
A conversation begins: How Israelis view Gaza's unfolding hunger crisis
in Gaza
this week due to
Israel's
'starvation policy', was accompanied by a harrowing photograph of a Gaza mother clutching her undernourished 18-month-old child.
Until recently, Ha'aretz was the only mainstream Israeli media outlet giving prominence to the worsening humanitarian crisis
in Gaza
. However, a week ago this began to change.
A reporter for Israel's most popular TV channel, Channel 12, posted a screenshot of a dialogue among the station's journalists, debating the question of the coverage (or, more accurately, lack of coverage) of the growing hunger in Gaza.
The gist of the exchange was that although Israel's military censor imposes no restrictions on such coverage, self-censorship by almost all Israeli journalists, motivated by the need for patriotic coverage in a time of war, has prevented stories of starvation from reaching the Israeli public. The feeling was that such coverage would somehow undermine the war effort and public morale and boost Hamas's manipulation of the humanitarian crisis for its own ends, turning world public opinion against Israel.
Many of the hostages who have been released have told stories of how they were starved by their Hamas captors, and some journalists argued that it would be inappropriate or even offensive to talk about the starvation of the Gaza population when food is deliberately withheld from the hostages.
Posters of Israeli hostages being held in Gaza displayed outside the Israeli embassy in Washington, DC. Photograph:The background to these exchanges is the fact that the overwhelming majority of Israelis continue to see Hamas as solely responsible for the suffering of the Gaza population and everything that has happened in the last 21 months.
Images of Gaza civilians crossing the border to loot border kibbutz communities and angry mobs surrounding the hostages on the streets of Gaza on October 7th have had a deep impact on Israeli public opinion. This was compounded by a number of hostages relating how their captors ordered them to whisper while in captivity, fearing that if local residents discovered their whereabouts, they would be lynched.
Some 64 per cent of Israelis believe that 'there are no innocents' in Gaza, according to a survey published by Jerusalem Hebrew university's aChord Centre last month. This figure rose to 87 per cent among supporters of Israel's ruling coalition.
The poll also examined public attitudes toward media coverage of the war in Gaza. It found that 64 per cent of Israelis said domestic media coverage was balanced and did not require broader reporting on the humanitarian situation in the Palestinian enclave.
Among coalition voters, 89 per cent held that view, but among opposition voters, only 44 per cent agreed, with 56 per cent of the latter calling for broader coverage.
The revelations of the internal debate among Channel 12 journalists opened up the floodgates and this past week, for the first time, the Gaza hunger issue was extensively reported on the daily news programmes and in the print media, often ahead of the ongoing war coverage and ceasefire contacts. The main debate centred on the claims of starvation and the reliability of the statistics put out by the Hamas-controlled health ministry and local NGOs, who many Israelis believe work in tandem with Hamas.
Samah Matar holds her son Yousef (6) north of Gaza City on Thursday. Yousef has cerebral palsy and severe malnutrition. He weighed about 29 pounds before the war but now weighs about 20 pounds. Photograph: Saher Alghorra/The New York Times
The second question now being openly discussed is Israel's responsibility for the humanitarian crisis. The almost daily casualties at the food distribution centres are reported along with the fact that not enough food is entering the enclave, but Israel is not automatically blamed for this. Prominence is given to the Israeli military claims that hundreds of food lorries are ready on the Gaza border to make deliveries but the humanitarian NGOs are unable or unwilling to assume responsibility for the operation. And the claim that Hamas loots the trucks and stores large amounts of aid in its warehouses is also reported extensively.
In recent weeks protests have increased by groups calling for the war to end. A small but vocal group of anti-war protesters have always been a feature of the weekly demonstrations calling for the release of the hostages but many of them are veteran left-wing activists and the protest organisers were concerned that their presence would undermine the mainstream consensus that overwhelmingly supports a deal that will bring home the remaining 50 hostages, 20 of whom are believed to be alive.
Increasingly, as the war has dragged on with no end in sight, the two groups have merged and the placards with images of dead or starving Gazan children are now more prominent.
The most fervent anti-war protests are organised by Israeli Arabs but a small number of Jewish radicals also participate. In the mixed Jewish-Arab city of Haifa, police arrested 24 protesters at one such gathering this week.
Hundreds of Israelis gather in Tel Aviv, marching and protesting against the Israeli government, accusing it of starving Palestinian civilians in Gaza. Photograph: Ori Aviram / Middle East Images via AFP
Police described those arrested as rioters, saying they 'did not respond to officers' orders, held up signs and chanted slogans against Israel's actions in the war in Gaza'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
43 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Epstein saga has exposed cracks in Maga movement which could fatally undermine Donald Trump
The second Trump administration has featured many scandals: his shameless corruption, his pardoning of the January 6th insurrectionists, his pushing a Bill that strips millions from healthcare to give more money to those who need it the least, his backing for the Israeli genocide of Palestinians and Israel's other reckless wars in the Middle East. All these things seem more important than whether his justice department relents and releases its files on the Jeffrey Epstein case. Yet, this is the one scandal from which Trump can't seem to escape, and the one that might prove the most damaging for him politically. No one is more aware of this than Trump himself. It is a sign of his desperation to move on from the Epstein story that on Wednesday – at a bizarre press conference with the president of the Philippines looking on – he ranted about Barack Obama's supposed corruption. READ MORE He claimed that Obama was guilty of 'treason' and that he tried to 'lead a coup' with faked intelligence about Russian interference in the election. It was a transparent effort to change the story. The embattled Trump even admitted as much: 'It's time to go after people.' In the past, he has had a brilliant knack for deflecting negative attention from himself to others. During the 2016 campaign, it seemed like he was finished when the Access Hollywood tapes emerged which captured him bragging about groping women. But before the next presidential debate, he assembled a press conference of several women who claimed to be victims of sexual harassment by Bill Clinton . It worked then; it allowed enough voters to come to the cynical conclusion that all politicians are equally corrupt. The tactic is unlikely to work this time. Attacking Obama is something of a reflex for Trump, who rose to prominence promoting the 'birther' conspiracy theory that Obama was born outside the US. Trump's run for the presidency was, people close to him has said, partly a desire for vengeance against Obama after the then-president mercilessly mocked him at the fateful 2011 White House correspondents' dinner (Obama's quips included: 'No one is happier, no one is prouder to put this birth certificate matter to rest than the Donald. And that's because he can finally get back to focusing on the issues that matter–— like, did we fake the Moon landing'). But Obama is arguably the politician that the public would least expect to have anything to do with a sexual predator like Epstein. Bill Clinton was in fact friends with Epstein, but his presidency ended so long ago that attacking him just doesn't have much purchase any more. [ White House claims 'fake news' over reports Donald Trump named in Epstein files Opens in new window ] Donald Trump, Melania Knauss (later, Melania Trump), Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell pose together at the Mar-a-Lago club in 2000. Photograph: Davidoff Studios/ Getty Images This time, Trump hasn't been able to shift the narrative. That is partly because, as Ciarán O'Connor wrote this week , once the flames of conspiracy theories have been fanned, they are difficult to extinguish. But it is also because it goes to the same open secret that was at the centre of the Access Hollywood scandal: Trump's serial pattern of sexual abuse makes the notion that he has something to hide more plausible. To paraphrase congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who would have thought that electing a sexual offender would have complicated the release of the Epstein files? In 2023, a civil court ruled that Trump had sexually abused E Jean Carroll. By one count, at least 18 women have accused Trump of sexual assault or sexual harassment. The controversy over the release of the Epstein files has also resurfaced, leading to renewed attention on Trump's once close relationship with him. Epstein's brother has suggested that Trump was once Jeffrey Epstein's 'best friend'. The Wall Street Journal published a card that it claimed Trump sent Epstein on his 50th birthday with a lewd drawing of a woman and a reference to a 'wonderful secret'. Trump is suing the Wall Street Journal for $10 billion over the report, which he vehemently denies. It's possible that there is nothing in the Epstein files that reveals damaging information about Trump. But that is now almost beside the point. The political significance of the Epstein controversy is that it has hurt Trump's standing among his own base, which was already upset about his breaking America First principles by joining Israel's war against Iran. Though Trump has been unpopular with many Americans for most of the last decade, his political strength has been the unshakeable support of his base, which has allowed him to dominate the Republican Party. [ Bill Clinton reportedly sent Jeffrey Epstein note for birthday album Opens in new window ] This time, Trump hasn't been able to shift the narrative. Photograph: Anna Moneymaker/ Getty Images As he himself once boasted, 'I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose any voters.' But it is symptomatic of his hubris that he promoted the conspiracy theory about Epstein, someone who was once a close associate. Under pressure from a disaffected Maga base, a significant number of Republican legislators broke with Trump for the first time in this second term. Rather than face a vote on whether to release the Epstein files that he was certain to lose, House Speaker Mike Johnson simply declared that they would break for summer early, even though that meant abandoning parts of the Republican agenda. But significantly, three Republicans on the ten-member House Committee on Oversight joined Democrats to subpoena the justice department for its Epstein files. Republicans Nancy Mace of South Carolina, Scott Perry of Pennsylvania and Brian Jack of Georgia sided with Democrats. Democrats certainly don't consider the Epstein case to be the most significant issue facing the US – but they smell a rare political opportunity to exploit cracks in the Maga movement. They recognise that Trump is in a lose-lose situation. It seems unlikely he will release any information too damaging about himself. Yet, if he refuses to release files or releases them but there's nothing significant in them, many – and not only conspiracy theorists – will wonder if key information is being withheld. It's certainly possible that the Epstein controversy will blow over. Come September, when the US legislature reconvenes, we may all be talking about something else: a national or world crisis, quite possibly one of Trump's own making. And yet the cracks it has revealed in MAGA are potentially disastrous for Trump's power, dampening enthusiasm for Republican candidates at the next election, and undermining his tight control of the Republican Party.


Irish Times
43 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Words like ‘humanitarian' have lost all meaning. Let the images speak instead
Chapin Fay is the spokesperson for an organisation called – in one of the many grossly Orwellian inversions of language and meaning we have come to associate with the Israeli war on Gaza – the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. An American operation based in Delaware and backed by Israel , GHF – which has no experience in humanitarian aid distribution – has been entirely responsible for it in Gaza since May. The United Nations and major aid groups have refused to co-operate with GHF because they say it prioritises Israeli military objectives over the safe delivery of aid. As such, until a ceasefire holds and the safe flow of aid resumes, GHF has been the only thing standing between 90,000 already seriously malnourished women and children and imminent death by starvation. According to his online biography, Fay is 'one of the best media strategists and Republican operatives in the state' and a 'crisis management expert with a track record of helping Fortune 500 companies'. He is also now the public face of the group operating what has been called by the head of United Nations Relief and Works Agency (Unrwa), ' sadistic death traps ', food hubs staffed by US mercenaries and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). These hubs, which are located in areas Palestinians have been ordered to leave, typically open for an average of 11 minutes at a time, according to a powerful Guardian investigation . As desperate Palestinians, who have trekked long distances and waited many hours, rush towards unattended packages of flour, they risk being shot by the IDF. Since May, more than 1,000 people have reportedly died in the scramble for food from the centres, according to Unrwa. READ MORE During the masterclass in Orwellian Newspeak he delivered at a briefing this week, Fay shrugged this off. 'Civilians are being killed all over the Strip,' he said. But then he went on: 'By Hamas, the IDF and other armed groups. But I'd like to point out that actually, the most violent incidents, the highest casualties have been linked to the UN or other humanitarian convoys. That's a fact.' [ Doctors report wave of hunger deaths in Gaza as US envoy arrives to 'push for ceasefire' Opens in new window ] As words like 'fact' and 'humanitarian' have lost all meaning – have been so violently divorced from their normal use as to now infer precisely the opposite – we may need to start inventing new ones. Like inhumanitarian. Binyamin Netanyahu wants to ethnically cleanse the population of Gaza, removing survivors to an inhumanitarian city. US president Donald Trump wants to create an inhumanitarian transit area . Or we can take the approach of Ehud Olmert, the former Israeli prime minister, and use the names we already have for these kind of places: concentration camps . Whatever words we use, none can occlude the reality of what is happening in Gaza. No words can adequately capture it either. Language has been so debased that maybe we should abandon it altogether and allow the images to speak instead. One such photograph was published on the front of this newspaper on Wednesday. Taken by Ahmed Jihad Ibrahim Al-Arni, it shows a woman dressed in mauve robes with a stained white headscarf knotted under her chin. Only the lower half of her face is visible. The serene set of her mouth belies the unspeakable horror of what she has seen, and what she wants us to see. Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq, a one-and-a-half-year-old child, in Gaza city this week. Photograph: Ahmed Jihad Ibrahim Al-arini/Anadolu/Getty A little boy of 18 months, Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq, clings to her. Her hand is tenderly cradling the back of his head. Instead of a nappy, he is wearing a black bin liner. The outline of his vertebral column, his shoulder blades and his rib cage protrude under his dry, papery skin. Babies normally have dimples at their elbows, but he has the wizened limbs and loose skin of an old man, of someone close to death. Muhammad, you understand instantly from the picture, is very close to death. The images coming in on the wire services from Gaza used to show children playing in the rubble of what was formerly their home. They were very distressing. But the pictures we are now getting are unfathomable: emaciated small bodies who no longer have the strength to stay upright. Children with horribly protruding ribs, hollow eyes, scabbed lips and noses, distended bellies and far off, vacant stares. Toddlers whose features are scarcely recognisable as belonging to children. [ Seeing Israel use hunger as a weapon of war is monstrous to me as someone with a Holocaust legacy Opens in new window ] In the 48 hours before Muhammad's picture was published in this newspaper, 12 children and 21 adults had died of starvation in the Gaza Strip, according to the Gaza health ministry. Fay recommends we don't believe the ministry, because it is run by Hamas. Who, then, do we believe? Who does the EU choose to believe? Whose words will be enough for the United Nations Security Council to intervene? What about the evidence of researchers from University of London, the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, Princeton, Stanford, Peace Research Institute Oslo and Université Catholique de Louvain and the first independent study of the number of people killed as a result of Israel's military campaign in Gaza? The study was based on household surveys and found that at least 75,200 Palestinians were killed between October 2023 and January 2025. Another 8,540 died due to starvation, disease and the collapse of healthcare systems. The researchers say the Gaza health ministry's figures are, in fact, far too conservative. Do we believe the AFP when it warns that the 10 freelance journalists it has left in Gaza face death by starvation? Do we believe the 109 aid organisations that wrote a letter this week begging Israel to end the blockade? Do we believe the evidence of our own eyes? Or do we believe the Newspeak of Chapin Fay, of Binyamin Netanyahu's government and of Donald Trump, when they insist that freedom is slavery, that concentration camps are humanitarian cities, and that the babies starving to death in front of us are Hamas propaganda?


Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
The Irish Independent's View: Collective inaction on Gaza is a dark stain on humanity
The totally preventable tragedies of Gaza are a black mark on our age. But where is the global pressure to insist that the cruelty must end? One wonders if 21st-century life has really become so transactional as to be impervious to the traumas of defenceless children. If such is the case, we are in a very dark place. Surely the unwarranted cruelty witnessed daily in Gaza is intolerable to a rules-based order. Yet it appears that, even after 22 months, there are no depths of agony from which the people of the enclave can hope to be spared. The starvation in Gaza is of a magnitude that medics sent in to help are collapsing from hunger And so US secretary of state Marco Rubio thought it fitting to lash out at France for becoming the first G7 nation to recognise Palestine as a state. It was, he said, a 'slap in the face' to the families of the victims murdered by Hamas. Can he be unaware that since then, 60,000 Palestinians have been killed? Concerns for them and their remaining loved ones and the worsening death toll seems non-existent. All death is deplorable. To be casual about the mass taking of life is to risk being trapped in an inescapable moral vacuum. The starvation in Gaza is of a magnitude that even the medics sent in to help are collapsing from hunger. At the same time, the killing of desperate people – many of them children taking on the responsibility of fending for the families – continues. The lines of the skeletal and the destitute queuing for whatever scraps they might be offered belong in the Dark Ages. As daily bombardments continue, Israeli troops fire near where the aid is handed out. Recently returned from Gaza, Dr Nick Maynard told RTÉ he had seen young boys who were shot in the testicles. He believed they had been used as target practice as their wounds were all of a similar nature. But even as the deaths from starvation mount, Israeli heritage minister Amichai Eliyahu went on radio to claim: 'There's no hunger in Gaza.' Israel 'is racing ahead for Gaza to be wiped out', he said, calling Palestinians 'indoctrinated Nazis'. 'Thank God we are wiping out this evil,' he added. I can't imagine I'm going to die of starvation after 21 months of bombing One female doctor is quoted in the Washington Post as saying: 'I can't imagine I'm going to die of starvation after 21 months of bombing. We are all walking towards death.' Atrocities are no less atrocious because they are carried out by elected politicians and facilitated by democratic governments. Yet in this darkest hour, Donald Trump and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu appear to be abandoning peace talks. Mr Netanyahu said it was clear that Hamas did not want a deal, and Mr Trump said they would have to now be 'hunted down'. That Hamas needs to be brought to account is not in question. But this 'forever war' in which civilians and children are deemed worthless and expendable is unjust and indefensible and must be stopped.