logo
Federal health workers terrified after ‘DEI' website publishes list of ‘targets'

Federal health workers terrified after ‘DEI' website publishes list of ‘targets'

NBC News05-02-2025
Federal health workers are expressing fear and alarm after a website called 'DEI Watch List' published the photos, names and public information of a number of workers across health agencies, describing them as 'targets.'
It's unclear when the website, which lists mostly Black employees who work in agencies primarily within the Department of Health and Human Services, first appeared.
'Offenses' for the workers listed on the website include working on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, donating to Democrats and using pronouns in their bios.
The website, a government worker said, is being circulated among multiple private group chats of federal health workers across agencies, as well as through social media links.
The site also reached Dr. Georges Benjamin, the executive director of the American Public Health Association, who learned about it Tuesday evening when a federal health worker sent it to him.
'This is a scare tactic to try to intimidate people who are trying to do their work and do it admirably,' Benjamin said. 'It's clear racism.'
A government worker said they found out theirs was among the names on the website Tuesday afternoon after a former co-worker sent them the link on social media.
'It's unnerving,' said the person, who requested anonymity because of safety concerns. 'My name and my picture is there, and in 2025, it's very simple to Google and look up someone's home address and all kinds of things that potentially put me at risk.'
'I don't know what the intention of the list is for,' the person said. 'It's just kind of a scary place to be.'
The site lists workers' salaries along with what it describes as 'DEI offenses,' including political donations, screenshots of social media posts, snippets from websites describing their work, or being a part of a DEI initiative that has been scrubbed from a federal website.
Benjamin suggested the acts of online harassment are criminal. 'Law enforcement should look into them.'
A person who isn't on the list but works at a federal health agency called the website 'psychological warfare.' The link, this person said, is being circulated in their private group chat of federal health workers, causing some to 'freak out.'
It's hard to gauge, the worker said, whether it's a legitimate threat. 'I don't know anything about the organization doing this or their parent association. People are just paranoid right now.'
A note at the bottom of the website says, 'A project of the American Accountability Foundation.' That group is a conservative watchdog group.
It's not the first time the group has created a list of 'DEI targets.' In December, it sent Pete Hegseth, then the nominee for defense secretary, a list of names of people in the military whom it deemed too focused on diversity, equity and inclusion, the New York Post reported at the time.
Neither the American Accountability Foundation nor HHS immediately responded to requests for comment.
The website comes after a bruising two weeks for public health workers. Employees at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention say they have received 'threatening' memos from the Department of Health and Human Services directing them to terminate any activities, jobs and research with any connection to diversity, equity and inclusion — and turn in co-workers who don't adhere to the orders. HHS oversees federal health agencies, including the CDC and the National Institutes of Health.
'The tone is aggressive. It's threatening consequences if we are not obedient. It's asking us to report co-workers who aren't complying,' said a CDC physician who wasn't authorized to speak to reporters. 'There's a lot of fear and panic.'
NBC News reviewed one of the memos, which directed employees to 'review all agency position descriptions and send a notification to all employees whose position description involves inculcating or promoting gender ideology that they are being placed on paid administrative leave effective immediately.'
The result, staffers said, is paranoia.
'I know of people who have been put on administrative leave for perceived infractions related to these ambiguous memos. People are thinking if I put one foot wrong, I'm just going to be fired,' another CDC physician said.
In one case, a potluck luncheon among co-workers was hastily canceled for fear it would be seen as a way to promote cultural diversity.
Despite the harassment, public health employees said they remain committed to their work.
'If I leave, who's going to replace me?' a CDC physician said. 'If nobody replaces me and enough of us leave, then who's going to be doing the public health work?'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I worked at top secret nuclear base Area 52 – now I'm riddled with tumours and Pentagon won't reveal the truth
I worked at top secret nuclear base Area 52 – now I'm riddled with tumours and Pentagon won't reveal the truth

Scottish Sun

timea day ago

  • Scottish Sun

I worked at top secret nuclear base Area 52 – now I'm riddled with tumours and Pentagon won't reveal the truth

A VETERAN of one of America's most secretive bases is fighting for justice after he and his colleagues ended up riddled with diseases. Dave Crete, 60, believes his experience working at a top secret base in Nevada left them with horrific tumours due to radiation exposure. 8 Dave Crete served in the US Air Force at the Nevada Test and Training Range back in the 1980s Credit: supplied 8 Dave and his friends requested their medical records from the US military Credit: supplied 8 The top secret Nevada base Credit: Google He told The Sun: "Multiple times in a week, I'm on the phone with a widow telling me the story of her husband. "And it gets really hard, and my doctor thinks it's been really hard on me." Dave served in the US Air Force at the Tonopah Test Range in Nevada in the 1980s - a base better known as the secretive Area 52. The work at this range is highly classified - and has long attracted the fascination of conspiracy theorists. Read more world news SEAS THE DAY I married stranger on stranded cruise ship - now we're on a 15-YEAR honeymoon But since his retirement, he and his former servicemen noticed a horrifying trend of ghastly cancers among their ranks. Not only that, but the medical records from their service days are redacted due to the classified nature of Area 52 - making it even harder to get the support they need. It all started when he invited his old colleagues for a reunion BBQ at his home in Nevada. A group of eight of them sat around and reminisced about their service before they quickly realised the shocking trend. Dave told The Sun: "One of the guys brought up the question, 'does anyone have a tumour?'" It transpired that six of the eight men there had tumours - while a seventh said his son had been born with one. Watch Netfix's documentary Trainwreck Storm Area 51 where nurds take on the government's top secret Alien base "So I found that kind of strange, maybe a little too too coincidental," Dave said. The revelation inspired him to dig deeper into the matter, pouring years into researching any possible link between their service and illnesses. Dave found an environmental assessment dated to the 1970s that suggested parts of the range were contaminated with plutonium. But the report added the national security benefits of continuing to operate the range outweighed any negative impacts. It reads: "The environmental costs inherent in the work are small and reasonable for the benefits received." 8 Dave told The Sun: "That was an environmental assessment I've done in the area where I worked, and it said that the range is contaminated with plutonium. "They knew all that, but they said the juice is worth the squeeze." He eventually compiled his findings into a Powerpoint presentation and invited his comrades to hear what he had found. "Everyone I'm telling was shocked. Everyone was really surprised at what I was saying," he said. "But I backed up everything I had to say with government documents." Dave estimates that his average fellow serviceman is dying young as a result. He told The Sun: "I can't do a statistical analysis yet, but the average age of the guy dying is about 65 years old." Dave added: "I'm 60 and you're sitting there... the average says I've got five years." It prompted him to set up a charity called The Invisible Enemy, campaigning for justice for those affected. The charity released a short documentary detailing the challenges Dave and his comrades have faced. The old Area 52 crew have been afflicted with "every kind of cancer you can imagine", he added. Everything we know about Area 52 AREA 52, otherwise known as the Tonopah Test Range, is located in Tonopah, Nevada, around 70 miles northwest of the famed Area 51 facility. The military facility spans 525 square miles and was opened in 1957 as a testing site for United States Department of Energy weapons programs. Missiles have been tested, bombs have been dropped and state-of-the-art aircraft have all been piloted at the base over the last six decades. Between 1977 and 1988, the range hosted a combat training program code-named Constant Peg which tested Russian Mikoyan MiG aircraft against US aircrews, radars, and UAVs. Despite flying thousands of missions over the course of 11 years, the operation was kept completely secret until November 2006. The famed twin-engine stealth attack aircraft Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk was also secretly tested at the site from 1982 through 1989 while the F-117 program was classified. But around 1992, very little is known about the aircraft that were tested at the site thereafter. The base remains active and in 2017 it received state-of-the-art upgrades to help advance the US' nuclear arsenal modernization initiative, as well as other programs. One of the primary facilities at the base is a large airfield, consisting of a 12,000-foot runway and numerous hangars. A glimpse at the facility also shows 50 twin-level dormitories capable of housing thousands of workers. Workers who are flown in to work at the base land in a private terminal and are escorted via government vehicles, local reports say. According to its website, TTR "offers a wide array of signal-tracking equipment, including video, high-speed cameras, and radar-tracking devices. "This equipment is used to characterize ballistics, aerodynamics, and parachute performance for artillery shells, bomb drops, missiles, and rockets." While the facility is known publicly as TTR, in government documents it is referred to as Area 52. "The number of people that I know that have had cancers multiple times is very high." Dave himself has had tumours all over his body in the years since his service, and he's far from the only one. But to make matters worse, when Dave and his buddies requested their medical records from the US military, the documents were redacted - plunging them further into the dark. "Our time out there is still classified," Dave said. "We're trying to remove that veil of secrecy - not over what we did - but we need to be able to go down to the Veterans Administration and get the benefits that every other veteran would get." Dave has now testified before Congress over the treatment of former servicemen at the Nevada Test Range. "What's happened to us is complete garbage, and I think most reasonable people agree. It's just not right," he said. "I want to connect the dots from my service to my illness, and because of the classification they say no." Dave estimates that a few thousand people are affected at least, and that number "continues to grow". The Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs were contacted for comment. 8 Dave Crete testifies before Congress Credit: The Invisible Enemy 8 TTR is operated by Sandia National Laboratories and the US Department of Energy Credit: Getty - Contributor 8 Unlike Area 51, Area 52 is visible via satellite Credit: Wikimedia

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 review: I ran and hiked 100 miles to test this new smartwatch
Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 review: I ran and hiked 100 miles to test this new smartwatch

Telegraph

time4 days ago

  • Telegraph

Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 review: I ran and hiked 100 miles to test this new smartwatch

The products or services listed have been independently tested by our journalists. We earn a commission from the affiliate links in this article. Read more > What is the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8? The Galaxy Watch 8 is a health and fitness tracker that connects to Samsung and other Android smartphones. Think Apple Watch, but for the people who don't own Apple products. This new model is the latest smartwatch from Samsung and at £319 it's at the upper end of the market. It has a brighter display than previous models with a simple, slim design, but the battery needs recharging regularly. It's also the first from Samsung to integrate Google Gemini AI smart assistance and can handle complex tasks with a single voice command, such as: 'Find my next nearest parkrun and save it to my calendar'. The new running coach feature also includes 160 tailored training plans, a new antioxidant level estimate and sleep apnea detection, too. That's on top of traditional functions like showing incoming calls, notifications and music playback, and health fitness features like tracking your sleep and heart rate, and an integrated GPS. JUMP TO: How we test fitness trackers When I test smartwatches and fitness trackers I wear them non-stop, night and day, and only take them off to charge. I test their general day-to-day performance, trialling unique features, testing the battery life and getting a feel for how easy they are to set up, interact with and use. I assess how they handle intense exercise like a cycling workout or a run, more casual exercise like a morning walk, and how they manage notifications coming through from a connected smartphone. I also wear them to bed as many health features rely on data like your heart rate and respiratory rate when you're asleep. I compare all of this combined health, sleep and fitness data against the readings on a Garmin Forerunner 970 high-end running watch, an Eight Sleep Pod 4 mattress and a Garmin HRM 600 chest strap heart rate monitor. Why you can trust Telegraph Recommended Our tech experts continuously conduct in-depth, independent, real-world tests, scoring devices against pre-set testing metrics and industry benchmarks, so we can deliver definitive and comprehensive buying advice. Telegraph Recommended reviews are never shared with product manufacturers before publication, we don't accept payment in exchange for positive reviews, nor do we allow brands to pay for placement in our articles. Visit our Who We Are page to learn more Ease of use Score: 8/10 The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 was easy to set up and simple to use with my Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 smartphone. There are some extra hurdles to jump setup if you're not using a Samsung phone, however, and this smartwatch isn't compatible with an iPhone. The touchscreen and two-button controls on the side of the display let you tap and swipe through the screens. The set up of the display means its easy to navigation though the tools and health insights the smartwatch tracks, while manually tracking runs, cycles and swims is quick and easy. I found the automatic workout detection was swift to detect when I was on a walk and I the Google Gemini AI assistant was genuinely helpful when I wanted to track my progress or navigate a route. The smartwatch seamlessly synchronises your data within Samsung's connected health apps, making it easier to dig deeper into you daily health stats. Comfort and wearability Score: 8/10 This is a fashionable design that I found comfortable to wear 24/7, even at night. It comes in 40mm and 44mm wrist sizes with a graphite or silver finish. I tested the grey silicone sport band but you can swap it out for a pop of colour. It felt comfortable against my skin and I had no rubbing or irritation (some Garmin straps can cause silicone burn). My only complaint was the tuck-under fastening, which requires an awkward pinch to attach. This smartwatch adopts the Galaxy Watch Ultra's 'squircle' design (Samsung's words, not mine), putting a brilliantly bright, vibrant and responsive circular touchscreen on top of a square 'cushion' design, with a low-profile optical heart rate sensor that helps improve the overall comfort. The result is a smartwatch that I found comparatively thin, light and more comfortable on my wrist compared to bigger Garmin watches. Activity and movement metrics Score: 8/10 The Galaxy Watch 8 tracks more than 100 sports with a focus on running, cycling, swimming and walking or hiking. It has a 'health heart' monitor that challenges you to log enough steps, active minutes and calories to complete your 'heart'. I ran and hiked over 100 miles over multiple workouts and was impressed by the accuracy of its tracking when I compared it to other devices. The GPS was often slow to link up, but it mainly matched my Garmin Forerunner 970 for overall distances. It clocked 13.2 miles when I ran a half-marathon, while my Garmin measured 13.13 miles. The heart rate data was proved reliable. My Garmin HRM 600 chest strap logged a 105bpm average and 159bpm max, while Samsung's optical sensor clocked 106bpm and 159bpm, respectively on the same run. Step tracking was a bit more topsy-turvy, not quite catching my different stages, while Samsung's step counts were often more than 2,000 steps higher or lower than the Forerunner 970. Sleep and recovery tracking Score: 7/10 Sleep tracking gives you a nightly sleep score, sleep duration information and a breakdown of your sleep stages. It also monitors blood oxygen levels, skin temperature and nightly heart rate. I tested this against the Garmin Forerunner 970 and an EightSleep Pod mattress. Samsung's sleep quality readings and durations sometimes matched the Garmin and smart mattress, but were sometimes an hour off. The Watch 8 was often more optimistic with my sleep quality score, too. I also found Samsung's blood oxygen ranges sometimes provided readings from 78 to 100 per cent, which is incredibly broad. The recovery scores were hit and miss, too. One morning, Samsung gave me a 68 Energy Score because of an 'elevated overnight heart rate', while Garmin suggested I had hit '100 prime readiness'. My own perceptions had me closer to Garmin than Samsung and my tests did little to alleviate my scepticism when it comes to the reliability of these scores. Lifestyle and wellness features Score: 9/10 The Watch 8 gives you electrocardiogram (ECG) heart rate and blood pressure readings, though you'll need some calibration using a regular blood pressure cuff and you need to have a Samsung phone to hand. There's a body composition analysis to estimate how much fat and muscle you're carrying, monthly cycle tracking, plus a vascular load readout that monitors blood vessel strain over time. You can also measure stress, do journal-style mood check-ins and manually track food and water intake. One intriguing new tool is the antioxidant index. This uses sensors to reveal if you're getting your recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables to help boost your antioxidant levels. These are molecules that can help fight off health conditions like cancer and diabetes. But in practice (and despite eating a lot of fruit and veg) my readings regularly came up 'low' even when I significantly upped my intake. Technical specifications The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 was launched alongside the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic. If you're looking for a more traditional style of smartwatch with a similar suite of features, it's definitely an alternative to consider. Should you buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8? The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 is a highly capable smartwatch with a mixture of simple and serious health and fitness tools. Runners, cyclists and swimmers will find it a competent sports tracker, though it lacks the advanced tools you get from Garmin and Coros. The one-and-a-half-day battery life also falls short of the month-long staying power of some dedicated sports watches. If you already own a Samsung phone and want a fashionable smartwatch that's comfortable to wear, is a comprehensive health and fitness tracker, the Galaxy Watch 8 is one of the best options available. Yes, if: You need an easy-to-use fitness companion for your smartphone You're a Samsung or Android phone user You're a runner or a hiker No, if: You use an iPhone You want a smartwatch or fitness tracker with a week-long battery life You want advanced training metrics for running, cycling and other sports Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 FAQs What are the biggest new health and AI features of the Galaxy Watch 8? The standout new health features include a readiness-style energy score that crunches sleep, activity, heart rate and other metrics to reflect how prepared your body is for activity or recovery. There's an antioxidant index that uses sensors to estimate oxidative stress levels in your body. Those same sensors serve up body composition insights for body fat and muscle. A vascular load tool monitors blood vessel strain over time. Is the Galaxy Watch 8 waterproof? The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 is waterproof. It carries a water rating of 5ATM, which means it can handle being submerged up to 50 metres. What are the differences between the Galaxy Watch 8 and the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic? The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 was released alongside a new Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic. The Classic model has a more traditional look with a physical rotating watch face bezel and stainless steel case. The Watch 8 is aluminium, and the Classic comes in large sizes with 43mm and 47mm options. When was the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 released? The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 was released in July 2025, alongside a new Galaxy Watch 8 Classic and a pair of foldable smartphones: the Galaxy Z Flip 7 and Fold 7.

'Underwear I bought from TikTok melted into my skin leaving second degree burns'
'Underwear I bought from TikTok melted into my skin leaving second degree burns'

Daily Mirror

time4 days ago

  • Daily Mirror

'Underwear I bought from TikTok melted into my skin leaving second degree burns'

Molly-May Watson had to rip the TikTok shop underwear off her body when it burned onto her skin. Despite being rushed to hospital she was only given £10 in compensation A woman has been left with second degree burns after shapewear she purchased on TikTok shop "melted" into her skin. ‌ Molly-May Watson, 27, bought the £8.57 "Spanx-like" shorts in May 2024 through a seller called MOONGIRL-UK on the social media app. She wore them for the first time under a dress while attending a baby shower, for her sister on July 27, 2024 and thought a bee had flown into her dress after she 'felt this burning' on her upper right thigh. ‌ Rushing to the bathroom to see what had happened, Molly-May was forced to rip her shorts off after she says the elastane stretchy material had "melted" into her skin. She attended A&E at St Thomas' Hospital, London, the following day where she was told she could be "scarred for life". ‌ After complaining to TikTok Shop through the help function on the app, she says she was given just a £10 coupon as compensation. Molly-May, an executive assistant, from Kennington, south London, said: "I felt this burning on my upper bum cheek and side of my leg. She said: "For some reason I thought a bee had got into my dress. I went to the toilet to see what the hell was going on. The shorts had melted into my leg. "So I've had to rip them off and I've been left with first and second degree burns. I'm unable to walk properly at the moment. The hospital where I went said I could be scarred for life at this point." ‌ Molly-May had only worn the shorts once before briefly, to try them on and make sure they fit, before her sister's baby shower. After taking them off and getting through the rest of the event in pain Molly-May attended hospital the following day to get checked over. "I thought 'I'll just leave it' but it was agonising and had gotten worse," she said. I had to go to A&E on the Monday and had to be treated in the urgent treatment centre for burns. ‌ "I've been bandaged up ever since. They confirmed it's definitely a burn and that's what happened. They said 'it's strange, we don't really know if it's a heat burn or a chemical reaction'." Molly-May added: "I now can't find the seller on Google - which makes me think it wasn't legit in the first place. I sent TikTok Shop a message with pics of all the burns and the melted shorts and said 'this is what happened'. I spoke to an agent and said they'd need to pass it on to a specialist team. I sent another chaser message. 'They came back to me and said, 'We can refund you and give you a £10 coupon.' I said 'I don't feel comfortable accepting a coupon from you to be honest'. I'll never be shopping from that shop again. It's insulting. They said, 'Unfortunately nothing we can do'.! ‌ "When I've been talking to friends and people at work and stuff, they've told me they've bought similar things and said 'we felt really irritated'. It's just made me overly aware now. You think 'that's a nice little bargain' but it could leave you like me scarred for life. 'Any sort of budget or third party sellers I won't ever order from them again. I'm starting to scar already from some bits of the burn'. Molly-May has had to work from home whilst she recovers, and has been advised to attend the doctors if she sees any changes. TikTok confirmed the listing and seller page was removed from the platform in June last year. A spokesperson said TikTok has already responded and given compensation to the buyer after the complaint.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store