logo
UK foreign office asks staff to resign if they disagree with Gaza policy

UK foreign office asks staff to resign if they disagree with Gaza policy

Hindustan Times2 days ago

Civil servants in the Foreign Office have been told they should resign if they disagree with the Government's policy over Gaza, reports suggest.
Some 300 staff at the Government department, based in the UK and offices abroad, sent a letter to Foreign Secretary David Lammy raising concerns about Israel's conduct in Gaza, the BBC reported. The letter warned of 'complicity' in Israel's actions and questioned continued UK arms sales to the country, according to the broadcaster.
The Foreign Office's two most senior officials, Sir Oliver Robbins and Nick Dyer, responded to the letter. 'If your disagreement with any aspect of Government policy or action is profound your ultimate recourse is to resign from the Civil Service. This is an honourable course,' they told staff in their reply.
The two Foreign Office bosses insisted they wanted to see a 'healthy challenge' to policy but said it was up to civil servants to deliver on the will of the Government. The letter, which follows several other similar missives to Civil Service chiefs, was signed on May 16, the BBC reported.
In it, the signatories said: 'In July 2024, staff expressed concern about Israel's violations of international humanitarian law and potential UK government complicity. 'In the intervening period, the reality of Israel's disregard for international law has become more stark.'
They went on to list the killing by Israeli forces of 15 aid workers in March, and the blockade on aid into Gaza, among their concerns. They added that 'supported by the Trump administration, the Israeli government has made explicit plans for the forcible transfer of Gaza's population'. Ministers' official line is that Israel is 'at risk' of breaching international law with its actions in Gaza.
The Government halted 30 out of around 350 arms sales licences to Israel in September last year, for fear they may be used for war crimes. MPs critical of Israel's actions have called on ministers to go further, and to halt all UK arms sales to the country.
A Foreign Office spokesperson said: 'Since day one, this Government has rigorously applied international law in relation to the war in Gaza. 'One of our first acts in Government was to suspend export licences that could be used by the Israeli Defence Forces in Gaza.
'We have successfully implemented the suspension decision and continue to refuse all relevant licence applications. 'We have suspended direct exports of F-35 parts for use by Israel, and we categorically do not export any bombs or ammunition which could be used in Gaza.
'We have also suspended negotiations on a free trade agreement, while supporting humanitarian efforts through the restoration of funding to UNRWA, and the commitment of over £230 million in assistance across the past two financial years.'
They added: 'It is the job of civil servants to deliver on the policies of the government of the day and to provide professional, impartial advice as set out in the Civil Service Code. There are systems in place which allow them to raise concerns if they have them.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Decoded: How Iran and Israel's decades-old conflict could explode into war
Decoded: How Iran and Israel's decades-old conflict could explode into war

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

Decoded: How Iran and Israel's decades-old conflict could explode into war

The Islamic Republic of Iran on Thursday (June 12) posted a chilling two-word message on social media platform X: 'We are ready,' amid reports that Israel is preparing to launch a strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. The United States has responded by warning that Iran may retaliate against American targets in neighbouring Iraq and has advised some US citizens to leave the region as a precaution. Tensions have surged since the breakdown of nuclear talks between Washington and Tehran. US President Donald Trump has reaffirmed his hardline stance, declaring that Iran would not be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. 'Very simple. They can't have a nuclear weapon. We're not going to allow that,' he said, adding that US troops are being repositioned away from parts of the Middle East 'because it could be a dangerous place.' Iran's enriched uranium stockpile nears weapons-grade threshold The trigger behind this rising tension lies in Iran's growing nuclear stockpile. According to a recent estimate by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran now holds over 408 kilograms of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent purity, dangerously close to the 90 per cent threshold required for a nuclear weapon. That's a nearly 50 per cent increase from earlier this year. The time it would take Iran to 'break out' and build a bomb is shrinking rapidly. Tracing the historical roots of Iran-Israel hostility Iran and Israel weren't always enemies. In fact, prior to 1979, the two countries maintained close ties. Iran was one of the first Muslim-majority nations to recognise Israel after its founding in 1948. Under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Iran and Israel enjoyed diplomatic, economic, and military ties. Both nations viewed Arab nationalism as a mutual threat, and Israel considered Iran a key strategic ally on the periphery of the Arab world. But this cooperation snapped after the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The new regime in Tehran cut all ties with Israel, transferred the Israeli embassy to the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), and declared Israel an enemy of Islam. Ayatollah Khomeini's regime began openly supporting anti-Israel militant groups, shifting the nature of the conflict from political rivalry to ideological confrontation. Iran's proxy network intensifies regional warfare against Israel Since then, Iran has supported and armed groups such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and the Islamic Jihad Movement in the Palestinian territories. This network of proxies has conducted many wars against Israel, including those in Lebanon and several Gaza conflicts from 2008 to 2024. Iran has also provided support to groups in Syria and Yemen over the years, designed to counter Israel and attack its interests. How close is Iran to developing a nuclear weapon? Iran's nuclear programme has always been at the heart of Israeli fears. Israel has long considered Iran's nuclear ambition an existential threat. Over the years, it has launched covert operations to sabotage Iran's programme, including the infamous Stuxnet cyberattack and the assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists. These efforts have slowed but not stopped Iran's progress. Once Iran crosses the 90 per cent enrichment mark, experts warn it could produce a nuclear weapon within weeks—a scenario Israel says it will not allow. Where are the modern flashpoints in the Iran-Israel conflict? The conflict has played out across multiple theatres in West Asia. Lebanon remains a critical front. Iran's most powerful proxy, Hezbollah, is based there and has fought major wars with Israel, including the 2006 conflict. Hezbollah is believed to possess over 100,000 rockets aimed at Israeli cities. In Gaza, Iran funds and supports both Hamas and the Islamic Jihad Movement. Despite the Shia-Sunni divide, their shared hostility towards Israel unites them. Syria is another major flashpoint. Iran maintains a strong military presence there and uses the territory to transfer weapons to Hezbollah. Israel frequently launches airstrikes on Iranian assets and supply routes in Syria. Recently, Iraq has emerged as a new front. Iranian-backed militias there have carried out drone attacks on Israeli targets. In 2024, after Israel bombed an Iranian consulate in Damascus, Iran and its proxies launched a large-scale drone and missile barrage. Though most were intercepted with US and European assistance, Israel responded with strikes inside Iran and Syria. Both sides then pulled back to avoid a wider regional war. Who supports Iran and Israel in this regional power struggle? Iran's 'Axis of Resistance' includes state and non-state actors such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), its elite Quds Force, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Islamic Jihad Movement, Houthi rebels in Yemen, and various Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria. Iran also supports smaller militant groups in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Israel, meanwhile, is firmly backed by the United States. Washington provides billions in military aid, advanced defence systems like Iron Dome, and intelligence support. US forces also target Iranian-backed militias in Syria and Iraq. Western allies, including the UK, Germany, and Italy, assist diplomatically and through missile defence cooperation. While not formal military allies, several Sunni Arab states share Israel's concerns. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, and Egypt have deepened ties with Israel since the 2020 Abraham Accords. The Palestinian Authority in the West Bank remains ideologically opposed to Israel but occasionally coordinates security efforts against Hamas. Why is Iraq becoming a critical theatre in this confrontation? Iraq now serves as a launchpad for Iranian-aligned militias and a proxy battleground. Groups like Kata'ib Hezbollah under the 'Islamic Resistance in Iraq' banner have claimed attacks on Israeli military assets. These militias allow Iran to strike Israel indirectly while avoiding direct confrontation. Geographically, Iraq's proximity to Israel makes it strategically significant for weapons transfers and strikes. However, the Iraqi government under Prime Minister Mohammed Shia' Al-Sudani is under pressure to control these groups, fearing that Israeli retaliation could further destabilise the country. The US military presence in Iraq—currently around 2,500 troops—acts as a deterrent. But Washington's plan to withdraw by 2026 could reduce Iraq's resistance to Iranian pressure and shift the balance of power further. Are the conditions now set for full-scale regional war? With nuclear breakout potential, active proxy networks, and direct military exchanges, the Iran-Israel conflict is dangerously close to escalation. Iraq's emergence as a proxy front, growing Hezbollah stockpiles, increased Western involvement, and failed diplomacy are all converging. Whether this leads to an all-out war or a prolonged cycle of strikes and retaliation depends on the decisions made in the coming weeks—both in Jerusalem and Tehran, and in capitals far beyond.

The Ghost of al-Qassam: Who is Ezzedin al-Haddad? Meet Hamas' third Gaza chief in seven months
The Ghost of al-Qassam: Who is Ezzedin al-Haddad? Meet Hamas' third Gaza chief in seven months

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

The Ghost of al-Qassam: Who is Ezzedin al-Haddad? Meet Hamas' third Gaza chief in seven months

Gaza's war-scarred labyrinth has a new face of command. His name is Ezzedin al-Haddad—and most people have never heard of him. After more than 600 days of war, and the deaths of both Yahya and Mohammed Sinwar, Hamas has quietly handed over its Gaza operations to a shadowy veteran commander known as The Ghost of al-Qassam. At 55, Ezzedin al-Haddad is no stranger to bloodshed, nor to survival. With a $750,000 Israeli bounty on his head and the weight of a crumbling militant empire on his shoulders, Haddad steps in as Hamas's third Gaza chief in just seven months. From the Tunnels to the Top An experienced field commander and tactician, Haddad played a key role in planning the devastating October 7, 2023 attacks that sparked the current war. According to Arab and Israeli officials, he has also overseen the recruitment of new fighters and taken personal responsibility for the Israeli hostages still held in Gaza—keeping photos of them on his phone, even engaging directly with some in captivity. But he didn't exactly rise to the top through a hotly contested election. The war has decimated Hamas's top ranks. Of the 18 senior figures on the group's military council before the war, only a few are thought to still be alive. Mohammed Sinwar, Haddad's immediate predecessor and Yahya's younger brother, was killed in May during an Israeli strike beneath Khan Younis's European Hospital. Haddad survived—and took over. A Ghost with a Memory and a Grudge Unlike the flamboyant Sinwar brothers, Haddad is known for his silence and shadowy demeanour. His nickname, The Ghost of al-Qassam, reflects a career defined by evasion and low visibility. He has survived several Israeli assassination attempts, but not without personal loss: both of his sons have been killed in the current conflict. A former hostage who met Haddad five times during captivity described him as calm, cold, and Hebrew-speaking. On one occasion, Haddad even ordered that a book left behind by a hostage be returned to him. But the ghost has moods too. In later meetings, he became harsher and more bitter—changes that coincided with the death of his son. A Diminished but Not Defeated Hamas While Israel claims to have killed up to 20,000 of Hamas's 35,000 fighters and destroyed most of its weapons stockpile, the group remains Gaza's dominant armed force. Its ranks have been replenished—at least numerically—with thousands of young recruits trained with little more than leaflets or crash courses in ambush tactics. Israeli and Arab intelligence sources estimate Hamas now commands around 25,000 fighters, though many are poorly trained and under-equipped. The group's financial reserves have also dwindled. Once flush with income from taxing aid and smuggling contraband, Hamas is reportedly struggling to pay its fighters. According to an internal document found by the Israeli military, Hamas reduced the share of aid diverted to its military wing from 25% in early 2024 to just 7% by April. Still, the organisation has retained one of its most potent strategic advantages: its underground network. Israeli military sources concede that as much as 75% of Hamas's tunnels remain intact. And as recent Israeli casualties show, the group is turning unexploded ordnance into makeshift bombs capable of ambushing even well-armoured patrols. A Fighter Willing to Talk? Despite his militant past, Haddad is reportedly more pragmatic than his predecessors. Arab intelligence officials say he pushed for the January 2024 hostage-prisoner swap and urged further releases to extend the ceasefire, which eventually broke down in March. He has also shown tentative openness to discussing the disarmament of Hamas—something the Sinwar brothers firmly rejected. But pragmatism has limits. Haddad still insists that no further hostages will be released without a full Israeli withdrawal and an end to the war. His motivations, officials believe, are driven as much by strategic calculation as ideology: Hamas remains Gaza's only coherent armed authority, but it is bleeding fighters, funds, and territory. What Comes Next? Israel aims to control 75% of Gaza by late July. Its current strategy seeks to fragment Hamas's hold on the enclave by isolating population centres and targeting remaining leadership. But for every commander killed, another emerges. And while the group may now rely on improvised explosives rather than rockets, its capacity to inflict daily pain on Israeli forces persists. As Miri Eisin, former deputy head of Israeli combat intelligence, put it: 'They don't need tens of thousands of weapons. They just need to kill a soldier a day.' Whether Haddad can—or wants to—shift the trajectory of the war remains unclear. He is a commander forged in tunnels and blood, tempered by loss, and now facing a military juggernaut in a battle that seems increasingly existential. But so far, the Ghost has not disappeared.

Even at half the price, is this Chinese jet proving costly for bankrupt Pakistan
Even at half the price, is this Chinese jet proving costly for bankrupt Pakistan

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Even at half the price, is this Chinese jet proving costly for bankrupt Pakistan

In a flash sale–like deal for Pakistan, China is reportedly offering a 50% discount on the J-35A, its most advanced fighter jet, to its 'iron brother.' The aircraft is marketed as an alternative to the U.S.'s F-35. The deal for 40 jets comes at a time when Pakistan's economy is faltering. Pak Finance minister Muhammad Aurangzeb's announcement of a 20% hike in the country's defence budget to ₹2.5 trillion, which comes amid the advanced weapons deals. On the other hand the government has cancelled 118 development projects worth ₹1,000 billion (PKR). The Shehbaz Sharif government has slashed the national budget by 7% to 17.57 trillion rupees ($62 billion) for the current fiscal with minimal resistance from the political circles. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 목 망치는 경추베개 TOP3 IT 업종 7년차 팀장 더 알아보기 Also Read: Chenab railway bridge: While India lays tracks in Kashmir, Pakistan cancels development projects The J-35A, a twin-engine, multi-role fighter equipped with PL-17 missiles and advanced AESA radar, promises to enhance Pakistan's air superiority and strike capabilities. Pakistan Air Force has already approved the purchase, and various agencies have reported that pilots are already training in China. Live Events The western neighbour's approximately 80% of weapons arsenal is made up of Chinese weapons. Pakistan used Chinese weapons such asJ-10C fighters and HQ-9 air defence systems against India in the recent conflict. The 40 J-35A fighter jet deal in addition to the 50% discount also comes with liberal payment terms with deliveries starting as soon as August. India has opposed to loans to Pakistan Earlier this year, Pakistan secured an $800 million loan from the Asian Development Bank . This followed a $1 billion tranche from the International Monetary Fund , part of a broader $7 billion bailout programme. The latest IMF bailout package is the country's 28th in the past 35 years. India has publicly opposed both, arguing the funds could be diverted to support terrorism rather than their intended development use. Pakistan Foreign minister Ishaq Dar is busy trying to portray his country as a stabilising force and India as the aggressor. He has been engaging with Gulf states, EU and the UN to counter the terrorism narrative against Pakistan. These efforts include back-channel talks and leveraging the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor to secure economic lifelines from Beijing. During a recent visit to China, Dar thanked Beijing for its support during the India-Pakistan conflict, highlighting it as an 'iron-clad' relationship.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store