Man facing federal firearms charge after allegedly brandishing a gun at Nashville ‘No Kings' protest
A teenager from central Tennessee is facing a federal firearms charge after allegedly brandishing a gun at a 'No Kings' protest in Nashville, the Department of Justice announced Monday.
Elijah Millar, 19, of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, attended the June 14 protest near Bicentennial Capitol Mall State Park in downtown Nashville, where he allegedly spat at and yelled at protesters before pulling out a gun, federal prosecutors said. Millar was a counterprotester, the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department said. He kept his gun pointed at the ground, but left 'others in the crowd in fear,' police said.
The demonstration was part of the nationwide 'No Kings' day of protests on June 14, which saw people come together at more than 2,000 events across the country to protest Trump administration policies, organizers said.
The protests were largely peaceful, but isolated incidents – including a deadly shooting at the Salt Lake City, Utah, protest, did occur.
In Nashville, officers arrested Millar at the scene, seizing the pistol, and charging him with disorderly conduct, police said. Days later, in a separate incident, Murfreesboro police found Millar carrying another loaded firearm, the Justice Department said.
Federal prosecutors said Monday they charged Millar with a count of unlawful possession of a firearm.
They cited a 2023 case that barred Millar from owning or possessing firearms under a conservatorship order issued by the Chancery Court in Rutherford County. The court found Millar to be 'at risk of substantial harm to his health, safety, and welfare,' and restricted his access to firearms. A 2024 court order reaffirmed these restrictions, describing him as a 'disabled person needing care, prosecutors said.
'The right to peaceably protest government action is guaranteed by the First Amendment and cannot be infringed upon by armed individuals whose actions put people in danger,' said Robert E. McGuire, acting US Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee. 'Our efforts to hold firearm offenders accountable are designed to keep all members of the public safe from potential violence.'
If convicted, Millar could face up to 15 years in federal prison and a $250,000 fine.
The case is being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation Nashville Field Office, the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department and the Murfreesboro Police Department, the Justice Department said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Army veteran killed in suspected road rage incident in Fort Bend County
FORT BEND COUNTY, Texas (KIAH) — Fort Bend County investigators are looking into the shooting death of an Army veteran as a possible case of road rage. Authorities say 25-year-old Roy Ferrer was shot around noon Saturday on Highway 6 near West Bellfort, in the Four Corners area. His vehicle was later found crashed on the side of the road near an Aldi grocery store. Full story:
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
5 Top Ways Your Paycheck Will Change If the Supreme Court Allows Mass Layoffs
In recent news, it was announced that the Trump Administration's mass layoff plan — also called a 'reduction in force' plan — has once again moved to the Supreme Court for final approval. If it passes, 22 government departments could be affected as thousands of federal employees would be let go from their jobs. Read Next: Find Out: If the Supreme Court allows this mass layoff, it could have a ripple effect across both federal and non-federal employees. Here's how experts think it might impact workers in the U.S. — and potentially your paycheck. Recent changes have already impacted employees across the board. For federal workers, there's a significant increase of those being forced to leave the workforce without severance pay. 'While, initially, many of the federal workers cut from the workforce accepted a voluntary incentive to leave the ranks earlier than they might otherwise have left, there are thousands more who were simply severed without compensation,' said Eric Steffy, Founder and CEO at Federal Solutions Support. Steffy added that many of those who were severed without pay were employees who were still on probation and contract workers. That said, many of those severed are still eligible for state unemployment benefits as they seek new opportunities in the private sector. Mass layoffs in the federal government could have implications regarding job stability and workplace confidence. 'Even for non-federal workers, substantial cuts in the federal workforce can create impacts on job stability, local economic systems, and public confidence,' said Eric Kingsley, Partner at Kingsley Szamet Employment Lawyers. 'It is possible that we can witness shrinking consumer spending, increased competition for available jobs, and a general sense of insecurity pervading the job market.' Increased competition could also lead to more skilled workers vying for jobs with a lower starting salary. This is especially plausible as more federal workers seek private sector opportunities. The average federal worker earns $106,382 annually. However, federal workers often get paid less than their private sector counterparts. As per The Federal News Network, there's a 24.72% wage gap between federal and private sector workers who have jobs where they perform similar duties. Given this, federal employees who get laid off and need to make the switch could see a pay increase. Just because many people would be laid off doesn't mean everybody would be. After all, someone still needs to perform the tasks at hand. But even here, there could be the downside of heavier workloads and more responsibilities for those who remain. Some experts believe this could also lead to longer hours, potentially without overtime pay — that's more work. 'Salaried employees, who are not eligible for overtime pay, may be expected to work longer hours without additional compensation,' said George Carrillo, former Director of Social Determinants of Health for Oregon and current Co-founder & Chief Executive Officer at Hispanic Construction Council. 'Hourly workers typically won't see a pay increase either, since government compensation is fixed within existing budget agreements and union contracts.' Another potential impact is that on small businesses — both the owners and the employees. As Steffy pointed out, many small businesses work in part based on federal grants and contracts. This has led to some businesses shutting down permanently, while others have laid off some of their employees as a result of canceled contracts. 'This has been painful not only for those business owners who must now weigh whether their work can go forward, but for severed employees now without a paycheck and those downstream who benefited from their services,' Steffy said. Mass layoffs on any level are stressful, but they're not the end of the world. 'One thing is certain, the marketplace will continue to evolve. Federal and non-federal jobs will come and go but the skillset, mindset, and lifetime experience that you bring to the table are needed in multiple venues,' said Steffy. If you're stressing about your livelihood, take a moment to calm down. It might help to talk to someone you trust and to make a plan — just in case. More From GOBankingRates 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on 5 Top Ways Your Paycheck Will Change If the Supreme Court Allows Mass Layoffs
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
DOJ Sues Against Law That Church Threatened To Excommunicate Priests Over
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit against a new law that demands priests report child abuse revealed during private confession. One American Archbishop and other Catholic Church figures warned priests will be excommunicated for obiding by Washington State's new law set to take effect on July 27. Why It Matters The issue spotlights the enduring tension between religious freedom and the state's duty to protect children from abuse. The laws proponents argue it's necessary to help safeguard against child abuse, while critics argue that compelling clergy to breach the confessional seal damages their ability to practise religion freely. The outcome may influence how other states approach mandated reporting requirements for clergy, especially as constitutional and civil rights groups enter the debate. Stock image shows a priest in the confessional recites the rosary awaiting penitent. Stock image shows a priest in the confessional recites the rosary awaiting penitent. Getty Images What To Know The Democrat-led state of Washington passed a law in May requiring clergy to report any suspected child abuse and neglect learned during confession, which was previously exempt, within 48 hours of hearing of it. The Archdiocese of Seattle responded, saying: "Catholic clergy may not violate the seal of confession—or they will be excommunicated from the Church." Archbishop Paul Etienne of Seattle said: "Priests cannot comply with this law if the knowledge of abuse is obtained during the Sacrament of Reconciliation." The Justice Department's lawsuit backed the Catholic leaders in a legal filing on Monday, arguing the law "unlawfully targets clergy and, specifically, Catholic priests" and "directly interferes with and substantially burdens this sacred rite" of confession. "Complying with [new law] SB 5375 under these circumstances would place Catholic priests fundamentally at odds with the core tenets and beliefs of their religion, and even prohibit them from continuing to serve as priests in the Catholic church," it added. "Under Catholic canon law, priests are "prohibited completely from using knowledge acquired from confession to the detriment of the penitent even when any danger of revelation is excluded." Washington Senator Noel Frame, a Democrat who sponsored the initial bill, has rejected church leaders' talk of excommunicating priests, and suggested the church change its own rules. "I am reminded that Canon law has changed many times over the years in the Catholic faith and there's nothing to say they cannot change their rules to allow the reporting of real time abuse and neglect of children," she told NPR last month. "That is within their power to change and I think they should so." The Justice Department, in a news release announcing the lawsuit, argued the bill "violates the free exercise of religion for all Catholics, and requires Catholic priests to violate the confidentiality seal of Confession" and would deprive them of the free exercise of religion, something protected under the first amendment and the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment. They added that this would subject them to "immediate excommunication from the Catholic Church." What People Are Saying Mark Shanahan, who teaches American politics at the University of Surrey in the U.K., told Newsweek via email on Tuesday: "The DoJ has a history of intervening where States impose laws that appear to impinge on citizens' rights to practice religion freely. In so doing, it is upholding rights enshrined by the First Amendment. While the Washington Senate Bill may be making the headlines now, it's just the latest in a long line of state laws that have fallen foul of Constitutional rights." Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division said in a release: "Laws that explicitly target religious practices such as the Sacrament of Confession in the Catholic Church have no place in our society. Senate Bill 5375 unconstitutionally forces Catholic priests in Washington to choose between their obligations to the Catholic Church and their penitents or face criminal consequences, while treating the priest-penitent privilege differently than other well-settled privileges. The Justice Department will not sit idly by when States mount attacks on the free exercise of religion." In a statement to KOIN 6 News, Washington Governor Bob Ferguson, who signed the law, said: "It is disappointing, but not surprising, to see the DOJ seek to shield and protect child abusers." What Happens Next The law is set to go into effect on July 27. Meanwhile, it is facing another lawsuit from bishops of the Archdiocese of Seattle and the dioceses of Spokane and Yakima who raised concerns about religious freedom.
