Six get life-term in two separate murder cases in Aurangabad
In the first case, linked to Madanpur police station, the court of principal district and sessions Judge, Rajkumar, sentenced Krishna Ram and Krit Ram to life imprisonment for the murder of their own uncle, Sahang Ram. According to public prosecutor Pushkar Agrawal, both convicts, residents of Karmdih village, were fined Rs10,000 each, with an additional one-year jail in case of default in payment.
As per advocate Satish Kumar Snehi, the case was based on a complaint filed on June 26, 2003, by one Sanjay Ram.
The FIR alleged that a dispute over passage through govt land led to a violent altercation between Mahang Ram and his brother Sahang Ram, aided by his sons Krishna and Krit Ram. Mahang Ram sustained critical injuries and later succumbed during treatment. Sahang Ram passed away during the trial.
In another case, related to Uphara police station, additional district and sessions Judge VIII, Manish Jaiswal sentenced four men — Ashok Sharma alias Ashok Verma, Abu alias Ranjeet Kumar, Satish Kumar, and Jayprakash Singh, all residents of Shankardih village in Uphara — to life imprisonment and also slapped a fine of ₹15,000 each.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice
Grammarly
Install Now
Undo
Govt prosecutor Pradeep Kumar Singh said the prosecution examined seven witnesses, including a doctor and the investigating officer. One of the accused, Bishnupad Singh, died during trial proceedings.
The FIR, lodged by Sujit Kumar of Shankarpur village on Dec 2, 2020, stated that his father, Srinath Sharma, was brutally assaulted near the village canal by the accused and others over a land dispute. He was rushed to the primary health centre in Goh, where doctors declared him dead.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Idaho student murders: Kohberger kept women's IDs as keepsakes; prosecutors detail eerie glovebox discovery
Bryan Kohberger, the man convicted of brutally murdering four University of Idaho students, had bizarre keepsakes belonging to women he knew before the massacre, a new report has revealed. According to KIMA, citing Latah County prosecutors, investigators discovered two ID badges stashed inside the glove compartment of Kohberger's car following his arrest in December 2022. The discovery was made while authorities were searching his parents' home in Albrightsville, Pennsylvania. One of the IDs belonged to a woman who worked with Kohberger during his time as a security guard at the Pleasant Valley School District, where he was employed from 2016 to 2021. The identity of the second woman remains unknown, and prosecutors did not disclose further details. Both women told authorities they were 'surprised' to find out that Kohberger had possession of their identification, but neither reported ever being harmed or threatened by him. Kohberger was found guilty last month of murdering University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin in the early hours of 13 November 2022. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like They Were So Beautiful Before; Now Look At Them; Number 10 Will Shock You Reportingly Undo The four were stabbed to death in an off-campus home, in a case that sent shockwaves across the United States. He declined to speak during the trial when offered the chance to explain why he committed the savage killings, leaving families and investigators without closure. Many continue to examine the evidence for clues into his motive or psychological state. Earlier this week, newly released police bodycam footage showed a traffic stop involving Kohberger in Latah county, capturing him speaking more than he did throughout his entire trial. 'I'm just being honest with you,' he told the officer, New York Post reported citing the report. 'Just for future reference, I'm obviously not this person, like I told you I wasn't wearing my seat belt — do people lie to you about that? Say I lied to you about that?' Kohberger eerily asked the deputy during the stop. Less than three months after that footage was recorded, Kohberger drove the same white Hyundai Elantra to Idaho, where he carried out the horrific murders.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Why Columbia's deal with Trump could drive international students away
Columbia agrees to report student arrests under new US government deal. (File Photo) Columbia University's recent settlement with the Trump administration has sparked concern across the academic sector due to the introduction of new monitoring and reporting requirements for international students. The agreement, made public through university sources and media reports, includes obligations that significantly expand Columbia's role in policing non-US student populations on campus. As part of the settlement, Columbia will pay $221 million and adopt stricter oversight measures, including reporting minor student infractions such as trespassing to the federal government. These measures go beyond existing requirements under the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), the US government's platform for monitoring international students. Expanded reporting obligations for Columbia According to a university official cited in the original press release, Columbia will now report arrest information to SEVIS, even in cases that do not result in suspension or expulsion. These infractions include offences like trespassing, which led to the arrest of 78 students during a pro-Palestinian protest at a university library. Previously, such incidents were resolved internally and did not involve federal authorities. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote Undo In an official statement issued by Columbia and referenced in the press release, the university confirmed: "In addition to those longstanding requirements, Columbia will now also notify the programme if it is made aware of arrest information." The university emphasised that its participation in SEVIS already required it to report disciplinary actions resulting in suspensions or expulsions but acknowledged that this new measure adds further obligations. Concerns over international student recruitment With nearly 40% of its student population coming from outside the US, Columbia is among the top three US institutions with the highest number of international students, as per data from the Institute of International Education. Many of these students pay full tuition fees, contributing significantly to the university's revenue, particularly at the graduate level. William Brustein, a veteran international student officer, stated that "international students and their parents were already hesitant about studying at US colleges," and noted that other countries such as the UK and Australia are viable alternatives. His remarks were included in the original press release. Potential impact across higher education sector The new conditions placed on Columbia may set a precedent for similar agreements at other US universities. Fanta Aw, Executive Director of NAFSA, said the arrest and disciplinary reporting requirement was "outside of the jurisdiction of universities" and warned it "sets a precedent that all institutions should be aware of," as reported in the press release. Acting Columbia President Claire Shipman, in a letter to students and staff, stated that one motivation for reaching the agreement was "the potential revocation of visa status of thousands of international students." She added that Columbia had not agreed to report information beyond what the federal government is legally entitled to access. Ongoing federal investigations at other universities Other institutions have also come under federal scrutiny. The University of Chicago is currently being investigated for its admissions policies regarding international students. Additionally, the US State Department has launched a probe into Harvard's compliance with foreign research programmes. In contrast, Brown University recently reached a settlement with the Trump administration that did not include measures affecting international students. Stephen Yale-Loehr, a former immigration law professor at Cornell University, stated that the implementation of such agreements is critical and that "no matter how this is implemented, it shows international students that Columbia — and other universities that accept similar language — will be less welcoming," as quoted in the press release. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
SC sets aside HC order granting anticipatory bail on condition to resume conjugal life
The Supreme Court has set aside an order of the Jharkhand High Court which granted anticipatory bail to a man on a condition that he would resume conjugal life with his wife and maintain her with dignity and honour. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih noted that the man was an accused in a case registered under various sections of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and under the Dowry Prohibition Act , 1961. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category MCA Design Thinking Product Management Data Science others CXO Public Policy Data Science Technology Management Cybersecurity Finance Leadership Artificial Intelligence healthcare Degree MBA Operations Management Healthcare Digital Marketing Others PGDM Data Analytics Project Management Skills you'll gain: Programming Proficiency Data Handling & Analysis Cybersecurity Awareness & Skills Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning Duration: 24 Months Vellore Institute of Technology VIT Master of Computer Applications Starts on Aug 14, 2024 Get Details "While considering the application for pre-arrest bail of the appellant, the court ought to have assessed whether the discretionary relief sought by the appellant for pre-arrest bail deserved to be granted within the settled parameters... but a condition such as the one impugned before us ought not to have been imposed in view of several decisions of this court," the bench said in its July 29 order. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo It said the high court should have considered the prayer for pre-arrest bail entirely on its own merit instead of imposing a condition, which is not traceable to section 438(2) of the erstwhile Code of Criminal Procedure. The apex court passed the order on a plea challenging a February 2025 order of the high court which had granted the prayer for pre-arrest bail on condition that the man resumes conjugal life with his wife and maintains her with dignity and honour as his lawful wife. Live Events During the hearing before the top court, the counsel appearing for the woman said the man, together with her, had jointly submitted before the high court that he was willing to resume his conjugal life. The lawyer contended that the man cannot now turn around and take a different stand. The bench said the counsel was partly right in the sense that the man had indeed agreed to resume conjugal life. "However, the respondent no.2 (woman) insisted for imposition of a further condition to which we do not find the appellant (man) to have agreed. The spouses seemingly, at one point of time, had drifted apart and resided separately for some time. Imposing a condition that the appellant would maintain the respondent no.2 with dignity and honour is beset with risk in that it can generate further litigation," the bench said. It said an application for cancellation of bail on the ground that such condition has not been complied with, if filed later, is bound to meet opposition from the man and could place the high court in further difficulty. "The impugned judgment and order, accordingly, stands set aside. The appeal is allowed," the bench said. It restored the anticipatory bail application on the file of the high court and asked it to decide it afresh on its own merits, as early as possible. The bench said till such time the matter is decided finally by the high court, the interim protection granted to the man by the top court earlier would continue. In its interim direction passed earlier, the top court had said the man be not arrested in connection with the case subject to his joining investigation as and when called upon to do so by the investigating officer.
