OPEC+ Discusses Another Super-Sized Output Hike for July
(Bloomberg) -- OPEC+ members are discussing making a third consecutive oil production surge in July, to be decided at the group's meeting in just over a week, delegates said.
Can Frank Gehry's 'Grand LA' Make Downtown Feel Like a Neighborhood?
Chicago's O'Hare Airport Seeks Up to $4.3 Billion of Muni Debt
NJ Transit Makes Deal With Engineers, Ending Three-Day Strike
An output hike of 411,000 barrels a day for July — triple the amount initially planned — is among options under discussion, although no final agreement has yet been reached, said the delegates, asking not to be named because the information is private. A final decision is due to be taken at a gathering on June 1.
The cartel has helped sink crude prices since announcing 411,000-barrel hikes for May and June — equivalent to about 1% of current OPEC+ output — in a historic break with years of defending oil markets. Oil made a fresh plunge on Thursday, dropping 0.9% to $64.31 a barrel as of 9:13 a.m. in London.
While OPEC+ says the supply increases are to satisfy demand, officials have privately proffered a range of motives, from punishing over-producing members to recouping market share and placating President Donald Trump.
Group leader Saudi Arabia warned errant members such as Kazakhstan and Iraq at their last meeting that it could deliver further production increases unless they fall in line with their quotas. Despite some promises of atonement, the Kazakhs have made little effort to rein in international oil companies operating in the country and continue to export near record levels.
'Our call is for another 411,000 barrel-a-day increase in the OPEC quota in July, similar to May and June,' said Martijn Rats, global oil strategist at Morgan Stanley. 'Compliance by the over-producing countries has not changed much, and so far, the previous quota increases have been absorbed by the market.'
See also: Kazakhstan Oil Data Show Impossible Task of Hitting OPEC+ Target
In a Bloomberg survey, 25 of 32 traders and analysts predicted OPEC+ will indeed approve a hike of 411,000 barrels a day. Five said they expect the group to revert to a previous schedule of more modest increases, with a boost of 138,000 barrels.
Coinciding with the launch of Trump's trade war in April, the surprise supply hikes from OPEC+ initially took a brutal toll on oil prices, sending crude to a four-year low near $60 a barrel in London. Futures have recovered since then as the White House rolled back some of its tariffs.
Even so, many forecasters now have a bearish outlook for the market this year. Last week, the International Energy Agency predicted that global oil demand growth will slow during the remainder of 2025 after a robust first quarter due to economic headwinds.
Consequently, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. has predicted that the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its partners will pause further hikes after agreeing on the increase for July.
Eight key OPEC+ nations will hold a video-conference on June 1 to settle July production levels. The full 22-nation alliance will also hold a set of virtual meetings on May 28, where it will have the opportunity to review underlying production quotas for 2025 and 2026.
Explainer: How Tariffs and OPEC+ Are Driving Down Oil Prices
'If there is indeed a shift in policy towards market share and away from price defence, it then its makes sense to unwind quickly,' said Harry Tchilinguirian, head of oil research and analytics at Onyx Commodities Ltd. 'It's a little like a band-aid: you pull it off in one swoop and not slowly.'
--With assistance from Sherry Su and Yongchang Chin.
(Updates with survey in seventh, analyst comment in final paragraphs.)
Why Apple Still Hasn't Cracked AI
Inside the First Stargate AI Data Center
Anthropic Is Trying to Win the AI Race Without Losing Its Soul
Microsoft's CEO on How AI Will Remake Every Company, Including His
Cartoon Network's Last Gasp
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What is the bond market and why is everybody so worried about it?
The bond market doesn't make headlines nearly as often as its more exciting cousin, the stock market, but when it does, look out. At least twice in 2025, bond investors have reacted negatively to U.S. President Donald Trump's policies, spooked first by his trade war and more recently by the growing U.S. government debt. Those join a list of other recent bond market tantrums that suggest investors have growing concerns about the state of government finances around the world. But just what is the bond market, how does it work and why is it such a problem when investors get jittery about it? The Financial Post explains. The bond market is a financial market where governments, companies and investors can issue, buy and sell debt in the form of — you guessed it — bonds. For governments, selling a new bond raises the funds needed to finance public spending, while a business might use the proceeds for corporate operations or an acquisition. In return, bonds provide investors with periodic interest payments, usually at a fixed interest rate, and guarantee the repayment of the principal at maturity. Government bonds can come in a range of durations from months all the way up to decades. For example, U.S. government debt ranges from one-month Treasury bills to 30-year Treasury bonds. Investors are especially focused on the U.S. bond market because it is the largest in the world, worth about US$47 trillion. This accounts for about 40 per cent of the US$142 trillion global bond market as of 2025, according to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, a U.S. industry trade group. As of the fourth quarter of 2024, investors held US$28 trillion of government debt in Treasuries. Investors buy government bonds because they are seen as safe, especially in contrast to stocks, which can carry more risk, especially during economic turbulence. Bonds pay out steady interest, and there is little risk the government of a major economy such as the U.S. will not repay the principal at maturity — or at least that's the theory. In reality, investors increasingly appear to be questioning whether government bonds, in particular those issued by the U.S., are such a safe bet. Carl Gomez, chief economist and head of market analytics for CoStar Group, said the bond market, like any other market for financial assets, depends on buyers and sellers making trades based on their expectations regarding market conditions. And some recent decisions by the U.S. government have investors feeling like they are taking on more risk with bonds, he said. When Trump unveiled his plan for massive tariffs on other countries on 'Liberation Day' in April, it sent shockwaves through the stock market. Although normally investors would buy bonds as a counterweight to equity risk, something unexpected happened. There was a selloff in the bond market as well, signalling that buyers were losing confidence in the U.S. as a safe place to store their money. The 10-year Treasury yield spiked from less than four per cent on April 4 to 4.5 per cent on April 8, while the 30-year yield topped five per cent. 'People are worried the independence of the Fed could be eroded to some extent, people are worried that the U.S. administration's policies have not been friendly to the allies or to the providers of capital for the U.S. market,' said Jason Daw, the head of North American rates strategy at Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) Capital Markets. 'This has led the market to believe that (foreign) investors are going to be investing less in the U.S and maybe more in their domestic markets.' And with the U.S.'s massive debt, investors question the government's fiscal prudence, weakening demand for U.S. bonds. Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill lead to the second big spike in yields this year. Introduced in May, the bill included extended tax cuts and an increase to the national debt ceiling, and would add nearly US$4 trillion to America's US$36 trillion in debt if passed. In the immediate aftermath of the tax bill announcement on May 22, the 10-year yield closed at 4.58 per cent, its highest level since 2023. To make matters worse, credit rating agency Moody's Corp. downgraded America's credit rating due to the country's inability to manage its ballooning debt. Following that up, there was tepid demand at a US$16 billion 20-year Treasury bond auction, another key indicator of the bond market's woes, pushing yields to 5.1 per cent. 'When the government goes to borrow, they auction up the bonds, and get the money from the Treasury,' Gomez said. 'If there are fewer buyers, then that price is going to come down, and the yields will need to go up on those bonds to make them sellable.' When people talk about trouble in the bond market, they often talk about yields spiking. The yield on a bond is how much you would expect to earn on your money per year if you held the bond through to maturity, including both interest payments and price return. While the interest payment on a bond is usually fixed, yields adjust to prevailing expectations about where interest rates are heading. For example, if investors think they will be able to buy a new bond at an interest rate of five per cent, they aren't likely to want an existing bond with an interest rate of only four per cent. So the price of that older bond falls. The big thing to remember is that yields and prices are inversely related: If yields go up or spike, it means the value of the bonds people are holding goes down. 'Similar to how the value of a stock or the equity market could change, the value of bonds changes depending on people's expectations of future interest rates and depending on when you purchase the bond (which could be) at a value that is above or below its maturity level,' said Daw. If bond buyers are concerned that the U.S. fiscal position is deteriorating, they are likely going to want a higher return to offset the risk of lending to Uncle Sam. So, yields go up, and prices go down. Bond yields have been rising across the globe — a striking reversal in a long-term trend of declining yields that persisted over the past 20 to 30 years thanks to modest inflation and economic stability. With inflation higher post-COVID and due to economic jitters from the U.S.-initiated trade war, there is less demand for especially long-term government bonds globally, making it more expensive for governments to borrow. If the U.S. has trouble selling its bonds at rates that allow it to service its debt, it could be forced to raise interest rates to higher and higher levels to placate investors seeking compensation for taking on the greater risk. Increasing interest rates could create a vicious cycle of higher rates making it more expensive for the government to service its debt, leading to bigger deficits and more debt, producing greater risk that buyers will want to be compensated for with higher interest rates. Most importantly, the U.S. relies on the sale of its Treasury bonds to fund its operations. If buyers don't want to buy bonds, the government could struggle to pay its bills, especially if there aren't sufficient tax revenues, Gomez said. 'Ultimately, it can lead to a financial crisis,' he said. 'It circles down across the whole financial system into the real economy.' Gomez pointed to Greece as an example. The country toppled into a government debt crisis in 2007, exacerbated by the global financial crisis, and struggled to recover. Major financial rating agencies flagged Greek bonds with 'junk' status in 2010. The country's unemployment rate hit a record 28 per cent in 2014, and poverty and homelessness snowballed. 'This doesn't usually happen to a well-developed country like the United States, given its position in the world,' Gomez said, noting the Fed could step in and be 'the buyer of last resort.' Still, this could lead to major inflation risks caused by 'printing money' and potentially call into question America's long-term debt sustainability, which would result in higher interest rates over the long run, he said. Although Canada's bond market typically follows the same direction as its southern neighbour, Gomez said it has hit a resistance point due to the Bank of Canada cutting interest rates out of step with the U.S. Federal Reserve. Canadian bond yields are getting tugged upward, influenced by what is occurring in the U.S., but they are also being pulled down by the central bank. 'Everybody probably expected at the end of last year that we'd see lower interest rates, lower mortgages,' Gomez said. 'But what's really happening is that the bond market and bond yields in Canada are just going sideways.' If the Fed starts cutting rates more than the Bank of Canada, Daw said it is likely the Canadian bond market will underperform the U.S. Treasury market over the next six to 12 months. Canada's central bank is in a tight spot, as it weighs the upside risks to inflation against the downside risks to growth brought on by U.S. tariffs. The other factor weighing on Canadian market sentiment is the expectation that the federal government and provinces will be issuing plenty of bonds this year to increase spending to support the economy through the trade war. When the supply of bonds goes up, this puts downward pressure on bond prices and upward pressure on bond yields. Canada's debt position doesn't look as grim as the U.S., but it is growing. The U.S. debt to gross domestic product (GDP) ratio was 123 per cent in 2024, while Canada's amounted to 110.8 per cent — but Canada's debt to GDP ratio has been on an upward path since 2022 and is markedly higher than its pre-pandemic levels (where it hovered around the 90 per cent range). Why everyone is worried about the bond market — especially Donald Trump Bond market volatility spells trouble for investors Gomez predicted that the Canadian bond market will outperform the U.S. but added that inflation and global factors will still influence yields. 'The thing about the U.S. is that it is still the centre of the capital markets across the world,' said Gomez. 'So, what happens in the U.S. invariably starts impacting the rest of the world.' • Email: slouis@ Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
South Florida now emerging as the ‘epicenter of housing weakness' — but will it spread to the rest of the US?
Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below. Bubbles don't always burst — sometimes they deflate. But the process can still be painful, as some Florida home sellers are now discovering. According to a Bloomberg analysis of Redfin data, the number of contracts to buy homes in Miami, Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach dropped in April compared to a year ago, marking the steepest declines among the 50 largest metro areas in the U.S. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has an important message for the next wave of American retirees — here's how he says you can best weather the US retirement crisis Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) Notably, pending sales in Miami plunged 23%, while transactions in Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach declined by 19% and 14%, respectively. According to Chen Zhao, head of economics research at Redfin, the region is clearly under pressure. 'South Florida is the epicenter of housing market weakness in the United States,' she told Bloomberg. Homes are also sitting on the market much longer than elsewhere. In April, the median time to sell in West Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale was 83 days, and 81 days in Miami — more than double the national average of 40 days. South Florida saw a historic run-up in prices during the pandemic, with homes routinely selling above asking price. But the tide has turned. In April, the median home sale price across Florida fell 3.2% year over year. And in West Palm Beach, Miami and Fort Lauderdale, nearly 5% of homes sold below asking — compared to just 0.77% nationally. 'I think you're seeing a really long, slow deflation of that bubble,' Zhao said in the Bloomberg analysis, reflecting on the shifting market dynamics. And while Florida may be feeling the pain, Zhao cautions it might not be the only state that ends up struggling: 'The question for the rest of the country is, will this spread? Florida is uniquely bad right now.' Florida's housing market seems to be under pressure, but that doesn't necessarily signal a nationwide collapse. In fact, according to Redfin, the median U.S. home sale price in April was $437,864 — up 1.3% from a year earlier. Zoom out further, and the long-term trend remains clear: Redfin data show U.S. home prices have surged roughly 45% over the past five years. Affordability, however, remains a major challenge due to the imbalance between supply and demand. As Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell acknowledged in a press conference last year, the real issue behind America's housing crisis is clear: 'We have had, and are on track to continue to have, not enough housing.' A June 2024 analysis by Zillow estimates the U.S. housing shortage at 4.5 million homes — a gap that continues to support demand and rental prices in many regions. Meanwhile, many investors view real estate as a time-tested hedge against inflation. As the cost of materials, labor and land rises, property values often follow — and so do rents. This allows landlords to earn income that tends to keep pace with inflation. Of course, with today's high home prices, elevated mortgage rates and an uncertain outlook, jumping into the market might feel daunting. But the good news is, you no longer need to buy a property outright to tap into the benefits of real estate investing. Crowdfunding platforms like Arrived offer an easier way to get exposure to this income-generating asset class. Backed by world class investors like Jeff Bezos, Arrived allows you to invest in shares of rental homes with as little as $100, all without the hassle of mowing lawns, fixing leaky faucets or handling difficult tenants. The process is simple: Browse a curated selection of homes that have been vetted for their appreciation and income potential. Once you find a property you like, select the number of shares you'd like to purchase, and then sit back as you start receiving positive rental income distributions from your investment. Another option is First National Realty Partners (FNRP), which allows accredited investors to diversify their portfolio through grocery-anchored commercial properties, without taking on the responsibilities of being a landlord. With a minimum investment of $50,000, investors can own a share of properties leased by national brands like Whole Foods, Kroger and Walmart, which provide essential goods to their communities. Thanks to Triple Net (NNN) leases, accredited investors are able to invest in these properties without worrying about tenant costs cutting into their potential returns. Simply answer a few questions — including how much you would like to invest — to start browsing their full list of available properties. Read more: Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — If you're uneasy about where the U.S. housing market — or the broader economy — is headed, you're not alone. Warnings from top economists and investors are piling up. Nobel Prize–winning economist Paul Krugman has cautioned that a recession could hit the U.S. this year. Meanwhile, Ray Dalio — founder of the world's largest hedge fund, Bridgewater Associates — recently sounded the alarm on 'something worse than a recession.' With soaring national debt, persistent fiscal deficits and rising geopolitical tensions, it's no surprise that markets have been on edge. So where can investors turn for shelter? Dalio points to a familiar safe haven: gold. 'People don't have, typically, an adequate amount of gold in their portfolio,' he told CNBC in February. 'When bad times come, gold is a very effective diversifier.' Long viewed as the ultimate safe haven, gold isn't tied to any single country, currency or economy. It can't be printed out of thin air like fiat money, and in times of economic turmoil or geopolitical uncertainty, investors tend to pile in — driving up its value. Hence why, over the past 12 months, gold prices have surged by more than 40%. One way to invest in gold that also provides significant tax advantages is to open a gold IRA with the help of Priority Gold. Gold IRAs allow investors to hold physical gold or gold-related assets within a retirement account, thereby combining the tax advantages of an IRA with the protective benefits of investing in gold, making it an option for those looking to help shield their retirement funds against economic uncertainties. When you make a qualifying purchase with Priority Gold, you can receive up to $10,000 in silver for free. JPMorgan sees gold soaring to $6,000/ounce — use this 1 simple IRA trick to lock in those potential shiny gains (before it's too late) Are you rich enough to join the top 1%? Here's the net worth you need to rank among America's wealthiest — plus a few strategies to build that first-class portfolio You're probably already overpaying for this 1 'must-have' expense — and thanks to Trump's tariffs, your monthly bill could soar even higher. Here's how 2 minutes can protect your wallet right now Access to this $22.5 trillion asset class has traditionally been limited to elite investors — until now. Here's how to become the landlord of Walmart or Whole Foods without lifting a finger This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's new approach to Russia's war in Ukraine might be his worst yet
Donald Trump and his team have spent a fair amount of time recently trying to convince the public that the president's policy toward Russia's war in Ukraine is having a positive impact. In mid-March, for example, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt boasted, 'I can say we are on the 10th yard line of peace, and we've never been closer to a peace deal than we are in this moment.' Two months later, Trump participated in a two-hour phone meeting with Vladimir Putin, and the Republican touted the discussion as a possible breakthrough. 'The tone and spirit of the conversation were excellent,' the American president declared, adding that his chat would 'immediately' lead to new diplomatic negotiations. Soon after, Kyiv came under a large-scale Russian drone and missile attack, described by Ukrainian officials as the largest aerial assault on the country since the war began. It was soon followed by Ukraine's surprise drone attack that proved disastrous for Russia, and that jolted global perceptions. This in turn led Russia to launch one of the largest barrages of missiles and drones of the war at targets across Ukraine. This does not look like 'the 10th yard line of peace.' It was against this backdrop that Trump has apparently come up with a new metaphor. The New York Times reported: As Germany's chancellor, Friedrich Merz, sat beside him watching in silence, President Trump compared Russia and Ukraine to two fighting children who needed to work out their differences for a while before anyone could intervene. 'Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'They hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart. They don't want to be pulled. Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart.' 'And I gave that analogy to Putin yesterday,' the Republican added. 'I said, 'President, maybe you have to keep fighting and suffering a lot, because both sides are suffering, before you pull them apart, before they're able to be pulled apart.'' So, a few things. First, comparing this conflict to a dispute among children on a playground is unhelpful, and Trump complaining about anyone engaging in juvenile behavior is unwise, given everything we know about his temperament and frequent tantrums. Second, the idea that the White House is prepared to let Russia and Ukraine 'fight for a while' overlooks the inconvenient fact that they've already been fighting for a while. Indeed, Russia invaded Ukraine back in February 2022 — more than three years ago — which Trump described at the time as 'genius' and part of a 'wonderful' strategy. But let's also not lose sight of the evolution of the American president's thinking. Trump's Plan A for the war in Ukraine was ending the conflict within 24 hours by way of a secret strategy he assured voters was real. When it became obvious that this strategy didn't actually exist, Trump moved on to Plan B: He told Russia that if it failed to end the conflict quickly, the White House 'would have no other choice' but to impose new economic sanctions. When Putin ignored those threats and Trump failed to follow through, the American president floated Plan C (international economic penalties designed to force a ceasefire), Plan D (Trump-backed bilateral talks between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy) and Plan E (bilateral talks between Trump and Putin). Plan F — White House passivity — is now increasingly coming into focus. Trump's latest plan to end the conflict is apparently to stop trying to end the conflict. This post updates our related earlier coverage. This article was originally published on
