MP CM Yadav congratulates Padma Shri awardees
Bhopal, May 28 (UNI) Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Mohan Yadav has congratulated the state's Padma Shri awardees on their prestigious honour.
In a post on X, Yadav said, "The President of India, Smt. Droupadi Murmu, honoured three distinguished personalities from Madhya Pradesh with the Padma Shri award in a grand ceremony at Rashtrapati Bhavan. Shri Harchandan Singh Bhatti was awarded for his contribution to Tribal and Folk Art, Shri Jagdish Joshila for Literature and Education, and Dr. Budhendra Kumar Jain for Medicine. I extend my heartfelt congratulations and best wishes to all of them."
Yadav added that these distinguished individuals have brought glory to Madhya Pradesh by setting exemplary standards in their respective fields through their hard work, dedication, and commitment. Their contributions will continue to inspire the younger generation.
The award ceremony was held at Rashtrapati Bhavan in New Delhi on Tuesday.
UNI XC AKT GNK 1233
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
23 minutes ago
- United News of India
Assam CM replies to Pak threat over Brahmaputra river
Guwahati, June 3 (UNI) Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Tuesday gave a stern reply to Pakistan over its threat of China stopping water flow of the Brahmaputra, saying China contributes only about 35 per cent of the river water, and that it is a river that grows and flows in India only. Taking to his X handle, the Chief Minister said the Brahmaputra expands in India with rainwaters from Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya and Nagaland — the waters of tributaries like Subansiri, Kameng, Lohit, Dhansiri, Manas and many others. He said that it is the rainfall in these Indian states and the tributaries that contribute to 70 per cent waters of Brahmaputra. 'After India suspended the Indus water treaty with Pakistan, the country now wants to create a new imaginary threat -- what will happen if China holds Brahmaputra's water?' said Sarma on his X handle on Tuesday. 'Nothing will happen to India. We are going to dispel these myths based on truth and data,' he said while China contributes only 30-35 per cent of waters of Brahmaputra, which are basically glacial melts, the Brahmaputra grows to its vastness only inside India by the massive rainfall in Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland and Meghalaya and by the waters of its tributaries in different parts of this region. 'The flow of Brahmaputra in Tuting along the India-China border is 2000 to 3000 cubic meters per second. However, this flow increases to 15,000 to 20,000 cubic meter per second in the Brahmaputra Valley in Guwahati during the rainy season. The Brahmaputra does not depend on the Himalayas for its flow, it is enriched by the massive rainfall in Indian states,' he said while giving data. 'I just want to remind one thing briefly — the Brahmaputra cannot be controlled by controlling just one of its sources. It is ever flowing due to its geographic location, It is a blessing for us,' he added. UNI ANP PRS
United News of India
39 minutes ago
- United News of India
Assam CM demolishes Pak narrative on Brahmaputra river
New Delhi, June 3 (UNI) After the nuclear blackmail during Operation Sindoor, Pakistan has resorted to a new threat asking what if China Stops Brahmaputra water to India. The narrative was, however, demolished by Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma before it could gain currency. In a response to Pakistan's new scare narrative, the Assam Chief Minister tweeted 'After India decisively moved away from the outdated Indus Waters Treaty, Pakistan is now spinning another manufactured threat: What if China stops the Brahmaputra's water to India ?' 'Let's dismantle this myth — not with fear, but with facts and national clarity,' the Chief Minister said. 'Brahmaputra : A river that grows in India — not shrinks. China contributes only 30–35 percent of the Brahmaputra's total flow, mostly through glacial melt and limited Tibetan rainfall. The remaining 65–70 percent is generated within India, thanks to torrential monsoon rainfall in Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Nagaland and Meghalaya and major tributaries like Subansiri, Lohit, Kameng, Manas, Dhansiri, Jia-Bharali, Kopili," he said. He said additional inflows are from the Khasi, Garo, and Jaintia Hills via rivers such as Krishnai, Digaru, and Kulsi. The Chief Minister said the Brahmaputra is not a river India depends on upstream, it is a rain-fed Indian river system, strengthened after entering Indian territory. The Truth that Pakistan should know is that even if China were to reduce water flow (unlikely as China has never threatened or indicated in any official forum), it may actually help India mitigate the annual floods in Assam which displace lakhs and destroy livelihoods every year. Meanwhile, Pakistan, which has exploited 74 years of preferential water access under the Indus Waters Treaty, now panics as India rightfully reclaims its sovereign rights. The Chief Minister said Brahmaputra is not controlled by a single source. 'It is powered by our geography, our monsoon and our civilizational resilience.' UNI RB SSP
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
SC agrees to hear Jaipur Royals' plea on historic covenants
New Delhi, June 3 (UNI) The Supreme Court has issued notice on a petition filed by Rajmata Padmini Devi, Rajasthan Deputy Chief Minister Diya Kumari, and Maharaja Sawai Padmanabh Singh of the erstwhile Jaipur royal family, challenging the constitutional bar under Article 363 over adjudication of disputes stemming from pre-Independence covenants between princely states and the Government of India. A bench comprising Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice A.G. Masih on Monday signaled readiness to delve into the nuanced constitutional debate surrounding the continuing applicability of Article 363 especially after the repeal of its companion provision, Article 362, in 1972. Appearing for the petitioners, Senior Advocate Harish Salve, assisted by Senior Counsel Vibha Datta Makhija, contended that the 1949 covenant in question was not signed with the Government of India (GoI), but among five Rajasthan rulers, with the Centre acting merely as a guarantor. Hence, Article 363, which bars courts from entertaining disputes arising from covenants, should not apply. Salve invoked Articles 363 and 366, arguing that the ownership of the disputed properties existed prior to the covenant, and that the Constitution must now permit courts to re-examine the legal rights surrounding such properties. Justice Mishra, however, asked pointedly, 'Without the Government of India being a party, how did you merge with the Union of India?' He further questioned the broader implications: 'If your argument is accepted, then the entire state of Rajasthan would be governed by the King. "Will all princely states be free to claim their properties?' the Court asked. Salve responded that allowing adjudication was not tantamount to conceding ownership: 'Filing a suit is different from asserting rights. I'm only arguing on the right to be heard in court.' The petition challenges the April 17 judgment of the Rajasthan High Court, which had dismissed four civil suits filed by the Jaipur royals and their trust over iconic Jaipur properties including Town Hall (Old Vidhan Sabha), Hazari Guards Building (Old Police HQ), and parts of the City Palace. The High Court had ruled that these suits were barred by Article 363, which prohibits court jurisdiction over disputes related to pre-Constitution covenants. The court accepted the State's revision pleas and rejected the royals' claims under the Civil Procedure Code. The apex court bench observed that the matter raises complex constitutional questions: 'You have been non-suited because of the bar. We are not commenting on merits. But allowing your argument would mean half of Jaipur could be yours.' The bench issued notice to the respondents and listed the matter for further hearing after eight weeks. Salve requested interim relief, seeking to preserve the status quo. Additional Advocate General (AAG) Shiv Mangal Sharma, appearing for the Rajasthan government, accepted the notice and assured the court that no precipitative steps would be taken regarding the disputed properties. This case may become a watershed moment in determining whether India's constitutional bar on royal covenants still holds, or whether legal avenues can reopen for former rulers seeking possession or compensation over their ancestral properties. The bench noted, this legal challenge could either reaffirm the constitutional closure of the princely era, or rekindle claims from royal families across the country, testing the delicate balance between historical integration and legal continuity in the Republic of India. UNI SNG RN
