
First Nations on B.C.'s North Coast say they would not support a new pipeline
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith told Bloomberg News Tuesday that she expects a private company will bring forward a proposal to build a new oil pipeline to B.C.'s North Coast within weeks.
Smith wants to revive a plan to bring oilsands crude to the northern B.C. coast for export to Asia, with the endpoint in Prince Rupert, B.C.
"There is no project or proponents that would be acceptable to us on the North Coast," said Marilyn Slett, elected chief councillor of the Heiltsuk Tribal Council, about 479 kilometres north of Vancouver, and president of the Coastal First Nations' Great Bear Initiative (CFN)—an alliance of nine First Nations on the north Pacific coast of B.C. to Haida Gwaii.
"Anything that proposes to send oil through the coast is a non-starter," said Slett.
Many of the CFN First Nations were parties to a B.C. Supreme Court appeal that stopped Northern Gateway pipeline plans to ship crude oil from the port of Kitimat, B.C.
The Enbridge project was scrapped because the court ruled Ottawa failed to properly consult with First Nations affected by the pipeline.
Slett said that CFN does support reliable energy projects like solar and hydroelectric.
"[The] north Pacific coast is one of the richest cold water marine ecosystems on earth and it's a source of our sustenance, tied to our culture and the livelihoods of not just our communities but many British Columbians," said Slett.
"We can't have one livelihood at the cost of another," she said.
A University of British Columbia Study estimated that a major oil spill cleanup on the North Coast could cost up to $9.6 billion, and cost the region's commercial fisheries, port, ferry transportation and tourism industries more than $300 million.
B.C. premier won't take position
B.C. Premier David Eby has not given a firm position on whether he would support a pipeline through northern B.C, telling CBC The Early Edition on Thursday, "I won't speculate about a project that doesn't exist." But did say he would not support a publicly funded pipeline to the North Coast.
Premier Eby discusses possibility of northern oil pipeline
1 day ago
Duration 13:36
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says a proposal to build an oil pipeline to B.C.'s North Coast could be just weeks away. For his part, B.C. Premier David Eby has said he opposes a publicly-funded pipeline, but may consider a privately backed project. He joined CBC's Stephen Quinn to respond to Smith and discuss the possible proposal.
Eby told CBC that his government is in support of the federal oil tanker ban on the North Coast.
The Oil Tanker Moratorium Act prohibits oil tankers carrying more than 12,500 metric tons of crude oil, or persistent oil products, from stopping, loading, or unloading at ports in a restricted area covering nearly the entire North Coast.
Slett said she would like Eby's government to take a position on a potential pipeline.
"Theoretically or not, these discussions are happening," said Slett.
'Knee-jerk reaction'
The B.C. regional chief for the Assembly of First Nations, Terry Teegee, said that First Nations have a right to be concerned about Eby's comments, but that these discussions are premature.
Teegee said that this is a "knee-jerk reaction" to tariffs from the U.S. administration, which has led the province to diversify its trade relationships.
Eby recently returned from a 10-day trade mission to East Asia, where Japanese conglomerates expressed interest in the liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the province.
"We've got partners over there that prefer to buy B.C. LNG because it comes from a politically stable jurisdiction, but also because it is the lowest carbon LNG in the world," Eby told CBC.
LNG has started producing liquefied natural gas that is being transported by the Coastal GasLink pipeline to an export facility in Kitimat, B.C.
"It is really concerning because some of these projects will have long-lasting impacts to many First Nations that would affect their territories [for] decades, if not hundreds of years," said Teegee.
Teegee said First Nations need to be part of the decision-making process when it comes to large energy projects being considered and approved.
"This one is, as we've seen previously, it failed," said Teegee.
"Perhaps it's a pipe dream."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
26 minutes ago
- CTV News
Learn more about The Future of Energy Global Summit
Calgary Watch Jim Kinnear joins Ian White to discuss The Future of Energy Global Summit, which will be held in Banff in mid-September.


CBC
27 minutes ago
- CBC
Air Canada says it will begin cancelling flights ahead of possible weekend strike
Air Canada says it will begin cancelling flights on Thursday ahead of a potential strike that could see more than 10,000 flight attendants walk off the job this weekend. It comes as unionized flight attendants with Air Canada issued 72-hour strike notice.


CBC
27 minutes ago
- CBC
BoC officials considered whether interest rate already low enough to weather tariffs
Newly released documents show some members of the Bank of Canada were wondering last month whether the central bank's benchmark interest rate is already low enough to support the Canadian economy through U.S. tariffs. The Bank of Canada on Wednesday released the summary of deliberations from the meetings leading up to its decision on July 30 to hold the policy rate steady at 2.75 per cent. Those minutes show the central bank's governing council was fixed on how U.S. tariffs and the global trade "rewiring" were affecting inflation and the wider Canadian economy. The central bank's decision arrived just a couple days before U.S. President Donald Trump ratcheted base tariffs on Canada up to 35 per cent, while maintaining an exemption for goods compliant with CUSMA. Despite the ongoing uncertainty, monetary policymakers noted there were some signs of economic resilience heading into the rate decision. Rate cuts 'sufficient' to support economy The deliberations show some members wondered if the Bank of Canada had already provided "sufficient support" to guide the economy through its tariff transition. The central bank cut its policy rate seven consecutive times from June 2024 to March of this year in a bid to boost the economy as inflation showed signs of coming back under control. Economists say much of the impact from a monetary policy decision tends to take effect a year or more after the move, so many of those rate cuts are just now starting to stimulate the economy. WATCH | Bank of Canada held rates again in July: Bank of Canada 'ready to respond to new information,' Macklem says after holding rate 14 days ago Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem, when asked Wednesday if he sees the need for a rate cut this year, declined to forecast — but stressed that the bank is always watching for new information, especially around the Canada-U.S. trade situation. In that vein, the Bank of Canada governing council wondered whether cutting rates now, only for the economy to recover on its own, would only end up fuelling inflation down the road. "Given the lagged effects of monetary policy, there was a risk that further easing might take effect only as demand was recovering, which could add to price pressures," the summary read. Some forecasters, including RBC, have no further interest rate cuts in their base-case outlooks. Others on the Bank of Canada's governing council felt that signs of slack emerging in the economy could warrant additional rate cuts, particularly if the labour market started showing more weakness. If incoming data showed inflation wasn't straying too far from the central bank's target of two per cent, there could be a need for a lower policy rate, those members argued in the deliberations. No sharp rise in inflation with U.S. tariffs Alongside the rate decision, the Bank of Canada issued three scenarios for how the U.S. tariff situation could evolve: the status quo persists; there's a de-escalation in trade restrictions; and tariffs ramp up. The governing council noted that none of those scenarios showed a "sharp rise in inflation." Monetary policymakers said in deliberations that the impact of tariffs on consumer prices "appeared to be modest so far," but those effects were only just starting to show up in the data. "Members judged the risks to inflation to be elevated given evident pressures on underlying inflation and the uncertainty around the impacts that tariffs and trade disruptions could have on Canada's economy over time," the summary read. The Bank of Canada will get a fresh look at inflation figures for July and August ahead of its Sept. 17 interest rate decision.