logo
Alternatives to long-term care insurance and how to pay for care

Alternatives to long-term care insurance and how to pay for care

Telegraph6 hours ago

The spiralling cost of long-term care is a concern for many in Britain's ageing population, especially since it can be difficult to get state support.
Long-term care insurance used to offer individuals protection to help cover these costs, but these policies no longer exist.
However, there are alternatives. Here, Telegraph Money explains what your options are to help meet care costs, and how much you might expect to pay.
What is long-term care insurance?
Why is it no longer available?
Alternatives to long-term care insurance
Cost of long-term care in the UK
Can the Government fund long-term care?
What is long-term care insurance?
Long-term care insurance is a legacy product that provides protection for later in life care costs.
The policies are no longer available on the market to buy, although customers may still be receiving payouts from existing plans.
Policies provided holders with a regular income to pay fees for a nursing home or for home care, according to the Financial Ombudsman Service.
This could include round-the-clock care in your home or for particular services, such as help with bathing and dressing.
Why is it no longer available?
Part of the reason long-term care insurance came to an end was the escalating costs of care and increasing life expectancy. Combined, this made it unaffordable for policy holders.
As there is no cap on the cost of care in the UK, it became too hard to develop a workable product.
Under Boris Johnson, the Conservatives had planned to introduce a £86,000 cap on the amount individuals would have to pay towards their own care costs, after which the state stepped in.
However, since coming to power last year Labour has announced that it will not go ahead with the previous government's plan.
As a result, many individuals will have to continue contributing high amounts to their care costs. There are around 130,000 care home residents who self-fund their care, according to the Office for National Statistics.
Alternatives to long-term care insurance
While long-term care insurance is no longer offered in the UK, there are other options that help meet individual care needs.
However, they are not comprehensive and so you need to make sure you know what is and isn't covered and how that corresponds to your needs.
It is also worth checking that you don't have an old long-term care insurance policy or existing coverage through long-standing life insurance.
Care fee annuity
A care fee annuity, also called an immediate needs annuity, is designed to bridge the gap between your income and the cost of your care for the long term.
An immediate care annuity works in a similar way to a normal annuity, where you receive a guaranteed income – but the money goes directly to your care provider rather than to you.
As the payment doesn't come to you it isn't classed as income, and therefore isn't taxable. It helps avoid a situation where you are left without the funds necessary to pay for care.
However, this kind of product requires you to provide a named care provider in order to access the money, which means you must either already be receiving care, or you're just about to start receiving care and know which provider you'll be using.
To buy an annuity of this kind it is best to find a financial planner specialising in long-term care. You may have to complete a medical assessment for a prospective provider so they can estimate your likely needs.
Your annuity rate – the amount of money you are given – will depend on a variety of factors, including your age and medical history. It is also worth looking at an option to protect against fee rises by increasing your annuity payment annually by a fixed percentage or inflation.
Sarah Pennells, consumer finance specialist at Royal London, said: ' Making decisions around care, for yourself or a parent, are never easy, but thinking about how you would pay care fees, ahead of any crisis, is a sensible approach to take.
'One of the options to consider is whether an 'immediate needs annuity' is right for you. There aren't many insurers who offer this product, but it can be bought at the point that you need care.
'In exchange for you paying a lump sum to an insurance company, it could pay your care costs for as long as you live.
'Although not cheap, as they can cost tens or even hundreds of thousands of pounds, these products can be a big help if you have capital or savings you want to preserve.
'However, depending on how quickly care home fees rise, they are not guaranteed to cover care home fees in full for as long as you need them.'
Critical illness cover
Critical illness cover is a form of life insurance that will pay out a lump sum if you are diagnosed with an illness covered by your policy.
The policy holder can then use that money for any costs, such as necessary long-term care. However, you will need to ensure that your illness is covered by the policy to get a payout, otherwise you could be left with costs that aren't covered.
Conditions that are likely to be covered include strokes, Alzheimer's and cancer. Critical illness insurance doesn't just cover care later in life, but can also be taken out at a younger age to protect against illness.
Some providers also offer policies designed to provide cover for children.
However, there may be a maximum age that you are still eligible to take out the policy. For Aviva, for example, it is 64.
Prices for critical illness cover vary based on factors such as your age, health and level of coverage, but premiums can be as cheap as £12 a month with an average of £29 a month, according to comparison site MoneySupermarket.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Time to face the harsh realities of spending orthodoxy
Time to face the harsh realities of spending orthodoxy

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Time to face the harsh realities of spending orthodoxy

Labour came to power fatuously parroting the word 'change' and yet has shown itself to be the same old tax and spending party it has always been. What it meant was a change of party in office not a change of direction. Not only have taxes gone up but so-called protected spending is set to rise despite record debt levels. Yet if ever a public policy has been tested to destruction surely it is the notion that the NHS will improve if only more money is thrown at it. Even Sir Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, are on record as saying that higher health spending is not the answer to the endemic flaws in the health service and yet another £30 billion is to be announced for the next three years on top of the £22 billion handed over after last year's general election, much of which went on pay and showed nothing in the way of productivity improvement. No mainstream politician is prepared to acknowledge that the problem with the NHS is the fact it is a nationalised industry with all the inherent inefficiencies associated with such. Most other advanced economies in Europe and elsewhere have social insurance systems which work better. But the insistence in Britain of cleaving to the 1948 'founding principle' that treatment should be free at the point of delivery has become a quasi-religious doctrine that few dare challenge. Only Nigel Farage has questioned the wisdom of continuing with a system that patently fails to achieve what others manage to do but has been noticeably quiet on the subject recently because Labour will exploit it mercilessly to see off the Reform threat. Telling people that they will have to pay for something they have always had for free is even more difficult when political parties are prepared to see the health system get worse rather than reform it. The same is true of welfare. Taking benefits from people, even when they are payments introduced just a few years ago like the winter fuel allowance, is hard if the reasons are not explained and the issue is 'weaponised' by opponents. Yet unless the welfare budget is brought under control it will bankrupt the country. If change is to mean anything then we need politicians finally to understand the extent of the country's difficulties and make decisions accordingly. Will we see that from the Chancellor on Wednesday?

Rachel Reeves faces crisis as cabinet conflicts threaten to block spending plans
Rachel Reeves faces crisis as cabinet conflicts threaten to block spending plans

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Rachel Reeves faces crisis as cabinet conflicts threaten to block spending plans

Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces a crisis as cabinet conflicts threaten to block her spending plans, with disagreements over proposed cuts to housing and police force budgets. Yvette Cooper and Angela Rayner are pushing back against budget cuts, leading to a stalemate with the Treasury just 48 hours before Reeves is due to unveil the spending review. Cabinet minister Peter Kyle refused to rule out real-terms spending cuts to the police force and housing budget, while the Ministry of Housing is reportedly resisting such cuts. The social housing sector is warning of a potential crisis if funding cuts proceed, with concerns about a "cliff edge" in building more homes and councils already running deficits on housing budgets. Senior police chiefs have cautioned that Keir Starmer's pledge to cut crime will be unattainable without significant investment, citing new online threats and pressures from prison overcrowding.

Midwife who told pregnant shop keeper that wearing a facemask during the height of the pandemic would harm her unborn baby is struck off
Midwife who told pregnant shop keeper that wearing a facemask during the height of the pandemic would harm her unborn baby is struck off

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Midwife who told pregnant shop keeper that wearing a facemask during the height of the pandemic would harm her unborn baby is struck off

An award-winning midwife has been struck off the register after she urged pregnant women to avoid COVID vaccinations and face masks during the height of the pandemic. Northern Ireland NHS worker Seana Kerr told a pregnant shopworker not to wear a mask in August 2020 in case it harmed her unborn child. Ms Kerr, who had been a registered midwife since 2007, approached the 27-week pregnant woman and said that a face covering would 'reduce the amount of oxygen her baby was receiving'. She had introduced herself as a midwife and further suggested to the mother-to-be that she should consider rejecting the offer of a flu vaccination in case it increased the risk of her baby being stillborn. The pregnant woman, known only as Patient A, said she was left 'highly distressed' by the incident because it was her first pregnancy and she 'wanted to ensure she was doing the best for her child'. A Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) tribunal suspended Ms Kerr for 12 months last year, and said she placed the woman at 'significant risk of harm' and 'risked seriously undermining the public confidence' in her profession at a crucial time. The panel also took issue with the midwife's social media posts throughout that period. Ms Kerr, who won Northern Ireland 's Excellence in Midwifery award in 2018 and was nominated for a further award in 2020, said that babies were being attacked in the womb through vaccination of mothers during pregnancy. Ms Kerr's statements on Facebook were also investigated Nursing and Midwifery Council She also claimed in March 2021 that healthcare professionals were being 'complicit' in the national response to Covid-19, and that the health crisis was 'a Trojan horse intend[ed] to introduce a new era for humanity'. A further post in December saw her make reference to how a group of people, described as 'they', had been 'planting the seeds' about Covid-19 over Christmas 2020 by referring to 'some bat in China'. Ms Kerr's social media comments were posted when she had identified herself as a midwife and was 'promoting her opinion on matters of clinical importance', the panel found. Ms Kerr last year said she 'did not deny any of it' and 'cannot regret a word I said', adding: 'I stood on principle, for what I believed in. And I still believe that this matters.' 'The panel considered that the actions of Ms Kerr took place during an exceptionally unusual time, where the entirety of the NHS was mobilised to protect the public from the international Covid-19 pandemic,' they said. 'Therefore, by expressing the view that other healthcare professionals, who Ms Kerr was working with in the Trust, were acting in ways which may cause harm, a view Ms Kerr held which was against the recognised guidance at the time, Ms Kerr risked seriously undermining the public confidence in the profession. 'It further noted that by making these accusations that Ms Kerr's colleagues may have suffered harm while working in an unprecedented and challenging situation.' The panel found the pregnant woman and her family were caused 'significant emotional harm' as a result of Ms Kerr's behaviour. 'The panel noted that it is a reasonable expectation of everyone working in a public environment, such as a shop, that they will not be approached and given personal, clinical advice and that such advice would normally only be given during a private clinical appointment or at an antenatal class,' they said. 'Therefore, by approaching Patient A in her place of work, outside a clinical relationship, unsolicited, Ms Kerr placed her at significant risk of harm.' The panel found Ms Kerr's fitness to practise was still impaired and that there was a risk of her repeating the behaviour. Ms Kerr did not show any remorse for her misconduct or demonstrate any insight into her previous actions, and had not engaged with the NMC since June 2022, the panel said. It made an order to strike Ms Kerr's name from the register, after a 12-month suspension order had previously been imposed last year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store