Fire engulfs home sending smoke over harbour
Fire crews from across Dunedin are battling a house ''well ablaze'' in St Leonards which has sent smoke billowing over Otago Harbour.
A Fire and Emergency New Zealand spokesman said five fire appliances crews from Ravensbourne, Port Chalmers, Dunedin and St Kilda were called to a Hawk lane address just before 3pm.
Photo: Alwyn Frost
When they arrived a house was ''well ablaze,'' he said.
They were working to get the fire under control and extinguish it presently.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
20 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Shock after birds removed from sanctuary
Te Anau residents are feeling betrayed by an early decision to remove birds from the town's beloved bird sanctuary before a community consultation process ends. Residents have reacted with shock, anger and disappointment after the Department of Conservation decided to move the two blue ducks (kōwhiowhio/whio) away from the Te Anau Bird Sanctuary Te Punanga Manu by early yesterday and they are worried about the rest. But the site's owner says the birds will be returned, and possibly more besides, to what could in time be a "grander" wildlife park. The sanctuary was home to 16 birds: four brown teal (pāteke), the two blue ducks (kōwhiowhio/whio), four Antipodes Island parakeets (kākāriki), and six South Island takahē, two of which are chicks. After a review last year, Doc decided it would no longer manage the sanctuary in favour of "higher priority" conservation work. And while there were no plans to rehome takahē pairs from the sanctuary, there had been no decision on a management plan for the other species. Earlier this month, Doc, regional development agency Great South, site owners Southland Fish & Game and iwi Ōraka Aparima Rūnaka asked the public for input, encouraging people to submit their ideas on the future of the park before August 3. But late on Monday, Doc announced it was going to move the birds, other than the takahē, to new homes in the coming months as it wound down operations at the sanctuary. The two blue ducks were moved yesterday to be taken to Isaacs Wildlife Conservation Trust in Christchurch. Two community groups set up to save the sanctuary have united and will meet Southland MP Joseph Mooney today with a member of the Tauri family, who own a holiday park across the road from the sanctuary, and a representative from Distinction Hotels Group, which has two hotels in the town, to ask for help to save the park. Advocacy group Save the Sanctuary spokesman Ken Browne said his group believed Fish & Game and Doc had an agenda that did not align with the community's interests, which was to remove the birds before the consultation concluded and then implement none of the community's ideas. "I feel absolutely gutted. I feel like we've been betrayed, basically," he said. A representative of a second advocacy group, Save the Te Anau Bird Park and Sanctuary, will also be at the meeting. The group's steering committee chairman, Roger Stephenson, said the Te Anau community was "shocked, angry and disappointed" when they found out Doc was planning to move the birds out of the sanctuary. The sanctuary was an important part of the town's tourism industry and tour buses often stopped there so visitors could explore, he said. Some companies had told him they were worried the sanctuary ultimately would be closed and they would lose a stop on their tours. When contacted yesterday, Fish & Game Southland manager Zane Moss said "the reality" was the infrastructure of the sanctuary was not fit for purpose and something needed to change. He was hopeful a "grander" wildlife park experience would come out of the community consultation. The birds would return after the process had concluded and the sanctuary's future was decided, he said. "There is scope to have a whole host of bird species, far more than are currently there at the moment. "Mana whenua are leading that process but we're very much looking at the opportunities to develop some infrastructure there that will provide real value for Te Anau and the Southland community." He could understand Doc's reasoning for making changes to the bird sanctuary as it had limited funding and he supported its decision. Fish & Game will care for the takahē. Great South regional strategy general manager Bobbi Brown said the consultation process continued and so far 43 submissions have been received. The process was about looking into the long-term future and nothing was off the table, she said. Doc Te Anau operations manager John Lucas acknowledged the community's disappointment about the rehoming of some of the birds. However, Doc could not continue to operate the park because of financial challenges. "Reducing the number of species at the Te Anau Bird Sanctuary is a temporary measure to ensure Doc can safely continue managing the site with reduced capacity. "This has not been an easy process or decision."
Otago Daily Times
20 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
$649,999 hit as land sold for $1
Environment Southland is selling land for $1 that it paid $650,000 for six years ago. PHOTO: MATTHEW ROSENBERG/LDR Environment Southland has agreed to sell a large block of land for just $1 after buying it six years ago for $650,000. The land known as the "Webster Block" is near Waituna Lagoon — an area of ecological and cultural significance about half an hour from Invercargill. The council has agreed to offer the land to Whakamana te Waituna Charitable Trust for the nominal amount to support long-term restoration and management, a council report said. Work is starting at the site on a "significant" reforestation project and pilot for nature credits. Covering an area of more than 48ha, the council bought the block in 2019 citing various reasons, including re-establishing a hydrological regime to protect the lagoon's values, re-establishing Te Rūnanga o Awarua as kaitiaki and providing alternative land use for better water quality. It was also bought to demonstrate different drainage options and farming interventions that could reduce contaminants in the lagoon and its tributaries. Council chairman Nicol Horrell said it was an ambitious project which would likely return the land to native plantings and wetland. "A lot of what the trust has been doing in recent years is leading edge and it has benefits for the whole community." The report noted the trust was set up to oversee a multimillion-dollar co-funding agreement between the council and the Ministry for the Environment in 2018. A covenant was placed on the land after it was bought, meaning it needed to be cared for in a way which improved biodiversity and freshwater. That covenant dropped the land's value from $650,000 to $250,000. The council has also retained a right of refusal on the land, meaning it can repurchase it for $1 if the trust attempts a disposal or winds up. Stakeholders of the trust include Environment Southland, the Southland District Council, Te Rūnanga o Awarua, Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu, the Department of Conservation and Fonterra. • LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Otago Daily Times
20 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Opening of Waituna Lagoon questioned
A panel deciding on the management of a Southland lagoon has questioned aspects of a proposal for future openings. A three-day hearing started in Invercargill yesterday regarding the Waituna Lagoon — specifically, a joint application to periodically open it to the sea. The lagoon forms part of an internationally significant wetland southeast of Invercargill but has been plagued by both high water levels and algae outbreaks. Te Rūnanga o Awarua, Department of Conservation and Environment Southland hope to improve its fortunes by gaining permission to open it to the sea based on varying triggers. But the proposal was met with some push-back from the panel, Dr Ian Boothroyd concerned about the governance structure and how it would play out. Dr Boothroyd also questioned a lack of details surrounding the authority and role of each agency involved, while member Megan McKay said it was difficult to see who was ultimately responsible for the proposed activity. Panel chairman Mark St Clair also had concerns, saying there was a lack of evidence on operational matters such as moving diggers. He said there was no spill management plan, information on minimising disturbance, or refueling information, which was "standard" in a consent. Protocol for activities such as disturbing shorebirds needed to be included in the consent, but the panel did not believe it was, subject to the joint witness statement. Doc solicitor Pene Williams represented the applicants and conceded there were some "level of detail" which was not yet available. In response to the chairman's concerns, she said she did not believe any of the joint witness statements addressed that issue. Ms Williams said they were committed to working with the community and other stakeholders to ensure the health of Waituna. "It's the bottom of the catchment, it's the receiving environment. So it is at risk of nutrient buildup from excessive contaminant loads, and that can have an impact on its water quality." Dean Whaanga, speaking as a mātauranga expert, said the lagoon was a unique and vital part of Murihiku. "It nourishes the health of our whanau and communities, the environment, economy and the quality of life." The proposed application helped achieve cultural aspirations and restore the mana and mauri of the lagoon, he said. • LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
