Debt forgiveness vs. debt consolidation: Which one could save you more?
We may receive commissions from some links to products on this page. Promotions are subject to availability and retailer terms.
Both debt forgiveness and debt consolidation can be good options, but the savings can differ significantly between these two strategies.
Getty Images
It can be tough to know what to do when you're staring at a pile of credit card bills and you realize that the minimum monthly payments alone are eating up a large portion of your paycheck. But while this type of issue can be stressful, it's unfortunately not uncommon right now. Between the higher costs of essentials and the elevated interest rate environment, millions of Americans have been forced to turn to their credit cards to make ends meet and are now struggling under the weight of their high-rate credit card debt.
As a result, many are searching for ways to lighten their financial load, and while there are lots of options to choose from, two of the most effective routes for those with high credit card balances or multiple high-rate loans are debt forgiveness (also known as debt settlement) and debt consolidation. Each of these options promises relief, but in very different ways — and with vastly different consequences for your wallet and credit score.
Debt consolidation, for example, can simplify repayment and lower your interest rate, but it won't reduce your principal balance. Debt forgiveness, on the other hand, can slash the amount you owe, but it often comes with serious credit damage and other trade-offs. But which one could actually save you more? Below, we'll break down the costs, timeline and credit implications of both strategies to help you make the right move for your financial future.
Speak to a debt relief expert about the help available to you today.
Debt forgiveness vs. debt consolidation: Which one could save you more?
Before we look at how much debt forgiveness and debt consolidation could save you, it's important to understand how each of these debt relief options works. Debt consolidation combines multiple debts into one new loan or payment plan. Instead of juggling several credit card payments, you get a single monthly payment, ideally at a lower interest rate. Common consolidation methods include:
Debt forgiveness works completely differently. With this type of debt relief, you (or a debt relief company you hire) negotiate with creditors to try and get them to accept less than what you owe in return for a lump-sum payment. When successful, debt settlement typically leads to paying between 30% to 50% less than the original balance owed on the account. Here's how a settlement typically works:
You stop making payments to creditors entirely
Monthly payments are then made to the debt relief company and deposited into a separate account
That money accumulates, and the accumulated funds are used to make lump-sum settlement offers
You also have to pay the debt relief company fees, which are generally between 15% to 25% of the enrolled debt
The catch: You must stop payments during negotiations, which damages your credit as accounts become delinquent.
Find out how to start settling your debt for less.
Timeline and credit impact
Debt consolidation can happen relatively quickly, often within a few weeks if you qualify for a personal loan or balance transfer credit card. The payoff timeline depends on the terms you choose, but most people opt for loan terms between two and five years. This approach can actually help your credit score over time by lowering your credit utilization ratio and establishing a positive payment history.
Debt forgiveness is a much longer process, typically taking two to four years on average to complete. During this time, your credit accounts will likely be charged off as bad debt, and you may face collection calls and potential lawsuits. Your credit score will generally drop significantly and these negative marks will remain on your credit report for seven years.
Cost comparison
Now let's look at an example of how the savings and costs would compare between your options if you had $25,000 in credit card debt at an average interest rate of 21%.
Option 1: Keep paying monthly payments
Monthly payment (based on 3% of the balance): starting at $750 per month
Time to pay off: 30 years
Total interest paid: roughly $34,557
Total paid: about $59,557
Option 2: Debt consolidation with a personal loan at 13% over four years
Monthly payment: approximately $671
Interest paid: $7,193
Total paid: about $32,193
Total savings vs. monthly payments: $27,364
Option 3: Debt forgiveness (assuming a 50% reduction and 22% company fees)
Amount settled for: $12,500
Settlement company fees: $5,500
Total paid: approximately $18,000
Total savings vs. monthly payments: $41,557
While debt forgiveness saves substantially more money upfront, it's important to understand that the credit damage could cost you thousands more in higher interest rates on future loans, insurance premiums and other financial products. So, the savings from debt forgiveness might disappear, at least in part, if you need to finance a car or home shortly after your debt has been settled.
The bottom line
While debt forgiveness can help you save substantially compared to debt consolidation, your decision typically shouldn't be based solely on which option saves the most money upfront. If you can qualify for debt consolidation and manage the monthly payments, this approach protects your credit while still providing meaningful savings compared to making just the monthly payments. However, if your debt load is truly unmanageable and you're already facing potential bankruptcy, debt forgiveness might be worth the credit damage to avoid more severe consequences.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
12 minutes ago
- Forbes
How AI Is Exposing The Great SaaS Mediocrity Machine
Close-up of a person's hand holding an iPhone and using Google AI Mode, an experimental mode ... More utilizing artificial intelligence and large language models to process Google search queries, Lafayette, California, March 24, 2025. (Photo by Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images) The software-as-a-service industry has grown into a three hundred billion dollar colossus, powering everything from Fortune 500 customer relationships to your neighborhood coffee shop's inventory system. Yet beneath this impressive facade, a growing chorus of industry insiders suggests something troubling: much of this growth may have been built on a foundation of what the late anthropologist David Graeber termed "bullshit jobs" – roles that add little genuine value but consume enormous resources. Now, as artificial intelligence begins automating many of the tasks that filled these positions, the emperor's new clothes are becoming visible to all. David Graeber's 2018 book "Bullshit Jobs: A Theory" argued that modern capitalism had spawned entire categories of meaningless work – jobs that even their holders secretly believed were pointless. His taxonomy included "flunkies" (who exist mainly to make superiors feel important), "duct tapers" (who solve problems that shouldn't exist), and "box tickers" (who create the appearance of meaningful activity). Sound familiar to anyone who's worked in SaaS lately? Consider the typical Series B software company today: layers of growth marketers optimizing conversion funnels that users abandon, customer success managers managing relationships with customers who don't renew, and product managers shipping features that solve no real problems. Industry veteran Charles Grant Powell-Thompson recently wrote that the sector has become "a bloated ecosystem of recycled playbooks, unoriginal hires, and shallow growth hacks." At the heart of what Powell-Thompson identifies as SaaS mediocrity lies an over-reliance on playbooks. Visit any early-stage startup or public SaaS company, and you'll encounter identical practices: OKRs, product-led growth strategies, "land and expand" sales models, and user journey funnels copied wholesale from previous companies. "Product teams build features to meet roadmap commitments, not user needs," Powell-Thompson observes. "Sales teams push demos and discount paths based on generic conversion data. Marketing teams copy HubSpot's inbound strategy from 2014 and declare victory after publishing fifteen listicles." The 2021 wave of startups flooding the "Notion for X" and "Figma for Y" space exemplifies this template thinking. Nearly all adopted identical growth strategies: bottom-up freemium entry with vague "community" layers. Most failed because they misunderstood what made the originals successful – deep product design and obsessive iteration, not surface-level copying. Perhaps nowhere is the bullshit jobs phenomenon more visible than in SaaS hiring patterns. The industry has developed what Powell-Thompson calls "the SaaS hiring loop" – continuously recycling talent from the same pool of failed or plateaued startups. Competence gets assumed based on LinkedIn logos rather than demonstrated outcomes. "A growth marketer who scaled vanity metrics at one mediocre tool is hired to repeat the cycle elsewhere," Powell-Thompson notes, "without ever proving they can build sustainable customer retention or profit." This creates a carousel of recycled talent carrying identical playbooks and assumptions but rarely delivering results that justify their roles. The industry favors "SaaS-native" professionals who speak fluent ARR and OKR but don't question fundamentals or challenge assumptions. The venture capital boom masked much of this inefficiency. When Zendesk launched Zendesk Sell in 2018 – an acquisition of Base CRM – the company spent years trying to wedge it into a Salesforce competitor before sunsetting it in 2023. Evernote, once beloved, spent a decade chasing premium users with poorly built features while ignoring performance and user experience. These weren't scams – they were built by intelligent people. But as Powell-Thompson points out, they 'hired too fast, grew too shallow, and learned too late that real markets don't behave like pitch decks. When capital dried up in 2022-2023, widespread layoffs revealed how many SaaS positions had been consuming resources without contributing meaningful value'. Artificial intelligence isn't just changing how software works; it's revealing which human roles actually mattered in the first place. When AI can generate marketing copy instantly, what value does the growth hacker who spent weeks A/B testing subject lines provide? When algorithms can analyze user behavior patterns in real-time, what's the point of analysts who took days to produce similar insights? The numbers are telling the story. SaaS companies have eliminated hundreds of thousands of positions since 2022, yet many report improved productivity metrics. This suggests that much of what looked like essential work may have been what Graeber would recognize as elaborate theater. Graeber's categories map remarkably well onto modern SaaS organizational charts: The Flunkies: Business development representatives who exist primarily to make actual salespeople feel important, spending days sending LinkedIn messages nobody reads. The Duct Tapers: Customer success managers whose primary function involves fixing problems created by poorly designed products or misaligned sales promises. The Box Tickers: Growth marketers who obsess over vanity metrics like email open rates while customer churn rates remain stubbornly high. The Taskmasters: Middle managers who exist solely to manage other managers, creating elaborate OKR frameworks that nobody follows. Powell-Thompson identifies a particularly troubling aspect of SaaS culture: the near-complete lack of self-awareness. Workers confuse busywork with impact, treating twelve-slide strategy decks and Miro boards as substitutes for real execution. The industry has developed what he calls "a language of legitimacy that sounds impressive but says little." Phrases like "We're building an extensible platform for enterprise workflows" or "Our ICP is mid-market GTM teams in the post-series B range" mask fundamental confusion about customers and value propositions. LinkedIn amplifies this dynamic. The average SaaS employee presents themselves as management guru, life coach, and visionary simultaneously, while often unable to ship a bug fix, close a sale, or explain their product's API in plain English. Ironically, as AI eliminates some forms of meaningless work, it may be creating others. A new class of "AI prompt engineers" has emerged, with some commanding six-figure salaries for sophisticated search operations. Companies are hiring "AI ethics officers" and "automation specialists" who spend more time in meetings about AI than implementing it. This suggests we may be witnessing the birth of what could be called "AI bureaucracy" – jobs that exist primarily to manage, oversee, or optimize interactions with AI systems, potentially as divorced from real value creation as the roles they're replacing. The bullshit jobs critique isn't without its limitations. What appears inefficient may serve important functions that aren't immediately obvious. Redundancy in complex systems often provides resilience. The customer success manager scheduling seemingly pointless check-in calls might prevent million-dollar churn through relationship management that AI cannot replicate. Some of the most successful SaaS companies – Slack, Notion, Figma – emerged from overcrowded markets. The process of hiring diverse perspectives, even if some prove redundant, may be necessary for breakthrough innovation. And behind every critique of meaningless work stands a real person with real financial obligations. The growth marketer whose role seems pointless represents someone's mortgage payment, someone's child's college fund. The solution isn't eliminating all potentially redundant roles – that would be both cruel and counterproductive. Instead, the industry needs conscious evolution guided by several principles: Honest Performance Metrics: Moving beyond vanity metrics to measure actual business impact. Roles that can't demonstrate clear value creation over reasonable time periods should be restructured or eliminated. Skill Depth Over Buzzword Fluency: As Powell-Thompson argues, the industry needs "fewer growth hackers and more grown-ups. Fewer decks, more decisions. Fewer generalists, more expertise." Human-AI Collaboration: Rather than viewing AI as human replacement, smart companies are determining how to combine human judgment with AI capability for genuinely valuable outcomes. Cultural Honesty: Developing organizational cultures capable of honest productivity assessment without corporate speak or fear-based defensiveness. The SaaS industry's AI-driven reckoning previews what's coming for knowledge work broadly. As artificial intelligence becomes more capable, every industry will face similar questions about which roles create genuine value versus which exist primarily to create the appearance of activity. Graeber's insight about bullshit jobs revealed a moral crisis – people trapped in roles they knew were meaningless, maintaining economic survival through elaborate performance. The AI revolution offers an opportunity to escape this trap, but only through honest assessment of what we're escaping from. The SaaS industry's three hundred billion dollar scale means getting this transition right matters far beyond Silicon Valley. The sector employs millions globally and underpins much of the modern economy's digital infrastructure. If Graeber was correct about bullshit jobs' prevalence, then AI's arrival represents more than technological disruption – it's an opportunity for work reform. A chance to align human effort with genuine value creation benefiting both workers and customers. But realizing this opportunity requires something both the SaaS industry and broader business world have struggled with: courage to be honest about what actually works, what doesn't, and why. As Powell-Thompson concludes: "The truth is simple, and brutal. SaaS didn't just scale software – it scaled mediocrity." The question now is whether the industry will use this moment of AI-driven disruption for genuine transformation or simply automate meaningful work while preserving meaningless jobs through increasingly elaborate justifications. The three hundred billion dollar question is which path the industry will choose.
Wall Street Journal
30 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump's Big Opportunity in Japan
On the first international trip of his second term, President Trump visited the Middle East and went big, sparking trillions in new artificial-intelligence-centered investments. The result was a win for the administration and a shift away from the narrative that tariffs have upset allies and roiled markets. Now the president has an opportunity to go even bigger, this time with Japan. Japan undergirds U.S. power in the Pacific. It has one of the world's largest economies—$4 trillion a year in output, some 27% of which is manufacturing. It spends $70 billion on defense, a figure that has nearly doubled since 2022 as Tokyo grapples with Beijing's growing capabilities and ambitions. Japanese companies lead the world in critical industries from robotics to material sciences and semiconductor equipment. And Japan hosts more U.S. servicemembers than any other nation. America, in turn, hosts a Japanese national treasure—Dodgers slugger and three-time MVP Shohei Ohtani. The partnership is thriving. Take it from Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba: 'The Japan-U.S. alliance is the cornerstone of Japan's diplomacy and security.' When visiting Iwo Jima in March, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth agreed: 'Our alliance has been, and remains the cornerstone of freedom, prosperity, security and peace in the Indo-Pacific.' The alliance, moreover, has robust popular support: a 2024 poll found that 83% of Americans view Japan favorably. During Mr. Trump's first 100 days, the administration upgraded the status of U.S. forces in Japan, approved equipment sales for a Japanese hypersonic-missile program and explored joint production of dual-use ships. The president suggested collaboration on the Golden Dome missile defense system.
Forbes
37 minutes ago
- Forbes
What Are Smart Workcations? 5 Tips To Plan One This Summer
Find out why workcations are becoming more popular this year and how to take one that's balanced. Summer is just around the corner, and vacation plans are heating up. Many travelers are staying close to home this summer, staying in the U.S. or headed to Canada or Mexico, according to Squaremouth. Or they're staycationing at home, enjoying slow summer vacations. The tanking economy, jammed airports, travel disruptions, canceled flights and flight delays--plus lost luggage claims up 18%--are causing vacationers to rethink how they want to spend summer vacations. As a result, smart workcations are becoming more popular in the summer of 2025. Almost one year ago to the day I was writing about 'hushcations' for in which younger workers were sneaking vacations without calling off work or disclosing their location to their employers. The 'hush movement' grew among remote workers across the country as they tried to find risk-averse ploys to combine remote working with their desire for job flexibility. Now, as summer 2025 nears, Americans hit a 15-year low in travel planning, according to Fortune, explaining that job insecurity from DOGE layoffs and tariffs are shattering 2025 vacation plans. This summer vacationers are turning to a different kind of break called 'slow summer vacations,' shying away from baggage delays and loss, long lines, flight delays and disruptions and scaling back activities, cutting costs and allowing more unstructured time. A new Monster study reveals that most employees aren't getting the flexibility or support they need to enjoy the summer months. A notable 84% of U.S. workers say they aren't offered any designated summer benefits. And64% say they struggle to maintain a healthy work-life balance during the summer, When it comes to managing seasonal schedule conflicts, 42% report feeling unsupported by their managers or employers Among employees who receive summer benefits, 55% say it improves their productivity, proving that seasonal flexibility is more than just a perk--it's a performance booster. Workations are having a moment, as almost half of office workers (46%) have taken a one, with one in four doing so to obtain a better quality of life, and eight in ten claiming that a workation helps them cope with burnout. In fact, one in three workers have completed tasks on a beach or on a plane, according to a recent survey by Headway app. If you're like most people, the availability of technology and remote work make it impractical to plan a vacation totally devoid of work. White-knuckling through wondering if a work problem is going unaddressed actually raises your anxiety. Instead of planning a "cold turkey' vacation, it makes more sense to shoot for a smart workcation that balances play with work. Here are my five tips on how to have a fun and productive smart workcation: Limited communication with the office while vacationing can be less stressful than no communication at all and worrying about things piling up. Feeling that you're getting behind can make you feel out of control and make it harder to chill. Strictly enforced limits on vacations such as an hour a day to check email or make phone calls can help you relax. The breakneck speed of technology can activate your stress response, provoking a cortisol/dopamine squirt. Then you respond to the immediacy of the device as if it were a threat to extinguish. Be master instead of slave to your devices. Use custom ring tones for your family, friends or coworkers when you want to screen calls during off-hours. Ease up on instant messaging so you don't create the expectation that you're available 24/7. Avoid working right up until the moment you leave and head back to work right off the vacation. If possible, schedule an extra-day cushion before you depart and another when you return to ease back in. On vacation, alternate your time between staying active and restorative rest. A walk on the beach combined with five minutes of meditation both give you a biochemical boost. Activity raises endorphins. Quieting your mind stimulates the part of your brain that dampens the surges of adrenaline and cortisol accompanying stress. Choose a colleague you trust to manage day-to-day tasks during your absence, and make sure your coworkers know you'll be away. Designate a point person to be contacted on your voicemail and out-of-office email only on matters you want to be bothered about. Avery Morgan, workplace productivity expert and CHRO at Edubirdie, shares four easy-to-follow tips to help you stay focused, creative and one step ahead, without sacrificing the whole 'workation' vibe. "Your golden window of uninterrupted time, without Slack texts, emails and Whatnot, is while everyone else is sleeping, scrolling or sightseeing," Morgan explains. "Early mornings and late nights are your most productive window. No pings, no loud Zoom calls or zero distractions. Just you, your work and your full focus." "Besides, depending on your time zone vs. your team's, you might be able to sneak in deep work while everyone else is unavailable," she adds. 'So swap that midday hustle for some quiet early morning sessions--or whatever non-peak groove works.' "Travel time doesn't have to be downtime," Morgan says. "In fact, being on flights, trains and ferries is a perfect excuse to disconnect from meetings and dig into some much-needed big thinking." "No Wi-Fi? That can actually work in your favor!" she suggests. 'Jot down ideas, brainstorm projects, map out your goals--whatever your brain's been too busy to do lately. Pro tip: keep a tiny notebook or your Notes app handy. You'd be surprised how many good ideas hit when you're 30,000 feet in the air with no distractions in sight.' "Nothing disrupts your flow faster than bad Wi-Fi or a forgotten charger," Morgan warns. "Before you head out, test your hotspot, download offline backups of key files and make sure you've got your gear--adapters, headphones, chargers the works." "Scouting work-friendly spots at your destination is yet another way to streamline your processes," she advises. 'Know where the solid Wi-Fi is, have a backup location and steer clear of being the one scrambling for a charger in a noisy café with no signal.' "It's easy to blur the lines on a working trip," Morgan points out. 'If you don't set boundaries, work will bleed into your personal time and suck the joy out of your trip." She recommends blocking out active hours and downtime as well. "In your scheduled 'unplug' time, go sightseeing, take a nap or relax--just make sure when you're done for the day, you're really done. Protect your rest time like your productivity depends on it, because it really does." The beauty of smart workcations is that you gift yourself the freedom and to not just relax and play, but to do both. 'Try switching it up," Morgan says. "A cozy café in the morning, co-working space in the afternoon and beachside brainstorming in the evening. Different environments bring different vibes, and fresh vibes bring fresh energy.'
