A world of pain: How a ‘safe' painkiller unleashed a new wave of opioid addiction
After years of misery, Brad Lievoort managed to beat his addiction to oxycodone. In 2018, he and his wife, Linda Matthews, from Victoria, Australia, were hosting game nights and taking weekend trips.
They had made it, Linda thought. Brad felt happy to be alive.
But when Brad developed chronic headaches, a doctor prescribed a drug they weren't familiar with: tapentadol. Another opioid.
Brad trusted his doctor – but within two years he would be dead.
In the last five years, prescriptions of this lesser-known opioid have surged as Grünenthal, the family-owned German company that developed tapentadol, has marketed the drug as a safer alternative to traditional opioids.
Now it is accused of having downplayed addiction risks to doctors and influencing regulation governing its prescription, in an investigation by The Examination, a specialist team of global health reporters.
Grünenthal gained notoriety in the late 1950s with thalidomide, branded as Contergan, a drug used for morning sickness that caused thousands of miscarriages, stillbirths, and severe birth defects.
The company developed tapentadol, branded as Palexia or Nucynta, as patents expired on tramadol, its first blockbuster opioid, which is now widely abused globally.
Approved in 2008 in the US and 2010 in Europe and Australia, Grünenthal sells tapentadol in Europe and Latin America and collects royalties from licensees elsewhere.
Sales and prescriptions have risen around the globe in recent years in at least 10 countries, according to data collected by The Examination.
In Spain, tapentadol prescriptions have now surpassed oxycodone. In Australia, tapentadol has become the most prescribed opioid, with CSL Seqirus, the licenced seller, boasting last year that it was the 'only opioid with consistent growth.'
But experts are worried the opioids' addictive properties have been played down, causing the drug to be prescribed for long term for chronic pain, against the guidance of UK and US regulators.
Grünenthal and other opioid sellers have funded studies and articles in medical journals suggesting tapentadol is less likely to cause dependence or abuse.
Yet six independent experts who reviewed this research unanimously found no convincing evidence to support such claims.
'I have tried to find evidence – solid, impartial evidence – of tapentadol's less addictive properties, and I have not been able to find this,' said Eveline van Dorp, an anaesthesiologist and epidemiologist with a specific interest in opioid research at Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands.
In a medical journal, The Examination found that Grünenthal employees touted the drug's supposed 'low level of abuse,' a misleading claim repeated in a video posted on the company's website for Latin American doctors.
The video also minimised the drug's risk of respiratory depression – slower breathing – a known opioid side effect. Grünenthal took down the website following enquiries from The Examination.
Seven former Grünenthal employees who worked in the marketing, science and sales divisions also said in interviews for this story that tapentadol causes less dependence than other opioids.
In Germany, Grünenthal promoted tapentadol to doctors as 'highly effective' for chronic pain, contradicting guidance from the World Health Organization, and from regulators in the United States and the United Kingdom.
Grünenthal wields wide-ranging influence through funding doctors, medical organisations, patient groups and educational initiatives across Latin America and Europe.
In the last decade, Grünenthal has paid more than $9 million to help support at least 900 European patient groups and medical organisations, according to data analysed by The Examination. One company-funded association lobbied the Mexican Congress to loosen regulations around prescribing tapentadol.
Rob Poole, a psychiatrist who ran a clinic in Wales to help patients come off opioids, said many pain doctors are enthusiastic about tapentadol, prescribing it as a 'wonder drug'. He described Grünenthal's promotion of tapentadol as 'a classic drug company disinformation campaign.'
In a statement, Grünenthal acknowledged that 'a few' company documents had mischaracterised tapentadol's addiction risks.
The company commissioned an independent audit in 2019 and found that claims that tapentadol was less addictive than other opioids were 'not backed up by sufficient scientific references.'
But Grünenthal denied actively promoting the drug as less addictive and said addiction risks are included in every pack of pills and in product information for doctors.
And, it said, tapentadol is approved for moderate to severe chronic pain in some countries and the labels vary depending on the regulations.
The World Health Organization, the US Food and Drug Administration and independent doctors have warned that tapentadol, like any other opioid, causes dependence and has potential for addiction, misuse and abuse.
Lucas Trautman, medical director at Oxford Treatment Center in Mississippi, said his facility has gone from rarely seeing tapentadol-dependent patients to treating them regularly over the past three years.
In Australia, a report by the Coroners Court of Victoria noted an increase from zero 0 to 118 overdose deaths over a seven year stretch ending in 2023.
'The rise in tapentadol-involved overdose deaths is reminiscent of what happened when other analgesic products (such as extended release oxycodone …) were introduced,' the report states.
CSL Seqirus said in a statement that the report's findings show that there is an 'ongoing need to ensure all healthcare professionals are aware that tapentadol has potential for harm.'
In India, where generic companies sell tapentadol instead of Grünenthal's branded product, there is anecdotal evidence of a sharp rise in teenage boys becoming addicted since 2017, according to psychiatrists at a major addiction centre.
Patients from impoverished areas buy the tablets to crush, mix with water and inject. One 21-year-old who became addicted in high school said withdrawal left him weak, tired and without the energy to brush his teeth, wash his face or speak. 'I would always be sad,' he said.
Since tapentadol's introduction, Grünenthal, its licensees or researchers receiving industry funding have published studies or articles suggesting it causes less dependence, addiction or abuse.
The Examination sent five such studies to medical experts who identified a variety of shortcomings. 'The studies do NOT permit the conclusion that tapentadol leads to less dependence with any certainty,' said Kyla Thomas, professor of public health medicine at Bristol Medical School.
Health authorities have also raised concerns. When approving tapentadol, the FDA concluded it had 'high abuse potential.' The World Health Organization warned about its risks in 2014. French and Canadian health authorities also recommended against reimbursing slow-release tapentadol due to high costs, lack of evidence for chronic pain benefit, and abuse concerns.
At least seven former Grünenthal employees in Germany and the UK said in interviews with The Examination that they promoted tapentadol as less likely to cause dependence.
One former sales representative, who left in 2023 after six years and did not want to be named out of fear for her career, said she was trained to promote the drug this way using company-provided materials and seminars. Lack of dependence played a 'major role' in her marketing, she said.
Jan-Uwe Claas, a former senior vice president for marketing in Europe, who worked for Grünenthal for two decades until 2022, downplayed the possibility of addiction,
A video on Grünenthal's educational site for healthcare professionals across Latin America featured Silvia Allende-Pérez, head of a public pain clinic in Mexico and former Grünenthal employee, promoting tapentadol. It included a Grünenthal-branded slide claiming tapentadol has a 'minimum potential of abuse' and that respiratory depression is 'not reported' despite this being a well-known opioid side effect.
Grünenthal said the video did not reflect current evidence and, after The Examination's inquiry, removed it and took the website offline for review. Allende-Pérez did not respond to requests for comment.
Grünenthal has also funded the Mexican Association for the Study and Treatment of Pain, according to Angel Juárez, president of the organisation until last year.
Grünenthal said in response that it operates with the 'highest ethical standards' when partnering with healthcare professionals and organisations.
In Wales, the Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board raised warnings about Grünenthal's marketing of tapentadol in 2019 after discovering the area had more prescriptions than anywhere else in the country.
'Tapentadol is extremely similar to tramadol which was also launched (by the same pharmaceutical company) with similar claims of safety, tolerability and lack of 'addiction' potential, all of which have subsequently been proven false,' the health board said in an internal report.
Caroline Hildenbfrand-Nixdorf, a family doctor in northern Bavaria said Grünenthal sales representatives told her tapentadol was 'not an opioid' but a 'hybrid between an opioid and normal pain medication' that leads to 'no or little dependence' and encouraged its use for chronic pain.
'There is a feeling among doctors, nursing staff, but also patients … that these are harmless substances,' said Dominikus Bönsch, addiction specialist and medical director at the District Hospital Lohr am Main in Bavaria.
'It's pure nonsense,' he said. 'A myth.'
In Australia, Linda Matthews had given birth to triplets. But her husband Brad's tapentadol prescription triggered a relapse. His addiction raged. He couldn't keep a job and hardly helped with the children.
When he skipped the triplets' first Christmas, Linda, seeing no hope, asked him to move out.
Five months later, police found Brad dead, clutching pills in his hand.
A coroner's report found he had overdosed on tapentadol and oxycodone, both drugs found in life-threatening amounts.
In the six months before his death, he had been prescribed opioids by more than 10 doctors.
'Brad made some really, really bad decisions,' said Linda. 'But he shouldn't ever have been able to get the amount of stuff that he was getting.'
World of Pain is an investigative collaboration involving reporting by The Examination, Paper Trail Media, Latin American Center for Investigative Journalism (CLIP), PlatôBR, Salud Con Lupa, El Espectador and Der Spiegel.
Protect yourself and your family by learning more about Global Health Security
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bed Bugs May Have Been The First Urban Pest to Ever Plague Humans
Humans were letting the bed bugs bite long before beds existed, and while they do live on other species, we're the main reason this notorious parasite is still going strong. In fact, bed bugs might have been the first pest to plague our cities – earlier than the black rat, for instance, which joined us in urban life about 15,000 years ago, and even the German cockroach, which only got the memo about 2,100 years ago. Researchers think the blood-sucking pests – Cimex lectularius – first jumped from their bat hosts onto a passing human some 50,000 years ago, a move which would change the course of the insect species forever. Human bed bugs, it turns out, have boomed since the Last Glacial Maximum about 20,000 years ago. But it's a different story for those populations that continued living on bats. "Initially with both populations, we saw a general decline that is consistent with the Last Glacial Maximum; the bat-associated lineage never bounced back, and it is still decreasing in size," says entomologist Lindsay Miles, from Virginia Tech. "The really exciting part is that the human-associated lineage did recover and their effective population increased." The researchers were able to track this evolution because the human bed bugs have a much narrower genetic diversity, since only a few 'founders' probably came with us when we abandoned life in caves. But our move into cities around 12,000 years ago is what really kicked off the human bed bug boom. This was only briefly interrupted when DDT was invented in the 1940s. Populations crashed, humans slept sweetly, and then five years later, the bed bugs were back. Since then, bed bugs have travelled around the world with us, and even become resistant to our pesticides. For now, it seems, bed bugs are here to stay. It's been a long-term relationship, after all. The research is published in Biology Letters. Your Brain Wrinkles Are Way More Important Than We Ever Realized Something Strange Happens to Your Eyes When You're Sexually Aroused 2-Year-Old Prodigy Joins 'High IQ' Club Mensa as Youngest Member Ever

Miami Herald
10 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Haiti reels as Trump severs a lifeline
Born in northeast Haiti with a heart defect, Brad Mertens Joseph is 6, has difficulty walking and is still in diapers. His parents, accustomed to a dangerous nine-hour overnight bus ride to see cardiologists in the country's violent capital, had finally found a solution to their son's medical ailment, caused by a hole in his heart. It involved open-heart surgery in Akron, Ohio, arranged by a nonprofit. Those plans collapsed this past week when President Donald Trump issued an order banning people from a dozen countries, including Haiti, who don't already have valid travel visas, from entering the United States 'When I heard that, I was really upset, and I wondered, 'What are we going to do?'' said the boy's father, Dieudonné Joseph. 'I was panicking, and I'm still panicking.' The Josephs are among the many Haitians who are caught in the middle of Trump's sweeping travel ban. From young professionals to medical residents to longtime visitors whose visas had lapsed, Haitians are bracing for the consequences of having a lifeline abruptly cut. With its proximity to Florida, a long (often difficult) history with the United States, and grave political and social upheaval, Haiti has strong family and economic ties with its northern neighbor. People have businesses in both countries, and most middle-class Haitians have close relatives in South Florida or New York. The ban was the latest in a series of blows the United States has dealt to Haiti, a nation currently overrun by gangs and in the throes of a security crisis, and which is heavily dependent on international aid organizations and remittances from migrants in the United States. 'We feel like not only Haiti has been hit very hard, but also the whole world has been hit very hard by this decision, especially those small countries who believed the United States of America were their best friends,' said Joseph, 42, who works at a bank. If Brad does not receive the surgery, he is not likely to live past 30, said Dr. John Clark, a pediatric cardiologist at Akron Children's Hospital who was set to treat the boy this summer. More than 300 other Haitians, mostly children, are on waiting lists for surgery and are now unable to get treatment because they are barred from traveling to the United States, said Owen Robinson, the executive director of the International Cardiac Alliance, a nonprofit group based in the U.S. that arranged for Brad's treatment in Ohio. Finding enough doctors and hospitals in other countries to make up for the sudden loss will be extraordinarily difficult. 'If we could, we would,' Robinson said. Haitian Hearts, an organization in Illinois, was hoping to secure travel for Suze Lapierre, 46, who had cardiac surgery in the United States 21 years ago and needs a valve replaced. She is unemployed, was forced to flee her home in Port-au-Prince, Haiti's capital, because of gang violence, and, with most hospitals there closed, is out of any other options for her heart problem. In announcing the ban, Trump said that he had decided to 'fully restrict' people from Haiti because visitors from there overstayed their visas at least 25% of the time. 'I cannot be mad at Donald Trump. He is building his country, and he has the right to do it the way he wants,' Lapierre said in a telephone interview. 'I believe we have to fix our own country.' Haiti is engulfed in an extraordinary political, humanitarian and security crisis. Its last elected president was assassinated nearly four years ago, and the resulting power vacuum created an opening for gangs, long supported by the country's political and economic elite, to thrive. The armed groups joined forces last year in an explosion of violence that forced more than 1 million people from their homes and killed more than 5,000 people. The Trump administration recently declared the gangs terrorist organizations, a designation that helped land Haiti on the list of banned nations. The Trump administration also rescinded an immigration designation known as Temporary Protected Status that shielded more than 500,000 Haitians from deportation and revoked a program that had allowed more than 200,000 Haitians to move to the United States. Trump's proclamation said the secretary of state could issue travel waivers in cases that were in the 'national interest' of the United States. Asked to clarify if that could apply to children with medical conditions, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security offered a statement that did not answer the question. 'President Trump's action to limit the entry of foreign nationals from countries who have a significant terrorist presence, inadequate screening and vetting processes, and high visa overstay rates will help secure the American homeland and make our communities safer,' Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in the statement. The State Department said in a statement that there could be case-by-case waivers but added that it would not 'get into hypotheticals or specific cases about application' of the president's order. In some ways, Haiti was already under a de facto travel ban: The main international airport in Port-au-Prince has been closed since November after gangs fired at several U.S. aircraft. With the main airport closed, the U.S. Embassy on limited staffing and roads to another airport too dangerous, travelers have had to spend thousands of dollars to first go by helicopter to Cap-Haitien, in northern Haiti, and then fly to Barbados, Jamaica or other countries with functioning U.S. embassies to obtain or renew the visas they need to enter the United States. The onerous and expensive journey means many Haitians have visas that have now expired. That has left families and businesspeople with tough choices, said Pierre A. Noel, executive director of the Haiti Development Institute, a Boston-based nonprofit. Many Haitian professionals who have remained in Haiti through the turmoil had sent their children to safety in the United States and now risk long separations, he said. With graduation season in full swing, Haitian parents are at a loss about what to do. People working in Haiti and currently traveling in the United States are having to make decisions now on whether they should go back home and when, Noel said. 'And if they do go back, when would they next be able to see their family,' he said. People with businesses that rely on unencumbered travel between the United States and Haiti are deciding whether to keep their companies afloat and retain their workers, he said. Several Haitians interviewed expressed disappointment at the United States for, among other things, the well-known flow of illicit guns from Florida to Haitian gangs. Still, many people also stressed that the travel ban underscores the need to strengthen the interim government ruling Haiti until a new presidential election can be held. Cassandre V., 49, who lives in Port-au-Prince, said her visa expires in a year and is praying that her aging parents in the United States do not get sick. She spoke on the condition that her last name not be published because she did not have permission from her employer to speak to the news media. 'We feel like the States let Haiti down,' she said. 'What is going on? Are they leaving us to die? Every one of us?' Wolf Pamphile, executive director of the Haiti Policy House, a Washington-based research institute, said even Haitians with visas or U.S. residency are afraid to travel to the United States. 'This is a huge slap in the face,' Pamphile said. 'This should be a defining moment for the Haitian government. What are they going to do?' Haiti's prime minister declined to comment, and its presidential council — a committee formed to govern the country until elections are held -- did not respond to requests for comment. The Haitian Foreign Ministry, in a statement Thursday, said it was working to find a 'rapid' solution, especially for businesspeople and families divided between Haiti and the United States. 'This decision comes at a moment when the Haitian government is striving, with the help of its international partners, to fight the insecurity and to strengthen border security,' the Foreign Ministry said. Humanitarian groups stressed that the ban would hamper their ability to train Haitian staff and government technocrats. 'If we want to not be an NGO in Haiti forever, we need to be able to strengthen our relationship with the public sector,' said Sasha Kramer, executive director of SOIL, which works on improving Haiti's sanitation. Zanmi Lasante, an organization allied with Partners in Health, which runs medical facilities in Haiti, said at least 40 of its Haitian staff will be unable to attend training in the United States. 'We feel like we are on our own,' said Wesler Lambert, Zanmi Lasante's executive director. He said he would welcome senior members of the Trump administration to visit Haiti and 'meet the inspiring people they are excluding and witness the lifesaving work they are jeopardizing.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025


UPI
a day ago
- UPI
'Unite for Vets' rally in Washington, D.C., protest overhaul of VA
1 of 8 | Veterans, military families and demonstrators gather on the National Mall in Washington, D.C.,, to participate in a Unite for Veterans Rally to protest the Trump Administration's cuts to staffing and programs at the Department of Veterans Affairs. Photo by Annabelle Gordon/UPI | License Photo June 6 (UPI) -- Several thousand veterans converged on the National Mall on Friday at a rally among 200 events nationwide against a proposed overhaul that includes staffing reduction and some services shifted. The Veterans Administration counters the new proposed budget is higher than last year, processing of claims have sped up and it's easier to get benefits. Veterans, military families and others participated in the Unite for Veterans, Unite for America Rally on the 81st anniversary of D-Day, which was the Allies' amphibious invasion of German-occupied France. The protests, which were organized by a union, took place at 16 state capitol buildings and more than 100 other places across 43 states. "We are coming together to defend the benefits, jobs and dignity that every generation of veterans has earned through sacrifice," Unite for Veterans said on its website. "Veteran jobs, healthcare, and essential VA services are under attack. We will not stand by." Speakers in Washington included Democrats with military backgrounds: Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, former Rep. Conor Lamb of Pennsylvania and California Rep. Derek Tran. There were signs against President Donald Trump, VA Secretary Doug Collins and Elon Musk, the multi-billionaire who ran the Department of Government Efficiency. They said those leaders are betraying the country's promises to troops. "Are you tired of being thanked for our service in the public and stabbed in our back in private?" Army veteran Everett Kelly, the national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, asked the crowd. "For years, politicians on both sides of the aisle have campaigned on their support of veterans, but once they get into office, they cut our benefits, our services. They take every opportunity to privatize our health care." The Trump administration plans to cut 83,000 VA staffers and shift more money from the federal health care system to private-sector clinics. The administration's proposed budget for the VA, released on Friday, slashes spending for "medical services" by $12bn - or nearly 20% - an amount offset by a corresponding 50% boost in funding for veterans seeking healthcare in the private sector. The Department of Veterans Affairs employs approximately 482,000 people, including 500,000 workers at 170 hospitals and 1,200 local clinics in the nation's largest health care system. In all, there are 15.8 million veterans, which represents 6.1% of the civilian population 18 years and older. VA officials said the event was misguided. "Imagine how much better off veterans would be if VA's critics cared as much about fixing the department as they do about protecting its broken bureaucracy," VA press secretary Peter Kasperowicz said in a statement to UPI. "The Biden Administration's VA failed to address nearly all of the department's most serious problems, such as rising health care wait times, growing backlogs of veterans waiting for disability compensation and major issues with survivor benefits." Kasperowicz told UPI disability claims backlog is already down 25% since Trump took office on Jan. 20 after it increased 24% during the Biden administration. He said VA has opened 10 new healthcare clinics around the country, and Trump has proposed a 10% budget increase to $441.3 billion in fiscal year 2026. The administration's proposed budget for the VA reduces spending for "medical services" by $12 billion - or nearly 20% - which is offset by a 50% boost in funding for veterans seeking healthcare in the private sector. Kasperowicz said the "VA is accelerating the deployment of its integrated electronic health record system, after the program was nearly dormant for almost two years under the Biden Administration." The event was modeled after the Bonus Army protests of the 1930s, when veterans who served in World War I gathered in the nation's capital to demand extra pay denied after leaving the service. Irma Westmoreland, a registered nurse working at a VA hospital and the secretary-treasurer of National Nurses United, told the crowd in Washington: "It's important for every person to keep their job, from the engineering staff to the housekeeper to the dietary staff. When cuts are made, the nursing and medical staff will have to pick up all their work that needs to be done."