Ex-Army chief Lord Peter Inge famous for ‘putting the fear of God' into officers leaves staggering sum to family in will
HUGE FORTUNE Ex-Army chief Lord Peter Inge famous for 'putting the fear of God' into officers leaves staggering sum to family in will
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
FORMER Army chief Lord Peter Inge left £3million in his will.
Lord Inge died in July 2022, aged 86, after a five-decade career in which he rose from National Service conscript to Field Marshal.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
He was the last Field Marshal to actively serve in the Army, with those since elevated to the highest rank, including King Charles, only done so after their retirement.
Lord Inge was famous for putting the fear of God into other senior officers with cutting remarks and incisive questions.
He was appointed Chief of the General Staff in 1992, then Chief of the Defence Staff in 1994.
Lord Inge later became a fierce critic of the British campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan and blasted the Ministry of Defence for failing to 'think strategically'.
The South London-born officer took the top Armed Forces job after his predecessor was caught having an affair with a Tory MPs wife, and while British forces were struggling in Bosnia.
Sir John Major's Conservative government had also pledged to further slash the size of the Army – with Inge under pressure to accept fresh cuts.
The no-nonsense officer led forces through the conflict and was reportedly 'delighted' to come under mortar fire during a ride around Saravejo in a French armoured SUV.
After being elevated to the House of Lords, Lord Inge of Richmond, Yorks., became a vocal critic of further plans to cut the Army.
He left £3,167,854 in his estate, reduced by £150,000 after deductions.
His wife Letitia died in 2020 so it was divided between daughters Antonia, 63, and Verity, 59.
They also get their South London-born dad's vast collection of military memorabilia, farm estate in Leyburn, North Yorks, and central London flat.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
9 minutes ago
- Spectator
Josef Fritzl caused Badenoch to lose faith
'The testing of your faith produces perseverance' – James 1:2-3. That may be the case, but too much testing can also result in secularism apparently. In an interview with the Beeb, Conservative party leader Kemi Badenoch has said that while she was 'never that religious' growing up though would have 'defined myself as a Christian apologist'. She revealed, however, that all this changed in 2008 – due to Josef Fritzl. The Tory leader said that when she discovered what Fritzl had done to his daughter Elizabeth – imprisoning and repeatedly raping her in his basement over 24 years – it changed her attitude to religion forever. Badenoch – whose maternal grandfather was a Methodist minister – stopped believing in God as a result, confiding to the Beeb that: 'I couldn't stop reading this story.' It's not the first time this claim has been made. Last year, Lord Ashcroft published Blue Ambition, in which he documents Badenoch's rise through the ranks of the Conservative party. The Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Badenoch-backer Alex Burghart remarked: That foundation was that God does not test you beyond your endurance. She read about the poor woman who'd been locked in a cellar by her father and how she prayed every day that she'd be rescued. Kemi thought about all the prayers she herself had said, often for trivial and silly things. She told me how she'd have given up every single one of those for the victim not to have experienced the horror that she did. She told me that at that moment, she thought to herself, 'There is no God. If there was, he would have answered her prayers before answering mine.' It's certainly quite the revelation…
Scotsman
9 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why Chancellor Rachel Reeves must resist pressure to become a left-wing Liz Truss
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... There is no doubting that Rachel Reeves is in an extremely difficult position – caught between Labour's pre-election promise not to raise taxes on 'working people', party rebellions over proposed benefit cuts, her own 'fiscal rules', and a national debt of £2.7 trillion. Amid these competing pressures, the Chancellor somehow needs to find a way to fill a £51 billion black hole in the government's finances in time for her autumn Budget, according to the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, a leading think tank. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Despite the exhortations of some on the hard-left, the Chancellor must avoid seeking the easy way out by suddenly deciding to throw out the rule book and transforming herself into a sort of left-wing Liz Truss. To be fair to Reeves, she shows no signs of making such a horrendous mistake, but political pressure can do strange things to even normally sensible people. A lettuce covers the face of Liz Truss on a campaign advertising board ahead of last year's general election, when she lost her seat (Picture: Jacob King) | PA Clever ploy that backfired The immediate market reaction to the disastrous mini-budget concocted by Truss and her Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng in 2022 led to her downfall within weeks. Despite containing an eye-watering £45 billion of unfunded tax cuts, the then Conservative Prime Minister pretended this was not a proper 'Budget' but only a mere 'mini-budget'. They thought this was a clever ploy, as it avoided the need to get an assessment from the Office for Budget Responsibility. However it turned out to be another reason why investors were so worried that the government's plans did not add up. The result was a fall in the value of the pound, rises in both mortgage rates and the cost of UK Government borrowing, and very real pain for ordinary people. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ideological dreamers on the hard-left and hard-right may refuse to accept the advice of the 'experts' they love to deride, but no Chancellor can afford to be so cavalier and hope to survive in their job for long.
New Statesman
9 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Britons increasingly fear future political violence
Photo byA large majority of the British public are concerned about the potential for political violence according to new polling conducted by Looking for Growth and Merlin Strategy. A survey of 2000 adults between 25 and 27 July found that 7 in 10 (70 per cent) are concerned about the potential for political violence. A further 1 in 5 (21 per cent) say that political violence in the UK is acceptable in some conditions. A similar number (18 per cent) say they would consider participating in violent protests as the state of Britain declines. Broken down by party affilation, the survey found that 1 in 3 (32 per cent) of Reform UK voters say political violence is acceptable in some conditions. The Green Party had the second highest number saying violence was acceptable in some conditions (24 per cent). The findings come a year after the murder of Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, and Bebe King, six, at a Taylor Swift dance class in Southport sparked days of violent rioting across England and Northern Ireland. Riots in Aldershot, Tamworth and Rotherham targeted so-called 'asylum hotels'. The hotels have become a flashpoint once again this summer. Protests around so-called asylum hotels have taken place in Epping, Diss and Canary Wharf in recent weeks. On Saturday clashes took place between anti-racism demonstrators and anti-asylum hotel protestors outside the Thistle Hotel in central London. The Home Office says fewer than 210 hotels are now being used to house asylum seekers, down from more than 400 in the summer of 2023. Meanwhile the number of asylum seekers crossing the Channel has surpassed 25,000 this year, the earliest the figure has been reached. Britons are split on whether it is acceptable to protest outside an asylum hotel, with 47 per cent saying it is acceptable, and 44 per cent saying it is unacceptable. Only 14 per cent say it is acceptable to riot outside an asylum hotel, and only 1 in 5 (19 per cent) of Reform UK voters say it is acceptable to riot outside an asylum hotel. [See also: One year on, tensions still circle Britain's asylum-seeker hotels] Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Related
