&w=3840&q=100)
India rejects OIC remarks as 'unwarranted', slams Pakistan's influence
India on Monday slammed the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) for making "unwarranted" and "factually incorrect" references to it while coming under influence of Pakistan, which turned terrorism into "statecraft".
India's strong reactions came after a two-day foreign ministerial conclave of the OIC in Turkiye criticised New Delhi on a range of issues including what it said is "social marginalisation" of Indian Muslims.
The OIC also called for strict adherence to bilateral pacts between India and Pakistan, including the Indus Waters Treaty and stressed the need for a broad-based dialogue for peaceful settlement of all outstanding disputes.
"India categorically rejects the unwarranted and factually incorrect references to India at the OIC council of foreign ministers' meeting," the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said in a statement.
"These statements, driven by Pakistan, which has turned terrorism into statecraft, reflect the continued misuse of the OIC platform for narrow political ends," it said.
The MEA said the OIC's repeated "failure" to acknowledge the real and documented threat of terrorism emanating from Pakistan, most recently evidenced in the heinous Pahalgam attack, reflects a "wilful disregard" for facts.
It said "the OIC has no locus standi to comment on India's internal affairs, including Jammu and Kashmir, which is an integral and sovereign part of India -- a fact enshrined in the Indian Constitution and irreversibly settled." "The OIC should reflect deeply on the perils of allowing Pakistan's propaganda to hijack and politicise its agenda. Any other course can only undermine the OIC's credibility and relevance," the MEA said.
It said India also "outrightly rejects" Pakistan's baseless allegation of "unprovoked and unjustified military aggression".
"India's Operation Sindoor in response to the Pahalgam terror attack was a precise and legitimate act of self-defence against terrorist camps operating from Pakistani territory," the MEA said.
"It is absurd for Pakistan to speak of targeting only Indian military installations when its retaliatory attempts not only failed but recklessly endangered civilian lives and property and ended up causing several deaths and injuries among the civilian population.
"It is also ironic that Pakistan, a country with an abysmal human rights record and a history of sheltering, breeding and empowering terrorists, should lecture others on counter-terrorism and human rights," it said.
The MEA said the comments made by Pakistan at the OIC meeting are nothing more than a "desperate attempt" to deflect international attention from its own appalling record of "state-sponsored terrorism, minority persecution and sectarian violence, apart from failure of governance".
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Pahalgam terror attack: NIA gets 5-day remand of two accused
A local court in Jammu on Monday granted the National Investigation Agency (NIA) five-day remand of the two accused who were arrested for harbouring three Pakistani terrorists before the April 22 Pahalgam attack, officials said. Accused, held by NIA, being taken to be produced in the court on Monday. (PTI) Officials said that the two men - Parvaiz Ahmad Jothar and Bashir Ahmad Jothar from Pahalgam- were produced before the court of additional district and sessions judge, Jammu, Ritesh Kumar Dubey. The court sent the duo into NIA custody for five days till June 27. The NIA had arrested the two men on Sunday for allegedly harbouring the terrorists who killed 26 civilians in Pahalgam two months ago, the agency said on Sunday, marking the first set of arrests in connection with the terror attack. The NIA had said that Parvaiz and Bashir knew about the terror affiliations of the three gunmen and despite that provided them with shelter, food and logistical support in the days leading up to the April 22 attack. The duo has also disclosed the identities of the three armed terrorists involved in the attack, and have also confirmed that they were Pakistani nationals affiliated to the proscribed terrorist outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), the anti-terror agency has said. The Resistance Front, a proxy group for the banned Lashkar-e-Taiba organisation, claimed responsibility for the attack. Indian agencies say the group is a front used by Pakistan to avoid international sanctions. India responded with Operation Sindoor on May 7, bombing nine terrorist camps across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in pre-dawn strikes that killed at least 100 militants. The operation sparked four days of cross-border fighting involving fighter jets, missiles and artillery.


United News of India
3 hours ago
- United News of India
Op Sindhu: 290 Indian nationals, one Sri Lankan, evacuated from Iran arrive in Delhi
New Delhi, June 23 (UNI) As part of Operation Sindhu, 290 Indian nationals and one Sri Lankan national were evacuated from Iran on a special flight that arrived in New Delhi on Monday evening. With this, 2,003 Indian nationals have been brought back safely from Iran so far. The MEA spokesperson said in a post on X: 'Operation Sindhu '290 Indian nationals & 1 Sri Lankan national were evacuated from Mashhad on a special flight that arrived in New Delhi at 1915 hrs on 23 June. 'With this, 2003 Indian nationals have been brought back safely from Iran so far.' Earlier, a first batch of 161 Indian nationals evacuated from Israel took off on a flight from Amman, Jordan, for New Delhi. These passengers were evacuated from Israel and moved to Amman, Jordan, by road. Their flight is set to arrive at 11.30 pm, the Ministry of External Affairs said. UNI RN


Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
After Indus Waters Treaty suspension: India seeks pause in World Bank expert's proceedings over Kishanganga & Ratle
India has written to the World Bank's neutral expert, Michel Lino, requesting a pause in his proceedings on the Ratle and Kishanganga hydropower disputes, following the Union government's decision to place the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) in abeyance, The Indian Express has learned. Lino is understood to have sought Pakistan's views on India's request, which Islamabad has opposed. The disputes being heard by Lino since 2022 concern two Indian hydropower projects in Jammu and Kashmir — Kishanganga, on the Kishanganga river, and Ratle, on the Chenab river. A French dam engineer and, until recently, the president of the International Commission on Large Dams, Lino was appointed by the World Bank on October 13, 2022, under Article IX and Annexure F of the Indus Waters Treaty. His mandate is to hear both India and Pakistan and determine whether the design of these projects complies with the treaty. Pakistan claims India is violating the treaty, particularly on minimum water flow requirements. Following the Union Cabinet's decision to keep the the treaty in abeyance 'until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism,' the Indian government formally notified Lino and requested that he vacate the mutually agreed 'work programme' pertaining to the Kishanganga and Ratle disputes. In its response to Lino, Pakistan objected to India's stance and opposed any proposal to suspend the dispute resolution proceedings. As per the agreed 2025 work programme, which India now wants vacated, Pakistan was to submit its written response – or counter memorial – to India's submission by August 7. The fourth meeting of the neutral expert with both sides was scheduled for November 17 to 22. This meeting would have been significant, involving the presentation of India's written arguments (memorial) and Pakistan's counter, questioning by the neutral expert, and preparations for a second site visit to India, likely in December. After The Pahalgam attack, India kept the IWT in abeyance 'until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism'. Under the IWT, the waters of the 'Eastern Rivers' — Sutlej, Beas and Ravi – are for India's unrestricted use, while the 'Western Rivers' – Indus, Jhelum, Chenab – are primarily for Pakistan. Lino, who functions as a technical adjudicator under the treaty to resolve 'differences', is expected to consider Pakistan's comments before deciding whether to pause the proceedings. An email sent by The Indian Express to Lino seeking comment did not elicit a response. Even as India and Pakistan are now talking through the neutral expert, the two governments are learned to have directly exchanged letters at least once on the suspension of IWT. India formally notified Pakistan of its decision to keep the treaty in abeyance by a letter dated April 24. Pakistan replied (before Operation Sindoor was launched on May 7), signalling willingness to discuss Delhi's concerns and suggesting a date in May for talks. India has not responded to that offer. According to top government sources, New Delhi is currently not inclined to engage in discussions with Islamabad on the matter, and the treaty will remain in abeyance for now. Meanwhile, sources said the government has drawn up a plan to construct a canal to divert water from the Indus river system to various Indian states. It has also carried out two flushing exercises at Baglihar and Salal – two run-of-the-river hydroelectric projects on the Chenab in J&K – to clear sediment that hampers power generation. These are the first such exercises since Salal was built in 1987 and Baglihar in 2008–09. Pakistan had previously blocked such activities through objections under the IWT. Officials said flushing will now be conducted on a monthly basis. Earlier, The Indian Express had reported that the Centre is looking to fast-track four hydroelectric projects on the Chenab – Pakal Dul (1,000 MW), Ratle (850 MW), Kiru (624 MW) and Kwar (540 MW). Pakal Dul is the first storage-based hydro project being built in J&K. Ritika Chopra, an award-winning journalist with over 17 years of experience, serves as the Chief of the National Bureau (Govt) and National Education Editor at The Indian Express in New Delhi. In her current role, she oversees the newspaper's coverage of government policies and education. Ritika closely tracks the Union Government, focusing on the politically sensitive Election Commission of India and the Education Ministry, and has authored investigative stories that have prompted government responses. Ritika joined The Indian Express in 2015. Previously, she was part of the political bureau at The Economic Times, India's largest financial daily. Her journalism career began in Kolkata, her birthplace, with the Hindustan Times in 2006 as an intern, before moving to Delhi in 2007. Since then, she has been reporting from the capital on politics, education, social sectors, and the Election Commission of India. ... Read More