Chinese Navy Shadowed NATO Aircraft Carrier: Report
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Chinese navy—the world's largest by hull count—monitored a French aircraft carrier earlier this year in the contested South China Sea, according to a report published on Saturday.
France is one of three European countries that have deployed aircraft carriers to waters near China since 2021 as part of the European Carrier Group Interoperability Initiative, which aims to maintain a continuous presence in the Indo-Pacific through sequential deployments.
Newsweek has reached out to the Chinese Defense Ministry for comment via email.
Why It Matters
China asserts sovereignty over most of the South China Sea, with claims that overlap those of neighboring countries. The East Asian power's armed forces have frequently shadowed Western militaries operating alongside regional allies and partners, such as the Philippines.
France, a NATO member state, deployed its nuclear-powered aircraft carrier FS Charles de Gaulle last November for a five-month mission in the Indo-Pacific, where its ally, the United States, faces challenges from China as both military powers jostle for naval dominance.
The French aircraft carrier FS Charles de Gaulle is seen in Toulon, France, on November 28, 2024.
The French aircraft carrier FS Charles de Gaulle is seen in Toulon, France, on November 28, 2024.
CLEMENT MAHOUDEAU/AFP via Getty Images
Beijing has accused NATO of exceeding the geopolitical scope defined by the North Atlantic Treaty and using what it called "Eurasian security connectivity" as a pretext for maintaining a military presence in the Asia-Pacific.
What To Know
Citing a senior French naval officer at an event, the specialist outlet Naval News reported that Charles de Gaulle was monitored by a Chinese frigate as the aircraft carrier entered the Luzon Strait—a strategic waterway connecting the Philippine Sea and the South China Sea.
According to the report, the French naval strike group led by the Charles de Gaulle also encountered an unidentified Chinese aircraft carrier while operating in the South China Sea, where China maintains a "very substantial" presence of naval and coast guard vessels.
Newsweek previously reported on the Charles de Gaulle's deployment in the western Pacific, where it conducted a war game in mid-February with U.S. and Japanese aircraft carriers—USS Carl Vinson and JS Kaga, respectively—in the Philippine Sea, east of the Philippines.
Following the exercise, the French aircraft carrier participated in another war game with the Philippine military in waters of the South China Sea within the Southeast Asian country's 230-mile exclusive economic zone, before making a stopover at Subic Bay near Manila.
The French aircraft carrier FS Charles de Gaulle is seen in Subic Bay near Manila, the Philippines, on February 23, 2025.
The French aircraft carrier FS Charles de Gaulle is seen in Subic Bay near Manila, the Philippines, on February 23, 2025.
TED ALJIBE/AFP via Getty Images
While the Charles de Gaulle operated in the South China Sea, satellite imagery showed that one of China's two operational aircraft carriers, CNS Shandong, was not docked at its home port in southern China's Hainan province, suggesting a deployment in the South China Sea.
The French officer also revealed that during the Charles de Gaulle's deployment near China, no ships assigned to the naval strike group transited the Taiwan Strait, which lies between China and Taiwan—a self-governed island that Beijing has threatened to take by force.
What People Are Saying
Senior Colonel Zhang Xiaogang, spokesperson for China's Defense Ministry, said at a press conference on June 26: "We firmly oppose NATO using China as an excuse to 'expand eastward into the Asia-Pacific' and urge NATO to reflect on its own behaviors, change course, and contribute more to global security and stability."
Krzysztof Sliwinski, an associate professor in the Department of Government and International Studies at Hong Kong Baptist University, previously told Newsweek: "European carriers play a crucial role in maintaining open access to international waters, particularly in disputed regions such as the South China Sea. This effort challenges China's broad maritime claims and supports essential global trade routes that are important to both the U.S. and Europe."
What Happens Next
It remains to be seen which European aircraft carrier will be deployed next to the Indo-Pacific following the ongoing mission of the British aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
27 minutes ago
- Politico
Thailand and Cambodia agree to ceasefire
Hun Manet said he hoped that bilateral ties could return to normal soon so that almost 300,000 villagers evacuated on both sides could return home. It is 'time to start rebuilding trust, confidence and cooperation going forward between Thailand and Cambodia,' he said. Phumtham said the outcome reflected 'Thailand's desire for a peaceful resolution.' The joint statement on the agreement said that the United States was a co-organizer of the talks, with participation from China. The Chinese and American ambassadors to Malaysia attended the meeting that lasted over two hours. In a press statement, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who was involved in arranging the meeting, applauded the ceasefire declaration. Rubio said he and Trump 'are committed to an immediate cessation of violence and expect the governments of Cambodia and Thailand to fully honor their commitments to end this conflict.' News of the ceasefire deal brought relief and hope to evacuees from both sides. Some women at a crowded evacuation shelter in Surin, Thailand, shouted for joy. 'I'm happy about that, and feeling a bit relieved,' said Usa Dasri, a vendor and farmer. 'We miss our home. There are many small things I'm worried about, livestock and rice fields. I don't know what might've happened to them. I want to go home, so I'm happy. I also think about our soldiers at the frontline. I want them to be safe and have a good sleep like us.' She also credited outside diplomacy for the breakthrough. 'Without them, our two countries would have had a hard time negotiating — both sides have quite a hard time talking and understanding each other,' she added.
27 minutes ago
Jordan requesting US help with Gaza aid airdrops but Trump administration has no plans to assist, officials say
As international pressure to deliver more food aid to Gaza builds, the Kingdom of Jordan is "continuing to request assistance in the form of pledges to contribute aircraft, supplies, humanitarian aid, and logistical support" for its airdrop operation -- but the Trump administration has no active plans to join European allies in helping with the mission at present, according to an internal State Department communication reviewed by ABC News on Monday and two U.S. officials familiar with the matter. Per the communication, Jordan has informed the State Department of its intention to launch a three-week airdrop operation beginning in early August -- in addition to the drops conducted with the United Arab Emirates that took place Sunday -- and the department is tracking various pledges to assist with the operation from Spain, Belgium, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. "Emphasizing the irreplicable role of land routes and minimizing the risk of casualties due to airdrops are continued concerns among potential contributors," the department communication noted. Some aid organizations have also publicly expressed concerns about the efficacy and safety of airdrops. "Airdrops are the most expensive & inefficient way to deliver aid. It is a distraction to the inaction," Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency Philippe Lazzarini wrote in a post on X on Friday. Earlier Monday, President Donald Trump promised the U.S. would be "even more involved" when it comes to delivering aid to Gaza, saying this administration would work with European allies to set up "food centers" with fewer restrictions on access. He also suggested that additional assistance could come in the form of the U.S. helping with air drops if his administration chose to do so. "We did some airlifts before, some airdrops," he said following a meeting with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "It's not very hard to do, actually." Jordan has also informed the State Department that it encountered significant delays when moving aid into Gaza by ground on Sunday, stating that the Israeli government allowed only 25 out of 60 trucks traveling from Jordan to enter the enclave. According to the internal communication, the Jordanian Armed Forces reported that the screening of the aid convoy "went substantially slower" than it has for three previous convoys organized by the country. The 25 trucks that were permitted entry on Sunday were carrying World Food Programme contents, while the delayed trucks were carrying food supplies from other organizations, including World Central Kitchen and the Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization, it added. Jordan has informed the department of its intention to move two more convoys into Gaza this week, according to the communication. "President Trump wants to alleviate suffering for the people of Gaza because he has a humanitarian heart. He announced a new aid plan today to help Gazans obtain crucial access to food – details are forthcoming," White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said in a comment to ABC News. Trump said earlier that European countries would also help with his plan to set up food centers but shared few other details about his vision. "We have all of the European nations joining us, and others also have called. So, we're going to set up food centers and where the people can walk in and no boundaries. We're not going to have fences," he said. Regarding ABC News reporting on Jordan's request for assistance with its air drop operation and the reported delay moving ground aid into Gaza caused by Israel, a State Department spokesperson responded, "President Trump has called for creative solutions 'to help the Palestinians' in Gaza, and we welcome any effective effort that delivers food to Gazans and keeps it out of the hands of Hamas." "At this time, GHF remains the best mechanism for getting aid into the hands of people in desperate need in Gaza while also keeping aid out of the hands of Hamas," the spokesperson said, referring to the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. "A track record of distributing over 94 million meals to date while preventing any Hamas looting is absolutely incredible and should be commended and supported. We call on other aid agencies and the UN to participate in this secure aid delivery system and take GHF up on its offer to use its system to deliver food to Gazans in need," the spokesperson said. The Trump administration has pledged at least $30 million to the GHF and thrown its full support behind the controversial charity despite concerns from critics regarding its aid distribution practices. Earlier this month, more than 160 charity groups and NGOs called for the GHF to be shut down, claiming that more than 500 Palestinians had been killed while seeking aid from the organization and that its distribution locations 'have become sites of repeated massacres in blatant disregard for international humanitarian law.' The United Nations has also rejected requests to cooperate with GHF. 'We welcome working with any other partners. All we ask is that those partners work based on the most basic humanitarian principles, one of them being that don't set up an operation that will increase the risk of people to be shot at or trampled while trying to get food,' U.N. spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric said in a press conference last week. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation pushed back on the criticism in a statement to ABC News. "While Oxfam, MSF and these other groups hold press conferences and send out threatening letters, GHF is on the ground feeding people," a GHF spokesperson said. "We've offered to help them deliver it safely. They've refused. The humanitarian community must return to its core mission -- feeding people -- not protecting outdated systems or avoiding the discomfort of change. In a letter sent to Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday, a group of 21 Democratic senators called for the Trump administration to immediately cease funding for the GHF and resume support for the existing U.N-led aid coordination mechanisms.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's New EU Trade Deal Labeled 'Bad News' By Economists As Dow Futures Spike Over 150 Points
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. President Donald Trump's latest trade deal with the European Union is drawing sharp criticism from several leading economists, who argue that it will disproportionately harm American consumers and businesses. What Happened: Following Trump's announcement on Sunday, economist Peter Schiff posted on X, with a blunt assessment of the deal, saying that 'Americans lose again.' Schiff says that under the new terms, 'we will pay 15% tariffs to buy most European goods, but 50% tariffs to buy European steel, aluminum, or copper, driving up material costs for many U.S industries.' Meanwhile, he notes, 'Europeans won't pay any tariffs on most U.S. imports.' Trending: Be part of the breakthrough that could replace plastic as we know it—University of Michigan economist Justin Wolfers echoed similar concerns, while highlighting the folly of imposing trade barriers. 'These trade deals are all underwhelming for one simple reason,' he says, and that's because trade barriers and tariffs have been tiny for decades. 'When tariffs are 1-2%, there's not much to gain from a trade war,' he says, while warning that a 15% tax on imports can, however, 'do a lot of harm to Americans.' Danish economist Lars Christensen pushed back against the narrative that this was a bad deal for the EU and a win for Trump. He says, 'the deal lower[s] EU tariffs,' which he believes is 'good news for European consumers,' while adding that it is bad for the U.S. economy. Christensen agrees with both Schiff and Wolfers, saying that 'the biggest losers are US consumers,' while comparing the deal to 'shooting yourself in the foot' for the U.S., which he says 'is never a victory.'Why It Matters: The announcement of the trade deal with the EU on Sunday brought an end to months of trade and tariff-related uncertainties with the U.S.'s biggest trading partner. Besides the 15% tariff on imports from the region, the EU will also be buying $750 billion worth of U.S. energy, while investing $600 billion in the United States. Additionally, nations in the bloc will be purchasing weapons from the U.S., although no amount was mentioned. Meanwhile, top officials from the U.S. and China are set to meet in Stockholm to address pressing trade issues, with Trump saying last week that 'We have the confines of a deal with China.' U.S. stock futures are up pre-market, following news of the trade deal over the weekend. The S&P 500 Futures are up 0.37%, trading at 6,449.00, and Nasdaq Futures at 23,538.25, up 0.50%, followed by Dow Futures, which rose over 150 points, up 0.33%, trading at 45,234.00, at the time of writing. Photo Courtesy: Savvapanf Photo on Read Next: $100k+ in investable assets? Match with a fiduciary advisor for free to learn how you can maximize your retirement and save on taxes – no cost, no obligation. If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it? This article Trump's New EU Trade Deal Labeled 'Bad News' By Economists As Dow Futures Spike Over 150 Points originally appeared on
