
Powerful sister of North Korean leader Kim rejects outreach by South's new president
Kim Yo Jong called such steps 'sincere efforts' by Lee's government to develop ties. But she said the Lee government won't be much different from its predecessors, citing what it calls 'their blind trust' to the military alliance with the U.S. and attempt to 'stand in confrontation' with North Korea. She mentioned the upcoming summertime South Korea-U.S. military drills, which North Korea views as an invasion rehearsal.
North Korea has been shunning talks with South Korea and the U.S. since leader Kim Jong Un's high-stakes nuclear diplomacy with President Donald Trump fell apart in 2019 due to wrangling over international sanctions. North Korea has since focused on building more powerful nuclear weapons targeting its rivals.
North Korea now prioritizes cooperation with Russia by sending troops and conventional weapons to support its war against Ukraine, likely in return for economic and military assistance. South Korea, the U.S. and others say Russia may even give North Korea sensitive technologies that can enhance its nuclear and missile programs.
Since beginning his second term in January, Trump has repeatedly boasted of his personal ties with Kim Jong Un and expressed intent to resume diplomacy with him. But North Korea hasn't publicly responded to Trump's overture.
In early 2024, Kim Jong Un ordered the rewriting of the constitution to remove the long-running state goal of a peaceful Korean unification and cement South Korea as an 'invariable principal enemy.' That caught many foreign experts by surprise because it was seen as eliminating the idea of shared statehood between the war-divided Koreas and breaking away with his predecessors' long-cherished dreams of peacefully achieving a unified Korea on the North's terms.
Many experts say Kim likely aims to guard against South Korean cultural influence and bolster his family's dynastic rule. Others say Kim wants legal room to use his nuclear weapons against South Korea by making it as a foreign enemy state, not a partner for potential unification which shares a sense of national homogeneity.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
A top U.S. ally reckons with an age of ‘turbulence'
South Korea's top diplomat has barely been able to get his feet under the desk. The new liberal administration of President Lee Jae Myung took office just weeks ago following victory in June elections. But the country's new Foreign Minister Cho Hyun journeyed to Washington last week at a delicate moment in the relationship between the United States and one of its closest Asian allies.


The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Bill Maher defends Trump's university fight: ‘They became indoctrination factories'
Comedian Bill Maher defended President Trump's fight against higher education, saying college campuses have become 'indoctrination factories' in need of a wake-up call. In the latest episode of HBO's 'Real Time with Bill Maher,' the host said he doesn't agree with the president's approach, but he said he agrees with some of the criticism motivating the effort. 'I'm not totally against it. Academia needed a hot poker up the ass,' Maher said. 'I'm not saying— not everything, the way he's doing it, of course, is the right way, You know, to defund scientific research is not the way to do it,' Maher said. 'But, I mean, our universities have been out of control for a long time. They became indoctrination factories,' Maher added. 'There's absolutely no diversity of thought.' Maher pointed to students on some college campuses who celebrated the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre in Israel — before Israel had begun its retaliatory invasion of Gaza. 'You don't have to be Donald Trump to think that there's been something rotten on campuses for quite a long time. When you cannot speak the other side of the coin, when conservative thought — whatever you think of it — is just verboten, which is basically what happened,' Maher said. 'And some of the ideas — I mean, why do you think they erupted, so many of them, in cheers or what happened on Oct. 7? Why do you have professors coming out there and saying they were exhilarated by this mass massacre of people? Okay, that didn't happen overnight,' Maher continued, referring to the institutions as 'ivory towers' that are 'just very anti-America.'


Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Smithsonian Issues Update on Trump's Impeachment Exhibit Controversy
The Smithsonian National Museum of American History on Saturday released a statement on its website announcing that it would reinstall President Donald Trump to its exhibit about impeachments, saying that it never intended his removal to be temporary. Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment by email outside of normal business hours on Saturday evening. The museum removed references to Trump's two impeachments from its exhibit on presidential impeachments last month, igniting a debate about historical accuracy and political influence in public institutions. The controversy centered on "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden" exhibit, which included a temporary label about Trump's impeachments that was added in September 2021. Trump remains the only U.S. president to have been impeached twice. During his second administration, Trump has influenced the museum, which is independent of the government but receives funding from Congress. In March, he signed an executive order to eliminate "anti-American ideology" in the museum and to "restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness." The Smithsonian confirmed the temporary label remained in place until July before being removed during a review of legacy content. In a statement posted to the museum's website, the Smithsonian said the placard "did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline and overall presentation." "It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case," the statement continued. "For these reasons, we removed the placard. We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit." The museum assured that the exhibit in the coming weeks would see its impeachment section updated to reflect "all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history." "As the keeper of memory for the nation, it is our privilege and responsibility to tell accurate and complete histories," the museum wrote. The decision to remove the placard stoked concerns in the public about possible government interference, the shaping of public memory, and the integrity of historical curation at America's most prominent museum complex. A Smithsonian spokesperson previously told Newsweek: "In reviewing our legacy content recently, it became clear that the 'Limits of Presidential Power' section in The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden exhibition needed to be addressed. The section of this exhibition covers Congress, The Supreme Court, Impeachment, and Public Opinion. Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the Impeachment case back to its 2008 appearance. Trump faced two impeachment efforts by Democrats during his first administration: First on December 18, 2019, and then again on January 13, 2021 - just one week before he left office. He was ultimately acquitted both times. The first impeachment charged Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress over his dealings with Ukraine. Both articles passed the House with no support from any Republicans, and some Democrats split from the party. The second effort occurred following the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, with some Republicans in the House - most notably Liz Cheney - breaking from the party and supporting the effort to impeach. What People Are Saying Political analyst Jeff Greenfield wrote on X: "Orwellian is a much-overused phrase; but forcing the Smithsonian to erase the fact of Trump's impeachments is right out of 1984. Did they drop that stuff down the memory hole?" Senator Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, posted images of media coverage about Trump's impeachments on X, writing: "This is what Donald Trump wants you to forget. American never will." Former GOP Congressman and Trump critic Joe Walsh called the Post's report on X: "Despicable. Reprehensible. Dishonest. Cowardly. Trump's 2 impeachments are historical facts. They are both part of American history. He's using the powers of his office to try to rewrite history. I'm done saying 'shame on him.' Shame on us for electing him." A White House spokesperson told NPR: "We are fully supportive of updating displays to highlight American greatness. The Trump administration will continue working to ensure that the Smithsonian removes all improper ideology and once again unites and instills pride in all Americans regarding our great history." The Smithsonian acknowledged the need for a comprehensive update of its presidential impeachment exhibit. The institution stated the impeachment section will be revised in the coming weeks to "ensure it accurately represents all historical impeachment proceedings." No specific timetable was provided for when Trump's impeachments or other new content will be permanently reintroduced. Related Articles Removal of Trump From Smithsonian Impeachment Exhibit Sparks OutrageTiny Flying Reptile Found in Arizona Fills 200-Million-Year Evolutionary GapWho Is Kim Sajet? Donald Trump Fires National Portrait Gallery DirectorHistory-Making Carl Nassib Reflects as His Jersey Heads to the Smithsonian 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.