logo
Major Gulf markets retreat on geopolitics

Major Gulf markets retreat on geopolitics

Reuters3 days ago

June 12 (Reuters) - Major stock markets in the Gulf fell in early trade on Thursday amid uncertainty following the U.S. decision to relocate personnel from the Middle East ahead of nuclear talks with Iran.
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday U.S. personnel were being moved out of the Middle East because "it could be a dangerous place," adding that the United States would not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon.
Reuters reported on Wednesday that the U.S. is preparing a partial evacuation of its Iraqi embassy and will allow military dependents to leave locations around the Middle East due to heightened security risks in the region, according to U.S. and Iraqi sources.
Saudi Arabia's benchmark index (.TASI), opens new tab dropped 1.3% as almost all its constituents were in negative territory including Al Rajhi Bank (1120.SE), opens new tab, which was down 0.6%.
Among other losers, oil giant Saudi Aramco (2222.SE), opens new tab was down 0.4%.
The decision by the U.S. to evacuate some personnel comes at a volatile moment in the region. Trump's efforts to reach a nuclear deal with Iran appear to be deadlocked and U.S. intelligence indicates that Israel has been making preparations for a strike against Iran's nuclear facilities.
Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said on Wednesday that if Iran was subjected to strikes it would retaliate by hitting U.S. bases in the region.
Dubai's main share index (.DDFMGI), opens new tab retreated 1.7%, its biggest intraday fall since April, dragged down by losses across sectors and led by a 3% slide in blue-chip developer Emaar Properties (EMAR.DU), opens new tab.
In Abu Dhabi, the index (.FTFADGI), opens new tab fell 1%, hit by a 2% fall in ADNOC Gas (ADNOCGAS.AD), opens new tab.
The Qatari index (.QSI), opens new tab traded 0.8% lower, with petrochemical maker Industries Qatar (IQCD.QA), opens new tab losing 1%.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer's challenge in dealing with the G6 plus 1
Keir Starmer's challenge in dealing with the G6 plus 1

The Independent

time14 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Keir Starmer's challenge in dealing with the G6 plus 1

Sir Keir Starmer has proved himself to be a rather more adept negotiator on the world stage than his detractors would suggest. The timing was partly fortuitous, but it remains the case that he concluded three advantageous trade deals last month, with India, the United States and the European Union. He will need those diplomatic skills this weekend at the G7 summit in Canada. The geopolitical order has been shaken by Israel's attack on Iran, and there is an urgent need for the leaders of the world's rich democracies to show unity and resolve in response. Solidarity and resolution are hardly the qualities associated with Donald Trump, however, and even before the bombs fell on Tehran there were serious differences between the US president and his fellow leaders. Never before in the history of the G7, which goes back to the oil crisis of 1973, has one of its members sought to annex another, for example, as Mr Trump has offered to do with Canada. While most leaders of G7 nations seem to share a broadly similar outlook, there is one who does not. It is almost as if it is a summit of the Group of 6 plus 1. So far, it has to be said that Sir Keir has managed to deal with the unpredictable ego of the US president more adroitly than most. For all that some Britons might find it emotionally satisfying for their prime minister to tell Mr Trump to his face what they think of him, there can be no doubt that it is in our national interest for Sir Keir to lay on the compliments with a trowel. That is the approach that secured agreement in principle to exempt the United Kingdom from at least some of Mr Trump's tariffs. If Sir Keir has to continue that approach in order to get those exemptions locked down, then so be it. The prime minister will also need to work hard to try to keep the US president from straying too far from the G7 consensus on support for Ukraine – Mark Carney, the Canadian prime minister, has invited Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, to join the summit in Kananaskis, Alberta. Mr Trump will find it harder to try to bully Mr Zelensky in a setting in which the US president is so obviously outnumbered. There is the linked subject of Nato's future, and the forthcoming discussions about Nato's European members raising their defence spending to take up more of the burden of supporting Ukraine from the US. Then Sir Keir will also want to lobby Mr Trump to keep the Aukus submarine agreement between the US, the UK and Australia, about which some members of the US administration have been sceptical. Finally, there is the Middle East, where a gap has opened up between the US and UK responses to Israel's attempts to ensure that Iran does not acquire nuclear weapons. The Israeli strikes were a rebuff to Mr Trump, who seems to have imagined that his diplomacy aimed at restraining the Iranian nuclear programme was making progress. Yet the US president – despite Marco Rubio, his secretary of state, initially standing back from the onslaught – quickly declared his support for the 'excellent' attacks. The British government's response has been – rightly – more circumspect, and the leaders of the other G7 countries have likewise also called for restraint and de-escalation. On his arrival at the resort in the Canadian Rockies, Sir Keir will be walking a tightrope. Let us hope that he is as successful as he has been up to now.

Will Israel-Iran conflict spark fresh inflation crisis? Rachel Reeves admits spiking energy prices and threats to trade routes are 'cause for concern' - with fears public finances are too bad to respond
Will Israel-Iran conflict spark fresh inflation crisis? Rachel Reeves admits spiking energy prices and threats to trade routes are 'cause for concern' - with fears public finances are too bad to respond

Daily Mail​

time22 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Will Israel-Iran conflict spark fresh inflation crisis? Rachel Reeves admits spiking energy prices and threats to trade routes are 'cause for concern' - with fears public finances are too bad to respond

Fears are mounting about the economic impact of the Iran-Israel conflict today as energy prices rise and trade routes face disruption. Rachel Reeves admitted a 10 per cent spike in oil and gas costs and threats by Tehran to close the Straits of Hormuz were 'cause for concern'. In TV interviews this morning, the Chancellor stressed energy costs were still lower than 'a few months ago' - but said the potential fallout for UK plc was partly driving the UK's calls for de-escalation. Ms Reeves dodged questions on whether her already-delicate spending plans would be smashed by the crisis, insisting Britain has a 'strong economy'. The comments came as former BP boss Lord Browne warned oil prices would 'go up a long way' if Iran shut the Straits of Hormuz. Deutsche Bank has suggested that such action could see Brent crude hit $125 a barrel - compared to around $74 now. Former Chancellor Lord Hammond told Sky News that the government was not in a good position to respond to serious disruption because Ms Reeves had not rebuilt the Treasury's reserve. Ms Reeves told Sky News: 'We've already seen in the last few days, for example, oil and gas prices begin to go up'. 'Over the course of this week, oil and gas prices, oil prices have gone up by just over 10 per cent, they're still down compared to a few months ago but of course we're keeping an eye on that,' she said. 'And at the same time, as you say trade routes are very important through the Middle East and we've seen disruption there in the past, partly because of the Houthi attacks for example. 'And so that is a cause for concern.' Pressed how bad the situation could be, she said: 'It is very early days and things are moving quickly. But when we urge for de-escalation in the region that is in part because of the lives at risk… but also because what happens in the Middle East affects us here at home. 'It's why in the Spending Review this week we invested heavily in our defence to keep our country safe.' Ms Reeves confirmed the UK is deploying military assets to the region to 'protect ourselves' and 'potentially to support our allies'. She noted that in the past Britain has 'helped protect Israel' from 'incoming strikes'. 'I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future, but so far, we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies.' Lord Hammond told Sky News: 'What she should have been doing of course a long time ago is rebuilding our reserve. But she hasn't done that… 'If there's an economic shock we will be in a much more difficult position in responding to it.' He added: 'It's only if the situation becomes long term sustained that I think there is a risk we could see serious economic disruption.'

UK interest rates predicted to stay at 4.25% with Bank ‘nimble' amid uncertainty
UK interest rates predicted to stay at 4.25% with Bank ‘nimble' amid uncertainty

South Wales Argus

time25 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

UK interest rates predicted to stay at 4.25% with Bank ‘nimble' amid uncertainty

Most economists think the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) will opt to keep rates on hold when it meets on Thursday. The MPC has voted to cut rates at every other meeting since it started easing borrowing costs last August, from a peak of 5.25%. (PA Graphics) This has been possible while the rate of UK inflation has been steadily falling from the highs reached in 2023, at the peak of the cost-of-living crisis. However, inflation jumped to its highest level for more than a year in April, according to the latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation hit 3.5% in April, up from 2.6% in March. Since releasing the data, the ONS said that an error in vehicle tax data collected meant the April figure should have been 3.4%. Ellie Henderson, an economist for Investec, said monetary policy 'seems to be in a good position, allowing the Bank of England to wait and see how economic conditions and the international political backdrop evolve'. 'Ultimately, this is a highly uncertain time that requires a potentially nimble response from central banks, limiting any great foresight,' she said. 'Although the June decision might seem clear cut, how the MPC responds to the evolving economic backdrop thereafter much depends on the details of the world in which we find ourselves.' On Friday, oil prices were soaring after Israel launched an attack on Iran's nuclear programme, raising anxieties about possible disruption to the supply of the commodity in the Middle East. And ongoing uncertainty over US President Donald Trump's tariffs, which surveys suggest have dampened business confidence and reduced exports, also remains in focus for policymakers. (PA Graphics) Meanwhile, new official figures showed wage growth for UK workers eased sharply in the three months to April and the unemployment rate increased, as employers feel the effects of higher costs. Rob Wood and Elliott Jordan-Doak, economists for Pantheon Macroeconomics, said a weaker jobs market 'will reassure the MPC that it can plan on further rate cuts', but added that 'one month's data is far from enough to allow the MPC to bin its 'gradual and careful' approach to easing monetary policy.' Bank chief economist Huw Pill, who is also an MPC member, said last month that he thought rates had been cut too quickly partly due to the risk of 'stubbornly strong' pay growth on overall inflation. New UK inflation figures for May will be released on Wednesday, while the US central bank is also widely expected to keep its interest rates on hold.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store