New York county clerk rejects Texas's effort to fine doctor in abortion pill case
On Monday, the acting Ulster county clerk, Taylor Bruck, rejected a court filing by Texas's attorney general, Ken Paxton, which sought to collect a $113,000 penalty against Dr Margaret Carpenter. Paxton had sued Carpenter in December 2024 over allegations she shipped abortion pills to a Texas woman in defiance of the state's ban on virtually all abortions. When Carpenter did not show up to a court hearing earlier this year, a judge automatically ruled against her and ordered her to pay the fine as well as stop mailing pills to Texas.
However, New York is one of a handful of blue states that has enacted a 'shield law', which blocks state officials from extraditing abortion providers to other states or complying with out-of-state court orders. In his initial refusal to levy the fine, issued in March, Bruck cited the shield law.
Related: Planned Parenthood offices begin rejecting Medicaid after Trump signs bill to defund healthcare organization
'The rejection stands. Resubmitting the same materials does not alter the outcome,' Bruck said in his response to Paxton on Monday. 'While I'm not entirely sure how things work in Texas, here in New York, a rejection means the matter is closed.'
As a signoff, Bruck added New York state's motto: 'Excelsior.' The word means 'ever upward' in Latin.
Paxton's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. After the first rejection, Paxton said in a statement that he was 'outraged'.
'New York is shredding the constitution to hide lawbreakers from justice, and it must end,' he continued. 'I will not stop my efforts to enforce Texas's pro-life laws that protect our unborn children and mothers.'
Shield laws like New York's, which sprang up in the years since the US supreme court overturned Roe v Wade, have never been tested in court. However, anti-abortion activists are trying to change that, as they have grown increasingly frustrated by the accessibility of abortion through out-of-state travel and the availability of abortions pills through telehealth.
Despite the wave of state-level abortion bans unleashed by the fall of Roe, the number of abortions performed in the US is still on the rise, in large part thanks to providers' ability to facilitate the procedure through shield laws. In December 2024, shield law providers facilitated almost 14,000 abortions in states that ban almost all abortions or that restrict telehealth abortions, according to #WeCount, a research project by the Society of Family Planning.
Experts widely expect that the Texas case, or another similar case involving shield laws, will ultimately be decided by the supreme court.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Columbia University to pay $200 million, ban DEI in deal with Trump administration to restore federal research funding
NEW YORK — Columbia University has agreed to pay the Trump administration $200 million over the next three years as part of a broader deal to restore federal research funding, government and school officials announced Wednesday. The resolution agreement also bans racial preferences in hiring and admissions and other diversity, equity and inclusion programming, according to the feds. The implementation of the agreement — which caps off months of uncertainty since $400 million was revoked over allegations Columbia had not done enough to combat antisemitism — will be overseen by an independent monitor. 'The settlement was carefully crafted to protect the values that define us and allow our essential research partnership with the federal government to get back on track,' said Columbia Acting President Claire Shipman. 'Importantly, it safeguards our independence, a critical condition for academic excellence and scholarly exploration, work that is vital to the public interest.' In reaching a resolution, Columbia does not have to admit any wrongdoing. However, the statement said Jewish students and faculty have experienced 'painful, unacceptable incidents' and 'reform was and is needed.' The agreement codifies the original deal Columbia announced in March, which included oversight of Middle Eastern studies and gave some campus security personnel the power of arrest. Over the last couple of weeks, the university has also moved to adopt a definition of antisemitism that recognizes some criticism of Israel as discriminatory against Jews, and suspend or expel dozens of student protesters. U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon described the deal as a 'seismic shift' to hold universities that benefit from American taxpayer dollars accountable for antisemitism. 'Our elite campuses have been overrun by anti-Western teachings and a leftist groupthink that restricts speech and debate to push a one-sided view of our nation and the world,' McMahon said. 'Columbia's reforms are a road map for elite universities that wish to regain the confidence of the American public.' In addition to the $200 million settlement, Columbia will also pay $21 million to settle investigations brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. A Columbia spokesman declined to answer questions about a resolution monitor. In the original statement, the university said the monitor is 'jointly selected' by both parties and will receive 'regular reports' from Columbia on its compliance with laws related to 'admissions, hiring, and international students.' Despite the deal, a portion of Columbia's federal research funding will not be reinstated, which was canceled through a separate process from the antisemitism investigation, according to the school's announcement. While the university did not offer any specifics, the Trump administration has terminated grants nationwide related to diversity, equity and inclusion programs and transgender people, for example. _____
Axios
28 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump birthright citizenship order "unconstitutional," appeals court rules
President Trump's executive order that seeks to end birthright citizenship in the U.S. is "unconstitutional," a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday. Why it matters: The 2-1 ruling upholds a nationwide pause on enforcement of the policy, which is likely headed for the Supreme Court. It's the first time an appeals court has weighed in on the matter since the Supreme Court last month limited lower courts ' ability to freeze federal policies — specifically, Trump's effort to eliminate U.S. birthright citizenship. Driving the news: "We conclude that the Executive Order is invalid because it contradicts the plain language of the Fourteenth Amendment's grant of citizenship to 'all persons born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,'" per the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' majority ruling. Context: Although the Supreme Court limited lower courts' powers, it left room for broader relief through the filing of class-action lawsuits. The Trump administration has since faced fresh challenges to the policy. For the record: Democratic attorneys general in Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon brought the case against President Trump and agencies including the State Department, Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security. Administration officials named in the suit include Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
Columbia's Deal With Trump: What We Know
Under an agreement between Columbia University and the Trump administration on Wednesday, the institution will pay $200 million in penalties and meet other demands in exchange for the return of hundreds of millions of dollars in federal research funding. Here's what we know about the terms of the deal: Who is this agreement between? It is between Columbia and various agencies of the federal government, including the Departments of Justice, Education and Health and Human Services. The agreement — effective for three years — states that it is not an admission of guilt or liability by either party, but rather a settlement to avoid the burdens and risks of litigation. What does the agreement say about antisemitism? To settle civil rights claims against the university for allegedly failing to protect students from antisemitic harassment, Columbia will pay a fine of $200 million to the federal government over three years, in three annual installments. Columbia also agrees to abide by pledges it made in March to the Trump administration to reduce antisemitism and rein in protests on campus. Among them: Columbia will keep its new senior vice provost, who will review Columbia's regional studies programs, including their leadership and curricula, starting with the university's Middle East programs. Columbia will appoint new faculty who have affiliations with the Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies and other departments. The university will maintain restrictions that bar students from protesting inside academic buildings, and will require that demonstrators wearing masks show identification when asked. Columbia also agrees to employ some public safety officers with arrest powers. To further support Jewish life on campus, Columbia will add an administrator to serve as a liaison to students experiencing antisemitism issues. What else does Columbia agree to do? The university also pledges to follow the law in areas important to the Trump administration. For example, Columbia will 'not maintain programs that promote unlawful efforts' related to diversity, equity and inclusion and will not take race, color, sex or national origin into account in hiring decisions. The university will abide by the Supreme Court's decision ending affirmative action in college admissions. To prove it is following the law, Columbia will provide statistical information to the government about rejected and admitted students broken down by race, grade point average and performance on standardized tests, for all its schools. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
