After Trump's Ban, Hong Kong University Announces "Unconditional Offers" For Harvard Foreign Students
"Diversity fuels creativity and progress. We are prepared to welcome Harvard students into our community, offering them the resources and vibrant environment needed to thrive in their fields," said Guo Yike, the provost at HKUST, as per Newsweek.
HKUST's offer comes after the Chinese government criticised the US government for stopping the enrollment of foreign students and student exchange programmes at Harvard University. More than 1,000 Chinese students currently attend the Ivy League school, the outlet reported.
Announcing the move on Thursday, the US Department of Homeland Security said that Harvard had created an unsafe campus environment by allowing "anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators" to harass and assault Jewish students on campus and accused Harvard of coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party, saying it hosted and trained members of a Chinese paramilitary group as recently as last year.
Harvard University, on the other hand, called the US Government's move to ban foreign students "unlawful". In a statement, Harvard spokesperson Jason Newton said, "We are fully committed to maintaining Harvard's ability to host international students and scholars, who hail from more than 140 countries and enrich the University - and this nation - immeasurably." Harvard is also suing the Trump administration against its decision to revoke its eligibility to enrol international students. "As we pursue legal remedies, we will do everything in our power to support our students and scholars," the university said.
Meanwhile, critics have warned that the US government's move could deter top talent from abroad from coming to the US to study. So, HKUST's offer indicates that an increasing number of international students could choose top institutions in China, Hong Kong and other places instead.
Notably, HKUST is ranked sixty-sixth best in the world in the Times Higher Education's college rankings 2025. Harvard placed third.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
18 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump admin calls out human rights records of countries accepting deportees
The Trump administration on Tuesday released human rights reports for countries worldwide, which eliminate mentions of discrimination faced by LGBTQ people, reduce a previous focus on reproductive rights and criticise restrictions on political speech by US allies in Europe that American officials believe target right-wing politicians. The reports, which cover 2024 before President Donald Trump took office, reflect his administration's focus on free speech and protecting the lives of the unborn. However, the reports also offer a glimpse into the administration's view of dire human rights conditions in some countries that have agreed to accept migrants deported from the United States under Trump's immigration crackdown. This year's reports were streamlined for better utility and accessibility in the field and by partners, the State Department said. The congressionally mandated reports in the past have been frequently used for reference and cited by lawmakers, policymakers, academic researchers and others investigating potential asylum claims or looking into conditions in specific countries. The reports were delayed by the Trump administration's changes The reports had been due to be released in March. The State Department said in an overview that the delay occurred because the Trump administration decided in March to adjust the reports, which had been compiled during the Biden administration. Among other deletions, the reports do not include accounts from individual abuse survivors or witnesses. Frequently, eyewitnesses are intimidated or prevented from reporting what they know, the overview said. On the other hand, individuals and groups opposed to a government may have incentive to exaggerate or fabricate abuses. In similar fashion, some governments may distort or exaggerate abuses attributed to opposition groups. Human rights groups decried the changes in focus and omissions of certain categories of discrimination and potential abuse. The new reports reveal a disturbing effort by the Trump administration to purposefully fail to fully capture the alarming and growing attacks on human rights in certain countries around the globe, Amnesty International said in a statement. The reports do follow previous practices in criticizing widespread human rights abuses in China, Iran, North Korea and Russia. Laying out the poor human rights records of countries accepting migrant deportees Although such deportations did not begin until after Trump took office, the reports, with one notable exception, detail general poor human rights conditions in many of the countries that have agreed to accept migrants, even if they are not citizens of that nation. The exception is El Salvador, which was the first of several countries in Latin America and Africa to agree to accept non-citizen migrant deportees from the US. Despite claims from rights advocates to the contrary, the report about the country says there were no credible reports of significant human rights abuses in El Salvador in 2024 and that the government took credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses. Human rights groups have accused authorities of abuses, including at a notorious prison where many migrants are sent. However, for Eswatini a small country in Africa formerly known as Swaziland South Sudan and Rwanda, the reports paint a grimmer picture. All have agreed to accept third-country deportees from the United States. In all three countries, the reports noted significant human rights issues included credible reports of arbitrary or unlawful killings, torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, prohibiting independent trade unions or significant or systematic restrictions on workers' freedom of association. Those governments did not take credible steps or action to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, the reports said. Singling out the treatment of white South Africans South Africa was also singled out for its human rights situation significantly worsening. The report pointed to unfair treatment of white Afrikaners following the signing of major land reforms that the Trump administration has said discriminate against that minority, which ran the country's apartheid government. That system brutally enforced racial segregation, which oppressed the Black majority, for 50 years before ending in 1994. With the signing of that law in December, the report said that South Africa took a substantially worrying step towards land expropriation of Afrikaners and further abuses against racial minorities in the country. It also said the government did not take credible steps to investigate, prosecute and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, including inflammatory racial rhetoric against Afrikaners and other racial minorities, or violence against racial minorities. This year, the administration admitted as refugees some groups of white Afrikaners. Accusations of European allies restricting right-wing speech The reports take issue with what the Trump administration believes are restrictions on free speech imposed against generally right-wing voices in the United Kingdom, France and Germany. The reports use identical language to say that human rights conditions in each of the three Nato allies worsened during the year. The executive summaries for each of the three reports say significant human rights issues included credible reports of serious restrictions on freedom of expression, including enforcement of or threat of criminal or civil laws in order to limit expression; and crimes, violence, or threats of violence motivated by antisemitism. These governments have rejected such assertions that have been made by senior US officials, including Trump, Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Targeting Brazil over allegations of restricting Bolsonaro's speech Similar freedom-of-speech issues were raised in Brazil, which has more recently provoked Trump's ire by prosecuting his ally former right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro and led to the imposition of massive US tariffs and sanctions against Brazil's Supreme Court chief justice. The human rights situation in Brazil declined during the year, the report said. The courts took broad and disproportionate action to undermine freedom of speech and internet freedom by blocking millions of users' access to information on a major social media platform in response to a case of harassment. It added that the government undermined democratic debate by restricting access to online content deemed to undermine democracy and specifically mentioned suppressing the speech of Bolsonaro and his supporters. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
News18
41 minutes ago
- News18
George Washington University Joins List Of Schools Facing DOJ Action Over Antisemitism
Last Updated: The action marks a widening federal scrutiny of American higher education institutions under President Donald Trump's second term. The Trump administration has launched a civil rights enforcement action against George Washington University (GWU), accusing the Washington, DC-based institution of violating federal civil rights law. In a press statement released on Tuesday, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) alleged that the university had been 'deliberately indifferent to the hostile educational environment for Jewish, American-Israeli, and Israeli students and faculty." The action marks a widening federal scrutiny of American higher education institutions under President Donald Trump's second term. It follows a series of warnings and investigations into alleged antisemitism and transparency issues at major universities. Just a few days earlier, the administration threatened Harvard University over disclosure of its patents. Other elite institutions, including the University of Pennsylvania, Columbia University, and Brown University, have also come under investigation since Trump returned to office in January 2025. The charges against GWU stem from incidents during pro-Palestinian campus protests in April and May 2024. The DOJ alleges the university failed to act in response to antisemitic conduct during those events, thus violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on race, colour, or national origin in federally funded programmes. The DOJ asserts that university officials did not take appropriate steps to address the fears expressed by affected students. 'Every student has the right to equal educational opportunities without fear of harassment or abuse," Dhillon said. The university now faces possible legal consequences. However, the DOJ has offered GWU the opportunity to enter a voluntary resolution agreement. According to the letter, the university has until August 22 to reply. Responding to the developments, GWU spokesperson Shannon McClendon confirmed receipt of the DOJ letter and said the university is currently reviewing it. 'GW condemns antisemitism, which has absolutely no place on our campuses or in a civil and humane society," she stated. view comments First Published: August 13, 2025, 06:56 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Behind US-China trade truce
United States President Donald Trump on Monday extended his trade truce with China for another three months until November 10, pausing the triple-digit import duties that the two countries would have levied on each other's goods. Trump's move — 'to continue the suspension' of the prohibitive 145% tariff on Chinese goods and keep it at 30% following an earlier executive order dated May 12 — comes in the wake of Beijing's strong response with retaliatory measures of its own. That included not just imposing a 125% tariff on US shipments (since lowered to 10%), but also curbing exports of rare-earth metals and magnets, impacting American auto, aerospace, defence, and semiconductor manufacturers. However, it isn't just the choking of the supply of critical minerals that China has used as a leveraging tool to bring Trump to the negotiating table. In its ongoing, albeit temporarily halted, trade war with the US, China has also employed a 'trump card' in the form of agricultural imports. The accompanying table shows that the exports of US farm produce to China have more than halved, from $13.1 billion during January-June 2024 to $6.4 billion in the first six months of 2025. It comes on top of declines in the last two years, and is a far cry from the peak of $40.7 billion scaled in 2022. The fall in agricultural imports has been led by soyabean, with China importing hardly $2.5 billion worth of the leguminous oilseed from the US in January-June 2025, as against over $17.9 billion in 2022. That explains why Trump, in a post on his Truth Social platform on Monday, urged China to 'quickly quadruple' its soyabean imports from the US. He wrote, 'Our great farmers produce the most robust soybeans…Rapid service will be provided. Thank you President Xi [Jinping]'. Soyabean apart, China has massively reduced its purchases of US corn (maize), coarse grains (mainly sorghum and barley), cotton, beef, pork, poultry meat, and even forest products and tree nuts such as almonds, pistachios and walnuts. China is a huge importer of agri-commodities. Till two years ago, it was the world's biggest buyer of soyabean, rapeseed, wheat, barley, sorghum, oats and cotton, and No. 2 for corn (after Mexico) and palm oil (after India). A lot of these imports — 105 million tonnes (mt) of soyabean, 14.2 mt of barley, 13.8 mt of corn, 11.2 mt of wheat and 8.7 mt of sorghum in 2024 — catered to the protein and energy requirements of its massive swine herd and poultry flock. China houses roughly half of the world's pig population, and a fifth of its chickens. In 2024, China imported 74.7 mt of soyabean from Brazil and only 22.1 mt from the US. By sourcing more from Brazil, Argentina, Canada, Paraguay and other countries, it is hurting the interest of farmers in the US 'corn belt' states stretching from Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Missouri to North and South Dakota, Nebraska and Kansas. In addition, there are the beef farmers in Texas and Oklahoma, and the tree nut growers in California, Oregon, New Mexico, and Georgia, who stand to lose from a trade war with China. Simply put, China is not only leveraging its control over the global rare-earth elements market — from mining and refining to exports — but also its power as an agri-commodities importer to push Trump to continue 'productive discussions' with Beijing 'to resolve trade disputes and strengthen economic ties'. While US exports of farm produce to China have plunged by 51.3% in January-June 2025 over January-June 2024, that to India have soared 49.1% for the same period. As reported in this newspaper, agricultural trade between India and the US has actually been booming. Based on shipment value trends so far, both exports from the US to India and that from India to the US are set to top $3.5 billion and $7.5 billion respectively. India has, in fact, overtaken China to emerge as the biggest market for US tree nuts, with exports at more than $1.1 billion in 2024 and growing by 42.8% year-on-year to $759.6 million in January-June 2025. The US, likewise, has a 35% share in India's seafood exports. In frozen shrimps and prawns, more than $1.9 billion out of the $4.5 billion of Indian exports during 2024-25 (April-March) went to the US. It's another thing that despite this robust two-way trade engagement — more so in a sector that has become a sticking point in the ongoing bilateral trade talks — the Trump administration has doubled the tariff on Indian imports to 50%, effective from August 27. That includes a 25% 'penalty' for the purchase of Russian oil, which China has also been doing without inviting any such coercive duty.
