
New Mexico to allow ‘Idaho stop' so cyclists can roll through stop signs
Starting on July 1, people riding bicycles in New Mexico will be able to ride through stop signs without coming to a full stop, and stop at red traffic lights and continue even if the light hasn't turned green — as long as it's safe to do so.
That's according to a new state law Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham signed on Friday.
Senate Bill 73 changes New Mexico's traffic law to allow cyclists to treat stop signs as yield signs, and to treat red traffic lights as stop signs and proceed if there are no other cars, cyclists or pedestrians.
While it may seem counterintuitive to people who don't use bicycles, this is already common practice among bicycle riders in New Mexico because a cyclist wants to carry their momentum on the bike, said Sen. Antoinette Sedillo Lopez, who carried the bill, during a hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Doing this gets the cyclist out of the blind spot of motorists who have stopped at an intersection, Sedillo Lopez told the committee.
Eric Biedermann, a board member at-large of nonprofit advocacy organization BikeABQ, told the committee being able to treat a stop sign as a yield sign and a traffic light as a stop sign enhances cyclist safety because it reduces their exposure to cars, increases their visibility to cars and reduces the risk of being 'right hooked' if a car doesn't see them or a 'left cross' from oncoming traffic.
'There are a number of ways in which being able to proceed through an intersection with a head start before the cars move really enhances cyclist safety,' Biedermann told the committee. He was also speaking on behalf of Bike Santa Fe and Velo Cruces.
The so-called 'Idaho stop' — taking its name from the first U.S. state to ease traffic laws for cyclists — resulted in a 14.5% reduction in cyclist injuries a year after the state of Idaho enacted a similar law in 1982, according to a review of Idaho Office of Highway Safety data.
In New Mexico, between 2019 and 2023, 1,457 cyclists had crashes, according to the University of New Mexico Geospatial and Population Studies Center. Of those, 39 were killed, 115 were seriously injured and 694 were able to walk away.
Lynn Pickard, a retired New Mexico Court of Appeals judge and member of Santa Fe Seniors on Bikes, told the committee data show that as many as half of collisions between cars and bikes happen within intersections.
'So anything we can do to get cyclists into and out of the intersections quickly — leaving of course, for us, to determine our own safety if there are other cars there or pedestrians there — would be really helpful for us,' she said.
Source New Mexico, like the Idaho Capital Sun, is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Source New Mexico maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Julia Goldberg for questions: info@sourcenm.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
12-05-2025
- Yahoo
New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department ordered to pay more than $30,000 in IPRA case
May 11—A research institute in New Mexico has won a lawsuit against the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department over violations of the Inspection of Public Records Act. The Southwest Public Policy Institute (SPPI) — a think tank headquartered in New Mexico that examines data-driven policies and advocates for limited government and personal freedom — sued the NMTRD after the department refused to give SPPI access to the Motor Vehicle Division database, a division of the NMTRD, for research purposes. The institute requested records under the Inspection of Public Records Act, a New Mexico state law that guarantees the public has access to public records held by government entities. The institute planned to study the effects of Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham's electric vehicle mandate, which requires manufacturers deliver an increasing number of zero- and low-emission vehicles to the state beginning with 43% of model year 2027 cars. Specifically, the study would analyze how the mandate would affect lower income and minority residents. Patrick Brenner, president of SPPI, said the policy did not take New Mexican residents and their needs into perspective, something the institute wanted to highlight in its research. The NMTRD declined to comment. After SPPI filed a complaint to enforce IPRA in state district court, the two parties failed to come to an agreement during mediation. After a one-day trial in January, 1st Judicial District Court Judge Bryan Biedscheid ruled in favor of SPPI, and NMTRD was required to allow the institute access to MVD databases, and pay $30,796.93 to cover SPPI's attorneys' fees and litigation costs. "I think what really happened was just a fundamental misunderstanding of their obligations under the Inspection of Public Records Act," Brenner said. "It was not necessarily a malicious attempt to hide data." Brenner said that while the court ruled in SPPI's favor, he was not necessarily pleased with the results, stating that SPPI could have been awarded more money to discourage the state from inadequately responding to public records requests in the future. "Unfortunately, Judge Biedscheid split the baby," Brenner said. "He did it in a way where he strategically eliminated any possibility for the institute to appeal because he ruled in our favor, but he removed our ability to collect additional damages by not awarding any of the statutory damages outlined in IPRA." With the information acquired after the lawsuit, SPPI plans to produce a consumer-facing report that will show the demographics of people who own electric vehicles and the demographics of those who would be negatively affected by the mandate.

Yahoo
12-05-2025
- Yahoo
New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department ordered to pay more than $30,000 in IPRA case
May 11—A research institute in New Mexico has won a lawsuit against the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department over violations of the Inspection of Public Records Act. The Southwest Public Policy Institute (SPPI) — a think tank headquartered in New Mexico that examines data-driven policies and advocates for limited government and personal freedom — sued the NMTRD after the department refused to give SPPI access to the Motor Vehicle Division database, a division of the NMTRD, for research purposes. The institute requested records under the Inspection of Public Records Act, a New Mexico state law that guarantees the public has access to public records held by government entities. The institute planned to study the effects of Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham's electric vehicle mandate, which requires manufacturers deliver an increasing number of zero- and low-emission vehicles to the state beginning with 43% of model year 2027 cars. Specifically, the study would analyze how the mandate would affect lower income and minority residents. Patrick Brenner, president of SPPI, said the policy did not take New Mexican residents and their needs into perspective, something the institute wanted to highlight in its research. The NMTRD declined to comment. After SPPI filed a complaint to enforce IPRA in state district court, the two parties failed to come to an agreement during mediation. After a one-day trial in January, 1st Judicial District Court Judge Bryan Biedscheid ruled in favor of SPPI, and NMTRD was required to allow the institute access to MVD databases, and pay $30,796.93 to cover SPPI's attorneys' fees and litigation costs. "I think what really happened was just a fundamental misunderstanding of their obligations under the Inspection of Public Records Act," Brenner said. "It was not necessarily a malicious attempt to hide data." Brenner said that while the court ruled in SPPI's favor, he was not necessarily pleased with the results, stating that SPPI could have been awarded more money to discourage the state from inadequately responding to public records requests in the future. "Unfortunately, Judge Biedscheid split the baby," Brenner said. "He did it in a way where he strategically eliminated any possibility for the institute to appeal because he ruled in our favor, but he removed our ability to collect additional damages by not awarding any of the statutory damages outlined in IPRA." With the information acquired after the lawsuit, SPPI plans to produce a consumer-facing report that will show the demographics of people who own electric vehicles and the demographics of those who would be negatively affected by the mandate.
Yahoo
04-04-2025
- Yahoo
Marijuana billboard ban, towing rules stripped from Senate's BMV bill, but advance in House
From left: Rep. Bob Morris questions Rep. Jim Pressel about towing regulations on the House floor on Thursday, April 3, 2025. (Leslie Bonilla Muñiz/Indiana Capital Chronicle) A finance-focused Senate panel excised a billboard-specific ban on marijuana advertising and regulations on towing services from the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles's legislation Thursday morning — hours before the House advanced tweaked versions. Commercial driver's license (CDL) reciprocity also got the ax, with lawmakers citing immigration-related fears. Appropriations Committee chair Sen. Ryan Mishler, said the marijuana and towing provisions were nixed — just a week after both were inserted — because they weren't germane to the underlying agency bill. The edits were accepted by consent. But both ideas advanced in the House that same afternoon. Rep. Jim Pressel, R-Rolling Prairie, commandeered Senate Bill 73 in a Monday committee hearing for amendments outlawing all marijuana advertising and regulating towing. He made further changes on the House floor Thursday — despite opposition from fellow Republicans — setting up a contentious vote as soon as next week. Lawmakers cited illegal immigration as they scrapped a provision allowing CDL holders from other states to get Indiana CDLs without the written or skills exams. 'There are other states in our union that hand out driver's licenses like candy,' said amendment author Sen. Aaron Freeman, R-Indianapolis. '… I'm fine if they follow the Indiana process to get a license. I am not fine if that process is California's or New York's or name your other state's process, and I wanted to ensure that I didn't have a non-citizen getting a license.' Freeman promised to undo the change 'if this needs to go back in.' Pressel said CDL requirements are federal, describing them as another layer of standards that lie atop state mandates. He resisted the amendment, but added, 'This is not a hill I'm going to die on. If you all would like to take it out, I'm okay with that.' The committee adopted the changes by consent. But some expressed hesitation. CDL holder Sen. Jeff Raatz, R-Richmond noted the tests take 'a lot of time and money.' Sen. Liz Brown, R-Fort Wayne, said her district is a major logistics hub, and would benefit from reciprocity. She instructed her colleagues to 'get this figured out.' The committee advanced Senate Bill 1390 — sans deletions — on a 12-1 vote. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX