logo
Corruption and collapse: How Services Seta blew R163-million and broke SA's skills promise

Corruption and collapse: How Services Seta blew R163-million and broke SA's skills promise

Daily Maverick2 days ago
From fake companies winning multimillion-rand contracts to whistleblower warnings ignored, this exposé reveals how corruption flourished unchecked at South Africa's Sector Education and Training Authorities (Setas). As pressure mounts for reform, the question remains: will new leadership break the cycle of corruption?
Long before axed higher education minister Nobuhle Nkabane took office, the Sector Education and Training Authority (Seta) was already under a cloud of corruption and governance failures. Tasked with managing training levies and skills development in the services sector, the Services Seta has been dogged since 2018 by allegations of tender irregularities and financial mismanagement, exposed through investigations by watchdog group Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa).
How the Services Seta missed every red flag
At the heart of the Services Seta scandal lies a R163-million contract for biometric units meant to track learner attendance and manage stipend payments. Shockingly, the tender ran for just four days — far short of the Treasury's 21-day requirement — and bids were evaluated a week before the closing date.
The contract went to Grayson Reed — a shell company with no track record, no South African Revenue Service (SARS) declarations, and no real capacity to deliver. Investigators later revealed that the name itself was bogus. Despite glaring red flags, the Seta's bid committees waved the deal through. Outa says this blunder cost taxpayers more than R163-million.
Outa's investigation also uncovered serious financial irregularities in the execution of the contract. Grayson Reed submitted travel and accommodation claims exceeding R2.1-million, many lacking proper supporting documents. Some invoices were allegedly fraudulent, while others billed for expenses incurred by unrelated parties.
Suspiciously high fuel and Uber claims suggested daily double-charging, with duplicated invoices slipping through. Despite the red flags, senior Services Seta officials — including Project Accounting head Mpho Teffo and CFO Tsheola Matsebe — authorised the payments, raising alarm bells over the Seta's internal controls.
The contract's pricing was equally alarming — items like exam pads and USB sticks were inflated by up to 8,000%. Learners reported delayed stipends, faulty biometric devices, and underpayments. Strangely, records showed Grayson Reed paid its supplier more than it charged the Seta — raising red flags around possible kickbacks or financial mismanagement.
Despite Outa's repeated calls for cancellation and investigation, the Services Seta only terminated the contract six months early, in 2019, with no funds recovered and no criminal charges laid.
More contracts and more questions
The Grayson Reed saga was not a one-off. In June 2023, Outa uncovered yet another case of suspect spending at the Services Seta — a R36-million contract handed to Five Star Communications and Projects for branding materials.
A branded tender box costing R302,000 — marked up by over 8,000% — was among 29 inflated invoices paid to Five Star without question, all approved by then-CEO Andile Nongogo and branding head Duduzile Mwelase. Outa has since laid criminal charges with SAPS against the pair and two Five Star directors, citing fraud, corruption and breaches of the Public Finance Management Act.
The Werksmans report: confirming the suspicions
Under intense pressure from Outa and Parliament, the Services Seta commissioned Werksmans Attorneys in early 2023 to investigate procurement irregularities across multiple contracts.
Werksmans' findings confirmed whistleblowers' worst fears — exposing deep rot in the Services Seta's procurement processes.
Contracts were pushed through in as little as five days, with payments made before verifying delivery. In one shocking case, a contract ballooned from R6.6-million to R89-million with no valid explanation. Even committee setups were flawed — some decisions appeared to rest on just one improperly appointed member.
Adding to the turmoil, the Auditor-General issued a qualified opinion on the 2023/24 financials, citing poor record-keeping, material misstatements and glaring control failures. Irregular expenditure topped R193-million for the year — pushing the total to a staggering R1.26-billion.
Impunity persists
Daily Maverick spoke to Wayne Duvenage, the CEO of Outa, who said that while Outa had exposed multiple irregularities, particularly concerning tender manipulation and contract awards, in many cases the incumbents had remained in their positions.
'We try to get the boards to recognise misconduct or maladministration. If they don't act, it becomes very difficult for us to effect any meaningful change,' he said.
The 2023/24 annual report shows that disciplinary cases over irregular spending remain unresolved. Daily Maverick contacted the Services Seta for comment on 9 July, but the organisation did not respond to queries on the status of these cases.
In hearings in October 2024, committee members condemned the Services Seta's leadership for ignoring the Werksmans report and failing to hold anyone accountable, warning that this impunity eroded public trust and fuelled corruption.
Outa laid criminal complaints against Nongogo with SAPS in June 2023 over corrupt practices involving overpriced contracts awarded by the Services Seta. Nongogo was implicated alongside other officials for approving exorbitant payments and fraudulent activities. Nongogo was later appointed as NSFAS CEO in 2024.
Do Seta boards dodge the old playbook?
On the issue of Seta board appointments, Duvenage said that the former minister should have come up with a different approach.
'The chairperson and board members are in powerful positions, and they must be strong people appointed to exercise effective oversight. The minister knows, and we've told her, that these Setas have corrupt networks that infiltrate and use executive positions to control tender flows,' he said.
'We need skilled, credible board members with the moral courage to stand up to corruption,' said Duvenage. 'The public are not fools — we won't just accept anyone in these positions.'
In June, Nkabane told Parliament that her selection of 21 Seta chairpersons was guided by an advisory panel including advocate Terry Motau SC and several senior officials. But that claim is now unravelling — Motau says he was never formally involved, and others named have also denied participating in the final decisions. Their denials cast serious doubt on the accuracy of the minister's version of events.
The way forward
Reflecting on South Africa's investment in skills development, estimated at R21-billion annually, Duvenage said the returns had been inadequate. He reiterated that a systemic overhaul was urgently needed.
'There must be a summit, bringing together government, business, service providers, evaluators, civil society and citizens to map out a new way forward,' he said.
Duvenage called for an industry-led approach, with businesses identifying skills needs instead of the government dictating priorities. He warned that credible business leaders were stepping back due to political interference, saying: 'The system has collapsed. It's not working.'
South Africa's Setas stand at a crossroads, their promise of skills development overshadowed by corruption and mismanagement. Without urgent reform and accountability, public trust will continue to erode, and the country's workforce will ultimately bear the consequences. DM
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pretoria prosecutor and constable in the docks for extorting R1.6m
Pretoria prosecutor and constable in the docks for extorting R1.6m

The Citizen

time5 minutes ago

  • The Citizen

Pretoria prosecutor and constable in the docks for extorting R1.6m

Pretoria prosecutor and constable in the docks for extorting R1.6m A suspended prosecutor and a Wierdabrug police constable who allegedly demanded payment of R1.6-million in exchange for a businessman's release were granted bail on July 30 by the Pretoria Magistrate's Court. The court granted bail to the pair after they were charged with extortion. Advocate Avinash Ramapararat (45), the suspended prosecutor based at the Pretoria Specialised Commercial Crimes Unit (SCCU), and Constable Abdul Haig Shaik (37), a police officer stationed at Wierdabrug Police Station, were each granted R5 000 bail. According to National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) Gauteng spokesperson Lumka Mahanjana, in February 2024, Shaik allegedly contacted the businessman and requested that he report to the Wierdabrug Police Station regarding a fraud and theft case opened by Agynt Commodities. Mahanjana said the case was related to a coal transaction between Agynt and the businessman's company in 2023. Upon arrival, the businessman was arrested by Shaik and placed in a holding cell. While in custody, the two accused allegedly demanded payment of R1.6-million in exchange for the businessman's release. She said the businessman paid the money and was later released. Mahanjana said that after a few months had passed, the businessman made a follow-up on the case, and was told the case number given to him was unrelated to his matter. 'He then reported the incident to the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation, which led to the arrest of both accused on July 25.' Mahanjana said: 'During their bail application, the State did not oppose bail, as both accused had co-operated with the investigation, were not deemed flight risks, and had confirmed residential addresses. 'In addition to the current matter, the pair also face separate charges of extortion and corruption in a case before the Pretoria North Magistrate's Court.' Mahanjana said the court postponed the matter to October 24 for the Director of Public Prosecutions' decision, while the separate matter will return to court on October 27 for disclosure. She said the NPA is committed to fighting crime, including within its ranks. She said Ramapararat was placed on suspension pending finalisation of internal disciplinary processes. LISTEN: Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to [email protected] or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok.

Milestone conviction in multibillion ‘cum-ex' tax fraud tightens noose around Investec
Milestone conviction in multibillion ‘cum-ex' tax fraud tightens noose around Investec

Daily Maverick

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Milestone conviction in multibillion ‘cum-ex' tax fraud tightens noose around Investec

A central figure in the epic 'cum-ex' tax fraud scheme was convicted in June after cooperating with prosecutors. At the height of the scheme, Dr Kai-Uwe Steck advised Investec and others on how to claim fraudulent tax refunds from European governments. Investec has acknowledged what it calls the 'historical involvement' of its employees, but denies wrongdoing. The conviction of German lawyer and financial engineer Dr Kai-Uwe Steck, a key player in Europe's largest tax fraud scheme, may intensify scrutiny of Investec Bank's allegedly major role in financing and profiting off fraudulently procured tax refunds worth millions of euros. AmaBhungane has reported extensively on the 'cum-ex' scam, which drew in a number of banks and other financial service providers around the world. The basic mechanism of the scam was to claim tax refunds on dividend tax that was never paid. This required large amounts of upfront funding, which Investec provided to some key fraudsters. Read more about the complex mechanics of the scheme here. On 3 June, the Bonn Regional Court sentenced Steck to one year and 10 months in prison, suspended for three years. He was convicted on five counts of tax evasion related to cum-ex transactions. Steck played a central role in setting up multiple fund structures that were used in the scheme, as well as complex offshore payment systems to launder the illicit profits. According to the court ruling, Steck admitted that dividend tax refunds were obtained without actual tax payments. He personally earned €23-million (about R448.5-million) from these trades. Steck cooperated extensively with German authorities, helping to recover more than €660-million (about R12.87-billion) in fraudulent tax refunds. As part of his probation, he is required to continue repaying millions of euros. Both Steck's conviction and his continuing cooperation with authorities could have repercussions for Investec – if not legal, then most certainly reputational. A massive leak of documents around the fraud that formed the basis of our previous reporting on the story included extensive evidence of the involvement of Investec's UK and Ireland arm, as well as some direct interactions between Investec staff and Steck. Investec's investment in cum-ex AmaBhungane previously reported in a three-part series that Investec was also involved in facilitating deals where US pension funds were used for similar cum-ex scams. We additionally revealed that Investec supported infamous trader Frank Vogel's company MF Finance with up to €12.7-billion (about R263-billion) between 2011 and 2015. One particularly revealing detail in the leak is a meeting that took place on 19 January 2010 at the Frankfurt offices of the now-defunct law firm Dewey & LeBoeuf in Germany. According to documents seen by amaBhungane, Investec's then-head of equity finance in Dublin, Loman Gallagher, and deal structurer Michael Byrne attended the meeting alongside Steck, convicted cum-ex figure Hanno Berger and representatives of Zeta Financial Partners, a boutique advisory firm that worked on tax arbitrage structures. The leaked documents describe the 'cum-ex nature' of the trades being 'openly discussed from the onset', with all parties 'very familiar' with the mechanisms. The documents also indicate that some guarantees and decisions were discussed with, or escalated to, Investec's head office in Johannesburg, implying high-level awareness of the deals. Our investigation suggested that Investec had been acting with the apparent approval of senior Investec managers, including now-deceased executive director Alan Tapnack. Among the leaked documents there is also a legal opinion that Investec commissioned from Steck. Following Steck's conviction, amaBhungane sent questions to Investec, including whether the January 2010 meeting took place as described, whether Gallagher and Byrne had sought or received approval from the bank's leadership, and whether any employees had since been charged or subpoenaed. The bank did not answer specific questions, instead referring amaBhungane to its March 2025 financial statements and a press release issued on 14 September 2024. Per the financial statements: 'The group also holds a provision that reflects the estimate of financial outflows that could arise as a result of investigations concerning historical German dividend tax arbitrage transactions.' The size of this provision is not, however, disclosed to shareholders. Investec does admit though that its 'historical involvement in German dividend tax arbitrage transactions (cum-ex) continues to pose a significant risk. Ongoing investigations by the Cologne Public Prosecutor and the German Federal Tax Office create uncertainty around the ultimate financial impact, potentially affecting provisions and disclosures in the financial statements. While the group is cooperating with authorities, the ongoing investigations and potential for civil litigation create significant uncertainty.' For South Africans, the unfolding scandal matters not just because of Investec's prominence, but also because it raises broader questions about the governance practices of financial institutions operating across borders. Steck's sentencing is one of many. His cooperation, along with the mounting legal momentum in Germany, may yet lead to more prosecutions and further disclosures. For Investec, the legal risk remains unresolved. Its financial statements acknowledge a 'significant risk' and 'uncertainty'. But the reputational damage – and questions about ethical accountability – may prove even harder to contain. Whether Investec acted knowingly or recklessly is now the question that regulators, courts and perhaps the public will be forced to confront.

Unlock your tax savings: a guide to navigating auto-assessments
Unlock your tax savings: a guide to navigating auto-assessments

The Star

time21 hours ago

  • The Star

Unlock your tax savings: a guide to navigating auto-assessments

Dieketseng Maleke | Published 1 week ago As the 2025 tax season gets underway, millions of South Africans have already received their auto-assessments from the South African Revenue Service (Sars). But while these automatically generated assessments may seem like a welcome convenience, financial experts are urging taxpayers to proceed with caution before simply clicking "accept." 'Auto-assessments should not be accepted blindly,' warns Thys van Zyl, CEO of Everest Wealth Advisory. 'Tax season is, in fact, a golden opportunity to reduce your tax liability and potentially even receive a refund.' Van Zyl stresses that although Sars uses third-party data to calculate auto-assessments, these calculations may not include all the deductions you're entitled to. 'The reality is that not all allowable deductions are necessarily included. Additional deductions may include extra medical expenses, charitable donations, and home office or travel allowances. If you simply accept the auto-assessment, you may get less back than you're actually entitled to," he says. According to Van Zyl, if you've already received an auto-assessment and refund but realise you've missed important deductions, all is not lost. Taxpayers can still submit a tax return manually to correct or supplement the information provided by Sars. 'It's often wise to set aside the refund until the amended return has been processed. Just as it is every taxpayer's responsibility to ensure their tax return accurately reflects their income and expenses, they must also make sure they are refunded if they've overpaid or qualify for deductions," says Van Zyl. He says, importantly, taxpayers remain legally accountable for any errors, even if those originate from Sars' side. 'That's why you should always make sure your information is complete. If you notice any mistakes or omissions, you must request an amendment before accepting the assessment. Claiming that Sars calculated it and that it must therefore be correct will unfortunately not hold up. If you don't submit the correct information, it may result in penalties and interest on overdue tax – or, in severe cases, even criminal consequences," Van Zyl says. The 2025 tax season officially opened on July 7, with the rollout of auto-assessments. Taxpayers who want or need to submit returns manually can do so from July 21 to October 20, 2025, while provisional taxpayers have until January 19, 2026. According to Sars, 5.8 million taxpayers received auto-assessments this year, up from 5 million in 2024. Sars says 99.6% of those assessments have remained unchanged by taxpayers so far, and R10.6 billion in refunds have already been paid, most within 72 hours. Still, Van Zyl encourages South Africans to take a proactive approach: 'Tax season is an opportunity to take control of your finances and make the most of legal deductions and benefits.' Van Zyl says the most powerful tools available to taxpayers are: Tax-Free Investments: You can invest up to R36,000 per year (or R500,000 over your lifetime) tax-free, with no tax on dividends, interest, or capital gains. Retirement Contributions: You can deduct contributions to retirement funds up to 27.5% of the greater of your taxable income or remuneration, capped at R350,000 annually. 'It's smart to ask yourself during tax season: How can I make my money work for me? Even small contributions to a tax-free savings account or retirement annuity can make a big difference over time, especially thanks to the power of compound growth," Van Zyl says. Sars says the auto-assessment process is part of its broader drive to become a 'smart, modern' tax authority, using artificial intelligence, machine learning, and big data to streamline compliance. So far, more than 2.1 million taxpayers have engaged Sars through its digital channels, including: Online Query System (SOQS) WhatsApp (707,000 queries) Lwazi Chat Bot eFiling and the SARS MobiApp, which saw over 10.2 million logins since July 4. Sars commissioner Edward Kieswetter praised the success of this year's auto-assessment initiative, calling it 'a game changer' in making tax compliance easier. 'Ultimately, our aim is to make the best service to be no service at all. I encourage taxpayers to use our digital channels rather than queue at our Service Centres," he says. However, Sars also cautions taxpayers to be alert to scams. They remind users that Sars will never request engagement through unofficial links and urges the public to protect their login details and consult only registered tax practitioners. Suspicious messages or phishing attempts should be reported to [email protected] . 'Make sure your details are up to date, keep all necessary documentation, and use the legal mechanisms available to reduce what you owe – or to get something back. If you plan smartly and file on time, you can not only stay compliant but benefit from the process as well," Van Zyl says. Helpful Sars resources for 2025 Filing Season: Website: Online Query System: SOQS WhatsApp: 0800 117 277 (send 'Hi') SARS AI Virtual Assistant: Available 24/7 on the website Dial: 134 7277# for mobile access 7277# for mobile access YouTube: @sarstax PERSONAL FINANCE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store