logo
Montana snowpack near normal for most regions

Montana snowpack near normal for most regions

Yahoo14-05-2025
The Jefferson River near Cardwell, Montana, on June 19, 2024. (Photo by Blair Miller, Daily Montanan)
As Montana moves towards warmer weather, scientists with the U.S. Department of Agriculture continue to monitor the status of the state's snowpack and forecast how the waterways will flow this summer. But, much of the state appears to be better shape than the same time last year.
Most sites in Montana have passed their peak snow water equivalent accumulation for the season, with a majority of sites reaching near to below normal peak snowpack.
That's according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), which released its May Water Supply Outlook Report last week.
'The shift to spring brought to a close the bulk of the snowpack accumulation season and started the snowmelt and runoff season,' said Florence Millers, a NRCS hydrologist, in a press release about the report.
Weather in April was slightly warmer than normal for much of the state, while precipitation varied. Across the southwest and central Montana, precipitation for the year is near normal, while in the Northwest, an early water deficit has not been overcome, and the region is between 75-90% of median precipitation.
'Several April warm spells that brought periods of above normal temperatures and initiated snowmelt across many low-to mid-elevation SNOTEL sites,' Miller said.
As of May 1, snowpack percentages in the southwest and central parts of the state range between 95-110% of median, while snowpack in the western portion of the state has decreased to between 75-90% of median. The Sun-Teton-Marias basis saw 'well below normal' snowpack throughout the winter and is at just 61% of median snow water equivalent.
Snow-water equivalent, rather than snow depth, is the measurement used to gauge the amount of liquid water contained within snowpack, which will be released when the snowpack melts. The snowmelt plays a key role in agriculture, hydropower production, water storage, aquatic ecosystem health and recreation such as boating and fishing, as well as flood and drought forecasting.
The May water supply report highlights that while some early season melt has already occurred at some monitoring sites across the state, 'there is still a lot of water stored within the higher elevation snowpacks' and weather in the coming weeks will shape the water supply for the summer.
In April, the Beartooth and Bighorn mountains saw roughly double their normal precipitation for the month, much of it as snow, bolstering water supply in the regions. The Flathead and Kootenai basins also saw much more precipitation than average, which could benefit Flathead Lake in the early summer months.
The Tongue River Basin in the Bighorn Mountains has the highest snowpack compared to the 20-year median, according to NRCS data, at 111%. Meanwhile the Sun-Teton-Marias basin measured just 61% of median as of May 1.
Despite relatively good conditions throughout April, much of Montana is under drought conditions, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor.
Nearly three-quarters of the state is under some level of drought conditions, which range from 'abnormally dry' to 'exceptional drought.'
More than 43% of the state is under 'moderate drought' conditions, while a portion of the Upper Clark Fork and Blackfoot basins are classified as 'severe to extreme drought.'
The water supply forecast currently predicts much of state the will be near or below normal, ranging from 70-110% of median. At the low end of that prediction scale is the Powder River basin, currently forecast at between 60-70% of normal.
The Flathead River Basin is at 86% of median snowpack, compared to 68% at this time last year. Streamflows on the main Flathead River are forecast around 80% of the 20-year average.
The Upper Clark Fork Basin is sitting at 91% of median snowpack, a significant improvement from last year when it has just 56% of normal.
The Madison River Basin has a snowpack at 86% of normal, higher than at this point last year and is forecast to have streamflows around 85% of normal.
The Upper Missouri River Basin had a May 1 snowpack of 74% of median, significantly higher than the 42% seen in 2024.
For a complete look at each river basin's snowpack conditions and streamflow forecast, visit the NRCS May report here.
Flathead Lake, the largest freshwater lake west of the Mississippi River, has become a contentious point for water policy debates following extreme drought in 2023 that saw the lake fill to less than two feet below normal.
During the 2025 Legislative session, Montana lawmakers passed a resolution supporting recreational uses on Flathead Lake to be considered during management discussion by the myriad local, state, tribal and federal partners that coordinate the lake's water level.
Energy Keepers Inc., the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes company that operates the Se̓liš Ksanka Qĺispe̓ Dam on the south end of the lake, published regular updates using the latest streamflow predictions to inform the public of where it expects the lake levels to be.
According to a May 13 update, Energy Keepers expects the lake to reach its full-pool elevation of 2,893 feet by early to mid-June.
So far, the SKQ project has not had to coordinate flood risk management changes to its operating plan, as it has done the last two years when streamflow forecasts were much lower than normal.
The latest update from Energy Keepers states that while expectations are for the lake to fill to normal levels, 'both weather and streamflows are highly uncertain.'
'SKQ Project outflows and the Flathead Lake elevation are dependent on many variables including lake inflows, weather, the demand for electricity, and non-power constraints such as the downstream fishery and flood risk management needs.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California's Gifford Fire is now a ‘megafire.' Here's what that means
California's Gifford Fire is now a ‘megafire.' Here's what that means

San Francisco Chronicle​

time09-08-2025

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

California's Gifford Fire is now a ‘megafire.' Here's what that means

The Gifford Fire, burning through the rugged backcountry of California's Central Coast, has grown into the state's largest wildfire of the year and has reached 'megafire' status, federal officials say. Igniting on Aug. 1 along State Route 166, the blaze had scorched more than 104,000 acres as of Saturday morning, with containment at just 21%, according to a federal fire update. Fire officials attribute the explosive growth to extreme heat, steep and inaccessible terrain, and dry vegetation in areas that have no recorded history of wildfire. The fire is now advancing northward into the Garcia Wilderness in Los Padres National Forest, a remote region dense with fire-prone fuel. Thousands of firefighters are battling the blaze, which has already triggered evacuation orders for more than 600 residents in San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara counties. An additional 1,500 people remain under evacuation warnings. Once rare, such large-scale fires have become more frequent across the western United States in recent decades, driven in part by climate change and increasingly severe weather patterns. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, megafires are more accurately understood through their intensity, environmental disruption and socioeconomic consequences. 'We have hot weather, and we have low relative humidity,' Santa Barbara County Fire Capt. Scott Safechuck said earlier this week. 'So we expect extreme fire behavior.' Three civilians and four firefighters have been injured since the fire began. The cause remains under investigation. Road closures are in place, and the U.S. Forest Service has restricted access to portions of the national forest through February. Local officials are urging residents to stay alert and prepared.

Have this giant, noxious weed in your yard? How to get rid of it — without burning yourself
Have this giant, noxious weed in your yard? How to get rid of it — without burning yourself

The Hill

time20-07-2025

  • The Hill

Have this giant, noxious weed in your yard? How to get rid of it — without burning yourself

(NEXSTAR) — The definition of a weed is relatively vague — a plant growing where you don't want it, experts explain — but some earn an extra adjective to describe them: noxious. That term has a federal definition, thanks to the Plant Protection Act: 'any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the public health, or the environment.' One such massive, noxious weed may be growing in your yard, waiting to burn you if you try to remove it too quickly. Heracleum mantegazzianum, better known as giant hogweed, has been present in the U.S. for more than a century, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Invasive Species Information Center. Native to parts of Asia, researchers believe hogweed may have been brought to the U.S. as an ornamental garden option 'because of its extremely large size and impressive flower.' It's also possible its seeds, common in Middle Eastern cuisine, were among spice imports. Nonetheless, the giant hogweed has found its way around the country. The plant has been positively identified in several states, including Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. The perennial plant lives up to its name, reaching heights of 20 feet with massive umbrella-like flowers that bloom between May and July. The flowers, which grow in clusters, can reach diameters of 2.5 feet, according to the Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board. Hogweed stems and stalks, reaching up to 4 inches in diameter, have purplish-red blotches and stiff hairs. The leaves have toothed edges and can grow to 5 feet wide. You can see photos of the stem, leaf and flower of a giant hogweed plant in the slideshow below. Hogweed is often found in moist areas, like along streams and rivers, where there is also shade. The massive plant is capable of causing soil erosion in these areas, which can give way for the seeds to be dispersed downstream to other areas, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources explains. It's not unlike cow parsnip, a plant native to the U.S. Cow parsnip can often appear tall, as seen in the photo below, with heads of white flowers and wide leaves. There are some notable differences between cow parsnip and giant hogweed, however. The New York Department of Environmental Conservation points to its size, for starters: Cow parsnip can reach roughly 6 feet in height, with flowers that are about a foot in diameter and leaves reaching 2 feet wide. That's all about half of the size that hogweed can reach. Officials also say cow parsnip's stems do not have the purple blotches found on hogweed. Despite their differences, both plants are capable of irritating your skin. Sap from cow parsnip leaves and stems can give you a 'blistery rash' if you have sensitive skin, officials in Maine explain. Giant hogweed sap, found on all parts of the plant, can lead to severe burns in as little as a day, Nexstar's WIVB reports. If you have sap on your skin and are in the sun, you can develop phytophotodermatitis, a skin condition brought on by chemicals found in certain plants and fruits, like citrus. 'The sap interferes with the skin's natural ability to protect itself from sunlight, resulting in severe burning and blistering,' according to an article from the University of Maryland Extension. 'If sap goes into the eyes, it can cause temporary or permanent blindness.' Phytophotodermatitis can appear like sunburn on your skin, the Mayo Clinic explains, and develop itchy patches like eczema. The condition can last for several months, with treatment limited to 'self-care measures, such as soothing the affected skin with a cool, wet cloth.' If you come in contact with giant hogweed sap, Supervising Park Ranger Chuck Bartlett of Erie County, New York, recommends washing your skin with soap and water 'as soon as absolutely possible' while avoiding sunlight. Managing hogweed in your yard or on your property can vary based on the size of the plant. As seedlings or young plants, Washington state officials say giant hogweed can be dug up or hand-pulled, as long as you're wearing protective gear to avoid contact with the sap. You can also cut back larger plants before digging them up, bagging the plant and its flowers for disposal. You may also require a herbicide treatment, which could require assistance from an expert, Minnesota officials explain. If you live in a state that has not yet confirmed the presence of hogweed and believe you have spotted the noxious weed, you may want to document the sighting and report it to agriculture or wildlife officials before removing it.

At least 200 homes damaged in New Mexico flooding that killed 3 people, officials say
At least 200 homes damaged in New Mexico flooding that killed 3 people, officials say

USA Today

time11-07-2025

  • USA Today

At least 200 homes damaged in New Mexico flooding that killed 3 people, officials say

At least 200 homes were damaged after torrential rains triggered a deadly flash flood that killed three people, including two children, as waters rapidly swept through a mountain village in New Mexico, authorities said on July 10. The village of Ruidoso, located in south-central New Mexico, was continuing recovery and clean-up efforts after heavy rains from slow-moving storms overwhelmed the Rio Ruidoso on July 8. The sudden flooding trapped dozens of people in homes, vehicles, and trees, and caused widespread damage. A man and two young children, who had been camping at an RV park, were swept downstream and later found dead, according to local authorities. One person remained unaccounted for as of July 10, said Lincoln County Emergency Manager Eric Holt. Local authorities reported that between 200 and 400 homes were damaged in the flooding, and about 65 swift water rescues were conducted. New Mexico officials, including Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, surveyed the area on July 10. The governor noted that the state received partial approval for a federal emergency declaration, which will provide immediate assistance for search and rescue teams and incident management. Lujan Grisham said at a news conference that the federal government plans to provide financial assistance, including $3 million from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and $12 million from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, to help communities rebuild. "This federal declaration is a critical first step, but it's not everything Ruidoso needs and deserves," Lujan Grisham said. "We will continue working with the federal government for every dollar and resource necessary to help this resilient community fully recover from these devastating floods." State and local officials also warned that more rain was expected in the region and that residents should remain at risk. Ruidoso is susceptible to mudslides and increased runoff following two large fires that scorched swathes of land, known as "burn scars," in 2024. "Over the coming days, we are expecting additional rain. There are homes and people that will be in harm's way," said U.S. Rep. Melanie Stansbury, whose district includes Ruidoso and surrounding Lincoln County. "We cannot lose another life. So, it's really important over the coming days that everyone follow those emergency orders." Ruidoso, a popular summer retreat as well as ski resort nestled in the Sierra Blanca mountain range, is located about 180 miles southeast of Albuquerque, the state's largest city. Texas floods: Deaths rise to 120; search for missing enters seventh day. Family recounts parents' efforts to save children The family of the two children who died in the flooding recounted in a GoFundMe page the horrific moment floodwaters swept the young siblings away and the desperate attempt by their parents to save their lives. Charlotte and Sebastian Trotter, 4 and 7 years old, were found dead on July 8 after flash flooding swept across Ruidoso and into Riverview RV Park. The children and their parents, Sebastian and Stephanie Trotter, had arrived just two days prior for a camping trip from El Paso, Texas. "On July 8th, what was supposed to be a carefree family vacation in Ruidoso, New Mexico, turned into a nightmare no one could have imagined," wrote Hank Wyatt, the children's uncle, on the GoFundMe page. Wyatt described a typical day ahead of the flash flooding, which included exploring the village, shopping, playing soccer, and pizza for lunch. The family was packing up the RV when flooding hit, he said. "They received no warning or alerts on their phone when suddenly water began to flood the campsite at a rapid pace," Wyatt wrote. "The RV began to fill up with water before they could even step out of the door. Their efforts to escape the RV and seek refuge failed. As the water got more and more violent, the RV was nearly half way filled with water when the wall of the RV cracked in half and the mother and kids were sucked into the water." The children's father dove into the water to save their daughter, according to Wyatt, as Stephanie Trotter and her son climbed up a tree. Charlotte continued down the river until trees and debris hit and separated them. Stephanie then started drowning until she was rescued, Wyatt said. Ruidoso, NM flooding: Children cling to ceiling fan as flooding destroys RV park, family home Why the 2024 wildfires made Ruidoso vulnerable to catastrophic flooding Recovering from the fires that ravaged Ruidoso in 2024 was going to be a long process, but little did anyone know that it laid the groundwork for the deadly flooding on July 8. During the worst of the deluge, the Rio Ruidoso crested at 20 feet, five feet higher than any previous weather event. The wall of water left little in its wake. Still, meteorologist Jason Grzywacz of the National Weather Service office in El Paso and Santa Teresa noted the conditions were primed for a flooding event. "The main reason was the South Fork Fire last year that burned directly west of Ruidoso," Grzywacz said. "The soil wasn't able to absorb any of the rainfall, and it runs right down into Ruidoso. Normally, if you had that vegetation still there, it could absorb it. For the Ruidoso monsoon season, it was above average rain but not record rainfall." The village of Ruidoso is no stranger to the rains of the monsoon season, with it recently experiencing days of half an inch to an inch of precipitation, Grzywacz added. When a busy wildfire season occurs on level terrain, he explained, there is a lower chance of flooding. In this case, the fire consumed west of the village towards Sierra Blanca peak, making a natural pathway for any flow of precipitation. "That's where the rain started and the storm slowly built, and your drainages go to a town," Grzywacz said. "If the fire had been 10 miles north, then you probably wouldn't have heard anything about it. But it just happened that where that fire burned it was close to Ruidoso. When there's ample moisture in the atmosphere, there's always a threat of some flooding in the mountains like that." Contributing: Anthony Robledo, USA TODAY; Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store