest that school records are accurate just like other public systems of records such as the NHS or police."This ICO decision is excellent news as there really needs to be sufficient safeguards in Seemis to stop history being re-written."This is a Scotland-wide issue. If teachers take advantage of deficiencies in the system it means parents are not getting the full story."
School records altered
The East Dunbartonshire case started when a parent, who has asked not to be named, raised a formal bullying complaint with his daughter's school.The father-of-three said his daughter later returned to this school, which is in East Dunbartonshire, but there was then another incident involving a dangerous weapon which went unnoticed in a supervised play area.The school told the parent, who works as a data analyst, that the incident had been properly logged on Seemis, but the father later suspected this was not the case. East Dunbartonshire Council told the parent it was not possible to edit records of the incident involving a weapon but did not release them when asked.After a civil court challenge the council was forced to release the data, which showed changes to three records had been made after the incident, including backdating records. The content of these changes is not recorded by the system.
In its response to the parent's complaint about the backdating issue, the ICO said it was of the view that this practice did not comply with data protection legislation.It added: "The practice of changing the date on a note on the Seemis system does not meet with the obligation to be transparent with regard to the processing of an individual's personal data. "While the notes themselves may be an accurate record of an incident or opinion, they are not necessarily accurate if the date is changed."The ICO told East Dunbartonshire Council it should change the functionality of Seemis so notes cannot be backdated. Greg Bremner, chief education officer at the local authority, said: "Whilst the council does not comment on individual cases, it had already taken action to address the issue raised by the ICO."
'Escalating violence and bullying' in schools
Earlier this year, BBC News revealed there were more than 3,600 incidents of racism or racist bullying recorded in Scotland's schools in 2024, compared to 2,400 the year before.Campaigners say the true figure will be higher as councils are not complying with Scottish government guidance to log all incidents properly.Dr Pam Gosal, Scottish Conservative MSP for West Scotland, said: "Across Scotland violence in schools is getting worse, with teachers, parents and pupils all reporting a worsening situation."We can only deal with escalating violence and bullying if records are kept properly protected, and everyone can have full confidence in the system."The part of the Seemis system for monitoring bullying incidents was rolled out in 2019, but previous research by watchdog Education Scotland suggested many schools are not using it properly.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rayner claims Reform will ‘fail women' as she weighs in on online safety row
Rayner claims Reform will ‘fail women' as she weighs in on online safety row

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Rayner claims Reform will ‘fail women' as she weighs in on online safety row

Nigel Farage and Reform UK risk 'failing a generation of young women' if they scrap online safety laws aimed at preventing revenge porn, Angela Rayner has said. The Deputy Prime Minister demanded Mr Farage explain how his party would keep young women safe when they use the internet, after Reform vowed to repeal the Online Safety Act. Her warning is the latest intervention in a row between senior Labour figures and Mr Farage's party over the Act. Under new rules introduced through the legislation at the end of July, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Reform has vowed to repeal the law and replace it with a different means of protecting children online, though the party has not said how it would do this. Among their criticisms of the Act, Mr Farage and his colleagues have cited freedom of speech concerns and claimed the Act is an example of overreach by the Government. This prompted backlash from Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, who claimed people like Jimmy Savile would use the internet to exploit children if he was still alive, and insisted anyone against the Act – like Mr Farage – was 'on their side'. The Reform leader demanded an apology, but ministers have been trenchant in their defence of the Act. Now, the Deputy Prime Minister has questioned how Mr Farage would seek to prevent the 'devastating crime' of intimate image abuse, also known as 'revenge porn', without the Online Safety Act's protections. Ms Rayner claimed: 'Nigel Farage risks failing a generation of young women with his dangerous and irresponsible plans to scrap online safety laws. 'Scrapping safeguards and having no viable alternative plan in place to halt the floodgates of abuse that could open is an appalling dereliction of duty. It's time for Farage to tell women and girls across Britain how he would keep them safe online.' Under the Online Safety Act, revenge porn is classified among the 'most severe online offences', the Deputy PM added. Citing figures from the charity Refuge, the Labour Party claimed a million young women had been subject to revenge porn: either intimate images being shared, or the threat of this. Some 3.4 million adults in total, both men and women, have been affected, Labour also said. Ministers have previously had to defend the Online Safety Act against accusations from Elon Musk's X social media site that it is threatening free speech. In a post at the start of August titled 'What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach', the platform formerly known as Twitter outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Mr Farage has meanwhile suggested there is a 'tech answer' for protecting children online, but neither he nor the Government have outlined one. He also suggested children are too easily able to avoid new online age verification rules by using VPNs (virtual private networks), which allow them to circumvent the rules by masking their identity and location. When Reform UK was approached for comment, its Westminster councillor Laila Cunningham said: 'Women are more unsafe than ever before thanks to Labour. Starmer has released thousands of criminals back onto the streets early with no regard for women's safety. 'I am calling on Jess Phillips to debate me on women's safety – she ignored the grooming gangs scandal and now she's wilfully deceiving voters on this issue. 'Reform will always prioritise prosecuting abuse but will never let women's safety be hijacked to justify censorship. 'You don't protect women by silencing speech. You protect them by securing borders, enforcing the law, and locking up actual criminals, and that is exactly what a Reform government would do.'

Rayner claims Farage's Reform will ‘fail women' in online safety act row
Rayner claims Farage's Reform will ‘fail women' in online safety act row

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Rayner claims Farage's Reform will ‘fail women' in online safety act row

Angela Rayner has warned Nigel Farage and Reform UK that their plan to scrap online safety laws could "fail a generation of young women" by removing protections against issues such as revenge porn. The Deputy Prime Minister demanded Mr Farage explain how his party would ensure young women's online safety, given Reform's vow to repeal the Online Safety Act. Her warning is the latest in a series of interventions by senior Labour figures regarding the Act. Under rules introduced in late July, the legislation requires online platforms, including social media and search engines, to prevent children from accessing harmful content like pornography or material encouraging suicide. Reform has vowed to repeal the law and replace it with a different means of protecting children online, though the party has not said how it would do this. Among their criticisms of the Act, Mr Farage and his colleagues have cited freedom of speech concerns and claimed the Act is an example of overreach by the Government. This prompted backlash from Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, who claimed people like Jimmy Savile would use the internet to exploit children if he was still alive, and insisted anyone against the Act – like Mr Farage – was 'on their side'. The Reform leader demanded an apology, but ministers have been trenchant in their defence of the Act. Now, the Deputy Prime Minister has questioned how Mr Farage would seek to prevent the 'devastating crime' of intimate image abuse, also known as 'revenge porn', without the Online Safety Act's protections. Ms Rayner claimed: 'Nigel Farage risks failing a generation of young women with his dangerous and irresponsible plans to scrap online safety laws. 'Scrapping safeguards and having no viable alternative plan in place to halt the floodgates of abuse that could open is an appalling dereliction of duty. It's time for Farage to tell women and girls across Britain how he would keep them safe online.' Under the Online Safety Act, revenge porn is classified among the 'most severe online offences', the Deputy PM added. Citing figures from the charity Refuge, the Labour Party claimed a million young women had been subject to revenge porn: either intimate images being shared, or the threat of this. Some 3.4 million adults in total, both men and women, have been affected, Labour also said. Ministers have previously had to defend the Online Safety Act against accusations from Elon Musk's X social media site that it is threatening free speech. In a post at the start of August titled 'What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach', the platform formerly known as Twitter outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Mr Farage has meanwhile suggested there is a 'tech answer' for protecting children online, but neither he nor the Government have outlined one. He also suggested children are too easily able to avoid new online age verification rules by using VPNs (virtual private networks), which allow them to circumvent the rules by masking their identity and location. When Reform UK was approached for comment, its Westminster councillor Laila Cunningham said: 'Women are more unsafe than ever before thanks to Labour. Starmer has released thousands of criminals back onto the streets early with no regard for women's safety. 'I am calling on Jess Phillips to debate me on women's safety – she ignored the grooming gangs scandal and now she's wilfully deceiving voters on this issue. 'Reform will always prioritise prosecuting abuse but will never let women's safety be hijacked to justify censorship. 'You don't protect women by silencing speech. You protect them by securing borders, enforcing the law, and locking up actual criminals, and that is exactly what a Reform government would do.'

Tech Secretary Peter Kyle reignites war with Nigel Farage by accusing him of putting women at risk
Tech Secretary Peter Kyle reignites war with Nigel Farage by accusing him of putting women at risk

The Sun

time8 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Tech Secretary Peter Kyle reignites war with Nigel Farage by accusing him of putting women at risk

TECH Secretary Peter Kyle has reignited his war with Nigel Farage by accusing him of putting women at risk. He claims the Reform leader's vow to repeal online safety laws would 'rip up' protections against violent misogyny and revenge porn. 2 Mr Kyle sparked a row last month when he alleged Nigel was 'on the side' of paedos like Jimmy Savile. Furious Mr Farage branded the comments 'disgusting' and demanded an apology. But Labour has launched a fresh assault on Mr Farage as he soars in the polls. Both Deputy PM Angela Rayner and safeguarding minister Jess Phillips are attacking him over women's safety. Writing in today's Sun on Sunday, Mr Kyle says: 'When Nigel Farage boasts that he would scrap the Online Safety Act, he's admitting he's happy to leave the internet as a wild west and put women and girls at risk. 'He'd rip up protections that crack down on revenge porn, violent misogynistic content, and posts encouraging self-harm or suicide. 'He would tear down the defences we've built to hold back dangerous content and that would make the police's job much harder.' Zia Yusuf, head of the party's Department of Government Efficiency, said: 'This law is the biggest assault on freedom of expression in this country in our lifetimes. Since the Act came into force what has been censored? "Footage of a protest in Leeds, comments demanding the end of illegal migration, and even biographies of Richard the Lionheart have been removed from social media. Reform party leader Nigel Farage discusses immigration at Westminster press conference 'If this was really about protecting children from predators, why did this law result in the censorship of a speech in Parliament on the grooming gangs?' Mr Yusuf said Reform would pass a law 'fit for purpose'. It comes after Donald Trump's US administration attacked Britain for 'serious restrictions' on free speech. 2 Strangle porn 'rife for kids' By Sophia Sleigh MORE than half of kids have seen strangling in online porn, a shock poll will show this week. Some 58 per cent of 16 to 21-year-olds said they witnessed it when they were younger. Most had it served up to them on their feeds without looking for it. Stronger protections were introduced by Ofcom in July as part of the Online Safety Act. The Government aims to ban strangling porn through its Crime and Policing Bill. Children's Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza, who ordered the research, said: 'Pornography is warping children's views of themselves, of each other and of their expectations of sex. 'They are seeing, often by accident, things which are illegal in real life.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store