logo
How Netanyahu's demented hubris could shatter the region

How Netanyahu's demented hubris could shatter the region

Despite an uneasy ceasefire in the US-Israeli war of aggression against Iran, there's no telling what will come next, particularly from a volatile US administration led by Donald Trump that has elevated self-contradiction, confusion and policy U-turns to an art of geostrategic chaos.
Much will depend on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's next moves and Iran's reactions; less will hinge on the US itself.
Since his re-election, President Trump has taken a back seat to Netanyahu. He has been largely reacting, often appearing unpleasantly surprised, to the latter's strategic moves and cynical manipulations - just as Russian President Vladimir Putin has for a long time been playing the US president.
His recent bombing of Iran only aggravated the West's "Israel problem", by surrendering and sacrificing Washington's own national interests and professed values to an untrustworthy and purely self-interested Israeli "ally".
Trump, who has portrayed himself as an anti-war president, proclaimed in 2019 that great nations do not start forever wars. He is uninterested in exporting liberalism or democracy abroad.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
But Netanyahu deliberately defeated Trump's stated non-interventionism by cornering him on Iran - a situation where he felt he had no choice but to intervene, if only to save face, at personal political risk.
Relentlessly pushed by Netanyahu, Trump opted for limited "surgical" strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. He was careful to quickly declare that the bombing marked the end of the episode, and that he had no desire or intention to engage in further military actions against Iran.
But will Netanyahu let him retreat in the longer term? Though still a decisive player in the Middle East, Trump's US is no longer the driving force of the bloody regional mutations under way. Israel, unfortunately, plays that role.
Counterproductive war
Despite the chaos that unfolded last month, it appears that few if any of the proclaimed objectives were reached with regards to removing the Iranian nuclear threat. And what unfolded will likely backfire against both Israel and the US in the long run, for several reasons.
Firstly, it may indirectly solidify the Iranian regime by unifying the population around national defence in the face of Israeli-US aggression. Secondly, it may push Iran to accelerate its nuclear programme and ultimately develop the bomb as a means of self-protection. Finally, it may convince Iran to abandon the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which, unlike Israel, it has signed. Iran has now suspended cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency and banned its inspectors.
All of that being said, there is no denying that with his war on Iran, Netanyahu masterfully killed several birds with one stone.
The new world order sought by Netanyahu far exceeds the geographic limits of the Middle East. It includes domination over the US and Europe
He at the very least delayed Iran's nuclear programme, if only for a limited period of time. He sabotaged both US-Iran diplomatic talks and a planned French-Saudi summit where European states might have formally recognised a Palestinian state.
He also diverted international attention away from Gaza, thus making it easier for Israel to continue its ethnic cleansing and genocide of Palestinians in both Gaza and the occupied West Bank.
Additionally, as most EU states were criticising Netanyahu harshly on Gaza and several, including Britain and Spain, had suspended commercial deals or trade talks with Israel, he silenced those critiques, recreating overnight a western consensus around Israel.
Most importantly for Netanyahu, his approval rating soared thanks to the war on Iran, thus ameliorating his extremely precarious political standing within Israel.
Last but not least, he finally managed to reach a major goal he had been working towards for decades: getting the US to bomb Iran. That in itself was a major foreign policy victory for Netanyahu.
Larger goals
From a broader geostrategic perspective, Netanyahu's war on Iran was just the latest development in his multi-fronted attacks on Tehran's allies. After targeting Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen - the tentacles of the octopus - he went after the head of the "axis of resistance": Iran itself.
While systematically presenting these operations as defensive, Netanyahu's real goal is to keep the entire region in a state of vulnerability, by destabilising regimes and spreading chaos. The evidence that Israel's predatory aggression is typically not motivated by self-defence was underscored by Netanyahu's attacks on post-Assad Syria.
Through territorial incursions, strikes on Syrian military assets and land conquest, in addition to pitting minorities against the regime in classic divide-and-conquer tactics, Netanyahu aims to further weaken Syria - even though the new regime has displayed no intention to target Israel.
After ceasefire, Iran is preparing for the long war with Israel Read More »
Ultimately, Netanyahu's goal is to install a new regional order centred on unchallenged Israeli supremacy and domination. He is open about his "new Middle East" project, which - while sold as a pacification strategy - actually involves crushing all adversaries, especially the Palestinian people.
On the map he brandished at the United Nations in September 2023, Palestine had disappeared, with both Gaza and the occupied West Bank displayed as part of Israel. Tel Aviv was portrayed as the new centre of gravity in a region reduced to a few Gulf states, along with Sudan, Jordan and Egypt; the rest of the neighbouring countries were not even labelled.
This demented hubris is reminiscent of the ancient Pax Romana. And just like the fate of the recalcitrant populations who resisted then, it is not hard to figure out what could happen to any who reject this new hegemon.
The new world order sought by Netanyahu far exceeds the geographic limits of the Middle East. It includes domination over the US and Europe, whose racist neocolonial states have themselves long used Israel as an attack dog to keep the Arab and Muslim populations of the region weak, divided and vulnerable.
That fact, too, was admitted in a remarkable moment of candour and truth by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, when during the latest G7 summit, he thanked Israel for "doing the dirty work for all of us".
If anyone wants to know what the new face of a world dominated by Israel would look like, that's easy: just look at Gaza.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel Bans Palestinians in Gaza from Swimming and Fishing
Israel Bans Palestinians in Gaza from Swimming and Fishing

UAE Moments

timean hour ago

  • UAE Moments

Israel Bans Palestinians in Gaza from Swimming and Fishing

The Israeli military issued formal orders on Monday, July 14, declaring Palestinian entry into Gaza's coastal waters strictly prohibited. The ban covers swimming, fishing, and diving, and warns that any violations will be met with force by Israeli forces. During Israel's genocide of Palestinians in Gaza, more than 6,000 people, the majority of them fishermen, have effectively lost their jobs and sources of food. The fishing sector, once producing around 3,500 tonnes a year, has dropped to zero. Nearly all boats and equipment have been destroyed, and over 210 people from this sector have been killed since October 2023, including at least 60 fishermen. Gaza's fishing port has been destroyed, and all maritime activity has been stopped because of the genocide. Gaza's Government Media Office, led by director general Ismail Al‑Thawabta, condemned the ban as a violation of international law. He described it as a deliberate starvation tactic targeting Gaza's livelihood, undermining the right to work and live with dignity, and amounting to collective punishment under the Fourth Geneva Convention and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. As the enclave endures shortages of food, clean water, fuel, and electricity under a broader blockade, the maritime ban marks yet another devastating blow. With no safe space left on land or at sea, more than two million Palestinians in Gaza are stripped of one of the few existing freedoms and sources of survival. This article was previously published on kuwaitmoments. To see the original article, click here

Gaza accusations at centre of Microsoft shareholder resolution
Gaza accusations at centre of Microsoft shareholder resolution

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Gaza accusations at centre of Microsoft shareholder resolution

A shareholder resolution related to the allegations levelled at Microsoft concerning the use of its technology in Gaza will be voted on at the company's annual meeting. The resolution seeks to push Microsoft to evaluate its effectiveness in promoting "human rights due diligence processes" related to artificial intelligence. "Shareholders request the board of directors publish a report, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, assessing the effectiveness of Microsoft's human rights due diligence processes in preventing, identifying and addressing customer misuse of Microsoft artificial intelligence and cloud products or services that violates human rights or international humanitarian law," reads the resolution. Since April, the software company has come under criticism from various groups, chief among them No Azure for Apartheid, which consists of current and former Microsoft employees who have criticised the company's contracts with the Israeli military. The group has claimed that Microsoft's AI and cloud products have been used to target Palestinians in the war in Gaza. After weeks of condemnation from No Azure for Apartheid, Microsoft announced in May that an internal review had found "no evidence" its products have been used to harm people in Gaza. There were caveats in the review, however, particularly an acknowledgement that because of the nature of how software and AI tools are used by various entities, Microsoft's investigation might have been limited. The resolution recently submitted for the company based in Redmond, Washington, was filed by about 60 shareholders, "collectively representing more than $80 million in Microsoft shares", said corporation watchdog Eko, which provided a copy of the resolution to The National. Israel's campaign in the enclave – which followed the 2023 attacks by Hamas-led fighters on Israel that resulted in the deaths of about 1,200 people and the capture of 240 hostages – has killed nearly 58,400 people and injured more than 139,000. Microsoft is not alone in coming under scrutiny for contracts with Israel. Palantir, Lockheed Martin, Booz Allen Hamilton, Google and others have faced flak. The internal review of Microsoft, despite making the company stand out among others to have been condemned for their ties to Israel, failed to appease those who insist the company's AI tools and cloud computing offerings such as Azure have been misused in Gaza. The lead filer of the resolution, set to face a vote at Microsoft's annual shareholder meeting in December, is the Religious of the Sacred Heart of Mary, an international congregation of Catholic women. "Over the years, we have had constructive discussions with Microsoft," read a statement from the group. "However, in this case, we are disappointed that Microsoft's recent statements responding to allegations of complicity in war crimes lack both specificity and detail." Rewan Haddad, a campaign director at Eko, which describes itself as being "committed to curbing the growing power of corporations", said "time will tell if Microsoft's executives heed the call of their investors and people around the world, or continue to profit from and fuel atrocities". Microsoft has not yet responded to The National's requests for comment on the shareholder resolution. Its looks set to face an uphill battle in terms of being approved by Microsoft's shareholders and because resolutions for publicly traded companies in the US are non-binding, enforcing them is difficult. Meanwhile, demonstrators calling attention to the plight of Gazans have continued to interrupt Microsoft events throughout the US.

At least 13 civilians, mostly children, killed in Israeli strikes on Gaza
At least 13 civilians, mostly children, killed in Israeli strikes on Gaza

Middle East Eye

timean hour ago

  • Middle East Eye

At least 13 civilians, mostly children, killed in Israeli strikes on Gaza

At least 13 Palestinian civilians, most of whom are children, were killed and others wounded on Monday afternoon local time in a series of Israeli strikes in the Gaza Strip. Wafa news agency reported that nine civilians were killed and others wounded after an Israeli drone strike targeted a displacement tent in Khan Younis, in southern Gaza. In a separate attack, four civilians were killed and more wounded after Israeli forces bombed a shop in al-Bureij refugee camp, in central Gaza. Several others were also wounded following another Israeli strike targeting a group of people in Khan Younis refugee camp.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store