Trump's image of dead ‘white farmers' came from Congo, not South Africa
Reuters — US President Donald Trump showed a screenshot of Reuters video taken in the Democratic Republic of Congo as part of what he
US President Donald Trump showed a screenshot of Reuters video taken in the Democratic Republic of Congo as part of what he falsely presented on Wednesday as evidence of mass killings of white South Africans.
'These are all white farmers that are being buried,' said Trump, holding up a print-out of an article accompanied by the picture during a contentious Oval Office meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.
In fact, the video, published by Reuters on February 3 and subsequently verified by the news agency's fact check team, showed humanitarian workers lifting body bags in the Congolese city of Goma. The image was pulled from Reuters footage shot following deadly battles with Rwanda-backed M23 rebels.
The blog post showed to Ramaphosa by Trump during the White House meeting was published by American Thinker, a conservative online magazine, about conflict and racial tensions in South Africa and Congo.
The post did not caption the image but identified it as a 'YouTube screen grab' with a link to a video news report about Congo on YouTube, which credited Reuters.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Andrea Widburg, managing editor at American Thinker and the author of the post in question, wrote in reply to a Reuters query that Trump had 'misidentified the image.'
She added, however, that the post, which referred to what it called Ramaphosa's 'dysfunctional, race-obsessed Marxist government', had 'pointed out the increasing pressure placed on white South Africans.'
The footage from which the picture was taken shows a mass burial following an M23 assault on Goma, filmed by Reuters video journalist Djaffar Al Katanty.
'That day, it was extremely difficult for journalists to get in… I had to negotiate directly with M23 and coordinate with the ICRC to be allowed to film,' Al Katanty said. 'Only Reuters has video.'
Al Katanty said seeing Trump holding the article with the screengrab of his video came as a shock.
'In view of all the world, President Trump used my image, used what I filmed in DRC to try to convince President Ramaphosa that in his country, white people are being killed by Black people,' Al Katanty said.
Ramaphosa visited Washington this week to try to mend ties with the United States after persistent criticism from Trump in recent months over South Africa's land laws, foreign policy, and alleged bad treatment of its white minority, which South Africa denies.
Trump interrupted the televised meeting with Ramaphosa to play a video, which he said showed evidence of genocide of white farmers in South Africa. This conspiracy theory, which has circulated in far-right chat rooms for years, is based on false claims.
Trump then proceeded to flip through printed copies of articles that he said detailed murders of white South Africans, saying 'death, death, death, horrible death.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al-Ahram Weekly
10 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
US police make arrests in downtown LA during nighttime curfew - International
Downtown Los Angeles was largely calm overnight into Wednesday, with police arresting at least 25 people for violating a curfew after a fifth day of protests against President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. Heavily armed security officers, including several riding horses, patrolled near government buildings, while men boarded up storefronts after dark on Tuesday to protect against vandalism. Looting and vandalism in the second-biggest US city have marred the largely peaceful protests over ramped-up arrests by immigration authorities. The demonstrations, which began Friday, and isolated acts of violence prompted Trump to take the extraordinary step of sending in troops, over the objection of the state governor. One protester told AFP the arrest of migrants in a city with large immigrant and Latino populations was the root of the unrest. "I don't think that part of the problem is the peaceful protests. It's whatever else is happening on the other side that is inciting violence," she said Tuesday. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the curfew -- meant to stop vandalism and looting -- was in effect within one square mile (2.5 square kilometres) of the city's more-than-500 square mile area from 8:00 pm and 6:00 am (0300 to 1300 GMT). That zone was off-limits for everyone apart from residents, journalists and emergency services, she added. Protests against immigration arrests by federal law enforcement have also sprung up in cities around the country, including New York, Atlanta, Chicago, San Francisco and Austin. On Tuesday, in the Atlanta suburb of Brookhaven, dozens of demonstrators waved American and Mexican flags and held signs against US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the federal agency that has ramped up arrests and deportations of migrants under Trump. "You got people that are being arrested on the street by (immigration) agents that don't wear badges, wear masks... it makes me really angry," 26-year-old protester Brendon Terra told AFP. Breaking curfew The Los Angeles protests again turned ugly Tuesday night, but an hour into the curfew, only a handful of protesters were left downtown, with police making several arrests as they warned stragglers to leave. "Multiple groups continue to congregate" within the designated downtown curfew area, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) wrote on X late Tuesday. "Those groups are being addressed, and mass arrests are being initiated." Police arrested at least 25 people on suspicion of violating the curfew as of Tuesday evening, the Los Angeles Times reported, citing an LAPD spokesperson. At their largest, the protests have included a few thousand people taking to the streets, but smaller groups have used the cover of darkness to set fires, daub graffiti, and smash windows. Overnight Monday, 23 businesses were looted, police said, adding that more than 500 people had been arrested over recent days. 'Provide protection' Trump has activated 4,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles, along with 700 active-duty Marines, in what he has claimed is a necessary escalation to take back control, even though local law enforcement authorities insisted they could handle the unrest. A military spokeswoman said the Marines were expected to be on the streets by Wednesday. Their mission will be to guard federal facilities and provide protection to federal officers during immigration enforcement operations. The Pentagon said the deployment would cost US taxpayers $134 million. Photographs issued by the Marine Corps showed men in combat fatigues using riot shields to practice crowd control techniques at the Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach. Late Tuesday, Texas Governor Greg Abbott said his state would deploy its National Guard "to locations across the state to ensure peace & order" after solidarity protests. Behaving like 'a tyrant' In sprawling Los Angeles on Tuesday, it was largely a typical day, with tourists thronging Hollywood Boulevard, children attending school and commuter traffic choking streets. But at a military base in North Carolina, Trump painted a darker picture. "What you're witnessing in California is a full-blown assault on peace, on public order and national sovereignty," the Republican told troops at Fort Bragg. "We will not allow an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy." California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat who has clashed with the president before, said Trump's shock militarisation of the city was the behaviour of "a tyrant, not a president." In a filing to the US District Court in Northern California, Newsom asked for an injunction preventing the use of troops for policing. US law largely prevents the use of the military as a police force -- absent the declaration of an insurrection, which Trump has mused. The president "is trying to use emergency declarations to justify bringing in first the National Guard and then mobilising Marines," said law professor Frank Bowman. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
Egypt Independent
14 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Trump's China ‘truce' is nothing of the sort
CNN — At long last, the United States has reached a trade agreement with China. Again. After a testy war of words that escalated into a tit-for-tat restriction on key exports, American and Chinese officials this week met in the United Kingdom with a singular goal: Find a way to agree to what they had agreed to a month earlier in Geneva. It appears the countries' top trade negotiators have accomplished that. On Tuesday night, both Chinese and Trump officials said they had agreed to a framework to implement the consensus they reached in May, and the trade truce would be sent to their respective leaders for their approval. Businesses, consumers and Wall Street investors will no doubt breathe a sigh of relief: Burdensome tariffs have raised significant anxiety, and easing trade barriers between the world's two largest economies should lower costs and help inject some much-needed certainty into an economy that has been demonstrating some signs of strain. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said in a Truth Social post that a 'deal' with China has been completed. 'Our deal with China is done,' Trump said in his all-caps social media post. Trump said both countries agreed to ease export restrictions, per the prior arrangement agreed upon in Geneva in May. The president also confirmed on Wednesday in his post that the deal included 'full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China.' But in reality, the trade truce – if that's really what was accomplished this time around – is mostly just a return to the already-tense state of affairs from before April 2. Tariff rates from both countries remain historically high, and significant export restrictions remain in place. The United States has not opened its doors to China's autos, nor is it going to sell its high-end AI chips anytime soon. And, in Trump's parlance, China isn't treating America much more 'fairly' after this agreement than it did before. A much-needed détente Without a doubt, a trade agreement was much needed. After Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcements, tensions ran so high that trade between the United States and China came to an effective halt. A 145% tariff on most Chinese imports made the math impossible for US businesses to buy virtually anything from China, America's second-largest trading partner. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, America's chief negotiator in both trade talks with China, said previous tariff levels were 'unsustainable.' On May 12, delegates from China and the United States announced they would significantly roll back their historically high tariffs on one another. Economists pared back their recession forecasts, and moribund consumer confidence rebounded. But Trump and his administration in recent weeks grew increasingly hostile toward China, accusing the country of breaking the promises it made in mid-May. China similarly said the United States failed to live up to its obligations under the Geneva agreement. The Trump administration had expected China to lift restrictions on rare-earth materials that are critical components for a wide range of electronics, but China has only very slowly allowed them to return to the open market, causing intense displeasure inside the Trump administration and prompting a series of export restrictions on US goods to China, three administration officials told CNN last month. China has a virtual monopoly on rare earths, without which cars, jet engines, contrast dye used in MRI machines and some cancer drugs cannot be manufactured. Trump told reporters Friday that Chinese President Xi Jinping had agreed to allow exports of rare earth minerals products to begin, but industry analysts said the crucial materials had not been flowing to the United States as they once had. If both countries satisfy the terms of the agreement this time around, the de-escalation should prevent the direst warnings about the trade war, including potential pandemic-level shortages. Back to reality Despite the good vibes, the United States and China remain in an economic standoff. The Trump administration – and the Biden administration before it – have maintained that Chinese companies are more than happy to sell inexpensive products to the US market but that China places significant restrictions on US businesses operating in the country and encourages Chinese companies to steal American intellectual property. China has long disputed those claims. Trump, in his first term, raised tariffs on China based on national security concerns. Biden maintained many of those tariffs and doubled down on some. But the second Trump administration has taken trade barriers to an unprecedented level. It has placed a 10% universal tariff on virtually all goods coming into the United States. It put in place an additional 20% tariff on Chinese goods in an effort to get China to take action to reduce the flow of fentanyl over the US border. Both of those extraordinary tariffs remain in place on most Chinese goods, with the exception of some products like electronics. In addition, the White House closed the so-called de minimis exemption that allowed packages with a value of under $800 to come into the United States tariff-free. Hefty new tariffs remain in place on small packages, undermining the business models of Chinese ecommerce giants Shein and Temu. The compounding tariffs create significant trade barriers with America's second-largest trading partner, raising prices for American businesses and consumers with no easy fixes or clear market alternatives. Some gigantic companies, such as Apple, have complex supply chains that can withstand some of the price pressures. But even Apple, which has said it would ship most US iPhones from India as Chinese tariffs rise, said it would face a $900 million quarterly cost increase because of tariffs – at their current levels, not at the sky-high 145% rate. Other businesses, such as Boeing, have been completely shut out of China's market. Even without any tariffs or other formal barriers by China on purchases of US aircraft, Boeing has made virtually no sales in China, the world's largest for aircraft purchases, since 2019. So a trade truce may be better than the alternative – if it lasts this time.
See - Sada Elbalad
17 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Social and Political Divisions in the United States over Immigration Policies
Dr. Mohamed Mahmoud Abdelwahab The media is following the widespread protests that have erupted in Los Angeles since the end of last week, following raids carried out by Federal immigration authorities against undocumented immigrants, which resulted in the arrest of dozens. The protests were concentrated in predominantly Latino neighborhoods and, in some areas, turned into violent confrontations between demonstrators and security forces. This prompted Donald Trump to order the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops to the city, with Marines placed on alert. The mayor of Los Angeles and the governor of California considered this an "Unjustified" escalation, given that Los Angeles is home to one of the largest Latino and immigrant communities in America. The arrests and escalation are part of the Trump administration's efforts to tighten immigration policies and target what are known as "sanctuary cities" that refuse to cooperate with federal authorities. Trump has pledged to deport record numbers of people in the country illegally and lock down the U.S.-Mexico border. The White House has set a goal for immigration authorities to detain at least 3,000 migrants per day. This has made California and Los Angeles a constant flashpoint for tension between federal and local authorities over immigration issues. California is a Democratic stronghold, and Trump has repeatedly criticized its policies. The state embraces liberal policies on immigration, environmental, and civil rights issues, while the US president promotes conservative and hardline policies, particularly on immigration. It can be argued that the protests and popular anger witnessed in some cities reflect the extent of the societal and political division in the United States over immigration policies and also highlight the confrontation between the federal government, state authorities, and major cities. As everyone awaits the repercussions of relations between Washington and the California authorities, and the future of immigration policies, the protests spread from Los Angeles to other cities in California, such as San Francisco, where police arrested 60 demonstrators during violent confrontations. Houston and San Antonio, Texas, also witnessed mass demonstrations demanding an end to forced deportations. California Governor Gavin Newsom also criticized President Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard troops to Los Angeles and called for its revocation, while Department for Homeland Security spokesperson Trisha McLaughlin described the stance of both the governor and the mayor as "Disgusting," and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem Los Angeles protests are "professionally done," with demonstrators being "paid," adding that the mayor had protected criminals for years. The media debate resulted in sharp partisan polarization, which was reflected in the speech of Democratic Senator Bernie Sanders, who stated that Trump seeks to transform America into an "authoritarian state that silences the opposition." On the other hand, Republican Rep. Tony Gonzales of Texas praised the deployment of the National Guard, considering that what is happening in Los Angeles is "Just the tip of the iceberg," noting in this context what candidate Trump said in November 2024 and his criticism of the previous administration by saying that the current administration - Biden - is obstructing the construction of a border wall with Mexico. The Guardian published a report titled " Trump Uses LA Protests to Redirect Dissent from Policy Failures ". The report focuses on Trump's use of the Los Angeles protests as a tool to direct public anger away from "the enemy from within," his opponents on the radical left. This is the first time in six decades that a US president has activated the National Guard without a request from the state governor. Political circles view this as an authoritarian move and a dangerous escalation of the undermining of democratic norms, amid threats to use the military and the Insurrection Act against protesters. Trump has been criticized for rewriting the history of political violence and inciting his base through right-wing media, with no dissenting voices within the new administration, which is different from Trump's first term, as the current staff does not review his decisions and directions. CNN reported in mid-November that Trump's plans to implement strict border measures were already underway and that the Trump team had laid the groundwork for plans to expand detention centers on the border and had developed plans to deport undocumented immigrants from all over America. It is also worth noting an opinion poll conducted by Reuters in April 2025, which showed that Donald Trump's popularity had declined to its lowest level since his return to the White House. The results of the poll, which was conducted over 6 days, were as follows: * Trump's job approval rating fell to 42%, compared to 43% three weeks ago and 47% after his inauguration. * Despite the decline, Trump's popularity remains higher than during most of Joe Biden's presidency. * 83% of respondents agreed that the president should comply with federal court rulings, even if he was against his wishes. * 57%, including one-third of Republicans, disagreed with the statement that "it's okay for a U.S. president to withhold funding from universities if the president doesn't agree with how the university is run,'. * 66% said the president should not run prestigious cultural institutions such as museums and theaters. * On issues such as inflation, immigration, taxes, and the rule of law, those who disapproved of Trump's performance outnumbered those who supported him. * On immigration, 45% approved of his performance, while 46% disapproved. Notable, Donald Trump declared at the end of last April that he had achieved in the first 100 days of his presidency, which began last January, "What no previous administration in the history of the United States had achieved,' defending his policies since taking office last January, especially about imposing tariffs on all countries of the world, deporting immigrants, and heralded that this was the country's golden age. read more Analysis- Turkey Has 0 Regional Allies... Why? Analysis: Russia, Turkey... Libya in Return For Syria? Analysis: Who Will Gain Trump's Peace Plan Fruits? Analysis: Will Turkey's Erdogan Resort to Snap Election? Analysis: What Are Turkey's Aspirations in Iraq? Opinion & Analysis Analysis: Mercenaries In Libya... Who Should Be Blamed? Opinion & Analysis Analysis- How 'Libya Nightmare' Takes Erdogan to Algiers Opinion & Analysis Analysis: What Happens After Brexit? Opinion & Analysis Analysis: Strategic Significance of Libya's Sirte, Jufra! News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt News Prime Minister Moustafa Madbouly Inaugurates Two Indian Companies Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War Arts & Culture Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean
