logo
Flying Aircraft Carriers: Ukraine Refines FPV Mothership Tactics

Flying Aircraft Carriers: Ukraine Refines FPV Mothership Tactics

Forbes09-04-2025

A fixed wing carrier with six FPV drones recently shown by UNITED24
Ukraine is fielding carrier drones or motherships to transport FPVs to the target area before launching them. Russian forces reported these as far back as November 2023, and last month Russian news agency TASS stated that Ukraine was carrying out FPV attacks 25 miles or more behind the lines in seven regions suggesting that use is becoming widespread.
The commander of the Typhoon drone unit of the National Guard of Ukraine, who goes by the callsign 'Michael', told me that carrier operations are very much a matter of ongoing development.
'It's a combination of using existing technologies and continuously refining them based on operational feedback,' says Michael. 'It's about optimizing what we already have while layering in new enhancements where needed.'
There are parallels with the learning curve on traditional floating aircraft carriers. The Chinese Navy officially commissioned its first aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, in 2012. It took four years of trials and training -- and a number of accidents – before it was declared combat ready four years later. The Chinese already had a navy and air force, but flying aircraft from ships required a whole new skill set for both. New military operations take practice to perfect, and learning under field conditions is harder.
While a single FPV strike may be simple, a carrier with one or more FPVs is different and expensive. The carrier remains in the area to act as a flying radio relay for the FPV and Michael says they would not fly a reusable carrier drone against a low value target.
'If something goes wrong, we risk losing not just the FPV, but the entire system,' says Michael
Ukraine has displayed drone carriers include both fixed wing and multi-rotor types, carrying one, two, four or six FPVs. More might look better, but it brings complications.
'If we're using analog video transmission, for example, each drone must operate on a different frequency to avoid signal interference,' says Michael, 'Managing multiple video feeds, control links, and power systems adds significant complexity, especially under field conditions. It requires precise coordination and a reliable communication infrastructure to ensure everything works smoothly in practice.'
FPV drone on fixed wing aircraft type mothership
So something like the carrier with a single drone supplied to Birds of Magyar may be preferable to a bigger carrier. The choice between fixed wing or rotary carrier also involves tradeoffs.
'When it comes to rotary-wing carrier drones, the main disadvantage is their relatively low operational altitude — typically around 300–400 meters,' says Michael. 'At this height, they are vulnerable to a wide range of threats including small arms fire, other drones, and electronic warfare such as jamming.'
Russia routinely flies interceptor drones against Ukrainian multicopter Baba Yaga night bombers, and a rotary drone carrier would be a prime target.
'Fixed-wing carrier drones, on the other hand, operate at much higher altitudes,' says Michael, which some threats but increases others. 'At these altitudes, they become more visible to enemy radar and are more likely to be targeted by anti-aircraft systems.'
Either way, carrier missions must be carefully planned around the locations of Russian air defenses.
'In many combat zones, the airspace is protected by a mix of electronic warfare tools and radar systems,' says Michael. 'Successful use of such systems requires detailed intelligence to identify gaps in enemy air defense coverage.'
Michael says his Typhoon unit is starting to focus on one particular attack mode for carriers.
Multicopter drone carrier with FPV
'From our perspective, the most promising use case at the moment is integrating a 'lock-on-target' feature, which would allow for more autonomous and precise deployment of FPV drones from the carrier platform,' says Michael.
In this approach the carrier become more like a weapons platform, and the FPVs are more like guided missiles than independent aircraft. Michael previously described his units' work with automated target lock systems for FPVs. These bypass short-range jammers and are a limited but useful way of assisting human pilots.
'Implementing this capability requires additional technical development and system integration, so it's still a work in progress,' says Michael.
There are real benefits in prospect though. Apart from extending range, carrier drones eliminate problems like radio shadow can shorten the time between detecting a target and engaging it. They also open up the possibility of multiple coordinated strikes against long-range targets.
Meanwhile, interceptor operators are reportedly using drone carriers to get FPVs into action rapidly against high-altitude targets. A carrier can patrol at altitude and the FPVs are only launched when needed.
These are very much the early days of drone carriers. In future we may motherships carrying a mixed load of reconnaissance and attack drones, carriers delivering drones which land and carry out ambush attacks, and carriers with unjammable fiber-guided FPVs.
But while they have potential, Michael remains agnostic about whether carrier drones will become more than a special-purpose tool.
'Whether carrier drones become more common in the future largely depends on the operational environment and mission objectives,' says Michael.
But he notes that the extended range is a powerful benefit. A site within range of drone strikes is no longer safe, and the enemy will need to relocate ammunition dumps, fuel storage, repair shops and other facilities several miles further back, not to mention artillery and air defense assets – until longer-range carriers move the red line even further.
Simply possessing FPV carriers makes the enemy's life more difficult, even if they are rarely used.
'Even if a mission is not cost-effective in purely tactical terms, the psychological impact of a successful carrier drone strike — especially deep behind enemy lines — can be significant,' says Michael.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside Ukraine's Fiber-Optic Drone War
Inside Ukraine's Fiber-Optic Drone War

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Inside Ukraine's Fiber-Optic Drone War

Across the battlefield, both Ukraine and Russia are using fiber optic cables instead of radio waves to connect many of their first-person view (FPV) drones with their controllers. That makes them impervious to jamming and other forms of electronic warfare and helps mitigate the effects of terrain that can also interfere with radio control. Now, the commander of the First Corps Azov Brigade of the Ukrainian National Guard's Unmanned Systems Battalion, who uses the call sign Yas, has given us the bottom-line on the current state of play when it comes to actually employing fiber optic FPVs as weapons in an exclusive interview. It's worth noting that the Russians started the use of fiber optic wires on the FPV drone in the Spring of 2024 and Ukraine quickly followed suit. You can read more about that in our original story here. Yas' comments on fiber optic FPVs are part of a nearly two-hour interview conducted on Memorial Day about the Unmanned Systems Battalion and its fight in and around the rubbled city of Toretsk in Ukraine's eastern Donetsk region. We will publish the rest of the conversation in the coming days. The questions and answers have been slightly edited for clarity. Q: What is your experience using fiber optic cables on FPV drones? A: I'm very lucky, because I have my people, and one of the members of our team, he practically made the implementation of this technology in our unit possible, and the idea is great, because you are operating in total radio silence, so you cannot be detected by any radar system [passive sensors]. And any electronic warfare means that later on, they are just inefficient. At the same time, the use of fiber optic cables, as with any FPV drone, has its own peculiarities of operation, and if the pilot is not skilled enough, that is going to lead to significant losses in such equipment and systems. Ukrainian soldiers walk along a field covered in fiber-optic cable from FPV drones somewhere near the frontline. — Status-6 (Military & Conflict News) (BlueSky too) (@Archer83Able) May 27, 2025 Q: What's the percentage of targets hit with fiber-optic controlled drones? A: I would say that there is approximately a 50% probability that a totally functional drone that flies on a combat mission will strike its target. And I would also like to mention that this technology is quite fragile. Any mistake in handling this drone can result in an unintended explosion, for example, or in a loss of control. So that's quite a surprising thing, but we also had such issues of control loss. Mistakes can result in the fiber optic tearing as well, but nevertheless, we also had some successful strikes with the fiber optic drones. Q: Any other drawbacks to fiber optic cables that you can share? A: When manufacturers are very hasty about selling their technology, selling their recently developed product to us, this is actually the segment of the systems that causes the most problems. Q: How so? A: Well, the problem was that at the start of the development of this technology, the majority of manufacturers did not produce the components for the drone themselves; they basically purchased the fiber optic systems from China, and they were just reselling the Chinese components. We were buying the technology without properly understanding how to deploy it. And there was also this issue with radio signals, so we needed to switch off the radio signal ourselves, because the manufacturers did not understand these specifics. And those manufacturers that just resold the components and drones from China proved to be inefficient in terms of their systems. But with time – not all of them, but at least some of them – listened to us, they paid attention to our feedback, and with time, they came to better products, which in turn can lead to a 50% probability of a successful strike, and even higher. A Russian FPV drone located a Ukrainian fiber-optic quadcopter, and then cut the fiber-optic cable with its rotor blades, causing the Ukrainian drone to crash. — Samuel Bendett (@sambendett) May 28, 2025 Q: What percentage of your drones use fiber optic cables? A: This number is the lowest, and if I were to state a percentage, I would say that this is less than 5%. Q: Why? This technology is widely used by Ukraine and Russia alike. A: The popularity of this technology is the key reason why we cannot ensure we have a sufficient number of drones using this technology. We understand that in terms of quality, any good manufacturer that provides their clients with high-quality products – and this is just a basic market principle – they will always have a lot of clients. And in Ukraine, there are several good manufacturers of fiber optics for such drones, and they have quite a long waiting list. And then we have a dilemma when waiting for two to three months is quite a long period of time, and purchasing low-quality systems is also not an option for us. Fiber-Optic FPV Drones Strike Enemy Targets We will find a countermeasure-resistant FPV drone to break through any Russian electronic warfare system. This is precisely the type of weapon deployed by Azov drone operators in the Toretsk video features strikes on… — First Corps Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine (@azov_media) March 24, 2025 Q: How much do fiber optic cable drones cost? A: Well, the price is now quite lower at the moment for drones with a range of up to 10 kilometers (about 6.2 miles). It is approximately $1,200. But again, the key problem with ensuring a sufficient number of these drones is their deficit in general. Q: What is the maximum range of your fiber-optic drones? A: It all depends on the fiber optic coil that is used. We have efficiently used drones with ranges up to 15 kilometers (about 9.3 miles). I know about successful deployments of 20-kilometer (about 12.4 miles) drones. But at the same time, we know that the enemy already uses drones with up to 30 kilometers (about 18.6 miles) range. Ukrainian drone manufacturer Alexey Babenko says that Ukrainian fiber optic FPVs are currently not as successful as Russian range spools in particular are only 30% successful at 15km compared to 80% for Russian flights up to 20km.1/ — Roy (@GrandpaRoy2) April 30, 2025 Q: How do you bridge that gap? A: It's quite difficult for me to say, because I'm a simple person, I mostly deal with the usage of the systems, and I think that the planning and the scaling of these technologies need to be undertaken at the state level. And I would very much like to say that everything is perfect in this regard. But unfortunately, it is not so there are the state at the moment doesn't ensure a steady supply of such systems, such drones. And that is why it is quite difficult for us to catch up with the enemy with regard to most systems. I wouldn't say with all of them, but at least with many systems, the enemy puts the processes at the state level. So we already have established processes at the state level, with simple drones, with radio control drones, etc, but in terms of the fiber optic drones, there is still much work to be done. Thread 1/xUAS Battalion of the 12th Special Purpose Brigade 'Azov' hits Russian Comm Equipment with FPV dronesSource: — Audax (@AudaxonX) May 14, 2025 Q: What's the success rate of your radio-controlled drones? A: I think that we need to divide this particular issue into two parts. The first is actually reaching the targets. And as you have mentioned, for fiber optic drones, the probability of reaching the target is really 50% and higher. And for radio drones, due to various reasons, including the frequency overloading problem and various different factors, the probability can be much lower. For example, it can decrease to 30% etc. But there is also the story of actually striking the target. So not only reaching but striking targets. And here, other factors also come into play. For example, we can say that when the enemy is actively moving, when the enemy personnel is taking shelter, when they're hiding in basements and dugouts, etc, the probability of efficiently striking the target will be much lower than, for example, if we are deploying our drones in the open air. And the same story is true about deploying drones to strike enemy vehicles. So once again, there is a higher probability of reaching the target. So it's not a problem for a radio-controlled drone to reach a target. But there is, for example, an issue with the frequency overload, and we are trying to solve that through internal coordination, so we coordinate among the units in order not to overload one particular frequency. But there are also other aspects that also come into play. Q: Such as? A: If we delve deeper into the smaller details, we can say that these other factors include the enemy's tactics, the shooting down of our drones, and also definitely the electronic warfare measures that the enemy implements. The drones that are currently provided by the state are usually unable to operate at ranges more than five to eight kilometers (about 3.1 miles to about five miles) from the contact line. In terms of the enemy's electronic warfare (EW) measures, they have reached quite a high level of efficiency because they are frequently successful in suppressing, jamming our radio signal. We are trying to use better parts, more powerful parts, for our repeaters in order to provide coverage for our drones and to be able to continue efficiently deploying them. Unlimited Destruction of Occupiers in the Toretsk SectorAzov's FPV drones strike without limits — there is a munition for every video showcases a compilation of Russian light vehicles and personnel struck by the fighters of the Unmanned Systems Battalion of the… — First Corps Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine (@azov_media) March 15, 2025 Q: How strong is Russian electronic warfare? And how has it developed over the course of the war? A: Well, I think that the power of any element of the Soviet army is not in the equipment's quality, but in the equipment's quantity. So the Russian electronic warfare has an undoubted advantage in terms of numbers, and this is especially true for the electronic warfare. For example, they invent a countermeasure, they learn how to jam our control channel, and they quickly scale this decision, the solution, up. They quickly distribute that among their military. So then we change to another channel. We change to other frequencies, but when they find out how to channel those, they also scale this solution up. The same was true about our video transmission. So they learn how to create obstacles at the standard frequencies. Usually that's 5.8 [GHz] and they also learn how to introduce countermeasures to other systems of communication. I would like to say that at the moment, Russian electronic warfare is undoubtedly one of the leading in the world. So I do not want to underestimate the enemy. We need to accept, to acknowledge, the level of the enemy. Q: Can you tell me how else you're trying to improve your radio line of sight and beyond line of sight capabilities of your radio-controlled drones? A: I can differentiate it into two parts. The first is dealing with radio shadow. And usually, as for me, the best way to deal with this problem is to launch repeaters and place them directly above the targets to be struck. For example, we use this tactic when we need to deploy our drones inside of buildings. When we send our drones towards a building, we actually land the repeater on top of the building, and then we deploy another drone. The picture was just perfect. The picture was very good because of that repeater placement. As for your question regarding the line of sight, I think that's not really an issue of the line of sight, but about the transmission intensity. More and more drones are deployed, and more and more systems are used, and we are we're dealing with the problem that some frequencies are overloaded. We need to deal with these issues, and we need to experiment with the emitters and receivers in order to solve this problem, because both us and the enemy, we all will use more and more drones. And as for some ideas that are currently discussed – like the use of aerostats to install repeaters on – personally, I do not like this idea. It's not really efficient. In the next installment of this interview, Yas talks about the unit's new SETH drone, the problem with thermite-spewing so-called dragon drones and why Azov doesn't use weapons-equipped ground drones. Contact the author: howard@

Turkey, Belgium to join drone coalition for Ukraine
Turkey, Belgium to join drone coalition for Ukraine

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Turkey, Belgium to join drone coalition for Ukraine

Turkey and Belgium are set to join the international Drone Coalition supporting Ukraine, Latvia's Defense Minister Andris Spruds announced on May 28 during the Drone Summit in Riga. The coalition, co-led by Latvia and the United Kingdom, is expected to allocate 2.75 billion euros ($3.1 billion) in 2025 to support Ukraine's defense against Russian aggression. "The international Drone Coalition is becoming increasingly stronger — we will be able to deliver more drones to Ukraine while simultaneously strengthening the defense industries of Latvia, the EU, and NATO countries," Spruds said. "Our strength lies in unity." With the addition of Belgium and Turkey, the Drone Coalition will grow to 20 member states. The coalition, officially launched in February 2024, includes countries such as the U.K., Germany, Canada, France, Poland, Sweden, and Ukraine, among others. Each new member must be approved by existing coalition states, according to the memorandum of understanding. Since its inception, the coalition has committed a total of 4.5 billion euros ($5 billion) in aid to Ukraine over two years, including 1.8 billion euros ($2 billion) in 2024 and the planned 2.75 billion euros ($3.1 billion) for 2025. The Drone Coalition plays crucial role in supporting Ukraine's use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which have become key in targeting Russian military infrastructure, including airfields, oil depots, and logistics hubs deep inside Russian territory. In March, the coalition allocated 20 million euros ($22.5 million) from a joint fund to procure tactical reconnaissance drones for Ukraine, following an urgent request from Kyiv. The coalition complements Ukraine's domestic initiatives such as the "Drone Line," launched in February, which aims to accelerate battlefield drone deployment. Read also: Ukrainian drones hit Russian cruise missile factory, SBU source says, in one of largest reported strikes of full-scale war We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

U.S. Sen. Duckworth visits Taiwan to discuss regional security and trade
U.S. Sen. Duckworth visits Taiwan to discuss regional security and trade

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

U.S. Sen. Duckworth visits Taiwan to discuss regional security and trade

Strongly pro-Taiwan U.S. Sen. Tammy Duckworth is visiting the self-governing island democracy to discuss regional security and relations with the U.S. Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat, will hold a series of high-level meetings with senior Taiwan leaders to discuss U.S.-Taiwan relations during her visit Wednesday and Thursday, said the American Institute in Taiwan, which acts as the de-facto American embassy in Taiwan in liu of formal diplomatic relations. Trade, investment and 'other significant issues of mutual interest' also are on the schedule, the institute said. 'The visit underscores the United States' commitment to its partnership with Taiwan and reaffirms our shared commitment to strengthening a Free and Open Indo-Pacific,' the institute said. China routinely protests such visits, which it views as a violation of U.S. commitments. Duckworth and her staff are the second U.S. congressional delegation to visit Taiwan in as many days, demonstrating concerns in Washington over the island's security in the face of Chinese threats to invade, as well as its importance as a trade partner, particularly as the producer of 90% of the world's most advanced computer chips. Taiwan also faces 32% tariffs under the Trump administration, a figure the government in Taiwan is attempting to negotiate to a lower level without angering sectors such as agriculture that fear lower tariffs could open their markets to heightened competition from abroad. Duckworth is visiting at the same time as Lourdes A. Leon Guerrero, the governor of Guam, the U.S. Pacific territory that would almost certainly be a key player in any Chinese military moves against Taiwan. Taiwan and China split during a civil war in 1949 and Beijing still considers the island its own territory to be annexed by force if necessary. China refuses all contact with the government of President Lai Ching-te, whom China brands as a separatist, and seeks to maximize diplomatic pressure on Taiwan. While China sends military aircraft, ships and spy balloons near Taiwan as part of a campaign of daily harassment, special attention has been given this week to the location of the Liaoning, China's first aircraft carrier, whose hull was bought from Ukraine and then fitted out by China more than a decade ago. China has two aircraft carriers including the Liaoning, a third undergoing sea trials and a fourth under construction. 'What I can tell you is that the activities of the Chinese warship in the relevant waters are fully in line with international law and the basic norms of international relations,' Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said. Col. Hu Chung-hua of the Taiwanese Defense Ministry's' intelligence department told reporters Wednesday that the carrier was currently in waters southeast of Taiwan and has been under close surveillance by Taiwan's monitoring stations since leaving its home port in China. There are concerns the carrier might stage military drills close to Taiwan that could be a further step toward a blockade, an act the U.S. would be required to respond to under its own laws. While the U.S. provides much of Taiwan's high-tech military hardware, the law is unclear whether it would send forces to aid Taiwan in the event of a conflict. Hu said the ministry would not comment on the possibility of drills near Taiwan, but considers all options while monitoring the Chinese military. The ministry 'anticipates the enemy as broadly as possible and defends against the enemy strictly. We also carefully evaluate and act accordingly,' Hu said. China is considered a master of 'grey-zone encounters' that bring tensions just to the point of breaking out into open conflict. Col. Su Tong-wei of the ministry's operation of planning said the armed forces were constantly evaluating threat levels to consider whether to 'activate a response center, or to increase our defense readiness to perform an immediate readiness drill.' 'We will also react accordingly to safeguard national security,' Su said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store