
WhatsApp banned on House of Representative members' devices – but Signal still allowed, memo shows
WhatsApp has been banned on mobile devices belonging to members of the House of Representatives, though other messaging platforms including Signal – the app at the center of a major military controversy – are still reportedly allowed.
According to a memo sent to all House members on Monday and obtained by Reuters, WhatsApp was deemed as 'high risk' due to 'potential security risks involved with its use,' among other things.
It comes after uproar back in March, after journalist Jeffery Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, was mistakenly added to a Signal group chat which included high ranking members of the administration. The incident later became known colloquially as 'Signalgate.'
An investigation was launched after Goldberg reported that highly-sensitive information on U.S. military operations in Yemen had been shared in the group, which included cabinet members including Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and former National Security Advisor Michael Waltz.
But rather than single out Signal, Monday's memo said the "Office of Cybersecurity has deemed WhatsApp a high risk to users due to the lack of transparency in how it protects user data, absence of stored data encryption, and potential security risks involved with its use."
A Meta spokesperson said the company disagreed with the move "in the strongest possible terms," noting that the platform provides a higher level of security than the other approved apps.
However, in January, a WhatsApp official said Israeli spyware company Paragon Solutions had targeted scores of its users, including journalists and members of civil society.
Instead of WhatsApp, House members were recommended to use other messaging apps, including Microsoft Corp's Teams platform, Amazon.com's Wickr, and Apple's iMessage and FaceTime, Reutersreported.
Despite the shocking breach of security in March, Signal was also recommended as an alternative.
The incident saw Waltz take responsibility for the incident – though not before Trump blamed a 'lower level' mystery employee. The president also suggested that Goldberg may have added himself, saying the technology allows for someone to 'get onto those things,' but without giving details.
Signalgate also resulted in a federal lawsuit against five of the cabinet members in the group chat; Vance and Hegseth, as well as Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe.
The lawsuit, brought by the nonprofit American Oversight, asked a judge to order the cabinet member to preserve the Signal messages, claiming the use of Signal violates federal law.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
White House furious at top secret leak on Iran nuclear site bombing as Trump faces impeachment calls: Live updates
ICE arrests 15 Iranian migrants Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agents have arrested 15 illegal Iranian migrants since Sunday. One of the migrants admitted to having ties to Hezbollah in Lebanon. An FBI insider told Fox News agents are 'closely watching' for any 'sleeper agents' in wake of the US strikes on Iran's nuclear weapons facilities. 'DHS has identified and arrested known or suspected terrorists and violent extremists that illegally entered this country, came in through Biden's fraudulent parole programs or otherwise,' ICE tweeted earleir today. 'We have been saying we are getting the worst of the worst out—and we are. We don't wait until a military operation to execute; we proactively deliver on President Trump's mandate to secure the homeland.'


The Sun
31 minutes ago
- The Sun
Israel-Iran ceasefire could be a diplomatic triumph for Trump and see him remould Middle Eastern politics
DONALD Trump's style is diplomacy on steroids. There's a concept known as Trump Time, which is three times faster than everybody else wants to move at. 5 5 Generally, that creates disasters, but given the law of averages, that sort of disruption sometimes works out. Despite his F-bomb attack on Israel and Iran for breaking the ceasefire, the events of the last few days could turn into a diplomatic triumph for President Trump. He took a massive military risk at the weekend to bomb three Iranian sites using B-2 bombers carrying their Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs, alongside 30 Tomahawk cruise missiles fired from an Ohio-class submarine, probably the USS Georgia cruising somewhere under the Arabian Sea. If US action has not effectively destroyed the Iranian nuclear programme, it has certainly set it back a long way. When the Iranians responded with an attack on the US airbase in Qatar in a rather careful and measured way, we all wondered what Trump would do. When he suddenly announced an overnight ceasefire, presumably negotiated over the telephone, it was fairly astonishing – Trump Time again. But immediate ceasefires tend not to be very stable. Ceasefires usually take some time to negotiate so everybody knows what's supposed to happen and when it's supposed to happen. A monitoring mechanism is needed to make sure it doesn't fall apart by accident. 'They don't know what the f**k they're doing!' Trump rages as he blasts Israel AND Iran for breaking hours-old ceasefire Even though Trump claimed Israel and Iran 'don't know what the f*** they are doing' and ordered the Israelis 'do not DROP those bombs', he effectively put an end to this immediate round of warfare between them. If that all holds, whether you like Trump or not, you would have to say that's a very positive result. He could now be in a position to preside over a remoulding of Middle Eastern politics. It could all go spectacularly wrong, of course, but at the moment President Trump goes to the NATO summit with a sense of triumph in his Middle Eastern policy. Twenty-four hours earlier it looked as if this issue would wreck the summit by taking it over and exposing enormous differences between Europe and America. Now he might be in a position to leave the NATO summit with a triumph in the Middle East and having strong-armed the Europeans into putting 5 per cent of their GDP into defence. That would be a great headline to take back to Washington, where the plaudits would be loud indeed. It's all high-risk diplomacy, of course, that could go wrong pretty quickly. But that's the way he operates. 5


BreakingNews.ie
35 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Report suggests US strikes only set back Iran's nuclear programme by months
A new US intelligence report found that Iran's nuclear programme has been set back only a few months after a US strike, and was not 'completely and fully obliterated' as President Donald Trump has said. The early intelligence report issued by the Defence Intelligence Agency on Monday contradicts statements from Mr Trump and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities. Advertisement According to people familiar with the situation, the report found that while the Saturday strikes at the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites did significant damage, they were not totally destroyed. The White House strongly pushed back on the assessment, calling it 'flat-out wrong'. 'The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear programme,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop 14 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.' Advertisement The CIA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence declined to comment on the DIA assessment. ODNI coordinates the work of the nation's 18 intelligence agencies, including the DIA, which is the intelligence arm of the Defence Department, responsible for producing intelligence on foreign militaries and the capabilities of adversaries. The intelligence assessment was first reported by CNN on Tuesday.