Trump taps Missouri attorney general to be No. 2 at FBI
Bailey, a former prosecutor who has been serving as the attorney general of Missouri since January 2023, interviewed with Trump at Mar-a-Lago during the transition for the role of U.S. Attorney General.
The announcement comes as anger over the Epstein Files roils the MAGA base and has exposed fractures within the FBI. Bongino has been at odds with Bondi over the handling of the sensitive documents — at one point privately threatening to resign. That created an untenable working condition even if he later went back to work.
Bailey's tenure as Missouri AG has included high-profile moves aligned with Trump's interests, including a long-shot petition filed last year with the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to lift the gag order against Trump and delay his New York sentencing until after the Nov. 5 election.
Bailey was appointed in 2023 to fill a mid-term vacancy after the previous Missouri attorney general, Eric Schmitt, was elected to the U.S. Senate. He won a full term in November after defeating Trump White House staff secretary Will Scharf in the Republican primary.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil Slips as Trump Ramps Up Diplomatic Push to End Ukraine War
(Bloomberg) -- Oil slid as traders weighed the outlook for a ceasefire in Ukraine, with President Donald Trump pushing for a summit between Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelenskiy after a series of high-level talks. A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds Brent dropped below $66 a barrel, remaining within the narrow range in which prices have been stuck for the last two weeks. Any eventual peace deal could pave the way for fewer restrictions on Russian crude exports, though Moscow has largely kept its oil flowing since the conflict began. Trump called the Russian president and urged him to start making plans for a one-on-one meeting with Zelenskiy after discussions with the Ukrainian leader on Monday at the White House. The talks between Trump and Zelenskiy appeared to represent a reversal of fortune for Kyiv just days after the US president met Putin in Alaska and said the onus to end the conflict rested with Ukraine. Oil is more than 10% lower this year due to concerns about the fallout from US trade policies and the outlook for oversupply as OPEC+ brings back barrels. Any impact from the talks on the Ukraine war is still uncertain. 'Crude may be in for a holding pattern,' said Vandana Hari, the founder of oil market analysis firm Vanda Insights in Singapore. 'The path to resolving the conflict has opened up but could be a long one.' Despite the diplomacy, attacks from both sides continue. Ukraine said it carried out a fresh strike on Russia's Druzhba oil pipeline system on Monday, halting a conduit that's important for crude supply to parts of central Europe. Ukraine said Russia hit a domestic oil refinery in the country overnight. While crude prices have been largely sandwiched in a range as a result of thinner summer trading volumes and ongoing efforts to end the war, other market gauges have had a busier August. On the US Gulf Coast, crude barrels are fetching some of their biggest premiums in months, in a sign that more supplies could be heading for export over the next few weeks. At the same time, the US benchmark is trading at its biggest discount relative to Brent since April, another factor that could boost overseas shipments. --With assistance from Charlie Zhu and Sarah Chen. Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Yosemite Employee Fired After Flying Trans Pride Flag ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Newsweek
20 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Has a Chance To Stop Putin—But He Can't Do It Alone
Donald Trump's second-term foreign policies are turning out to be a string of disasters—alienating allies, driving India towards Russia, sowing uncertainties with whipsaw tariff changes that rattle markets, zeroing out foreign development aid, and continuing to supply an Israeli prime minister who has descended into a frenzy of revenge killing and destruction. Now Trump's latest bid to end the long war of attrition in Ukraine, parts of which Russia has occupied since the annexation of Crimea in 2014, appears only to have strengthened Vladimir Putin's hand. Before meeting the Russian president in Alaska, Trump had for weeks threatened new sanctions on Russia if Putin did not agree to a ceasefire and the start of peace talks. Instead, Putin got validation, refused to stop his total war on Ukraine's civilian infrastructure, and Trump has backed off the sanctions threat, right when Russia's economy is starting to falter. Worse, Trump now looks likely to press Ukrainian leaders to give up not just Crimea, but the country's eastern provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk, where Putin ginned up separatist movements before his February 2022 invasion. And worse still, Trump may pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to yield most of Ukraine's vital southeastern provinces on the Black Sea as well. Such an outcome would reward the greatest violations of international law in Europe since Adolf Hitler's occupation of Poland. That would be a catastrophe of epic proportions that is sure to enourage dictators worldwide. In exchange, Trump's foreign envoy Steve Witkoff is talking about a "security guarantee" that would promise Ukraine direct military intervention by the U.S., Britain, and France if Russia tries to bite off more Ukrainian lands in future. But Witkoff and Trump appear not to know that Ukraine already received such supposed protection at the end of the Cold War in exchange for giving up its nuclear weapons: Russia promised to respect Ukraine's new borders, and the U.S., U.K., France, and China promised to enforce this deal. TOPSHOT - Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and US President Donald Trump participate in a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on August 18, 2025. TOPSHOT - Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and US President Donald Trump participate in a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on August 18, 2025. MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images Putin proved that 1994 guarantee to be hollow, just as Hitler's meeting with Neville Chamberlain taught the "Fuhrer" that he could get away with seizing part of Czechoslovakia. So it's no wonder Putin is willing to trade another such Western "guarantee" in exchange for total triumph in Ukraine's east and southeast. In his eyes, that is a lot of something for nothing. But Trump's instincts, if naive, are not entirely wrong: a tighter economic vise could move Putin to concessions. Direct and secondary sanctions, like tariffs, can be used as effective tools of pressure under the right conditions. Trump's fundamental error lies in not realizing that these tools would be far stronger when wielded not by the U.S. alone, but by a global alliance of democracies of the kind that John McCain had the foresight to advocate in 2008. Such a league of democratic states has to be broader than Europe. It must include Asian and potentially southern hemisphere partners that are not part of NATO. While we should try to coordinate with our European partners on any new sanctions against Russia, U.S. leaders must also be realistic: the EU is not going to mount a credible challenge to Putin's mass-murdering depravity, which has violated all the most sacred principles of international law. Europe's paper tigers could have placed forces from their own nations into eastern Ukraine in January 2022 to enforce the 1994 treaty, thereby preventing the entire war. Instead they dithered, wrung their hands, and eventually imposed largely ineffective sanctions, while delaying shipments of tanks, long-range missiles, anti-missile defenses, and fighter aircraft to Ukraine. And as usual, they shamelessly waited for the United States to take the lead against yet another assault on democracy and human rights on their own continent. About this, Trump's instincts have been correct: weakness, cowardice, and appeasement has been the EU's policy against tyranny since the 1990s—and this has weakened NATO as well. Even with the strong resolve of British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to get European members to rebuild credible offensive armed forces and do their share within the NATO alliance, it will take time for them to catch up—time that Ukraine does not have. But imagine a broader alliance that includes most of NATO and the EU, along with South Korea, Japan, Australia, the Philippines, and potentially also India. Imagine that all the governments within this new bloc collectively imposed new sanctions banning commerce of all kinds coming from Russia (including natural gas)—and combined this with 50 percent extra tariffs on goods coming from any country that trades with Russia. That would put China in danger of losing over half of its export markets unless it cut economic ties with Putin. If Trump could manage this feat, he might actually end Russia's total war on Ukraine's people, and force Putin to abandon most of the stolen territory. Trump needs to learn that a united front of many large-economy nations is far more powerful than the U.S. acting alone. Imagine how much stronger the free world would be as a result. Trump could offer to make such a new alliance into a free trade bloc with mutual economic protections, which would bring nations into an economic alliance of all democracies in the OECD. Instead, he has returned to the unilateralist strategy that failed under George W. Bush, which led McCain to his landmark proposal. Such a global democratic alliance would be the sort of institution that, like NATO, can give a real security guarantee. With inspiring leadership, it could endure the stress that enforcing a total global embargo on Russia would mean. Its allied leaders would have to explain to their peoples that we have reached a critical moment: it is now or never to break Putin's tyrannical empire. This would also require a massive new effort to supply Europe with natural gas from non-Russian sources and to supply India with oil, which would cut off Russia's main revenue stream. It would be a bit like the Berlin airlift, an act of shared sacrifice and determination to return the arc of history to its proper trajectory—towards freedom, democracy, and hope for all peoples on Earth. Then we, rather than Putin, would be "holding all the cards." John Davenport is professor of philosophy and director of peace and justice studies at Fordham University. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Boston Globe
22 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump widens metal tariffs to target baby gear and motorcycles
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'We've had a lot of these 11th-hour implementations throughout 2025, this one in particular impacts every single client I have to an enormous degree,' Michigan-based customs broker Shannon Bryant said in an interview. Advertisement 'Earlier announcements at least had some in-transit exemptions so at least importers could make reasonable buying decisions,' said Bryant, president of trade compliance advisory service, Trade IQ. 'This one was unique in that way — it's very much a 'gotcha.'' The new list includes auto parts, chemicals, plastics and furniture components — demonstrating the reach of Trump's authority to use sectoral tariffs. That is separate from the executive power he invoked for his so-called reciprocal tariffs. Advertisement 'Basically, if it's shiny, metallic, or remotely related to steel or aluminum, it's probably on the list,' Brian Baldwin, a vice president of customs in the US at logistics giant Kuehne + Nagel International AG, wrote in a post on LinkedIn. 'This isn't just another tariff — it's a strategic shift in how steel and aluminum derivatives are regulated.' Compliance costs The difficulty with applying tariffs to derivative products lies in determining what percentage of an item is made from the targeted materials. Flexport, a digital freight forwarder, said in a blog post that 'for many brands, this means chasing suppliers for detailed data: aluminum weight, percentage of customs value, and country of cast/smelt.' The compliance burden, Flexport said, 'is significant.' This tranche of tariffs is also particularly expansive, including items such as motorcycles, cargo handling equipment, baby booster seats, tableware and personal care products that come in metal containers or packaging. Jason Miller, a professor of supply chain management at Michigan State University, conservatively estimates that the metals tariffs now cover about $328 billion worth of goods, based on 2024 import data. That's six times greater than in 2018 and a big jump from the $191 billion worth of goods covered prior to the change, he said in an email to Bloomberg News. Broker's plea Bryant, whose clients include cosmetics and commercial cookware importers, sent a letter to her elected officials in Washington on Monday warning that the complexity of overlapping tariffs is becoming unworkable even for professionals. 'For small importers,' she wrote, 'it's impossible.' 'I'm trying to think of a client that's not impacted,' Bryant said. 'These are American companies that employ American people that are being ambushed by their own government.' Advertisement Trump first imposed steel and aluminum tariffs in 2018 with the goal of boosting US output by making it more expensive for Americans to buy foreign material. But several major suppliers including Canada, Mexico and the European Union were ultimately exempted, and US industries have said they're still struggling to compete with imports. Big steel applauds In June, Trump fulfilled a campaign promise by doubling the levy on steel and aluminum to 50% and also sought feedback from industry on how to broaden it further. Lourenco Goncalves, chief executive officer of US steelmaker Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., applauded the expanded tariff list in a statement on Monday, thanking the Trump administration for 'taking decisive and concrete action that will deter tariff circumvention occurring in plain sight with stainless and electrical steel derivative products.' There's very likely more to come. At the end of July, the Trump administration imposed a 50% duty on semi-finished copper imports valued at more than $15 billion and ordered officials to come up with a plan to slap tariffs on an array of other copper-intensive goods. 'This isn't over,' said Pete Mento, DSV's global customs director, in a social media post on Monday. 'The next list will surely be for copper and I expect that to be equally as miserable.' Reference Shelf: Chaotic Tariff Rollout Leaves US Importers Short on Details (1) US INSIGHT: Importers Still Cover Most Tariffs Despite Revisions Why Trump Doubled Down on Steel and Aluminum Tariffs: QuickTake
