
Chief Legal Officers: The Expanded Purview Of A Trusted Advisor
Creative Critical Thinker With Light Bulb Illuminating To Show An Idea
The trusted adviser role has become more challenging and critical than ever.
'Trusted advisor' is a moniker bestowed upon an individual or group whose wisdom, skill, experience, judgment, and authenticity have earned client trust. The relationship embodies the zenith of the client-advisor dynamic, one that extends beyond the scope and term of a contract or the legacy boundaries of functional expertise. The trusted advisor has long been esteemed by corporate leadership even if, paradoxically, its true enterprise value is difficult to quantify.
Perhaps the best way to appreciate the elevated difficulty and importance of the trusted advisor role is to consider the state of the world and its impact upon business.
Accelerating Change And Interconnected Risks
The Doomsday Clock, a universally recognized indicator of human vulnerability to global catastrophe, is the closest it has ever been to the midnight witching hour. The World Economic Forum Global Risks Report 2025 cites a mélange of interrelated risks. The convergence and intensification of business, geopolitics, geoeconomics, domestic and global polarization, climate change, state sponsored armed conflict, cybersecurity, disinformation/ misinformation, and rapid technological advances have created a 'perfect storm' that business must navigate. These interconnected existential threats are occurring against the backdrop of a governance framework that is not equipped to address them. Nor is it able to respond to the global fragility the risks generate.
Public trust in institutions has cratered. The global political and economic order that has lasted for almost 80 years is teetering. The rule of law is under siege on multiple fronts across the globe. The US, long the beacon of democracy and the rule of law, has become all but unrecognizable to its long-time allies as well as a significant portion of its own citizens.
Moore's law is over; the acceleration and breadth of technological advances-notably AI- offers hope for tackling fundamental human and business challenges. But so too do those breakthroughs challenge human capacity to adapt. Consensus around an AI regulatory framework that balances risk and reward remains illusory. A patchwork approach to AI regulation will intensify an already white-hot geoeconomic cauldron and elevate the potential risk AI could pose to humanity.
The Ante Has Been Upped For Trusted Advisors
There is a correlation between the elevation of business challenges and the importance of the trusted advisor. This has upped the ante to fulfill the trusted advisor role. At a time when change has become a constant, trusted advisors must remain current, make sense of it all, and collaborate with enterprise leadership to create opportunity out of challenge. They must help to forge and implement creative solutions to challenges as well as find pathways to seize opportunities. They must galvanize human and technological resources, ensuring collaboration between them. To achieve this they must be constant learners with curious, creative, and flexible mindsets. They must be adept at synthesizing and extrapolating from large bodies of information, communicate clearly and effectively, and provide insightful, actionable, and balanced counsel across a wide range of issues, functions, and stakeholders.
If CEO's are piloting business through a perfect storm, then trusted advisors are air traffic controllers assisting them to circumnavigate it and to find a safer, less turbulent route.
To serve as a trusted advisor in the current environment requires more than it did even a few years ago. Three key 'supplemental' skillsets have emerged: (1) a voracious curiosity focused on understanding existing and emerging risk areas (technological, geoeconomic, geopolitical, climatic, etc.) while also identifying opportunities ; (2) a digital core that enables quicker, more effective processing and integration of data across different strands of an organization with a focus on how it can be applied to advance client outcomes and experience; and (3) a holistic approach to problem solving ('connecting the dots') that is collaborative, agile, and flexible.
Chief Legal Officers Have Emerged As Key Enterprise Trusted Advisors
This column first examined the changing role of Chief Legal Officers (CLO's)* nearly a decade ago, noting that corporate legal leaders are the profession's bellwethers as well as "guardians of business integrity and conscience of the company.'. A few years later, the author, noting the expansion and heightened influence of the CLO role, referred to them as 'law's astronauts' whose range of skills 'foreshadow changing expectations of all lawyers and allied legal professionals.'
Fast forward to the present. Business is operating in an altogether different world. Global change has necessitated and accelerated end-to-end enterprise transformation. That, in turn, has caused business to reimagine the legal function-how can it better serve the needs of the enterprise and its customers in a digital and AI world? CLO's are in the vanguard of that reimagination. Central to their remit is to align the legal function with the business (and customers) it serves. This will enable business to mine law's vast, untapped enterprise and customer value.
Chief Legal Officers have emerged as key trusted advisors to the C-Suite and Board. Their expanded purview is emblematic of the reimagination of the legal function by business to better serve its needs as well as to improve customer outcomes and experience. The elevated strategic value of the CLO reflects a blurring of legacy corporate departmental boundaries, cross-functionality, data-sharing, and the creative, responsible utilization of technology (notably artificial intelligence). It also derives from the speed, complexity, interconnected constellation of risks, and unrelenting change endemic to digital and AI-era business.
CLO's also play an important role in fashioning and implementing business integration, a holistic enterprise strategy that promotes agility, resilience, and rapid problem solving/opportunity capture. Success hinges on the rapid mobilization and collaboration of material workforce, supply chain, strategic partner data, and IT resources. That includes human resource integration as well as fashioning strategies that promote collaboration of human and technological assets. CLO's also play a key role in AI, data, and emerging technology governance.
Paradoxically, while the trusted advisor role CLO's play is widely acknowledged, quantifying its value—especially beyond the narrow 'legal' realm-- remains elusive. Nonetheless, a high level of trust between the CLO and the legal team is crucial evidence to support the enterprise value of the legal function. The Deloitte 2024 Chief Legal Officer Strategy Survey found that 85% of respondents report very or extremely high levels of trust between legal and the enterprise. This cuts across what Deloitte characterizes as the 'Four Faces' of the CLO role: strategist, catalyst, guardian, and operator.
The CLO's unique multi-dimensional enterprise role positions it as a trusted advisor not only to the C-Suite and Board but also to business unit leadership as well as other stakeholders. That requires balancing competing interests and building consensus through trust. In a world that increasingly demands hyper specialization, the CLO must have broad, diverse experience, expertise that extends beyond the narrow parameters of 'legal,' engage in multidisciplinary and multidimensional thinking, and draw from each of its multiple roles to offer holistic insights that spark new solutions.
The trusted advisor must collaborate- not compete- with other enterprise trusted advisors. To borrow from 'Dirty Harry,' they must know their own limitations. The trusted advisor role is a hybrid of an individual and team sport. CLO's are not law's sole trusted advisors. As the author noted in a 2017 Forbes article, trusted legal advisors need not be lawyers. Even more so, trusted advisors must work across disciplines, geographies, personality types, perspectives, and egos with their peers. The goal is not to be 'right' but to contribute to the best informed business judgment.
CLO's require high emotional intelligence, outstanding communication skills, authenticity, curiosity, and humanity. They must be good listeners, questioners, and be open to learning without regard to the source's rank or experience level. CLO's must be perpetually curious, unabashedly creative, ethical, practical, and trusted. They are strategic and operational business leaders who leverage their legal expertise and experience across disciplines, business functions, and the enterprise. This helps to explain why a growing number of top CLO's have transitioned to the CEO role.
Key Challenges of The CLO As Trusted Advisor
Chief Legal Officers confront a wide range of existing and emerging challenges whose scope, complexity, convergence, and existential importance are within the ambit of their trusted advisor role. Here is a sampling interconnected macroeconomic and geopolitical forces that are elevating the degree of difficulty and uncertainty confronting business. In each instance-notably in the areas of risk management and governance-CLO's are intimately involved. This illuminates the vastly expanded role of CLO's not only in new substantive areas (e.g. tech and data-related, IP protection, supply chain, etc.) but also in domestic and global affairs that impact business.
Geopolitical Risk
Armed conflict, proxy wars, tectonic shifts in the global world order, geoeconomics (see below), and the 'AI race' are elevating corporate risk and uncertainty. CLO's play a direct role in forging and implementing not only 'legal' strategy in those areas but also wider enterprise strategic initiatives. A recent Reuters article rightly posits that legal leadership 'must now be geopolitical analysts.' This impacts, among other things, supply chains, corporate finance, workforce deployment (and safety), regulatory and compliance, and governance issues.
Geoeconomic Fragmentation
Geoeconomics is the pursuit of power politics using economic means. Tariffs, trade wars, and a complex, fluid patchwork of regulatory and compliance issues have elevated the constraints upon free trade. What was until recently an integrated global economy has quickly morphed into an increasingly fragmented, polarized, and volatile marketplace. Shifting government policies are adversely impacting business, rattling financial markets, and disrupting supply chains. The microchip industry has become the epicenter of geopolitical tensions, a reflection of the intersection of global politics, technology, economy, and business. CLO's are in the midst of these issues.
Corporate Governance (international)
Corporate governance has been impacted by the spike in geopolitical and geoeconomic tension and uncertainty. A sampling of areas—all under the purview of the CLO—include: (1) governance of geopolitical risk, (2) compliance, (3) supply chain management, (4) contracts and litigation, (5) government relations, (6) investor/public relations, (7) senior executive and board expertise, and (8) an integrated strategy that is holistic, fluid, and capable of real-time adjustment and crisis management. All are within the expanded purview of the CLO as enterprise advisor.
Corporate Governance (Domestic)
Domestic polarization and calcification of political divides along ideological lines has heightened the difficulty of corporate governance and domestic government relations. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is an example. Not long ago a core element of corporate policy and ethos, recent Executive Orders have flipped the script and 'cancelled' them in Government agencies, higher education, business, etc. The abrupt shift on this and other issues will influence corporate culture, workforce, workplace, talent management, business practices, regulatory strategies, and governance. This will likely impact corporate governance well beyond the US, resulting in a widespread shift in the global business environment. These issues are also within the purview of CLO trusted advisors.
AI Integration and Governance
The debate whether AI is more hype than the next big thing is over. Investment in AI—especially among multinationals-remains white hot. The latest McKinsey Global Survey on AI reveals that large companies are implementing structural changes designed to extract future value from massive gen and agentic AI investment.
AI is already being applied to achieve scientific breakthroughs, a harbinger of its potential to help solve some of humanity's pressing challenges. For example, the recipients of the 2024 Nobel prize in Chemistry 'developed an AI model to predict proteins' complex structures. The Physics Prize winners were recognized 'for foundational discoveries and inventions that enable machine learning with artificial neural networks.'
CLO's will be in the vanguard of creating and implementing strategies that integrate AI within the legal function, the many business units it regularly serves, and across the enterprise. Likewise, they will play an important role in AI governance. As my good friend Richard Susskind asserts in his new book on how to think about AI: ' balancing the benefits and threats of artificial intelligence - saving humanity with and from AI - is the defining challenge of our age.' CLO's, again, will be central to that discussion, especially in ethics and consensus building.
Crisis Management
As the CLO's sphere of influence in corporate risk management has expanded, so too has the role become more directly involved in crisis management and brand protection. The glacial pace of the legal process is out-of-synch with the real-time speed of business. Crises often occur with little or no warning; a rapid, reasoned, coherent, consistent response is essential. No matter the cause, geography, or nature of the crisis, the sound judgment of the CLO is an important element of the enterprise response. Trusted advisors are most needed in high stakes, fluid, complex situations that require multidimensional analysis and balanced, creatively pragmatic counsel. They are challenged to operate at the speed of digital and AI-era business, not legacy law. A digital core (data, tech, and cloud grounding) will facilitate that.
The Rule Of Law
The rule of law in the United States is in critical condition. The Government's escalating attacks on judges, law firms, prosecutors, law schools, the American Bar Association, and other institutions and individuals committed to defending the Constitution and the rule of law are unprecedented. This imperils not only American democracy but also other democratic sovereign nations. It impairs America's standing in the world and sends a chilling message to our allies (especially NATO members) that long held mutual-defense commitments are no longer iron clad.
Business can no longer count on the solid foundation that the rule of law has long provided it. Nor can it count on America's checks and balances to rein in efforts to consolidate power within the Executive branch. What were once seen as conflict of interest 'red lines' in Government have been swept away, leaving open the possibility that the US is quickly morphing from the rule of law to rule by law.
Several tech Goliaths and companies that rely heavily on Government contracts are bowing to the pressure of an avalanche of norm-defying Executive Orders. Many businesses, fearing reprisals, are remaining mute in the wake of withering personal attacks against individuals and organizations challenging the Executive actions. No matter the response, business is adversely affected by attacks on the rule of law, tariff threats, trade issues, and the uncertainty of the current business environment. The rule of law is foundational to the health of all business and the economy.
Conclusion
No area of the CLO's trusted advisor role is presently more important or challenging than providing sage counsel to the C-Suite and Board on an appropriate response to the attack on the rule of law. The primacy of this issue extends beyond any individual business, industry, or sector. A collective response by business would be powerful. It should not be crafted as a polemic but as a pragmatic assessment of why, from the business perspective, the rule of law serves the national interest in a multiplicity of clearly articulated ways.
By ensuring such a collective message is delivered by leading businesses, CLO's and other trusted advisors would confirm that the trust reposed in them is well-placed and their role is incalculably valuable.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


TechCrunch
21 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
AMD takes aim at Nvidia's AI hardware dominance with Brium acquisition
AMD's latest acquisition could help reduce Nvidia's market dominance when it comes to AI hardware. Semiconductor giant AMD on Wednesday announced it acquired AI software optimization startup Brium. Terms of the deal were not disclosed. Brium is a startup that appears to be in stealth mode. The startup builds machine learning applications to enable AI inference, the process a trained AI model uses to draw conclusions from new data, across a variety of different hardware options, according to a blog post on Brium's bare-bones website. Cutting through that jargon a bit, Brium can help retrofit AI software to work with different AI hardware than it might have been designed for originally. In a press release, AMD said its acquisition of Brium will help its commitment to 'building a high-performance, open AI software ecosystem that empowers developers and drives innovation.' While AMD is saying that this acquisition helps create a more open AI ecosystem, which isn't wrong, it seems clear that it's also meant to help AMD overcome one of its biggest roadblocks: a large percentage of AI software is being designed for Nvidia hardware and chips. Brium's sole blog post, which came out in November 2024, talked about the industry's reliance on Nvidia and called out AMD specifically. Techcrunch event Save now through June 4 for TechCrunch Sessions: AI Save $300 on your ticket to TC Sessions: AI—and get 50% off a second. Hear from leaders at OpenAI, Anthropic, Khosla Ventures, and more during a full day of expert insights, hands-on workshops, and high-impact networking. These low-rate deals disappear when the doors open on June 5. Exhibit at TechCrunch Sessions: AI Secure your spot at TC Sessions: AI and show 1,200+ decision-makers what you've built — without the big spend. Available through May 9 or while tables last. Berkeley, CA | REGISTER NOW 'In recent years, the hardware industry has made strides towards providing viable alternatives to Nvidia hardware for server-side inference,' the blog post reads. 'Solutions such as AMD's Instinct GPUs offer strong performance characteristics, but it remains a challenge to harness that performance in practice as workloads are typically tuned extensively with Nvidia GPUs in mind. At Brium, we intend to enable efficient [model] inference across a range of hardware architectures.' This is AMD's fourth strategic acquisition in the past two years toward the company's goal of fostering an open-source AI ecosystem, according to the press release. The company previously acquired Silo AI (in July 2024), (October 2023), and Mipsology (August 2023). TechCrunch has reached out to AMD for more information.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI-driven search ad spending set to surge to $26 billion by 2029, data shows
By Jaspreet Singh (Reuters) -Spending on AI-powered search advertising is poised to surge to nearly $26 billion by 2029 from just over $1 billion this year in the U.S., driven by rapid adoption of the technology and more sophisticated user targeting, data from Emarketer showed on Wednesday. Companies that rely on traditional keyword-based search ads could experience revenue declines due to the growing popularity of AI search ads, which offer greater convenience and engagement for users, according to the research firm. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT Search giants such as Alphabet-owned Google and Microsoft's Bing have added AI capabilities to better compete with chatbots such as OpenAI's ChatGPT and Perplexity AI, which provide users with direct information without requiring to click through multiple results. Apple is exploring the integration of AI-driven search capabilities into its Safari browser, potentially moving away from its longstanding partnership with Google. The report has come as concerns grew about users increasingly turning to the chatbots for conversational search and AI-powered search results could upend business models of some companies. Online education firm Chegg said in May that it would lay off about 248 employees as it looks to cut costs and streamline operations because students are using AI-powered tools including ChatGPT over traditional edtech platforms. QUOTE "Publishers and other sites are feeling the pain from AI search. As they lose out on traffic, we're seeing publishers lean into subscriptions and paid AI licensing deals to bolster revenue," Emarketer analyst Minda Smiley said. GRAPHIC CONTEXT AI search ad spending is expected to constitute nearly 1% of total search ad spending this year and 13.6% by 2029 in the U.S., according to Emarketer. Sectors such as financial services, technology, telecom, and healthcare are embracing AI as they are seeing clear advantages in using the technology to enhance their ad strategies, while the retail industry's adoption is slow, the report said. Google recently announced the expansion of its AI-powered search capabilities into the consumer packaged goods sector through enhancements in Google Shopping. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
Will AI Really Take Your Job? Experts Reveal The True Outlook Today
Experts break down what AI job loss really means — and why reinvention, not just replacement, is the ... More future of work. Last month in a CNN interview with Anderson Cooper, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic — the AI company behind Claude — issued a warning that landed like a thunderclap in Silicon Valley and beyond. In what sounded almost like an apocalyptic future for workers around the globe, the 42-year billionaire predicted that within five years, AI could automate away up to 50% of all entry-level white-collar jobs. It was a jarring prediction, even for an industry accustomed to provocative soundbites. The quote quickly ricocheted across news outlets, igniting headlines and debates about the economic future of billions. CNN, notably, cast the comments in a more skeptical light, asking whether dire forecasts about AI are becoming self-fulfilling. Others, like Axios, highlighted the fear among young professionals who are just beginning to understand how automation might shadow their careers. 'This is coming faster than people think,' Amodei noted in his interview with Cooper, echoing concerns that have been quietly escalating across the AI industry in recent times. For recent graduates, entry-level workers and companies just beginning to embrace automation, the warning felt less like a forecast and more like a countdown. But is it true? Experts across telecom, software and enterprise architecture suggest a more nuanced reality. Yes, AI is changing work — faster than ever before. But this isn't just a story of job loss. It's also about reinvention, overcorrection and the uniquely human skills machines still struggle to replicate. 'Any industrial or technology revolution results in job loss. This has happened many times over,' said Andy Thurai, Field CTO at Cisco, in an interview with me. 'What's different this time is the speed. The AI hype cycle is moving much faster than anything we've seen before.' Dima Gutzeit, founder and CEO of LeapXpert, echoed this sentiment in an interview. 'We're entering a high-speed workforce transformation,' he said. 'What's different this time? The pace. Automation used to take decades — now it's happening in quarters.' In other words, AI isn't fundamentally new. But the compressed timeline between research breakthroughs and enterprise deployment has never been this short. Cloud-native architectures and API-first models have made it easier to scale new tools organization-wide in months, not years. The fear of missing out — or FOMO — is also pushing organizations, many of which aren't even ready for such a pivot, to integrate AI into their workflows. Essentially, too many things are happening so fast in the AI space that it feels almost inevitable that it could cause disruptions larger than the scale that was seen when mobile popped onto the scene in the early 2000s. However, there's more to this revolution than FOMO-ladened messages of doom. And as Allison Morrow noted in her poignant analysis on CNN Business, the narrative about a 'white-collar bloodbath' is likely another part of the AI hype machine. Klarna made headlines in 2024 when it replaced 700 customer support agents with an AI chatbot. But it quietly brought back some of those roles in early 2025, realizing customers preferred human support to AI. Why? Because the bots weren't flawless, as industry experts continue to warn. Many companies are trimming senior teams and hoping AI-enhanced mid-level hires can close the gap. But just like in Klarna's case, it's not always working. 'The results have been mixed so far,' said Thurai. 'The pendulum always swings wide. Companies get seduced by cost savings and forget about institutional memory and strategic insight.' The math doesn't always check out. Generative AI tools still struggle with hallucinations, context retention and compliance guardrails. And in industries like finance and healthcare, these flaws aren't just bugs — they're liabilities. Another big concern across sectors isn't whether jobs will be lost, but about who gets to keep them. 'A skilled digital worker can be replaced by someone with less expertise but greater AI proficiency,' Thurai said. In other words, AI adoption across organizations is creating a new kind of talent gap; one not defined by degrees, but by fluency in these AI tools, which are evolving faster than education systems can keep up. But Thurai also noted that augmenting certain human roles with AI is 'a perceived cost savings that could backfire.' It's, therefore, necessary for business leaders to keep in mind that diving into the AI ocean two feet first could be catastrophic in the end rather than beneficial. Organizations need the right dose of innovation and caution. Yes, there are likely routines that could be automated right away, but businesses must also stop to count the potential costs of such automation. As Gutzeit noted, 'automation without strategy is dangerous.' He added that this is especially true for regulated industries where 'AI needs a human firewall.' Nowhere is this more evident than in telecom. Arnd Baranowski, founder and CEO of Oculeus, explains that while AI has become essential to fraud detection, it still needs human judgment. 'AI allows telecom providers to analyze massive volumes of traffic well beyond human capacity. But when fraudsters adopt unpredictable new methods, only humans can anticipate the shift. That requires imagination — and that's something AI lacks.' The risk of over-reliance is real. 'Telcos that downsize their fraud prevention teams too aggressively risk becoming less capable of stopping fraud altogether,' Baranowski warned. This hybrid approach — AI as analyst, human as strategist — is becoming the new normal across industries. According to Gutzeit, while AI is indeed replacing and redefining routine, entry-level roles, with two-thirds of companies expecting to add AI-related roles, it opens the door to higher-value, human-centric work. 'Smart companies are building AI-augmented teams that are more productive, more consistent, and more client-focused. And they're not stopping at tools — they're investing in people who know how to orchestrate AI to elevate results,' he said. For Artin Avanes, head of core data platform at Snowflake, AI is not a net destroyer of jobs. He likens today's moment to Snowflake's own rise. 'We disrupted traditional business intelligence teams. Suddenly, business users could do analytics without IT. Some roles disappeared. But most evolved,' Avanes said. 'The same thing is happening now. AI won't erase people. It will change what they do.' His concern is less about job loss and more about organizational readiness. 'The biggest bottleneck to AI adoption isn't talent. It's infrastructure. You need secure, compliant access to the right data. Without that, no AI agent — no matter how smart — can work.' Thurai believes many of the more dramatic claims from AI vendors serve a strategic purpose. 'Obviously, the AI providers — Anthropic, OpenAI, consultants — have to say extreme things to gain attention and instill FOMO,' he said. 'But there are people like IBM's CEO with a more realistic picture of the future.' Yes, AI will cause job losses. But it will also create roles — including data scientists, prompt engineers, AI governance experts — that didn't exist five years ago. In a clap back at Amodei, American billionaire and investor Mark Cuban wrote on social platform Bluesky that 'someone needs to remind the CEO that at one point there were more than 2 million secretaries. There were also separate employees to do in-office dictation. They were the original white-collar displacements.' Cuban further noted that 'new companies with new jobs will emerge,' adding that 'people have to stop whining and start preparing.' Still, the math is sobering: those new roles won't fully replace the sheer volume of jobs displaced. There is no perfect one-to-one exchange. Which is why, even amid the hype, preparation matters more than ever. Maybe not. But the person who knows how to use it might. The big message from the experts is for global workers to move beyond the realm of FOMO into really understanding how to leverage AI tools for improved efficiency. As Avanes put it: 'AI isn't here to optimize systems. It's here to free people to focus on what matters. The question is whether we'll let it.' For Gutzeit, this an urgent call to reskill the global workforce. 'The traditional career ladder is being cut off at the bottom. If we don't reskill aggressively, we risk locking out an entire generation from meaningful career starts,' he said.